Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-r5qjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-07T11:18:11.414Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2025

Tanu Kumar
Affiliation:
Claremont Graduate University, California
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
Chapter
Information
Building Social Mobility
How Subsidized Homeownership Creates Wealth, Dignity, and Voice in India
, pp. 199 - 212
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Aaron, H. J. (1972). Shelter and subsidies: Who benefits from federal housing policies? Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Abrams, C. (1964). Housing in the modern world. Faber & Faber.Google Scholar
Ahuja, A. and Chhibber, P. (2012, December). Why the poor vote in India: If I don’t vote, I am dead to the state. Studies in Comparative International Development 47(4), 389410.Google Scholar
Alesina, A., Baqir, R., and Easterly, W. (1999). Public goods and ethnic divisions. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 114(4), 12431284.Google Scholar
Ansell, B. (2014). The political economy of ownership: Housing markets and the welfare state. American Political Science Review 108(2), 383402.Google Scholar
Ansell, B. and Samuels, D. (2010). Inequality and democratization: A contractarian approach. Comparative Political Studies 43(12), 15431574.Google Scholar
Ansell, B. W. (2019). The politics of housing. Annual Review of Political Science 22, 165185.Google Scholar
Araujo, M. C., Bosch, M., and Schady, N. (2016, September). Can cash transfers help households escape an inter-generational poverty trap? Working Paper 22670, National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
Armentano, Vincent, Craig McIntosh, Felipe Monestier, Rafael Piñeiro-Rodríguez, Fernando Rosenblatt, and Guadalupe Tuñón (2024). Movin’on up? The impacts of a large-scale housing lottery in Uruguay. Journal of Public Economics 235, 105138.Google Scholar
Asher, S., Novosad, P., and Rafkin, C. (2020). Intergenerational mobility in India: New methods and estimates across time, space, and communities. http://paulnovosad.com/pdf/anr-india-mobility.pdf.Google Scholar
Atake, E.-H. (2018). Health shocks in sub-Saharan Africa: Are the poor and uninsured households more vulnerable? Health Economics Review 8(1), 113.Google ScholarPubMed
Auerbach, A. M. (2016, January). Clients and communities: The political economy of party network organization and development in India’s urban slums. World Politics 68(1), 111148.Google Scholar
Auerbach, A. M. (2017). Neighborhood associations and the urban poor: India’s slum development committees. World Development 96(C), 119–135.Google Scholar
Auerbach, A. M. and Kruks-Wisner, G. (2020). The geography of citizenship practice: How the poor engage the state in rural and urban India. Perspectives on Politics 18(4), 11181134.Google Scholar
Auerbach, A. M. and Thachil, T. (2018, November). How clients select brokers: Competition and choice in India’s slums. American Political Science Review 112(4), 775791.Google Scholar
Aulia, F. (2020). Indonesia’s business property: One million houses program in 2020. Report, Indonesia Research Institute.Google Scholar
Auyero, J. (2001, January). Poor people’s politics: Peronist survival networks and the legacy of Evita. Duke University Press Books.Google Scholar
Auyero, J. and Swistun, D. (2008). The social production of toxic uncertainty. American Sociological Review 73(3), 357379.Google Scholar
Baird, S., McKenzie, D., and Özler, B. (2018). The effects of cash transfers on adult labor market outcomes. IZA Journal of Development and Migration 8(1), 120.Google Scholar
Bal, M. (2017). Dignity in the workplace: New theoretical perspectives. Springer.Google Scholar
Balakrishnan, S. and Pani, N. (2021). Real estate politicians in India. Urban Studies 58(10), 20792094.Google Scholar
Balboni, C. A., Bandiera, O., Burgess, R., Ghatak, M., and Heil, A. (2022). Why do people stay poor? Quarterly Journal of Economics 137(2), 785844.Google Scholar
Baldwin, K. and Huber, J. D. (2010, November). Economic versus cultural differences: Forms of ethnic diversity and public goods provision. American Political Science Review 104(4), 644662.Google Scholar
Banerjee, A., Duflo, E., Goldberg, N., Karlan, D., Osei, R., Parienté, W., Shapiro, J., Thuysbaert, B., and Udry, C. (2015). A multifaceted program causes lasting progress for the very poor: Evidence from six countries. Science 348(6236), 12601279.Google ScholarPubMed
Banerjee, A., Duflo, E., and Sharma, G. (2021). Long-term effects of the targeting the ultra poor program. American Economic Review: Insights 3(4), 471486.Google Scholar
Bardhan, P., Mitra, S., Mookherjee, D., & Nath, A. (2024). How do voters respond to welfare vis-a-vis public good programs? Theory and evidence of political clientelism (No. w32158). National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
Barnhardt, S., Field, E., and Pande, R. (2017, January). Moving to opportunity or isolation? Network effects of a randomized housing lottery in urban India. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 9(1), 132.Google Scholar
Becker, G. S. (1964). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Benabou, R. and Ok, E. A. (2001). Social mobility and the demand for redistribution: The poum hypothesis. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 116(2), 447487.Google Scholar
Berman, M. (2023). A rising tide that lifts all boats: Long-term effects of the Alaska permanent fund dividend on poverty. Poverty & Public Policy.Google Scholar
