Performance as the Foundation for a Secondary School Literacy Program: A Bakhtinian Perspective

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511755002.006

5 - Performance as the Foundation for a Secondary School Literacy Program: A Bakhtinian Perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 May 2010

Eileen Landay

Edited by

Arnetha F. Ball and

Sarah Warshauer Freedman

Show author details

Eileen Landay: Affiliation:
Brown University
Arnetha F. Ball: Affiliation:
Stanford University, California
Sarah Warshauer Freedman: Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Nothing is so practical as a good theory.

– James Britton

The theories of M. M. Bakhtin, philosopher of language, literary critic, and social theorist, have had wide influence in and beyond the academy. Writing in Russia in the years between 1920 and 1960, the period of the Russian Revolution and the rise of the Soviet state, and deeply influenced by those events, Bakhtin's project was to explore and challenge the formalist theories developed by the linguists and literary critics like Saussure and Jakobson. Language, Bakhtin argued, is never a fixed and closed system. Instead, it is a living, ever-changing entity, “social throughout its entire range and in each and every of its factors, from the sound image to the furthest reaches of abstract meaning” (Bakhtin, 1981, p. 259).

If Bakhtin's formulations are useful – and the extent to which they have been taken up and explored in the West since the 1980s suggests they are – there are relevant questions to be addressed: how do these formulations apply in settings whose explicit purpose is to support students' language and literacy development (i.e., schools)? To what extent do school settings promote learning through social interaction? What sorts of social interaction take place in those settings? How can we use Bakhtin's insights to provide a richer, more equitable environment for literacy teaching and learning?

Information

Type: Chapter
Information: Bakhtinian Perspectives on Language, Literacy, and Learning , pp. 107 - 128

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511755002.006 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Allen, J. (2000). Yellow brick roads: Shared and guided paths to independent reading, 4–12. Portland, ME: Stenhouse

Atwell, N. (1998). In the middle: Writing, reading, and learning with adolescents (3rd ed.). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann

Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays. (Ed. M. Holquist) (Trans. C. Emerson M. Holquist) Austin: University of Texas Press

Blachowicz, C., & Ogle, D. (2001). Reading comprehension: Strategies for independent learners. New York: Guilford Press

Bloome, D., Puro, P., & Theodorov, E. (1989). Procedural display in classroom lessons. Curriculum Inquiry, 19, 265–91CrossRef Google Scholar

Bordieu. P., & Passeron, J. C. (1977). Reproduction in education, society and culture. London: Sage

Calkins, L. (1986). The art of teaching writing. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann

City, E. (2000, November). Conversation is essential: The Paideia Seminar in a working thinking classroom. Paper presented at The Coalition of Essential Schools Fall Forum, Providence, RI.

Cohen, E. (1986). Designing groupwork: Strategies for the heterogeneous classroom. New York: Teachers College Press

Coles, R. (1989). The call of stories: Teaching and the moral imagination. Boston: Houghton Mifflin

Cook-Gumperz, J. (1986). The social construction of literacy. New York: Cambridge University Press

Daniels, H. (1994). Literature circles: Voice and choice in the student-centered classroom. Portland, ME: Stenhouse

Delpit, L. (1995). Other people's children. New York: The New Press

Ericson, J., Murphy, J., & Zeuschner, R. (1987). The debater's guide. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press

Garcia Lorca, F. (1994). Blood wedding. (Trans. Langston Hughes & W. S. Merwin) New York: Theatre Communications Group

Gee, J. P. (1992). The social mind: Language, ideology, and social practice. New York: Bergin & Garvey

Gee, J. P. (1996). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses. Bristol, PA: Taylor and Francis

Gilmore, P. (1987). Sulking, stepping and tracking: The effects of attitude assessment on access to literacy. In D. Bloome (Ed.), Literacy and schooling (pp. 98–120). Norwood, NJ: Ablex

Graves, D. (1983). Writing: Students and teachers at work. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann

Harvey, S., & Goudvis. A. (2000). Strategies that work: Teaching comprehension to enhance understanding. York, ME: Stenhouse

Heath, S. B. (1983). Ways with words: Language, life and work in communities and classrooms. New York: Cambridge University Press

Heath, S. B., & McLaughlin, M. W. (Eds.). (1993). Identity and inner-city youth: Beyond ethnicity and gender. New York: Teachers College Press

Heath, S. B. (with Roach, A.). (1999). Imaginative actuality: Learning in the arts during the nonschool hours. In E. Fiske (Ed.), Champions of change: The impact of the arts on learning (pp. 19–34). Washington, DC: The President's Committee on the Arts and the Humanities

Holquist, M. (1981a). Introduction. In M. M. Bakhtin. The dialogic imagination: Four essays. Austin: University of Texas Press

Holquist, M. (1981b). Glossary. In M. M. Bakhtin. The dialogic imagination: Four essays. Austin: University of Texas Press

Ketten, J. (2000). Unpublished paper, Brown University

Ketten, J. (2002). The community behind the curtain: Unpacking ArtsLiteracy pedagogy. Unpublished thesis. Providence, RI: Brown University

Kohl, H. (1994). “I won't learn from you”: And other thoughts on creative maladjustment. New York: The New Press

Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press

Lensmire, T. J. (2000). Powerful writing, responsible teaching. New York: Teachers College Press

McLaughlin, M. W., Irby, M., & Langman, J. (1994). Urban sanctuaries: Neighborhood organizations in the lives and futures of inner-city youth. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass

McMahon, S., & Raphael, T. (Eds.). (1997). The book club connection: Literacy learning and classroom talk. New York: Teachers College Press

Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

Michaels, S. (1981). “Sharing time”: Children's narrative style and differential access to literacy. Language in Society, 10, 423–42CrossRef Google Scholar

Minick, N. (1993). Teachers' directives: The social construction of “literal meanings” and “real worlds” in classroom discourse. In S. Chaiklin J. Lave (Eds.), Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and context (pp. 343–76). New York: Cambridge University PressCrossRef

Reddy, M. (1993). The conduit metaphor: A case of frame conflict in our language about language. In. A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (2nd ed., pp. 164–201). New York: Cambridge University PressCrossRef

Shakespeare, W. (1997). The tragedy of Othello, the moor of Venice. In G. B. Evans (Ed.), The Riverside Shakespeare (2nd ed., pp. 1246–96). New York: Houghton Mifflin

Tovani, C. (2000). I read it but I don't get it: Comprehension strategies for the adolescent reader. Portland, ME: Stenhouse

Wagner, B. J. (1999). Dorothy Heathcote: Drama as a learning medium. (rev. ed.) Portland, ME: Calendar Islands Publishers

Wilhelm, J. (1997). You gotta be the book. New York: Teachers College Press

Willinsky, J. (1990). The new literacy: Redefining reading and writing in the schools. New York: Routledge

Wiske, M. (1998). Teaching for understanding. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.