Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7857688df4-p2b9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-15T01:26:36.132Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

21 - Medical and Scientific Writing

from Part III - Genre and Medium in the Record

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 October 2025

Merja Kytö
Affiliation:
Uppsala Universitet, Sweden
Erik Smitterberg
Affiliation:
Uppsala Universitet, Sweden
Get access

Summary

What counts as scientific writing has undergone massive changes over the centuries. Medical writing is a good representative of the register of scientific English, as it combines both theoretical concerns and practical applications. Ideas of health and sickness have been communicated in English written texts for over a thousand years from the Middle Ages to the present, with different traditions and layers of writing reflecting literacy developments and changing thought-styles. This chapter approaches the topic from the perspective of registers and genres, considering how texts are shaped by their functions and communicative purposes and various audiences. Some genres run throughout the history of English: remedy books were already extant in the Old English period. Another core genre, the case study, mirrors wider scientific developments in response to changes in styles of thinking: medieval scholasticism is gradually replaced by a growing interest in increasingly systematic empirical observation. The establishment of learned societies from the seventeenth century onwards gives rise to new genres like the experimental report, and concomitant disciplinary advances and technological developments in the following centuries gradually pave the way for modern evidence-based medicine. Today medical advances are communicated in digital publications to a worldwide readership.

Information

Type
Chapter
Information
The New Cambridge History of the English Language
Documentation, Sources of Data and Modelling
, pp. 506 - 533
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Ainsworth-Vaughn, Nancy. 2001. The discourse of medical encounters. In Schiffrin, Deborah, Tannen, Deborah and Hamilton, Heidi E. (eds.), The Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 453469.Google Scholar
Atkinson, Dwight. 1992. The evolution of medical research writing from 1735 to 1985: the case of the Edinburgh Medical Journal. Applied Linguistics 13.4: 337374.Google Scholar
Atkinson, Dwight. 1999. Scientific Discourse in Sociohistorical Context: The Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 1675–1975. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Atwan, Robert. 2012. Notes towards a definition of an essay. River Teeth: A Journal of Nonfiction Narrative 14.1: 109117.Google Scholar
Bazerman, Charles. 1988. Shaping Written Knowledge: The Genre and Activity of the Experimental Article in Science. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Bhatia, Vijay K. 1993. Analysing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas and Conrad, Susan. 2019. Register, Genre, and Style. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas and Finegan, Edward. 1994. Intra-textual variation within medical research articles. In Oostdijk, Nelleke and de Haan, Pieter (eds.), Corpus-Based Research into Language. In Honour of Jan Aarts. Amsterdam: Rodopi, pp. 201221.Google Scholar
Broman, Thomas H. 2003. The medical sciences. In Porter, Roy (ed.), The Cambridge History of Science. Vol. 4: Eighteenth-Century Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 461484.Google Scholar
Burton, T. I. (ed.). 1998. Sidrak and Bokkus. A Parallel-Text Edition from Bodleian Library MS. Laud. Misc. 559 and British Library, MS Lansdowne 793, 2 vols. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bynum, William. 1994. Science and the Practice of Medicine in the Nineteenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bynum, William. 2008. History of Medicine: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cadden, Joan. 1993. Meanings of Sex Difference in the Middle Ages: Medicine, Science and Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Capp, Bernard. 1979. Astrology & the Popular Press: English Almanacs 1500–1800. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
Carter-Thomas, Shirley and Rowley-Jolivet, Elizabeth. 2008. If-conditionals in medical discourse: from theory to disciplinary practice. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 7.3: 191205.Google Scholar
Collins, Sarah, Peters, Sarah and Watt, Ian. 2011. Medical communication. In Simpson, James (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Applied Linguistics. London: Routledge, pp. 96110.Google Scholar
Crisciani, Chiara. 2000. Teachers and learners in scholastic medicine: some images and metaphors. History of Universities 15: 75101.Google Scholar
Crossgrove, William. 1998. Introduction. Early Science and Medicine 3.2: 8187. Special issue ed. by William Crossgrove et al.Google ScholarPubMed
