Clement of Alexandria's Stromateis were celebrated in antiquity but modern readers have often skirted them as a messy jumble of notes. When scholarship on Greco-Roman miscellanies took off in the 1990s, Clement was left out as 'different' because he was Christian. This book interrogates the notion of Clement's 'Christian difference' by comparing his work with classic Roman miscellanies, especially those by Plutarch, Pliny, Gellius, and Athenaeus. The comparison opens up fuller insight into the literary and theological character of Clement's own oeuvre. Clement's Stromateis are contextualised within his larger literary project in Christian formation, which began with the Protrepticus and the Paedagogus and was completed by the Hypotyposeis. Together, this stepped sequence of works structured readers' reorientation, purification, and deepening prayerful 'converse' with God. Clement shaped his miscellanies as an instrument for encountering the hidden God in a hidden way, while marvelling at the variegated beauty of divine work refracted through the variegated beauty of his own textuality.

‘Heath’s book is a very well-documented study that puts the works of Clement within the context of contemporary writers, who used similar literary tools and sources … Her main thesis is clear, and the material that she provides is interesting and important, and we congratulate her on that!’

Annewies van den Hoek Source: Vigiliae Christianae

‘… Heath underlines the need for a fuller integration of literary, social, cultural and theological aspects in the study of imperial antiquity. I always recommend this. … And seeking “to close the gap” between classics, ancient philosophy, and patristics is going to be highly beneficial to the study of Patristic Platonism and Patristic Philosophy in general.’

Ilaria L. E. Ramelli Source: Gnomon