Besley, T. and Ghatak, M. (2010). Property rights and economic development. In Rodrik, Dani and Rosenzweig, Mark (Eds.), Handbook of development economics, Volume 5, pp. 4525–4595. Elsevier.Google Scholar
Bhattacharya, A., Kar, A., and Nandi, A. (2016, December). Local institutional structure and clientelistic access to employment: The case of MGNREGS in three states of India. SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 2940724, Social Science Research Network, Rochester, NY.Google Scholar
Birdsall, N. (2015). Does the rise of the middle class lock in good government in the developing world? The European Journal of Development Research 27(2), 217229.Google Scholar
Bleakley, H. and Ferrie, J. (2016, August). Shocking behavior: Random wealth in antebellum Georgia and human capital across generations. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 131(3), 14551495.Google ScholarPubMed
Bloom, M. and Guthrie, D. (2020). The lived experience of dignity. In Sedmak, C. and Carozza, P. G. (Eds.), The practice of human development and dignity. University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Bloom, N. D. (2014). Public housing that worked. University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Bobonis, G. J., Gertler, P. J., Gonzalez-Navarro, M., & Nichter, S. (2022). Vulnerability and clientelism. American Economic Review 112(11), 36273659.Google Scholar
Breeding, M. (2011). The micro-politics of vote banks in Karnataka. Economic and Political Weekly 46(14), 7177.Google Scholar
Buckley, R. M. and Kalarickal, J. (2005). Housing policy in developing countries: Conjectures and refutations. The World Bank Research Observer 20(2), 233257.Google Scholar
Bueno, N. S. (2021). The timing of public policies: Political budget cycles and credit claiming. American Journal of Political Science 67(4), 9961011.Google Scholar
Bueno, N. S., Nunes, F., and Zucco, C. (2022a). Making the bourgeoisie? Values, voice, and state-provided homeownership. The Journal of Politics 84(4). 10.2139/ssrn.4003593.Google Scholar
Bueno, N. S., Nunes, F., and Zucco, C. (2022b). What you see and what you get: Direct and indirect political dividends of public policies. Working Paper.Google Scholar
Burra, S. (2005). Towards a pro-poor framework for slum upgrading in Mumbai,India. Environment and Urbanization 17(1), 6788.Google Scholar
Bussell, J. (2019). Clients and constituents: Political responsiveness in patronage democracies. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cadavid, P. R. (2010). Moving in–selling out: The outcomes of slum rehabilitation in Mumbai. https://econpapers.repec.org/paper/haljournl/hal-00490648.htmGoogle Scholar
Calvo, E. and Murillo, M. V. (2004, October). Who delivers? Partisan clients in the Argentine electoral market. American Journal of Political Science 48(4), 742757.Google Scholar
Camacho, A., Caputo, J.-E., and Sánchez, F. (2022). A new beginning: The effect of the free housing program on the quality of life of beneficiary households. Documento CEDE No. 26.Google Scholar
Cesarini, D., Lindqvist, E., Notowidigdo, M. J., and Ostling, R. (2017, December).The effect of wealth on individual and household labor supply: Evidence from Swedish lotteries. American Economic Review 107(12), 39173946.Google Scholar
Cesarini, D., Lindqvist, E., Ostling, R., and Wallace, B. (2016, May). Wealth, health, and child development: Evidence from administrative data on Swedish lottery players. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 131(2), 687738.Google Scholar
Chandra, K. (2004). Why ethnic parties succeed. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chatterjee, P. (2004, March). The politics of the governed: Reflections on popular politics in most of the world. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Chau, N., Yanyan, L., and Vidhya, S. (2018, January). Political activism as a determinant of clientelistic transfers: Evidence from an Indian public works program. International Food Policy Research.Google Scholar
Chetty, R., Hendren, N., and Katz, L. F. (2016, April). The effects of exposure to better neighborhoods on children: New evidence from the moving to opportunity experiment. American Economic Review 106(4), 855902.Google ScholarPubMed
Chhibber, P. K. and Verma, R. (2018, August). Ideology and identity: The changing party systems of India. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cicero, M. T. and Miller, W. (1913). Cicero. De Officiis. De Officiis. With an English translation by Walter Miller. Macmillan Company.Google Scholar
Conrad, M. M. and Pacquiao, D. F. (2005). Manifestation, attribution, and coping with depression among asian indians from the perspectives of health care practitioners. Journal of Transcultural Nursing 16(1), 3240.Google ScholarPubMed
Cunha, J. M. (2014). Testing paternalism: Cash versus in-kind transfers. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 6(2), 195230.Google Scholar
Currie, J. and Yelowitz, A. (2000). Are public housing projects good for kids? Journal of Public Economics 75(1), 99124.Google Scholar
Das, A. K. and Takahashi, L. M. (2009). Evolving institutional arrangements, scaling up, and sustainability: Emerging issues in participatory slum upgrading in Ahmedabad, India. Journal of Planning Education and Research 29(2), 213232.Google Scholar
Das, J. and Hammer, J. (2014). Quality of primary care in low-income countries: Facts and economics. Annual Review of Economics 6(1), 525553.Google Scholar
