Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-5447f9dfdb-84kf5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-29T15:17:58.719Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

36 - CMOS spectrally multiplexed FRET contact imaging microsystem for DNAanalysis

from Part VII - Lab-on-a-chip

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2015

By
Derek Ho ,
M. Omair Noor ,
Ulrich J. Krull ,
Glenn Gulak  and
Roman Genov
Edited by
Sandro Carrara  and
Krzysztof Iniewski
Derek Ho
Affiliation:
City University of Hong Kong
M. Omair Noor
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
Ulrich J. Krull
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
Glenn Gulak
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
Roman Genov
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
Sandro Carrara
Affiliation:
École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Krzysztof Iniewski
Affiliation:
Redlen Technologies Inc., Canada
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Analytical platforms are used in the life sciences for the observation,identification, and characterization of various biological systems. Theseplatforms serve applications such as sequencing of deoxyribonucleic acid(DNA), immunoassays, and gene expression analyses for environmental,medical, forensics, and biohazard detection [1]–[3]. Biosensors are asubset of such platforms that can convey biological parameters in terms ofelectrical signals. Biosensors are utilized to measure the quantity ofvarious biological analytes and are often required to be capable ofspecifically detecting multiple analytes simultaneously. A goal in biosensorresearch is to develop portable, hand-held devices for point-of-care (POC)use, for example in a physician’s office, an ambulance, or at ahospital bedside, that could provide time-critical information about apatient on the spot [4].

The current demand for high-throughput, point-of-care bio-recognition hasintroduced new technical challenges for biosensor design and implementation.Conventional biological tests are highly repetitive, labor-intensive, andrequire a large sample volume [2], [5]. The associated biochemical protocolsoften require hours or days to perform at a cost of hundreds of dollars pertest. Instrumentation for performing such testing today is bulky, expensive,and requires considerable power consumption. Problems remain in detectingand quantifying low levels of biological compounds reliably, conveniently,safely, and quickly. Solving these problems will require the development ofnew techniques and sensors.