Cunningham, Andrew and French, Roger (eds.). 1990. The Medical Enlightenment of the Eighteenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dear, Peter. 1991. Narratives, anecdotes, and experiments: turning experiments into science in the seventeenth century. In Dear, Peter (ed.), The Literary Structure of Scientific Argument: Historical Studies. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, pp. 135163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Digby, Anne. 1994. Making a Medical Living: Doctors and Patients in the English Market for Medicine, 1720–1911. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Djulbegovic, Benjamin and Guyatt, Gordon H.. 2017. Progress in evidence-based medicine: a quarter century on. The Lancet 390.10092: 415423.Google ScholarPubMed
Donald, Anna and Greenhalgh, Trisha. 2000. A Hands-On Guide to Evidence Based Health Care: Practice and Implementation. Oxford: Blackwell Science.Google Scholar
Druss, Benjamin G. and Marcus, Steven C.. 2005. Growth and decentralization of the medical literature: implications for evidence-based medicine. Journal of the Medical Library Association 93.4: 499501.Google ScholarPubMed
Else, Holly. 2020. How a torrent of COVID science changed research publishing – in seven charts. Nature 588, n.p.Google ScholarPubMed
Falk, Seb. 2020. The Light Ages: A Medieval Journey of Discovery. Milton Keynes: Allen Lane and Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Gibson. 2001. If you pop over there: a corpus-based study of conditionals in medical discourse. English for Specific Purposes 20.1: 6182.10.1016/S0889-4906(99)00027-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, Gibson. 2012. English for medical purposes. In Paltridge, Brian and Starfield, Sue (eds.), The Handbook of English for Specific Purposes. London: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 243261.Google Scholar
Fleischman, Suzanne. 2001. Language and medicine. In Schiffrin, Deborah, Tannen, Deborah and Hamilton, Heidi E. (eds.), The Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 470502.Google Scholar
Frampton, Sally and Wallis, Jennifer. 2019. Reading medicine and health in periodicals. Media History 25.1: 15.Google Scholar
French, Roger. 2003. Medicine before Science. The Business of Medicine from the Middle Ages to the Enlightenment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gaukroger, Stephen. 2006. The Emergence of a Scientific Culture: Science and the Shaping of Modernity, 1210–1685. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Gong, Heng, Le, Thi Ngoc Phuong and Buckingham, Louisa. 2025. Lexical bundles across IMRD-structured Medicine research article sections: a within-register perspective. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 74: 101487.Google Scholar
Grafton, Anthony, Shelford, April and Siraisi, Nancy. 1992. New Worlds, Ancient Texts: The Power of Tradition and Shock of Discovery. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gray, Bethany, Biber, Douglas and Hiltunen, Turo. 2011. The expression of stance in early (1665–1712) publications of the Philosophical Transactions and other contemporary medical prose: innovations in a pioneering discourse. In Taavitsainen, Irma and Pahta, Päivi (eds.), Medical Writing in Early Modern English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 221247.Google Scholar
Greenhalgh, Trisha. 2000. How to Read a Paper: The Basics of Evidence-Based Medicine. Second edition. London: BMJ.Google Scholar
Griffin, Carrie (ed.). 2013. The Middle English Wise Book of Philosophy and Astronomy: A Parallel-Text Edition. Heidelberg: Winter Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar
Hiltunen, Turo. 2010a. Philosophical Transactions. In Taavitsainen, Irma and Pahta, Päivi (eds.), Early Modern English Medical Texts: Corpus Description and Studies. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 127131.Google Scholar
Hiltunen, Turo. 2010b. Grammar and Disciplinary Culture: A Corpus-Based Study. PhD thesis, Helsinki: Department of Modern Languages, University of Helsinki. http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-10-6464-7.Google Scholar
Holbrook, Sue Ellen. 1998. Medieval scientific encyclopedia ‘renewed by goodly printing’: Wynkyn de Worde’s English De proprietatibus rerum. Early Science and Medicine 3.2: 119156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kesling, Emily. 2020. Medical Texts in Anglo-Saxon Literary Culture. Anglo-Saxon Studies 38. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer.Google Scholar
Lawn, Brian (ed.). 1979. The Prose Salernitan Questions. Edited from a Bodleian Manuscript (Auc.t. F. 3.10). London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lehto, Anu and Taavitsainen, Irma. 2019. Medical case reports in Late Modern English. In Taavitsainen, Irma and Hiltunen, Turo (eds.), Late Modern English Medical Texts: Writing Medicine in the Eighteenth Century. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 89111.Google Scholar