Das, P., Coulson, N. E., and Ziobrowski, A. (2019). Caste, faith, gender: Determinants of homeownership in urban India. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 59(1), 2755.Google Scholar
Dasgupta, A. (2016, April). Voice in a Clientelist System: How Civically Engaged Communities Succeed in Distributive Politics. SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 2768808, Social Science Research Network, Rochester, NY.Google Scholar
Dasgupta, A. and Kapur, D. (2020). The political economy of bureaucratic overload: Evidence from rural development officials in India. American Political Science Review 114(4), 13161334.Google Scholar
De, A. and Dreze, J. (1999, June). Public report on basic education in India. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
De, I. (2017). Slum improvement in India: Determinants and approaches. Housing Studies 32(7), 9901013.Google Scholar
de Chaisemartin, C. and Behaghel, L. (2015, November). Estimating the effect of treatments allocated by randomized waiting lists. arXiv:1511.01453 [econ, stat]. arXiv: 1511.01453.Google Scholar
De Janvry, A., Gonzalez-Navarro, M., and Sadoulet, E. (2014). Are land reforms granting complete property rights politically risky? Electoral outcomes of Mexico’s certification program. Journal of Development Economics 110, 216225.Google Scholar
De La, O, A. L. (2013a). Do conditional cash transfers affect electoral behavior? Evidence from a randomized experiment in Mexico. American Journal of Political Science 57(1), 114.Google Scholar
De La, O, A. L. (2013b, January). Do conditional cash transfers affect electoral behavior? Evidence from a randomized experiment in Mexico. American Journal of Political Science 57(1), 114.Google Scholar
De Mel, S., McKenzie, D., and Woodruff, C. (2012). One-time transfers of cash or capital have long-lasting effects on microenterprises in Sri Lanka. Science 335(6071), 962966.Google ScholarPubMed
De Soto, H. (2003, July). The mystery of capital: Why capitalism triumphs in the west and fails everywhere else (Reprint edition ed.). Basic Books.Google Scholar
Dear, M. (1992, September). Understanding and overcoming the NIMBY syndrome. Journal of the American Planning Association 58(3), 288300.Google Scholar
Desai, S. and Vanneman, R. (2020). National Council of Applied Economic Research, New Delhi. India Human Development Survey (IHDS), 2020. ICPSR22626-v11. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 02–16.Google Scholar
Di Tella, R., Galiani, S., and Schargrodsky, E. (2007). The formation of beliefs: Evidence from the allocation of land titles to squatters. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 122(1), 209241.Google Scholar
Diana, E. (1981). Darsan: Seeing the divine image in India. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Diaz-Cayeros, A., Estévez, F., and Magaloni, B. (2016, February). The political logic of poverty relief: Electoral strategies and social policy in Mexico. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dixit, A. and Londregan, J. (1996). The determinants of success of special interests in redistributive politics. The Journal of Politics 58(4), 11321155.Google Scholar
Doepke, M. and Zilibotti, F. (2008). Occupational choice and the spirit of capitalism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 123(2), 747793.Google Scholar
Donnelly, J. (1982). Human rights and human dignity: An analytic critique of non-western conceptions of human rights. American Political Science Review 76(2), 303316.Google Scholar
Duflo, E. (2012). Lack of hope and the persistence of poverty. Marshall Lecture Series.Google Scholar
Dumont, L. (1980). Homo hierarchicus: The caste system and its implications. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Durand-Lasserve, A. and Royston, L. (2002). Holding their ground: Secure land tenure for the urban poor in developing countries. Earthscan.Google Scholar
Durning, D. (1987). The efficiency and distribution of mortgage revenue bond subsidies: The effects of behavioral responses. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 7(1), 7493.Google Scholar
Einstein, K. L., Palmer, M., and Glick, D. M. (2019). Who participates in local government? evidence from meeting minutes. Perspectives on Politics 17(1), 2846.Google Scholar
Fafchamps, M., McKenzie, D., Quinn, S., and Woodruff, C. (2014). Microenterprise growth and the flypaper effect: Evidence from a randomized experiment in Ghana. Journal of development Economics 106, 211226.Google Scholar
Ferguson, B. (1999). Micro-finance of housing: A key to housing the low or moderate-income majority? Environment and Urbanization 11(1), 185200.Google Scholar
Fernandes, L. (2006). India’s new middle class: Democratic politics in an era of economic reform. University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Fetter, D. K. (2013). How do mortgage subsidies affect home ownership? Evidence from the mid-century gi bills. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 5(2), 111147.Google Scholar
Field, E. (2005). Property rights and investment in urban slums. Journal of the European Economic Association 3(2–3), 279–290.Google Scholar
Field, E. (2007). Entitled to work: Urban property rights and labor supply in Peru. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 122(4), 15611602.Google Scholar
Field, E. M. and Kremer, M. (2006). Impact evaluation for slum upgrading interventions. World Bank, Poverty Reduction and Economic Management, Thematic Group on.Google Scholar
