Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-hvd4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-04T10:32:27.803Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Thermochemical Conversion of Biomass

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 January 2025

Sven Gjedde Sommer
Affiliation:
Aarhus Universitet, Denmark
Morten Lykkegaard Christensen
Affiliation:
Aalborg University, Denmark
Birgir Norddahl
Affiliation:
University of Southern Denmark
Morten Ambye-Jensen
Affiliation:
Aarhus Universitet, Denmark
Maria Cinta Roda-Serrat
Affiliation:
University of Southern Denmark
Get access

Summary

Our infrastructure and production is based on fossilized carbon feedstock. This fossil carbon used was once biogenic carbon that has undergone a natural thermochemical conversion and very similar products can be produced from biomass via thermochemical processing; enabling the utilization of the existing infrastructure. The thermochemical processes; pyrolysis, gasification, and combustion, are commercially available for coal but their adaption to biomass is lagging. Understanding both the chemical and physical differences and considering the process chemistry can, however, mitigate this. This chapter talks the reader though the carbon and process chemistry in the thermal and hydrothermal processing of biomass.

Type
Chapter
Information
Bioprocesses
A Comprehensive Guide to Sustainable Resources in the Non-Fossil Era
, pp. 359 - 385
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

IEA. (2023). CO2 Emissions in 2022. Paris: IEA.Google Scholar
IEA. (2022). Coal 2022: Analysis and Forecast to 2025. Paris: IEA.Google Scholar
Allan, R. P., Arias, P. A., Berger, S., Canadell, J. G., Cassou, C., Chen, D., et al. (2021). IPCC, 2021: Summary for Policymakers. Geneva: IPCC.Google Scholar
Van Krevelen, D. W. (1993). Coal: Typology, Physics, Chemistry, Constitution. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Miller, B. G. (2004). Coal Energy Systems. Amsterdam: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Sarkanen, K. V., and Tillman, D. A. (2013). Progress in Biomass Conversion, Vol. 1. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Smith, K. L., Smoot, L. D., Fletcher, T. H., and Pugmire, R. J. (2013). The Structure and Reaction Processes of Coal. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media.Google Scholar
Amaducci, S., Facciotto, G., Bergante, S., Perego, A., Serra, P., Ferrarini, A., and Chimento, C. (2017). Biomass production and energy balance of herbaceous and woody crops on marginal soils in the Po valley. Global Change Biology Bioenergy 9(1), 3145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shankar Tumuluru, J., Sokhansanj, S., Hess, J. R., Wright, C. T., and Boardman, R. D. (2011). A review on biomass torrefaction process and product properties for energy applications. Industrial Biotechnology 7(5), 384401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shinn, J. H. (1984). From coal to single-stage and two-stage products: A reactive model of coal structure. Fuel 63(9), 11871196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Speight, J. G. (2013). The Chemistry and Technology of Coal. Boca Raton, FL: CRC press.Google Scholar
Schuhmacher, J. P., Huntjens, F. J., and Van Krevelen, D. W. (1960). Chemical structure and properties of coal XXVI studies on artificial coalification. Fuel 39, 223234.Google Scholar
Koppejan, J., and Van Loo, S. (2012). The Handbook of Biomass Combustion and Co-firing. Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tillman, D. A., Duong, D. N. B., and Harding, N. S. (2012). Blending coal with biomass: Cofiring biomass with coal. In: Tillman, D. A., Duong, D. N. B., and Harding, N. S. (eds.), Solid Fuel Blending. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann, 125200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, Z. (2005). Fundamentals of Pulverised Coal Combustion. London: IEA Clean Coal Centre Reports.Google Scholar
Miller, B. G., and Tillman, D. A. (2008). Combustion Engineering Issues for Solid Fuel Systems. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Williams, A., Jones, J. M., Ma, L., and Pourkashanian, M. (2012). Pollutants from the combustion of solid biomass fuels. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science 38(2), 113137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glassman, I., Yetter, R. A., and Glumac, N. G. (2014). Combustion. Amsterdam: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Dahlquist, E. (2013). Technologies for Converting Biomass to Useful Energy, 1st ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masiá, A. A. T., Buhre, B. J. P., Gupta, R. P., and Wall, T. F. (2007). Characterising ash of biomass and waste. Fuel Processing Technology 88(11), 10711081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimm, A., Skoglund, N., Boström, D., and Öhman, M. (2011). Bed agglomeration characteristics in fluidized quartz bed combustion of phosphorus-rich biomass fuels. Energy & Fuels 25(3), 937947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riedl, R., Dahl, J., Obernberger, I., and Narodoslawsky, M. (1999). Corrosion in fire tube boilers of biomass combustion plants. In Proceedings of the China International Corrosion Control Conference 1999. Beijing.Google Scholar
Heschel, W., Rweyemamu, L., Scheibner, T., and Meyer, B. (1999). Abatement of emissions in small-scale combustors through utilisation of blended pellet fuels. Fuel Processing Technology 61(3), 223242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, K.-H., Kabir, E., and Kabir, S. (2015). A review on the human health impact of airborne particulate matter. Environment International 74, 136143.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parker, K. R. (2012). Applied Electrostatic Precipitation. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media.Google Scholar