Leong, Elaine and Pennell, Sara. 2007. Recipe collections and the currency of medical knowledge in the early modern ‘medical marketplace’. In Jenner, Mark S. R. and Wallis, Patrick (eds.), Medicine and the Market in England and Its Colonies c. 1450–1850. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 133152.Google Scholar
Lerer, Seth. 1985. Boethius and Dialogue: Literary Method in The Consolation of Philosophy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Liuzza, R. 2012. In measure, and number, and weight: writing science. In Lees, C. (ed.), The Cambridge History of Early Medieval English Literature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 475498.Google Scholar
Luzón, Maria José and Pérez-Llantada, Carmen. 2019. Connecting traditional and new genres: trends and emerging themes. In Luzón, Maria José and Pérez-Llantada, Carmen (eds.), Science Communication on the Internet: Old Genres Meet New Genres. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 118.Google Scholar
Lysanets, Yuliia, Morokhovets, Halyna and Bieliaieva, Olena. 2017. Stylistic features of case reports as a genre of medical discourse. Journal of Medical Case Reports 11.1: n.p.Google ScholarPubMed
Maher, John. 1986. The development of English as an international language of medicine. Applied Linguistics 7.2: 206218.10.1093/applin/7.2.206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandelbrote, Scott. 2001. Footprints of the Lion: Isaac Newton at Work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Library.Google Scholar
McIntosh, Carey. 1998. The Evolution of English Prose, 1700–1800: Style, Politeness, and Print Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McVaugh, Michael R. (ed.). 1997. Guigonis de Caulhiaco (Guy de Chauliac): Inventarium sive Chirurgia Magna. Vol. I: Text. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Miller, Carolyn R. and Casper, Christian F.. 2010. Digital rhetoric and science. In Priest, Susanna Hornig (ed.), Encyclopedia of Science and Technology Communication. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, pp. 225228.Google Scholar
Minnis, Alastair J. 1979. Late-medieval discussions of compilatio and the rôle of the compilator. Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur 101.3: 385421.Google Scholar
Nichols, Marcia. 2015. Attitudes, tropes, satire: the Aristotle texts, sex, and the American woman. In Stephanson, Raymond and Wagner, Darren N. (eds.), The Secrets of Generation: Reproduction in the Long Eighteenth Century. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, pp. 417437.Google Scholar
Nwogu, Kevin Ngozi. 1997. The medical research paper: structure and functions. English for Specific Purposes 16.2: 119138.Google Scholar
Pahta, Päivi. 1998. Medieval Embryology in the Vernacular: The Case of De spermate. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Google Scholar
Pahta, Päivi and Taavitsainen, Irma. 2004. Vernacularisation of scientific and medical writing in its sociohistorical context. In Taavitsainen, Irma and Pahta, Päivi (eds.), Medical and Scientific Writing in Late Medieval English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 118.Google Scholar
Piqué-Angordans, Jordi and Posteguillo, Santiago. 2006. Medical discourse and academic genres. In Brown, Keith (ed.), Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics. Oxford: Elsevier, pp. 649657.Google Scholar
Pomata, Gianna. 2014. The medical case narrative: distant reading of an epistemic genre. Literature and Medicine 32.1: 123.10.1353/lm.2014.0010CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Porter, Roy. 1993 [1987]. Disease, Medicine and Society in England, 1550–1860. Second edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1007/978-1-349-13271-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puente-Castelo, Luis and Moskowich-Spiegel, Isabel. 2022. Writing science in urgent times: CoViD-19 and its impact on scientific writing. ICAME Journal 46: 1932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redden, Elizabeth. 2020. Rush to publish risks undermining COVID-19 research. Inside Higher Education 588: n.p.Google Scholar
Schneider, Gerold. 2022. Medical topics and style from 1500 to 2018: a corpus-driven exploration. In Hiltunen, Turo and Taavitsainen, Irma (eds.), Corpus-Pragmatic Studies on the History of English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 4978.Google Scholar
Shapin, Steven. 1996. The Scientific Revolution. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Sprat, Thomas. 2003 [1667]. The History of the Royal Society of London, for the Improving of Natural Knowledge. Whitefish, MT: Kessinger.Google Scholar