Fischel, W. A. (2001, February). Why are there NIMBYs? Land Economics 77(1), 144152.Google Scholar
Fischel, W. A. (2009, June). The Homevoter hypothesis. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Frankel, F. R. (2005 [1978]). India’s political economy: The gradual revolution (1947–2004). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Franklin, S. (2020). Enabled to work: The impact of government housing on slum dwellers in south africa. Journal of Urban Economics 118, 103265.Google Scholar
Friedman, M. (1957). The permanent income hypothesis. In Milton Friedman (Ed.), A theory of the consumption function, pp. 20–37. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Fukuyama, F. (2018). Identity: The demand for dignity and the politics of resentment. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
Gaikwad, N. and Nellis, G. (2016). Do politicians discriminate against internal migrants? Evidence from nationwide field experiments in India. Technical report, IGC working paper.Google Scholar
Gaikwad, N. and Nellis, G. (2017). Do politicians discriminate against internal migrants? Evidence from nationwide field experiments in India. American Journal of Political Science 61(2), 456472.Google Scholar
Galiani, S. and Schargrodsky, E. (2010). Property rights for the poor: Effects of land titling. Journal of Public Economics 94(9), 700729.Google Scholar
Ghosh, P. and Vats, N. (2022). Safety nets, credit, and investment: Evidence from a guaranteed income program. Technical report, Working Paper.Google Scholar
Gilbert, A. (2004). Helping the poor through housing subsidies: Lessons from Chile, Colombia and South Africa. Habitat International 28(1), 1340.Google Scholar
Gilbert, A. and Ward, P. (1985). Housing, the state and the poor: Policy and practice in three Latin American Cities. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Glewwe, P. and Hall, G. (1998). Are some groups more vulnerable to macroeconomic shocks than others? Hypothesis tests based on panel data from Peru. Journal of Development Economics 56(1), 181206.Google Scholar
Golden, M. and Min, B. (2013). Distributive politics around the world. Annual Review of Political Science 16(1), 7399.Google Scholar
Goldthorpe, J. H. and McKnight, A. (2006). The economic basis of social class. Mobility and inequality. Frontiers of Research in Sociology and Economics, 109136.Google Scholar
Gopalan, K. and Venkataraman, M. (2015). Affordable housing: Policy and practice in India. IIMB Management Review 27(2), 129140.Google Scholar
Graham, P. K. (2010). Georgia land lottery research. Georgia Genealogical Society.Google Scholar
Greulich, E. and Quigley, J. M. (2009). Housing subsidies and tax expenditures: The case of mortgage credit certificates. Regional Science and Urban Economics 39(6), 647657.Google Scholar
Gruber, J., Jensen, A., and Kleven, H. (2021). Do people respond to the mortgage interest deduction? Quasi-experimental evidence from Denmark. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 13(2), 273303.Google Scholar
Gulyani, S. and Bassett, E. M. (2007). Retrieving the baby from the bathwater: Slum upgrading in sub-saharan africa. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 25(4), 486515.Google Scholar
Habyarimana, J., Humphreys, M., Posner, D. N., and Weinstein, J. M. (2007). Why does ethnic diversity undermine public goods provision? American Political Science Review 101(4), 709725.Google Scholar
Hall, A. B. and Yoder, J. (2022). Does homeownership influence political behavior? Evidence from administrative data. The Journal of Politics 84(1), 351366.Google Scholar
Hardoy, J. E., Mitlin, D., and Satterthwaite, D. (2001). Environmental problems in an urbanizing world: Finding solutions for cities in Africa. Asia and Latin America, Earthscan, London.Google Scholar
Harma, J. (2011, May). Low cost private schooling in India: Is it pro poor and equitable? International Journal of Educational Development 31(4), 350356.Google Scholar
Harriss, J. (2006). Middle-class activism and the politics of the informal working class: A perspective on class relations and civil society in Indian cities. Critical Asian Studies 38(4), 445465.Google Scholar
Haushofer, J., Reisinger, J., and Shapiro, J. (2015). Your gain is my pain: Negative psychological externalities of cash transfers. Working Paper 13.Google Scholar
Haushofer, J. and Shapiro, J. (2018). The long-term impact of unconditional cash transfers: Experimental evidence from Kenya. Busara Center for Behavioral Economics, Nairobi, Kenya.Google Scholar
Heller, P., Swaminathan, S., and Varshney, A. (2022). The rich have peers, the poor have patrons: Engaging the state in a south indian city. American Journal of Sociology.Google Scholar
Hern, E. A. (2017). Better than nothing: How policies influence political participation in low-capacity democracies. Governance 30(4), 583600.Google Scholar
Hicken, A. (2011). Clientelism. Annual Review of Political Science 14(1), 289310.Google Scholar
Hilber, C. A. and Turner, T. M. (2014). The mortgage interest deduction and its impact on homeownership decisions. Review of Economics and statistics 96(4), 618637.Google Scholar
Hindustan Times Editors (2018, July). I bought a home: 13 tales from proud new homeowners in Mumbai. Hindustan Times.Google Scholar
Hingorani, P. (2011). Revisiting low income housing: A review of policies and perspectives. Indian Institute for Human Settlements.Google Scholar
Holland, A. C. (2016). Forbearance. American Political Science Review 110(2), 232246.Google Scholar
