Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 September 2025
Information
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Kant on Language , pp. 295 - 312Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2025
References
Abbott, D. P. 2007: Kant, Theremin, and the Morality of Rhetoric, Philosophy and Rhetoric, 40, 3, pp. 274–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akmajian, A., Demers, R. A., Farmer, A. K., Harnish, R. M. 2001: Linguistics: An Introduction to Language and Communication, Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, H. E. 1973: Kant’s Critique of Berkeley, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 11, 1, pp. 43–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, H. E. 2001: Kant’s Theory of Taste: A Reading of the Critique of Aesthetic Judgment, Cambridge: CUP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Almond, I. 2009: History of Islam in German Thought: From Leibniz to Nietzsche, London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, E. 1994: Kant, Natural Kind Terms, and Scientific Essentialism, History of Philosophy Quarterly, 11, 4, pp. 355–373.Google Scholar
Arnauld, A., Lancelot, C. 1660: The Port-Royal Grammar: General and Rational Grammar, ed. and transl. by Rieux, J., Rollin, B. E., The Hague: Mouton, 1975.Google Scholar
Arnauld, A., Nicole, P. 1662: Logic or the Art of Thinking, ed. and transl. by Buroker, J. V., Cambridge: CUP, 2003.Google Scholar
Amman, J. C. 1700: Dissertation sur la parole, in Cours élémentaire d’éducation des sourds et muets de naissance, ed. by Deschamps, E.-F., Paris: Debure, 1779.Google Scholar
Aumann, A. 2021: Form and Content in Emily Dickinson’s Poetry, in The Poetry of Emily Dickinson, ed. by Camp, E., Oxford: OUP, pp. 109–144.Google Scholar
Bagnoli, C. 2011: Constructivism in Metaethics, in Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. by E. Zalta, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/constructivism-metaethics/.Google Scholar
Baker, D., Woods, J. 2015: How Expressivists Can and Should Explain Inconsistency, Ethics, 125, 2, pp. 391–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bar-On, D. 2004: Speaking My Mind: Expression and Self-Knowledge, Oxford: OUP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, K. G., Eschke, E. A. 1801: Über den Unterricht der Taubstummen: Anmerkungen zu Kant’s Anthropologie. Nebst einem Schreiben des Herrn J. G. C. Kiesewetter. Berlin: Braun.Google Scholar
Baumgarten, A. G. 2013: Metaphysics, transl. and ed. by Fugate, C. D., Hymers, J., London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Bayer, O. 2013: Wider die Sprachvergessenheit transzendentaler Vernunftkritik. Eine Einführung in Hamanns Metakritik über den Purismum der Vernunft, in Herders ‘Metakritik’. Analysen und Interpretationen, ed. by Heinz, M., Stuttgart: Frommann-Holzboog, pp. 65–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berkeley, G. 1891: The Works of George Berkeley, Vol. II, ed. by Fraser, A., Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Berkeley, G. 1964: The Works of George Berkeley, Bishop of Cloyne, Vol. I, ed. by Luce, A. A., Jessop, T. E., London: Thomas Nelson.Google Scholar
Black, M. 1962: Models and Metaphors: Studies in Language and Philosophy, Ithaca (NY): Cornell UP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, M. 1993: More About Metaphor, in Metaphor and Thought, ed. by Ortony, A., Cambridge: CUP, pp. 19–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackburn, S. 1998: Ruling Passions: A Theory of Practical Reasoning, Oxford: OUP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blair, H. 1838 3: Lectures on Rhetoric and Belles Lettres, New York: Robinson and Franklin.Google Scholar
Bradfield, E. 2014: Productive Excess: Aesthetic Ideas, Silence, and Community, The Journal of Aesthetic Education, 48, 2, pp. 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandom, R. B. 1994 1, 19982: Making It Explicit: Reasoning, Representing, and Discursive Commitment, Cambridge (MA): Harvard UP.Google Scholar
Brandom, R. B. 2000: Articulating Reasons: An Introduction to Inferentialism, Cambridge (MA): Harvard UP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandom, R. B. 2009: Reason in Philosophy: Animating Ideas, Cambridge (MA): Harvard UP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandom, R. B. 2015: From Empiricism to Expressivism: Brandom Reads Sellars, Cambridge (MA): Harvard UP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandom, R. B. 2019: A Spirit of Trust: A Reading of Hegel’s Phenomenology, Cambridge (MA): Harvard UP.Google Scholar
