Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 April 2023
The material presented earlier indicates that the British Police during the last four decades – say from that crucial turning-point of 1966 (Waddington, 1991) – engaged in a continuous learning process regarding police use of firearms and the allied issues of rights, command, accountability, investigations and oversight. In wrestling with these complex and intertwined matters, police were driven by a number of factors that have culminated generally in a more professional and sophisticated approach.
The broader reform process in policing has not always been even, smooth and progressive, but rather has often been tardy, painful, contested and even at times retrograde. There have, for example, been highly critical moments eliciting considerable negative publicity with insistent demands for reform arising from major corruption scandals, miscarriages of justice, public order situations including the 1981 riots in Brixton and elsewhere, and from the profound repercussions of the murder of Stephen Lawrence. There can be no doubt, however, that policing has altered considerably in a number of areas and is continually subject to change and reform (Blair, 2003; Reiner, 2010).
Behind a number of these changes are several streams of influence combining to push the police to concentrate their minds on command, accountability, investigations and oversight (Jones, 2003). Here I shall touch on five key factors. The growing importance of human rights (HR) law and the pronouncements of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR); the potential impact from the late 1990s of the proposed legislation on ‘corporate manslaughter’; influential court cases and judicial pronouncements on police firearms use; developments in structures and practices of operational command and control; and problems with investigations and the rise of new oversight agencies.
Indeed, behind these particular impulses the police have been subjected in the last three decades more generally to a swelling stream of commissions, directives on procedures and legislation, which has cascaded onto them from both Conservative and Labour governments (Reiner, 2010). Under the New Labour government from 1997, for instance, there was a flood of measures: ‘During its first ten years in office New Labour passed fifty-three Acts containing criminal justice legislation and created 3,000 new or revised criminal offences’ (Blair, 2009: 105).
To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.