Holland, A. C. (2018). Diminished expectations: Redistributive preferences in truncated welfare states. World Politics 70(4), 555594.Google Scholar
Howard, R. E. and Donnelly, J. (1986). Human dignity, human rights, and political regimes. American Political Science Review 80(3), 801817.Google Scholar
Hunter, W. and Sugiyama, N. B. (2014). Transforming subjects into citizens: Insights from brazil’s bolsa familia. Perspectives on Politics 12(4), 829845.Google Scholar
Imai, K., King, G., and Velasco Rivera, C. (2020). Do nonpartisan programmatic policies have partisan electoral effects? Evidence from two large-scale experiments. The Journal of Politics 82(2), 714730.Google Scholar
Imbens, G. W. and Kolesar, M. (2015, November). Robust standard errors in small samples: Some practical advice. The Review of Economics and Statistics 98(4), 701712.Google Scholar
Imbens, G. W., Rubin, D. B., and Sacerdote, B. I. (2001). Estimating the effect of unearned income on labor earnings, savings, and consumption: Evidence from a survey of lottery players. American Economic Review 91(4), 778794.Google Scholar
Imparato, I. and Ruster, J. (2003). Slum upgrading and participation: Lessons from Latin America. World Bank Publications.Google Scholar
Jacobson, N. (2009). A taxonomy of dignity: A grounded theory study. BMC International Health and Human Rights 9(1), 19.Google ScholarPubMed
Jain, V., Chennuri, S., and Karamchandani, A. (2016). Informal housing, inadequate property rights. FSG.Google Scholar
Jenkins, R. and Manor, J. (2017, April). Politics and the right to work: India’s National Rural Employment Guarantee Act. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jha, S., Rao, V., and Woolcock, M. (2007, February). Governance in the gullies: Democratic responsiveness and leadership in Delhi slums. World Development 35(2), 230246.Google Scholar
Jones, D. and Marinescu, I. (2022). The labor market impacts of universal and permanent cash transfers: Evidence from the alaska permanent fund. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 14(2), 315340.Google Scholar
Joshi, R. (1970). The Shiv Sena: A movement in search of legitimacy. Asian Survey 10(11), 967978.Google Scholar
Kapur, D. and Vaishnav, M. (2013). Quid pro quo: Builders, politicians, and election finance in india. Center for Global Development Working Paper (276).Google Scholar
Kaur, S., Mullainathan, S., Oh, S., and Schilbach, F. (2022). Does financial strain lower productivity. Technical report, India Housing Report.Google Scholar
Keswell, M. and Carter, M. R. (2014). Poverty and land redistribution. Journal of Development Economics 110, 250261.Google Scholar
Khaire, M. and Jha, S. K. (2022). Examining homeownership bias in indian housing policy using frame analysis. Environment and Urbanization ASIA, 09754253221079527.Google Scholar
Kieti, R. M. (2020). Affordable housing in Kenya. Africa Habitat Review 14(1), 16771687.Google Scholar
Kingdon, G. (1996). The quality and efficiency of private and public education: A case-study of urban India. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 58(1), 5782.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, H. and Wilkinson, S. I. (Eds.) (2007, April). Patrons, clients and policies: Patterns of democratic accountability and political competition. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kleinke, C. L. (1986). Gaze and eye contact: A research review. Psychological Bulletin 100(1), 78.Google ScholarPubMed
Krishna, A., Poghosyan, M., and Das, N. (2012). How much can asset transfers help the poorest? Evaluating the results of brac’s ultra-poor programme (2002–2008). Journal of Development Studies 48(2), 254267.Google Scholar
Krishnan, S. and Hatekar, N. (2017). Rise of the new middle class in india and its changing structure. Economic and Political Weekly 52(22), 4048.Google Scholar
Kruks-Wisner, G. (2018a, August). Claiming the state: Active citizenship and social welfare in rural India. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kruks-Wisner, G. (2018b, January). The pursuit of social welfare: Citizen claimmaking in rural India. World Politics 70(1), 122163.Google Scholar
Kumar, A. (2014). Estimating rural housing shortage. Economic and Political Weekly, 7479.Google Scholar
Kumar, A. (2015). Housing shortages in urban india and socio-economic facets. Journal of Infrastructure Development 7 (1), 19–34.Google Scholar
Kumar, T. (2021). The housing quality, income, and human capital effects of subsidized homes in urban India. Journal of Development Economics 153, 102738.Google Scholar
Kumar, T. (2022). Home price subsidies increase local-level political participation in urban India. The Journal of Politics 84(2), 831845.Google Scholar
Kumar, T., Post, A. E., Ray, I., Otsuka, M., and Pardo-Bosch, F. (2022). From public service access to service quality: The distributive politics of piped water in Bangalore. World Development 151, 105736.Google Scholar
Lanjouw, J. O. and Levy, P. I. (2002). Untitled: A study of formal and informal property rights in urban Ecuador. The Economic Journal 112(482), 9861019.Google Scholar
Larreguy, H., Marshall, J., and Trucco, L. (2015a). Breaking clientelism or rewarding incumbents? Evidence from an urban titling program in Mexico. Technical report, Working paper Harvard University.Google Scholar
Lin, W. (2013, March). Agnostic notes on regression adjustments to experimental data: Reexamining Freedman’s critique. The Annals of Applied Statistics 7(1), 295318.Google Scholar