Brandt, R. 1991: Die Urteilstafel. Kritik der reinen Vernunft A 67–76; B 92–101, Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar
Bubner, R. 1982: Selbstbezüglichkeit als Struktur transzendentaler Argumente, in Kommunikation und Reflexion, ed. by Kuhlmann, W., Böhler, D., Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, pp. 304–332.Google Scholar
Brown, S. R. 2004: On the Mechanism of the Generation of Aesthetic Ideas in Kant’s Critique of Judgment, British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 12, 3, pp. 487–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruno, P. W. 2010: Kant’s Concept of Genius: Its Origin and Function in the Third Critique, London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Butts, R. E. 1988: The Grammar of Reason: Hamann’s Challenge to Kant, Synthese, 75, 2, pp. 251–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capozzi, M. 1987: Kant on Logic, Language and Thought, in Speculative Grammar, Universal Grammar and Philosophical Analysis of Language, ed. by Buzzetti, D., Ferriani, M., Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 97–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capozzi, M. 2006: Kant on Heuristics as a Desirable Addition to Logic, in Demonstrative and Non-Demonstrative Reasoning in Mathematics and Natural Science, ed. by Cellucci, C., Pecere, P., Cassino: Edizioni Università Cassino, pp. 123–181.Google Scholar
Capozzi, M. 2011a: The Cognitive Importance of Sight and Hearing in Seventeenth and Eighteenth-Century Logic, in Logic and Knowledge, ed. by Cellucci, C., Grosholz, E., Ippoliti, E., Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp. 3–25.Google Scholar
Capozzi, M. 2011b: Philosophy and Writing: The Philosophical Book According to Kant, Quaestio, 11, pp. 307–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capozzi, M. 2014: Kant, Soemmerring and the Importance of the Sense of Hearing, Lexicon Philosophicum, 2, pp. 25–40.Google Scholar
Capozzi, M. 2020: Singular Terms and Intuitions in Kant: A Reappraisal, in Kant’s Philosophy of Mathematics. Volume 1: The Critical Philosophy and Its Roots, ed. by Posy, C., Rechter, O., Cambridge: CUP, pp. 103–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capozzi, M. 2021: Why Language Matters to Kant’s Philosophy and Logic, in The Court of Reason: Proceedings of the 13th International Kant Congress, Vol. I, ed. by Himmelmann, B., Serck-Hanssen, C., Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 97–11.Google Scholar
Capozzi, M., Roncaglia, G. 2009: Logic and Philosophy of Logic from Humanism to Kant, in The Development of Modern Logic, ed. by Haaparanta, L., Oxford: OUP, pp. 78–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carruthers, M. 1998: The Craft of Thought: Meditation, Rhetoric, and the Making of Images, 400–1200, Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Cassirer, E. 1923: Philosophie der symbolischen Formen, Erster Teil. Die Sprache, (ECW XI), transl. by Lofts, S. G. [The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms. Volume 1. Language], London: Routledge, 2020. Cited as PSF I.Google Scholar
Cassirer, E. 1985: Die Sprache und der Aufbau der Gegenstandswelt (1932–1933), in Symbol, Technik, Sprache, ed. by Orth, E. W., Krois, J. M., Hamburg: Meiner, pp. 121–160.Google Scholar
Cassirer, E. 2003: Die Kantischen Elemente in Wilhelm von Humboldts Sprachphilosophie (1923), in Aufsätze und kleinere Schriften (1922–1926), ed. by Clemens, J. (ECW, XVI), Hamburg: Meiner, pp. 105–133, transl. by S. G. Lofts, The Kantian Elements in Wilhelm von Humboldt’s Philosophy of Language, in The Warburg Years (1919–1933), New Haven: Yale UP, 2013, pp. 101–129.Google Scholar
Cassirer, E. 2009: Schriften zur Philosophie der symbolischen Formen, Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar
Cassirer, E., Heidegger, M. 1929: The Davos Dispute (1929) [between Cassirer and Heidegger], in The Neo-Kantian Reader, ed. by Luft, S., London: Routledge, 2015, pp. 447–485.Google Scholar