Information

Type
Chapter
Information
Handbook of Bioelectronics
Directly Interfacing Electronics and Biological Systems
 , pp. 430 - 447
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Gao, X., Cui, Y., Levenson, R., Chung, L., and Nie, S., “In vivo cancer targeting and imaging with semiconductor quantum dots,” Nat. Biotechnol., vol. 22, no. 8, pp. 970–976, Jul 2004.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chagovetz, A. and Blair, S., “Real-time DNA microarrays: reality check,” Biochem. Soc. Trans., vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 471–475, Apr 2009.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schena, M., Shalon, D., Davis, R., and Brown, P., “Quantitative monitoring of gene expression patterns with a complementary DNA microarray,” Science, vol. 270, no. 5235, pp. 467–470, Oct 1995.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Choi, J., Beaucage, G., Nevin, J., et al., “Disposable smart lab on a chip for point-of-care clinical diagnostics,” Proc. IEEE, vol. 92, no. 1, pp. 154–173, Jan 2004.Google Scholar
Tavares, A., Noor, M., Algar, W., et al., “Toward an on-chip multiplexed nucleic acid hybridization assay using immobilized quantum dot-oligonucleotide conjugates and fluorescence resonance energy transfer,” Proc. SPIE: Colloidal Quantum Dots/Nanocrystals for Biomedical Applications, vol. 7909, no. 79090X, pp. 133–141, Jan 2011.Google Scholar
Bruchez, M., Moronne, M., Gin, P., Weiss, S., and Alivisatos, A., “Semiconductor nanocrystals as fluorescent biological labels,” Science, vol. 281, no. 5385, pp. 2013–2016, Sep 1998.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Algar, W. and Krull, U., “Towards multi-colour strategies for the detection of oligonucleotide hybridization using quantum dots as energy donors in fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET),” Anal. Chim. Acta, vol. 581, no. 2, pp. 193–201, Jan 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, R., Ho, D., Nilchi, A., et al., “A CMOS/thin-film fluorescence contact imaging microsystem for DNA analysis,” IEEE Trans. Circ. Syst. I, vol. 57, no. 5, pp. 1029–1038, May 2010.Google Scholar
Levine, P., Gong, P., Levicky, R., and Shepard, K., “Active CMOS sensor array for electrochemical biomolecular detection,” IEEE J. Solid-State Circ., vol. 43, no. 8, pp. 1859–1871, Aug 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schienle, M., Paulus, C., Frey, A., et al., “A fully electronic DNA sensor with 128 positions and in-pixel A/D conversion,” IEEE J. Solid-State Circ., vol. 39, no. 12, pp. 2438–2445, Dec 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Homola, J., Yee, S., and Gauglitz, G., “Surface plasmon resonance sensors: review,” Sens. Actuators B, vol. 54, no. 1–2, pp. 3–15, Jan 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noor, M. and Krull, U., “Microfluidics for the deposition of density gradients of immobilized oligonucleotide probes; developing surfacesthat offer spatial control of the stringency of DNA hybridization,” Anal. Chim. Acta, vol. 708, no. 1–2, pp. 1–10, Dec 2011.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eltoukhy, H., Salama, K., and Gamal, A., “A 0.18-μm CMOS bioluminescence detection lab-on-chip,” IEEE J. Solid-State Circ., vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 651–662, Mar 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tigli, O., Bivona, L., Berg, P., and Zaghloul, M., “Fabrication and characterization of a surface-acoustic-wave biosensor in CMOS technology for cancer biomarker detection,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Circ. Syst., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 62–73, Feb 2010.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bruchez, M., Moronne, M., Gin, P., Weiss, S., and Alivisatos, A., “Semiconductor nanocrystals as fluorescent biological labels,” Science, vol. 281, no. 5385, pp. 2013–2016, Sep 1998.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jang, B. and Hassibi, A., “Biosensor systems in standard CMOS processes: fact or fiction?” IEEE Trans. Indust. Electron., vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 979–985, Apr 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, S. and Krull, U., “A spatially resolved nucleic acid biochip based on a gradient of density of immobilized probe oligonucleotide,” Anal. Chim. Acta, vol. 564, no. 2, pp. 133–140, Apr 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Algar, W. and Krull, U., “Developing mixed films of immobilized oligonucleotides and quantum dots for the multiplexed detection of nucleic acid hybridization using a combination of fluorescence resonance energy transfer and direct excitation of fluorescence,” Langmuir, vol. 26, no. 8, pp. 6041–6047, Apr 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murari, K., Cummings, R., Thakor, N., and Gauwenberghs, G., “A CMOS in-pixel CTIA high-sensitivity fluorescence imager,” IEEE Trans. Biol. Circ. Syst., vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 449–458, Oct 2011.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nelson, N., Sander, D., Dandin, M., et al., “Handheld fluorometers for lab-on-a-chip applications,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Circ. Syst., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 97–107, Apr 2009.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kong, S., Wijngaards, D., and Wolffenbuttel, R., “Infrared microspectrometer based on a diffraction grating,” Sens. Actuators A, vol. 92, no. 1–3 pp. 88–95, Aug 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Correia, J., Graaf, G., Bartek, M., and Wolffenbuttel, R., “A single-chip CMOS optical microspectrometer with light-to-frequency converter and bus interface,” IEEE J. Solid-State Circ., vol. 37, no. 10, pp. 1344–1347, Oct 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ho, D., Gulak, G., and Genov, R., “CMOS field-modulated color sensor,” in IEEE Custom Integrated Circ. Conf., pp. 1–4, Sep 2011.Google Scholar
Honghao, J., Sander, D., Haas, A., and Abshire, P., “Contact imaging: simulation and experiment,” IEEE Trans. Circ. Systems I, vol. 54, no. 8, pp. 1698–1710, Aug 2007.Google Scholar
Daivasagaya, D., Yao, L., Yung, K., et al., “Contact CMOS imaging of gaseous oxygensensor array,” Sens. Actuators B, vol. 157, no. 2, pp. 408–416, Oct 2011.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richard, C., Courcier, T., Pittet, P., et al., “CMOS buried quad p–n junction photodetector for multi-wavelength analysis,” Opt. Express, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 2053–2061, Jan 2012.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richard, C., Renaudin, A., Aimez, V., and Charette, P., “An integrated hybrid interference and absorption filter for fluorescence detection in lab-on-a-chip devices,” Lab Chip, vol. 9, no. 10, pp. 1371–1376, May 2009.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huang, T., Sorgenfrei, S., Gong, P., Levicky, R., and Shepard, K., “A 0.18-μm CMOS array sensor for integrated time-resolved fluorescence detection,” IEEE J. Solid-State Circ., vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 1644–1654, May 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ai, H., Hazelwood, K., Davidson, M., and Campbell, R., “Fluorescent protein FRET pairs for ratiometric imaging of dual biosensors,” Nat. Methods, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 401–403, Apr 2008.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Integrated DNA technologies. Accessed on Jun 1, 2012, <>.
Peng, X., Chen, H., Draney, D., Schutz-Geschwender, A., and Olive, D., “A nonfluorescent, broad range quencher dye for Forster resonance energy transfer assays,” Anal. Biochem., vol. 388, no. 2, pp. 220–228, May 2009.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tian, H., Fowler, B., and Gamal, A. E., “Analysis of temporal noise in CMOS photodiode active pixel sensor,” IEEE J. Solid-State Circ., vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 92–101, Jan 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kabuss, J. and Richter, M., “Theory of light scattering from semiconductor quantum dots: excitation frequency dependent emission dynamics,” Photon. Nanostruct., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 296–301, Oct 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neumann, M. and Gabel, D., “Simple method for reduction of autofluorescence in fluorescence microscopy,” Nat. Biotechnol., vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 437–439, Mar 2002.Google ScholarPubMed
Munson, M., Hasenbank, M., Fu, E., and Yager, P., “Suppression of nonspecific absorption using sheath flow,” Nat. Biotechnol., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 438–445, Sep 2004.Google Scholar
Long, G. and Winefordner, J., “Limit of detection a closer look at the IUPAC definition,” Anal. Chem., vol. 55, no. 7, pp. 712A–724A, Jul 1983.Google Scholar
Philips. Accessed on Sep 7, 2011, <>.
Omega Optical. Accessed on May 8, 2011, <>.
Cytodiagnostics. Accessed on Jun 1, 2012, <>.
Leatherdale, C., Woo, W., Mikulec, F., and Bawendi, M., “On the absorption cross section of CdSe nanocrystal quantum dots,” J. Phys. Chem. B, vol. 106, no. 31, pp. 7619–7622, Jul 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Algar, W., Wegner, D., Huston, A., et al., “Quantum dots as simultaneous acceptors and donors in time gated Forster resonance energy transfer relays: characterization and biosensing,” J. Am. Chem. Soc., vol. 134, no. 3, pp. 1876–1891, Jan 2012.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wong, H., “Technology and device scaling considerations for CMOS imagers,” IEEE Trans. Electron Devices, vol. 43, no. 12, pp. 2131–2142, Dec 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peck, K., Stryer, L., Glazer, A., and Mathies, R., “Single-molecule fluorescence detection: Autocorrelation criterion and experimental realization with phycoerythrin,” Proc. Natl Acad. Sci., vol. 86, no. 1, pp. 4087–4091, Feb 1989.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×