Loayza, N., Rigolini, J., and Llorente, G. (2012). Do middle classes bring about institutional reforms? Economics Letters 116(3), 440444.Google Scholar
López-Calva, L. F. and Ortiz-Juarez, E. (2014). A vulnerability approach to the definition of the middle class. The Journal of Economic Inequality 12, 2347.Google Scholar
Lybbert, T. J. and Wydick, B. (2018). Poverty, aspirations, and the economics of hope. Economic Development and Cultural Change 66(4), 709753.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, J. G. and White, H. (1985). Some heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimators with improved finite sample properties. Journal of Econometrics 29(3), 305325.Google Scholar
MacLean, L. M. (2011, September). State retrenchment and the exercise of citizenship in Africa. Comparative Political Studies 44(9), 12381266.Google Scholar
Macpherson, C. B. (1962). The political theory of possessive individualism, Volume 19527. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Madan, U. (2016). Personal interview with the chief commissioner of Mumbai’s Metropolitan Region Development Authority.Google Scholar
Maiorano, D., Das, U., and Masiero, S. (2018, October). Decentralisation, clientelism and social protection programmes: A study of India’s MGNREGA. Oxford Development Studies 46(4), 536549.Google Scholar
Malik, M. (2022). Discrimination and defiant pride: How the demand for dignity can create slack for poor governance. Available at SSRN 4043185.Google Scholar
Manacorda, M., Miguel, E., and Vigorito, A. (2011). Government transfers and political support. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 3(3), 128.Google Scholar
Mandelbaum, D. G. (1986). Sex roles and gender relations in north india. Economic and Political Weekly, 19992004.Google Scholar
Mandelbaum, D. G. (1988). Women’s seclusion and men’s honor: Sex roles in North India, Bangladesh, and Pakistan. University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Martins, N. C. and Villanueva, E. (2006). The impact of mortgage interestrate subsidies on household borrowing. Journal of Public Economics 90(8–9), 1601–1623.Google Scholar
Mast, E. (2019). The effect of new market-rate housing construction on the lowincome housing market. Upjohn Institute WP, 19307.Google Scholar
Mayo, S. K. and Gross, D. J. (1987). Sites and services – and subsidies: The economics of low-cost housing in developing countries. The World Bank Economic Review 1(2), 301335.Google Scholar
McCloskey, D. N. (2010). Bourgeois dignity: Why economics can’t explain the modern world. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McCrudden, C. (2008). Human dignity and judicial interpretation of human rights. European Journal of International Law 19(4), 655724.Google Scholar
McIntosh, C. and Zeitlin, A. (2018). Benchmarking a child nutrition program against cash: Experimental evidence from Rwanda. University of California.Google Scholar
Meltzer, A. H. and Richard, S. F. (1981). A rational theory of the size of government. Journal of Political Economy 89(5), 914927.Google Scholar
Mettler, S. (2002). Bringing the state back in to civic engagement: Policy feed-back effects of the GI bill for World War II veterans. American Political Science Review 96(2), 351365.Google Scholar
Mickevičienė, D. (2003). Concept of purity in the studies of the Indian caste system. Acta Orientalia Vilnensia 4, 239254.Google Scholar
Miguel, E. and Gugerty, M. K. (2005, December). Ethnic diversity, social sanctions, and public goods in Kenya. Journal of Public Economics 89(11), 23252368.Google Scholar
Mincer, J. (1958). Investment in human capital and personal income distribution. Journal of Political Economy 66(4), 281302.Google Scholar
Minhas, B. S. (1970). Rural poverty, land redistribution and development strategy: Facts and policy. Indian Economic Review 5(1), 97128.Google Scholar
Montgomery, M. R. (2008). The urban transformation of the developing world. Science 319(5864), 761764.Google ScholarPubMed
Nakamura, S. (2014). Impact of slum formalization on self-help housing construction: A case of slum notification in india. Urban Studies 51(16), 34203444.Google Scholar
Nakamura, S. (2017). Does slum formalisation without title provision stimulate housing improvement? A case of slum declaration in Pune, India. Urban Studies 54(7), 17151735.Google Scholar
Narayan, D., Chambers, R., Shah, M. K., and Petesch, P. (2000). Voices of the poor: Crying out for change. Oxford University Press for the World Bank.Google Scholar
Nathan, N. L. (2016). Does participation reinforce patronage? Policy preferences, turnout and class in urban Ghana. British Journal of Political Science, 127.Google Scholar
Newman, S. J. and Harkness, J. M. (2002). The long-term effects of public housing on self-sufficiency. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management: The Journal of the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management 21(1), 2143.Google Scholar
Nijman, J. (2008). Against the odds: Slum rehabilitation in neoliberal mumbai. Cities 25(2), 7385.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. C. (2013). Creating capabilities: The human development approach. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Osella, C. and Osella, F. (1998). Friendship and flirting: Micro-politics in Kerala, South India. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 189206.Google Scholar
Otiso, K. M. (2003). State, voluntary and private sector partnerships for slum upgrading and basic service delivery in Nairobi City, Kenya. Cities 20(4), 221229.Google Scholar