Cazeaux, C. 2005: Kant, Cognitive Metaphor and Continental Philosophy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chrisman, M. 2016: The Meaning of “Ought”: Beyond Descriptivism and Expressivism in Metaethics, Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Cohen, A. 2009: Kant and the Human Sciences: Biology, Anthropology and History, New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Courtès, F. 1983: Deux lecteurs du jeune Kant: Ploucquet et Mendelssohn, Archives de Philosophie, 46, 2, pp. 291–321.Google Scholar
Couturat, L. 2012: The Logic of Leibniz, transl. by D. Rutherford, R. Timothy Monroe, unpublished, http://philosophyfaculty.ucsd.edu/faculty/rutherford/Leibniz/couturatcontents.php.Google Scholar
Crusius, C. A. 1747: Gewißheit und Zuverläßigkeit der menschlichen Erkenntniß, Leipzig: Gleditsch.Google Scholar
Crusius, C. A. 1766: Entwurf der nothwendigen Vernunft-Wahrheiten, Leipzig: Gleditsch.Google Scholar
Curtius, E. R. 1948: Europäische Literatur und lateinisches Mittelalter, Bern: Francke.Google Scholar
Darwall, S. 2006: The Second-Person Standpoint: Morality, Respect, and Accountability, Cambridge (MA): Harvard UP.Google Scholar
Dascal, M., Senderowitcz, Y. 1992: How Pure is Pure Reason? Language, Empircal Concepts and Empirical Laws in Kant’s Theory of Knowledge, Histoire Épistemologie Langage, 14, 2, pp. 129–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, D. 1986: A Nice Derangement of Epitaphs, in Truth and Interpretation: Perspectives on the Philosophy of Donald Davidson, ed. by Lepore, E., Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
De Bianchi, S. 2018: The Stage on Which Our Ingenious Play is Performed: Kant’s Epistemology of Weltkenntnis, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 71, pp. 58–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Brosses, C. 1777: Über Sprache und Schrift. Aus dem Französischen des Präsidenten von Brosses übersetzt, und mit Anmerkungen begleitet, von Mich. Hissmann, Leipzig: Weygand [original: Traité de la formation mécanique des langues, 1765].Google Scholar
de Condillac, E. B. 1748: Essay on the Origin of Human Knowledge, transl. by Aarsleff, H., Cambridge: CUP, 2001.Google Scholar
de Condillac, E. B. 1799–1800: Cours d’étude pour l’instruction du prince de Parme. Grammaire, Tome I, Paris: Dufart.Google Scholar
De l’Épée, C.-M. (Abbé de l’Épée) 1776: Institution des sourds et muets, Paris: Nyon l’Aîné.Google Scholar
De l’Épée, C.-M. 1784: L’art d’enseigner à parler aux sourds-muets de naissance, Paris: Dentu, 1820.Google Scholar
De l’Épée, C.-M. 1881: Controverse entre l’abbé de l’Épée et Samuel Heinicke, au sujet de la véritable manière d’instruire les sourds-muets, transl. and ed. by Alard, J., Paris: Pelluard.Google Scholar
De Souza, N. 2012: Language, Reason, and Sociability: Herder’s Critique of Rousseau, Intellectual History Review, 22, 2, pp. 221–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demmerling, C. 2021: Idle Talk (Gerede), in The Cambridge Heidegger Lexicon, ed. by Wrathall, M., Cambridge: CUP, pp. 409–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Descartes, R. 1637: Discourse and Essays, transl. by Stoothoff, R., in The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, Cambridge: CUP, 1985, pp. 109–176.Google Scholar
Descartes, R. 1641–1647: Meditations on First Philosophy, transl. by Moriarty, M., Oxford: OUP, 2008.Google Scholar
Descartes, R. 1644: Principles of Philosophy, transl. by Cottingham, J., in The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, Cambridge: CUP, 1985, pp. 177–292.Google Scholar
Di Cesare, D. 1996: Hat Kant über die Sprache geschwiegen?, in Language Philosophies and the Language Sciences, ed. by Gambarara, D., Gensini, S., Pennisi, A., Münster: Nodus, pp. 181–200.Google Scholar
Di Giovanni, G. 1985: The Facts of Consciousness, in Between Kant and Hegel: Texts in the Development of Post-Kantian Idealism, ed. by Di Giovanni, G., Harris, H. S., Albany: SUNY Press, pp. 2–50.Google Scholar
Diderot, D. 1751: Lettre sur les sourds et muets, à l’usage de ceux qui entendent et qui parlent, in Lettre sur les aveugles, ed. by Hobson, M., Harvey, S., Paris: Flammarion, 2000.Google Scholar
Dommerich, J. C. 1765: Die Mnemonik und Heuristik nach ihren ersten Zügen entworfen, Halle: Hemmerde.Google Scholar
Dreier, J. 2004: Meta-Ethics and the Problem of Creeping Minimalism, Philosophical Perspectives, 18, 1, pp. 23–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eberhard, J. A. 1787: Über Lamberts Verdienste um die theoretische Philosophie, Lambert 1787, pp. 333–346.Google Scholar