Swales, John M. 1990. Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Swales, John M. 2004. Research Genres: Explorations and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma. 2001. Middle English recipes: genre characteristics, text type features and underlying traditions of writing. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 2.1: 85113.Google Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma. 2005. Genres and the appropriation of science: loci communes in English in the late medieval and early modern period. In Skaffari, Janne, Peikola, Matti, Carroll, Ruth, Hiltunen, Risto and Wårvik, Brita (eds.), Opening Windows on Texts and Discourses of the Past. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 179196.Google Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma. 2006. Medical communication, Lingua Francas. In Brown, Keith (ed.), Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics. Oxford: Elsevier, pp. 643644.Google Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma. 2016. Genre dynamics in the history of English. In Kytö, Merja and Pahta, Päivi (eds.), Cambridge Handbook of English Historical Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 271285.Google Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma. 2018. Scholastic genre scripts in English medical writing 1375–1800. In Whitt, Richard J. (ed.), Diachronic Corpora, Genre, and Language Change. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 95115.Google Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma. 2020. Dissertations, essays, and pamphlets 1660–1800: a study on the genres. In Maci, Stefania, Sala, Michele and Spinzi, Cinzia (eds.), Communicating English in Specialised Domains: A Festschrift for Maurizio Gotti. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp. 177190.Google Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma. 2021. Scientific book reviews in the seventeenth century: early stages of the genre. In Brownlees, Nicholas (ed.), The Role of Context in the Production and Reception of Historical News Discourse. Bern: Peter Lang, pp. 245262.Google Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma. 2022. Walter Bailey’s (1529–1593) medical genres. In Taavitsainen, Irma, Hiltunen, Turo and Suhr, Carla (eds.), Medical Writing: Socio-Cultural Contexts of Production and Use, 1500–1800. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 167186.Google Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma, Jones, Peter and Hiltunen, Turo. 2019. Sociohistorical and cultural context of Late Modern English medical texts. In Taavitsainen, Irma and Hiltunen, Turo (eds.), Late Modern English Medical Texts: Writing Medicine in the Eighteenth Century. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 1730.Google Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma and Pahta, Päivi. 2000. Conventions of professional writing: the medical case report in a historical perspective. Journal of English Linguistics 28.1: 6076.Google Scholar
Vihla, Minna. 1999. Medical Writing: Modality in Focus. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Voigts, Linda Ehrsam. 1984. Medical prose. In Edwards, Anthony S. G. (ed.), Middle English Prose: A Critical Guide to Major Authors and Genres. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, pp. 315335.Google Scholar
Voigts, Linda Ehrsam. 1996. What’s the word? Bilingualism in late-medieval England. Speculum 71: 813826.Google Scholar
Voigts, Linda Ehrsam and McVaugh, Michael R.. 1984. A Latin Technical Phlebotomy and Its Middle English Translation. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society.Google Scholar
Wear, Andrew. 2000. Knowledge and Practice in English Medicine 1550–1680. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Withey, Alun. 2019. Household medicine and recipe culture in eighteenth-century Britain. In Taavitsainen, Irma and Hiltunen, Turo (eds.), Late Modern English Medical Texts: Writing Medicine in the Eighteenth Century. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 113128.Google Scholar
Wogan-Browne, Jocelyn, Watson, Nicholas, Taylor, Andrew and Evans, Ruth (eds.). 1999. The Idea of the Vernacular: An Anthology of Middle English Literary Theory, 1280–1520. Exeter: University of Exeter Press.Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: WCAG 2.0 A

Why this information is here

This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

Accessibility Information

The PDF of this book conforms to version 2.0 of the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG), ensuring core accessibility principles are addressed and meets the basic (A) level of WCAG compliance, addressing essential accessibility barriers.

Content Navigation

Table of contents navigation
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Index navigation
Provides an interactive index, letting you go straight to where a term or subject appears in the text without manual searching.

Reading Order & Textual Equivalents

Single logical reading order
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
Short alternative textual descriptions
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.

Visual Accessibility

Use of colour is not sole means of conveying information
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.

Structural and Technical Features

ARIA roles provided
You gain clarity from ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) roles and attributes, as they help assistive technologies interpret how each part of the content functions.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×