Owens, K. E., Gulyani, S., and Rizvi, A. (2018). Success when we deemed it failure? Revisiting sites and services projects in Mumbai and Chennai 20 years later. World Development 106, 260272.Google Scholar
Panda, S. (2022). Does local elite capture vary by levels of political connections? Evidence from an Indian public housing program. The European Journal of Development Research 34(4), 19121939.Google Scholar
Parker, S. W. and Vogl, T. (2018, February). Do conditional cash transfers improve economic outcomes in the next generation? Evidence from Mexico. Working Paper 24303, National Bureau of Economic Research. Series: Working Paper Series.Google Scholar
Patel, S. and Burra, S. (1994). Access to housing finance for the urban poor: Institutional innovations in India. Cities 11(6), 393397.Google Scholar
Picarelli, N. (2019, May). There is no free house. Journal of Urban Economics 111, 3552.Google Scholar
Pierson, P. (1993). When effect becomes cause: Policy feedback and political change. World Politics 45(4), 595628.Google Scholar
Popkin, S. J., Cunningham, M. K., and Burt, M. (2005). Public housing transformation and the hard-to-house. Housing Policy Debate 16(1), 124.Google Scholar
Portney, K. (1991, February). Siting hazardous waste treatment facilities: The NIMBY syndrome. Praeger.Google Scholar
Post, A. E., Bronsoler, V., and Salman, L. (2017). Hybrid regimes for local public goods provision: A framework for analysis. Perspectives on Politics 15(4), 952966.Google Scholar
Rains, E., & Wibbels, E. (2023). Informal work, risk, and clientelism: Evidence from 223 slums across India. British Journal of Political Science 53(1), 124.Google Scholar
Rajendran, G. (1974). The Ezhava community and Kerala politics. Kerala Academy of Political Science.Google Scholar
Ramanath, R. (2018). A place to call home: Women as agents of change in Mumbai. Routledge.Google Scholar
Rao, N. (2011). Three concepts of dignity in constitutional law. Notre Dame Law Review 86(1), 183271.Google Scholar
Rao, S., Royo-Olid, J., and Turkstra, J. (2022). Tenure security and property rights: The case of land titling for slumdwellers in Odisha, India. International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development 14(1), 119.Google Scholar
Romano, J. M. and Bellack, A. S. (1980). Social validation of a component model of assertive behavior. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 48(4), 478490.Google ScholarPubMed
Roy, I. (2013). Development as dignity: Dissensus, equality and contentious politics in Bihar, India. Oxford Development Studies 41(4), 517536.Google Scholar
Santos, P. and Barrett, C. B. (2011). Persistent poverty and informal credit. Journal of Development Economics 96(2), 337347.Google Scholar
Sanyal, P. and Rao, V. (2018, December). Oral democracy: Deliberation in Indian village assemblies. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sarkar, A. and Bardhan, R. (2020). Socio-physical liveability through sociospatiality in low-income resettlement archetypes-a case of slum rehabilitation housing in Mumbai, India. Cities 105, 102840.Google ScholarPubMed
Schaub, M. (2021). Acute financial hardship and voter turnout: Theory and evidence from the sequence of bank working days. American Political Science Review 115(4), 12581274.Google Scholar
Schofield, H. (2014). The economic costs of low caloric intake: Evidence from India. Unpublished Manuscript.Google Scholar
Sen, A. (1979, May). Equality of what? The Tanner Lecture on Human Values.Google Scholar
Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sensen, O. (2011). Human dignity in historical perspective: The contemporary and traditional paradigms. European Journal of Political Theory 10(1), 7191.Google Scholar
Shah, A. K., Mullainathan, S., and Shafir, E. (2012). Some consequences of having too little. Science 338(6107), 682685.Google ScholarPubMed
Shapiro, J. (2019). The impact of recipient choice on aid effectiveness. World Development 116, 137149.Google ScholarPubMed
Sharma, A. et al. (2019). Indira awas yojana and housing adequacy: An evaluation using propensity score matching. Technical report, The Australian National University, Australia South Asia Research Centre.Google Scholar
Singh, S. (2021a). House versus cooking gas cylinder: Assessing the political impact of two benefits. Technical report, Working Paper. New Haven, CT: Yale University. Available at: https://github.Google Scholar
Singh, S. (2021b). Winning support by distributing houses? Evidence from India. Working Paper.Google Scholar
Sinha, A. (2016). Why has development become a political issues in Indian politics. Brown Journal of World Affairs 23, 189.Google Scholar
Soss, J. (2000). Unwanted claims: The politics of participation in the US welfare system. University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Soss, J. (2015). Talking our way to meaningful explanations: A practice-centered view of interviewing for interpretive research. In Yanow, Dvora and Schwartz-Shea, Peregrine (Eds.), Interpretation and method, pp. 161182. Routledge.Google Scholar
Stokes, S. C., Dunning, T., Nazareno, M., and Brusco, V. (2013, September). Brokers, voters, and clientelism: The puzzle of distributive politics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Subramaniam, A. (2010). Caste and social churning in India. Technical report, Peterson Insitute for International Economics.Google Scholar
Sudarshnam, G. and Kumar, M. A. (2005). Rural housing for weaker sections–a study of Indira Awas Yojana (IAY). Indian Journal of Public Administration 51(3), 566594.Google Scholar