Engstrom, S. 2009: The Form of Practical Knowledge: A Study of the Categorical Imperative, Cambridge (MA): Harvard UP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engstrom, S. 2013: Constructivism and Practical Knowledge, in Constructivism in Ethics, ed. by Bagnoli, C., Cambridge: CUP, pp. 133–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Favaretti Camposampiero, M. 2018: Philosophy of Language, in Handbuch Christian Wolff, ed. by Theis, R., Aichele, A., Wiesbaden: Springer, pp. 115–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrarin, A. 2015: The Powers of Pure Reason: Kant and the Idea of Cosmic Philosophy, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Filieri, L. 2022: Kant on the Purposiveness of the Reflecting Power of Judgment, Aisthesis, 14, 2, pp. 29–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fix, J. D. 2020: The Error Condition, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 50, 1, pp. 34–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flach, W. 1982: Zu Kants Lehre von der symbolischen Darstellung, Kant-Studien, 73, 4, pp. 452–462.Google Scholar
Forgione, L. 2006: L’io nella mente. Linguaggio e autocoscienza in Kant, Roma: Bonanno.Google Scholar
Formigari, L. 1977: La logica del pensiero vivente. Il linguaggio nella filosofia della Romantik, Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
Forster, M. N. 2011: German Philosophy of Language: From Schlegel to Hegel and Beyond, Oxford: OUP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forster, M. N. 2012: Kant’s Philosophy of Language?, Tijdschrift voor Filosofie, 74, 3, pp. 485–511. Reprinted: Kant’s Philosophy of Language?, in Schalow/Velkley 2014: 81–104.Google Scholar
Forster, M. N. 2014: Kant’s Philosophy of Language? in The Linguistic Dimension of Kant’s Thought, ed. by Schalow, Frank, Velkley, Richard, Evanston (IL): Northwestern UP, pp. 81–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forster, M. N. 2026: Skepticism About Logic in Germany at the Turn of the Nineteenth Century, in The Palgrave Handbook of German Idealism and Analytic Philosophy, ed. by Conant, J., Held, J., Cham: Palgrave-Macmillan.Google Scholar
Freitag, W., Kraus, K. 2022: An Expressivist Interpretation of Kant’s ‘I Think’, Noûs, 56, 1, pp. 110–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frost, K. 2014: On the Very Idea of Direction of Fit, Philosophical Review, 123, 4, pp. 429–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fugate, C. D. 2014: The Teleology of Reason: A Study of the Structure of Kant’s Critical Philosophy, Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garsten, B. 2006: Saving Persuasion: A Defense of Rhetoric and Judgment. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gasché, R. 1990: Some Reflections on the Notion of Hypotyposis in Kant, Argumentation, 4, 1, pp. 85–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gehrke, P. J. 2002: Turning Kant Against the Priority of Autonomy: Communication Ethics and the Duty to Community, Philosophy & Rhetoric, 35, 1, pp. 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Germana, N. 2017: The Colossal and Grotesque: The Aesthetics of German Orientalism in Kant and Hegel, in Gendered Encounters between Germany and Asia, ed. by Cho, J., McGetchin, D., Cham: Palgrave-Macmillan, pp. 23–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gessinger, J. 1994: Auge und Ohr. Studien zur Erforschung der Sprache am Menschen, 1700−1850, Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbard, A. 1990: Wise Choices, Apt Feelings: A Theory of Normative Judgment, Cambridge (MA): Harvard UP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbard, A. 1999: Morality as Consistency in Living: Korsgaard’s Kantian Lectures, Ethics, 110, 1, pp. 140–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, J. 2011: The Question of Poetic Meaning, nonsite.org, 4, https://nonsite.org/the-question-of-poetic-meaning/#.Google Scholar
Goetschel, W. 1994: Constituting Critique: Kant’s Writing as Critical Praxis, transl. by Schwab, E., Durham: Duke UP.Google Scholar
Graf, M. 1829: Johann Heinrich Lambert’s Leben, in Johann Heinrich Lambert nach seinem Leben und Wirken, ed. by Huber, D., Basel: Schweighauser, pp. 1–66.Google Scholar