Shanthakumar, S., Singh, D. N., and Phadke, R. C. (2008). Flue gas conditioning for reducing suspended particulate matter from thermal power stations. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science 34(6), 685695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Córdoba, P. (2015). Status of Flue Gas Desulphurisation (FGD) systems from coal-fired power plants: Overview of the physic-chemical control processes of wet limestone FGDs. Fuel 144, 274286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marschner, H., and Marschner, P. (2012). Marschner’s Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants. Amsterdam: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Korbee, R., Kiel, J. H. A., Zevenhoven, M., Skrifvars, B., Jensen, P. A., and Frandsen, F. J. (2001). Investigation of biomass inorganic matter by advanced fuel analysis and conversion experiments. In Proceedings of Power Production in the 21st Century: Impacts of Fuel Quality and Operations. United Engineering Foundation Advanced Combustion Engineering Research Center, Snowbird, UT, October 2001.Google Scholar
O’Sullivan, A. C. (1997). Cellulose: The structure slowly unravels. Cellulose 4(3), 173207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheller, H. V., and Ulvskov, P. (2010). Hemicelluloses. Annual Review of Plant Biology 61(1), 263289.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rutherford, D. W., Chiou, C. T., and Kile, D. E. (1992). Influence of soil organic matter composition on the partition of organic compounds. Environmental Science & Technology 26(2), 336340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, J. M., Saddawi, A., Dooley, B., Mitchell, E. J. S., Werner, J., Waldron, D. J., et al. (2015). Low temperature ignition of biomass. Fuel Processing Technology 134(Supplement C), 372377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huéscar Medina, C., Phylaktou, H. N., Andrews, G. E., and Gibbs, B. M. (2015). Explosion characteristics of pulverised torrefied and raw Norway spruce (Picea abies) and Southern pine (Pinus palustris) in comparison to bituminous coal. Biomass and Bioenergy 79, 116127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saeed, M. A., Slatter, D. J. F., Andrews, G. E., Phylaktou, H. N., and Gibbs, B. M. (2016). Combustion of pulverized biomass crop residues and their explosion characteristics. Combustion Science and Technology 188(11–12), 22002216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemmon, E. W. (2009). Thermophysical Properties of Fluid. CRC, CRC Co.Google Scholar
Kruse, A. J. B. (2008). Bioproducts and B.I.f.a.s. economy. Supercritical Water Gasification 2(5), 415437.Google Scholar
Einstein, A. (1956). Investigations on the Theory of the Brownian Movement. North Chelmsford: Courier Corporation.Google Scholar
Kruse, A., and Dinjus, E. (2007). Hot compressed water as reaction medium and reactant: properties and synthesis reactions. The Journal of Supercritical Fluids 39(3), 362380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uematsu, M., and Franck, E. U. (1980). Static dielectric constant of water and steam. Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data 9(4), 12911306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, W. L., and Franck, E. U. (1981). Ion product of water substance, 0–1000 C, 1–10,000 bars. New International Formulation and its background. Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data 10(2), 295304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biller, P., and Ross, A. B. (2011). Potential yields and properties of oil from the hydrothermal liquefaction of microalgae with different biochemical content. Bioresource Technology 102(1), 215225.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Teri, G., Luo, L., and Savage, P. E. (2014). Hydrothermal treatment of protein, polysaccharide, and lipids alone and in mixtures. Energy & Fuels 28(12), 75017509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leow, S., Witter, J. R., Vardon, D. R., Sharma, B. K., Guest, J. S., and Strathmann, T. J. (2015). Prediction of microalgae hydrothermal liquefaction products from feedstock biochemical composition. Green Chemistry 17(6), 35843599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lu, J., Liu, Z., Zhang, Y., and Savage, P. E. (2018). Synergistic and antagonistic interactions during hydrothermal liquefaction of soybean oil, soy protein, cellulose, xylose, and lignin. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering 6(11), 1450114509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, J., He, Q., Corscadden, K., Niu, H., Lin, J., and Astatkie, T. (2019). Advanced models for the prediction of product yield in hydrothermal liquefaction via a mixture design of biomass model components coupled with process variables. Applied Energy 233, 906915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Y., Leow, S., Fedders, A. C., Sharma, B. K., Guest, J. S., and Strathmann, T. J. (2017). Quantitative multiphase model for hydrothermal liquefaction of algal biomass. Green Chemistry 19(4), 11631174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, W., Li, X., Li, Z., Tong, C., and Feng, L. (2015). Understanding low-lipid algae hydrothermal liquefaction characteristics and pathways through hydrothermal liquefaction of algal major components: Crude polysaccharides, crude proteins and their binary mixtures. Bioresource Technology 196, 99108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×