Sugiyama, N. B. and Hunter, W. (2020). Do conditional cash transfers empower women? insights from brazil’s bolsa família. Latin American Politics and Society 62(2), 5374.Google Scholar
Sunikka-Blank, M., Bardhan, R., and Haque, A. N. (2019). Gender, domestic energy and design of inclusive low-income habitats: A case of slum rehabilitation housing in Mumbai, India. Energy Research and Social Science 49, 5367.Google Scholar
Thachil, T. (2014). Elite parties and poor voters: Theory and evidence from India. American Political Science Review 108(2), 454477.Google Scholar
Tighe, J. R. (2010). Public opinion and affordable housing: A review of the literature. Journal of Planning Literature 25(1), 317.Google Scholar
Tiwari, P., Rao, J., and Day, J. (2016). Housing development in a developing India. In Day, Jennifer, Rao, Jyoti, and Tiwari, Piyush (Eds.), Development paradigms for urban housing in BRICS countries, pp. 83139. Springer.Google Scholar
Trucco, L. (2017). Broken cities: The effect of government responsiveness on citizens’ participation.Google Scholar
Turner, J. C. (1967). Barriers and channels for housing development in modernizing countries. Journal of the American Institute of Planners 33(3), 167181.Google Scholar
UN-Habitat (1996). Global Report on Human Settlements. Oxford University Press for the United Nations Centre for Human Settlements.Google Scholar
UN-Habitat (2004). The challenge of slums: Global report on human settlements 2003. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal 15(3), 337338.Google Scholar
UN-Habitat (2013). State of the world’s cities 2012/2013: Prosperity of cities. Routledge.Google Scholar
United Nations (2015). United nations sustainable development goals. 2015. Technical report.Google Scholar
van Dijk, W. (2019). The socio-economic consequences of housing assistance. Working Paper.Google Scholar
Varshney, A. (2000). Is India becoming more democratic? The Journal of Asian Studies 59(1), 325.Google Scholar
Varshney, A. (2002). Ethnic conflict and civic life: Hindus and Muslims in India. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Varshney, A. (2014, November). Battles half won: India’s improbable democracy. Penguin.Google Scholar
Vatuk, S. (1975). The aging woman in India: Self-perceptions and changing roles. Women in Contemporary India and South Asia, Manohar Publications New Delhi, 142163.Google Scholar
Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., and Brady, H. E. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wein, T. (2020). Dignity and development: A review of the literature on its application, definition and measurement. The Dignity Project.Google Scholar
Werlin, H. (1999). The slum upgrading myth. Urban Studies 36(9), 15231534.Google Scholar
Wherry, F. F., Seefeldt, K. S., and Alvarez, A. S. (2019). Credit where it’s due:Rethinking financial citizenship. Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Wietzke, F.-B. and Sumner, A. (2014). What are the political and social implications of the new middle classes in developing countries. Strand, London King’s International Development Institute.Google Scholar
Witsoe, J. (2012). Everyday corruption and the political mediation of the Indian state: An ethnographic exploration of brokers in Bihar. Economic and Political Weekly, 4754.Google Scholar
Woo, A., Joh, K., and Yu, C.-Y. (2021). Who believes and why they believe: Individual perception of public housing and housing price depreciation. Cities 109, 103019.Google Scholar
Yoder, J. (2020). Does property ownership lead to participation in local politics? Evidence from property records and meeting minutes. American Political Science Review 114(4), 12131229.Google Scholar
Zewde, N. and Schwab, V. (2022). A new public housing model: Addis ababas urban transformation. Jaine Family Institute. https://jainfamilyinstitute.org/a-new-public-housing-model-addis-ababas-urban-transformation/Google Scholar
Zhang, L., Xie, L., & Zheng, X. (2023). Across a few prohibitive miles: The impact of the Anti-Poverty Relocation Program in China. Journal of Development Economics 160, 102945.Google Scholar
Zucco, C. (2013, October). When payouts pay off: Conditional cash transfers and voting behavior in Brazil 200210. American Journal of Political Science 57(4), 810822.Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: Inaccessible, or known limited accessibility

The PDF of this book is known to have missing or limited accessibility features. We may be reviewing its accessibility for future improvement, but final compliance is not yet assured and may be subject to legal exceptions. If you have any questions, please contact accessibility@cambridge.org.

Content Navigation

Table of contents navigation
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Index navigation
Provides an interactive index, letting you go straight to where a term or subject appears in the text without manual searching.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Tanu Kumar, Claremont Graduate University, California
  • Book: Building Social Mobility
  • Online publication: 15 September 2025
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Tanu Kumar, Claremont Graduate University, California
  • Book: Building Social Mobility
  • Online publication: 15 September 2025
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Tanu Kumar, Claremont Graduate University, California
  • Book: Building Social Mobility
  • Online publication: 15 September 2025
Available formats
×