Grice, H. P., Strawson, P. F. 1956: In Defense of a Dogma, The Philosophical Review, 65, 2, pp. 141–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, P. 1990: Reason and Reflective Judgment: Kant on the Significance of Systematicity, Noûs, 24, 1, pp. 17–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, P. 1994: Kant’s Conception of Fine Art, The Journal of Aesthetic and Art Criticism, 52, 3, pp. 275–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, P. 2003: Beauty, Freedom and Morality: Kant’s Lectures on Anthropology and the Development of His Aesthetic Theory, in Essays on Kant’s Anthropology, ed. by Jacobs, B., Kain, P., Cambridge: CUP, pp. 135–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, P. 2005: Values of Beauty: Historical Essays in Aesthetics, Cambridge: CUP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haase, M. 2009: The Laws of Thought and the Power of Thinking, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 35, S1, pp. 249–297.Google Scholar
Hanich, J. 2017: Audience Effect: On the Collective Cinema Experience, Edinburgh: Edinburgh UP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hare, R. M. 1999: Objective Prescriptions: And Other Essays, Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harfouch, J. 2017: Does Leibniz Have Any Place in a History of Racism?, Philosophy Today, 61, 3, pp. 737–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. 1970: Werke in zwanzig Bänden, ed. by Moldenhauer, E., Michel, K. M., Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Heinicke, S. 1778: Beobachtungen über Stumme, und über die menschliche Sprache, in Briefen, Hamburg: Herold.Google Scholar
Henrich, D. 1989: Kant’s Notion of a Deduction and the Methodological Background of the First Critique, in Kant’s Transcendental Deductions, ed. by Förster, E., Stanford: Stanford UP, pp. 29–46.Google Scholar
Henrich, D. 2003: Between Kant and Hegel: Lectures on German Idealism, ed. by Pacini, D. S., Cambridge (MA): Harvard UP.Google Scholar
Herder, J. G. 2004: Philosophical Writings, transl. and ed. by Forster, M. N., Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Hohenegger, H. 2004: Kant, filosofo dell’architettonica: Saggio sulla Critica della facoltà di giudizio, Macerata: Quodlibet.Google Scholar
Höffe, O. 2000: La raison kantienne est-elle républicaine? Essai de lecture politique de la Critique de la raison pure, in Kant actuel. Hommage à Pierre Laberge, ed. by Duchesneau, F., Lafrance, G., Piché, C., Montréal: Bellarmin, pp. 201–214.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, A. F. 1737: Vernunft-Lehre, darinnen die Kennzeichen der Wahren und Falschen aus den Gesetzen des menschlichen Verstandes hergeleitet werden, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Hogan, P. C. 2016: Beauty and Sublimity: A Cognitive Aesthetics of Literature and the Arts, Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Hogrebe, W. 1974: Kant und das Problem einer Tranzscendental Semantik, Freiburg: Alber.Google Scholar
Hsia, A. 2001: The Far East as the Philosophers’ ‘Other’: Immanuel Kant and Johann Gottfried Herder, Revue de Littérature Comparée, 297, pp. 13–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulshof, M., Rancan de Azevedo Marques, U. 2018: Linguagem em Kant, a linguagem de Kant, Marília: Oficina Universitária-Cultura Acadêmica.Google Scholar
Hume, D. 1748: An Enquiry concerning Human Understanding, ed. by Flew, A., La Salle (IL): Open Court, 1988.Google Scholar
Hussain, N. J. Z., Shah, N. 2006: Misunderstanding Metaethics: Korsgaard’s Rejection of Realism, Oxford Studies in Metaethics, 1, pp. 265–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jäger, L. 2009: Das Schreibende Bewusstsein. Transkriptivität und Hypotypose in Kants ‘Andeutungen zur Sprache’, in Philosophie der Schrift, ed. by Birk, E., Schneider, J. G., Tübingen: Niemeyer, pp. 97–123.Google Scholar
Jankowiak, T. 2014: Sensations as Representations in Kant, British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 22, 3, pp. 492–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jankowiak, T., Watkins, E. 2014: Meat on the Bones: Kant’s Account of Cognition in the Anthropology Lectures, in Kant’s Anthropology Lectures: A Critical Guide, ed. by Cohen, A., Cambridge: CUP, pp. 57–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, G. R. 1996: Kant on Swedenborg in the Lectures on Metaphysics: The 1760s and 1770s, Studia Swedenborgiana, 11, 1, pp. 1–38.Google Scholar
Johnson, G. R. 1997: Kant on Swedenborg in the Lectures on Metaphysics: The 1780s and 1790s, Studia Swedenborgiana, 11, 2, pp. 1–26.Google Scholar
Kaitaro, T. 2022: Language, Culture and Cognition from Descartes to Lewes, Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, I. 1998: Logik-Vorlesung. Unveröffentlichte Nachschriften, ed. by Pinder, T., Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar
Kemal, S. 1997: Kant’s Aesthetic Theory: An Introduction, London: Palgrave-Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleingeld, P. 1998: The Conative Character of Reason in Kant’s Philosophy, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 36, 1, pp. 77–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleingeld, P. 2018: Moral Autonomy as Political Analogy: Self-Legislation in Kant’s Groundwork and the Feyerabend Lectures on Natural Law, in The Emergence of Autonomy in Kant’s Moral Philosophy, ed. by Bacin, S., Sensen, O., Cambridge: CUP, pp. 158–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Konersmann, R. 2007: Wörterbuch der philosophischen Metaphern, Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Korsgaard, C. M. 2003: Realism and Constructivism in Twentieth-Century Moral Philosophy, Journal of Philosophical Research, 28, Supplement, pp. 99–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korsgaard, C. M. 2009: Self-Constitution: Agency, Identity, and Integrity, Oxford: OUP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kremm, D., Schafer, K. 2017: Metaethical Quietism, in The Routledge Handbook of Metaethics, ed. by McPherson, T., Plunkett, D., London: Routledge, pp. 643–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuplen, M. 2019: Cognitive Interpretation of Kant’s Theory of Aesthetic Ideas, Estetika, 56, 1, pp. 48–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuplen, M. 2021: Reflective and Non-Reflective Aesthetic Ideas in Kant’s Theory of Art, British Journal of Aesthetics, 61, 1, pp. 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lach, D. 1945: Leibniz and China, Journal of the History of Ideas, 6, 4, pp. 436–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamacchia, A. 1972: Sprachphilosophische Erwägungen zur Funktion von Signum und Symbolum in Kants Kritischer Philosophie, in Proceedings of the Third International Kant Congress, ed. by White, L. W., Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 376–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamarque, P. 2009a: The Elusiveness of Poetic Meaning, Ratio, 22, 4, pp. 398–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamarque, P. 2009b: Poetry and Abstract Thought, Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 33, 1, pp. 37–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamarque, P. 2015: Semantic Finegrainedness and Poetic Value, in The Philosophy of Poetry, ed. by Gibson, J., Oxford: OUP, pp. 18–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambert, J. H. 1764: Neues Organon oder Gedanken über die Erforschung und Bezeichnung des Wahren und der Unterscheidung von Irrtum und Schein, Leipzig: Wendler.Google Scholar
Lambert, J. H. 1768: De Topicis Schediasma, Nova Acta Eruditorum, 18, pp. 12–33, in Lambert 1787: 269–294.Google Scholar
Lambert, J. H. 1782a: Deutscher gelehrter Briefwechsel, Bd. I, Berlin: Bey dem Herausgeber.Google Scholar
Lambert, J. H. 1782b: Logische und philosophische Abhandlungen, Bd. I, Berlin: Bey dem Herausgeber.Google Scholar
Lambert, J. H. 1787: Logische und philosophische Abhandlungen, Bd. II, Berlin: Bey dem Herausgeber.Google Scholar
Lamm, M. 2000: Emanuel Swedenborg: The Development of His Thought, transl. by Spiers, T., Hallengren, A., West Chester (PA): Swedenborg Foundation.Google Scholar
Land, T. 2011: Kantian Conceptualism, in Rethinking Epistemology, Vol. I, ed. by Abel, G., Conant, J., Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 197–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lanier Anderson, R. 2015: The Poverty of Conceptual Truth: Kant’s Analytic/Synthetic Distinction and the Limits of Metaphysics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
La Rocca, C. 1999, 20222: Esistenza e Giudizio. Linguaggio e ontologia in Kant, Pisa: ETS.Google Scholar
La Rocca, C. 2001: Giudizi provvisori. Sulla logica euristica del processo conoscitivo in Kant, in Materiali per un lessico della ragione, Vol. I, ed. by Barale, M., Pisa: ETS, pp. 287–332.Google Scholar
La Rocca, C. 2004: How Are Synthetic a Posteriori Judgments Possible? The Conditions and Process of Empirical Knowledge in Kant, Quaestio, 4, pp. 265–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
La Rocca, C. 2013: La formazione dei concetti in Kant. A proposito della lettura di Alberto Vanzo, Studi Kantiani, 26, pp. 137–146.Google Scholar
Lavin, D. 2004: Practical Reason and the Possibility of Error, Ethics, 114, 3, pp. 424–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leeten, L. 2019: Kant and the Problem of ‘True Eloquence’, Rhetorica, 37, 1, pp. 60–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leibniz, G. W. 1704: New Essays on Human Understanding, transl. by Remanant, P., Bennett, J., Cambridge: CUP, 1996.Google Scholar
Leibniz, G. W. 1956: Philosophical Papers and Letters, transl. and ed. by Loemker, L. E., Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Leibniz, G. W. 1989: Meditations on Knowledge, Truth, and Ideas [1684], in Philosophical Essays, ed. and transl. by Ariew, R., Garber, D., Indianapolis: Hackett, pp. 23–27.Google Scholar
Leibniz, G. W. 1999: Modus examinandi consequentias per numeros [1679], in Sämtliche Schriften und Briefe, Philosophische Schriften, Bd. IV, ed. by Schepers, H., Schneider, M., Biller, G., Franke, U., Kliege-Biller, H., Berlin: Akademie Verlag, pp. 228–235.Google Scholar
Leibniz, G. W. 2007: The Leibniz-Des Bosses Correspondence, transl. and ed. by Look, B. C., Rutherford, D., New Haven: Yale UP.Google Scholar
Leighton, A. 2009: About About: On Poetry and Paraphrase, Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 33, 1, pp. 167–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leighton, A. 2015: Poetry’s Knowing: So What Do We Know?, in The Philosophy of Poetry, ed. by Gibson, J., Oxford: OUP, pp. 162–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenoir, T. 2006: Operationalizing Kant: Manifolds, Models, and Mathematics in Helmholtz’s Theories of Perception, in The Kantian Legacy in Nineteenth-Century Science, ed. by Friedman, M., Nordmann, A., Cambridge (MA): MIT Press, pp. 141–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leserre, D. 2001: Kritik der reinen Vernunft B 140: Ein Hinweis auf die kritische Perspective der Sprache, in Kant und die Berliner Aufklärung. Akten des IX. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses, Bd. II, ed. by Gerhardt, V., Horstmann, R.-P., Schumacher, R., Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 381–389.Google Scholar
Leserre, D. 2019: Argumentos kantianos en filosofía del lenguaje, Buenos Aires: Teseo.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lifschitz, A. 2012: Language and Enlightenment: The Berlin Debates of the Eighteenth Century, Oxford: OUP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locke, J. 1690: An Essay on Human Understanding, ed. by Nidditch, P. H., Oxford: OUP, 1979.Google Scholar
Longuenesse, B. 2006: Kant on A Priori Concepts: The Metaphysical Deduction of the Categories, in The Cambridge Companion to Kant and Modern Philosophy, ed. by Guyer, P., Cambridge: CUP, pp. 129–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Louden, R. 2000: Kant’s Impure Ethics: From Rational Beings to Human Beings, Oxford: OUP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lu-Adler, H. 2022a: Kant on Lazy Savagery, Racialized, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 60, 2, pp. 253–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lu-Adler, H. 2022b: Kant and Slavery – Or Why He Never Became a Racial Egalitarian, Critical Philosophy of Race, 10, 2, pp. 263–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lu-Adler, H. 2023: Kant on Language and the (Self-)Development of Reason, Kant Yearbook, 15, 1, pp. 109–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucy, Allais: Manifest Reality: Kant’s Idealism and His Realism, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Luft, Sebastian: The Space of Culture: Towards a Neo-Kantian Philosophy of Culture (Cohen, Natorp, and Cassirer), Oxford University Press, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lütterfelds, W. 2004: Kant in der gegenwärtigen Sprachphilosophie, in Warum Kant heute?, ed. by Heidemann, D., Engelhart, K., Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 150–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manchester, P. 2003: Kant’s Conception of Architectonic in Its Historical Context, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 41, 2, pp. 187–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manchester, P. 2008: Kant’s Conception of Architectonic in Its Philosophical Context, Kant-Studien, 99, 2, pp. 133–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, C. 2022: Kant’s Derivation of the Moral ‘Ought’ from a Metaphysical ‘Is’, in The Sensible and Intelligible Worlds, ed. by Schafer, K., Stang, N., Oxford: OUP, pp. 382–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martinengo, A. 2017: La metafora: una sfida per l’ermeneutica filosofica, Estetica. Studi e ricerche, 7, 1, pp. 73–88.Google Scholar
Marwah, I. 2022: White Progress: Kant, Race and Teleology, Kantian Review, 27, 4, pp. 615–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matherne, S. 2013: The Inclusive Interpretation of Kant’s Aesthetic Ideas, The British Journal of Aesthetics, 53, 1, pp. 21–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matherne, S. 2019: Kant on Aesthetic Autonomy and Common Sense, Philosophers’ Imprint, 19, 24, pp. 1–22.Google Scholar
McMahon, J. A. 2017: Immediate Judgment and Non-Cognitive Ideas: The Pervasive and Persistent in the Misreading of Kant’s Aesthetic Formalism, in The Palgrave Kant Handbook, ed. by Altman, M. C., London: Palgrave-Macmillan, pp. 425–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McPherson, T. 2021: Expressivism Without Minimalism, in Meaning, Decision and Norms: Themes from the Work of Allan Gibbard, ed. by Dunaway, B., Plunkett, D., Ann Arbor (MI): Maize Books, pp. 147–170.Google Scholar
Meier, G. F. 1749: Anfangsgründe aller schönen Wissenschaften. Zweyter Theil, Halle: Hemmerde.Google Scholar
Meier, G. F. 1752: Auszug aus der Vernunftlehre, Halle: Gebauer (reproduced in AA 16).Google Scholar
Meier-Oeser, S. 2013: Kant’s Transformation of the Symbol-Concept, in Symbol and Intuition. Comparative Studies in Kantian and Romantic-Period Aesthetics, ed. by Hühn, H., Vigus, J., London: Routledge, pp. 21–43.Google Scholar
Meiner, J. W. 1781: Versuch einer an der menschlischen Spache abgebildeten Vernuftlehre, Stuttgart: Frommann-Holzboog, 1971.Google Scholar
Mensch, J. 2013: Kant’s Organicism. Epigenesis and the Development of Critical Philosophy, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meo, O. 2004: “Un’arte celata nel profondo”. Gli aspetti semiotici del pensiero di Kant, Genova: Melangolo.Google Scholar
Michaelis, J. D. 1762: De l’influence des opinions sur le langage et du langage sur les opinions, dissertation qui a remporté le prix de l’Académie royale des sciences et belles lettres de Prusse, en 1759, par M. Michaëlis, Traduit de l’allemand par de Mérian et de Prémontval, Bremen: Förster.Google Scholar
Møller, S. 2020: Kant’s Tribunal of Reason: Legal Metaphor and Normativity in the Critique of Pure Reason, Cambridge: CUP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mosser, K. 2001: Why Doesn’t Kant Care About Natural Language?, Dialogue, 40, 1, pp. 25–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mosser, K. 2008: The Grammatical Background of Kant’s General Logic, Kantian Review, 13, 1, pp. 116–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munzel, F. G. 1999: Kant’s Conception of Moral Character: The ‘Critical’ Link of Morality, Anthropology, and Reflective Judgment, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, F. W. 1873: Über Wahrheit und Lüge in aussermoralischen Sinne, in Kritische Studienausgabe, Bd. I, ed. by Colli, G., Montinari, M., Berlin: De Gruyter, 1967–1977, pp. 873–890, transl. by W. Kaufmann, in The Portable Nietzsche, New York: Penguin, 1977.Google Scholar
Nuchelmans, G. 1983: Judgment and Proposition. From Descartes to Kant, Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
Nunez, T. 2019: Logical Mistakes, Logical Aliens, and the Laws of Kant’s Pure General Logic, Mind, 128, 512, pp. 1149–1180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nuyen, A. T. 1989: The Kantian Theory of Metaphor, Philosophy & Rhetoric, 22, 2, pp. 95–109.Google Scholar
Nuzzo, A. 2013: Imaginative Sensibility Understanding, Sensibility, and Imagination in the Critique of Pure Reason, in Imagination in Kant’s Critical Philosophy, ed. by Thompson, M., Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 19–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Neill, O. 1990: Reason and Politics in the Kantian Enterprise, in Constructions of Reason: Explorations of Kant’s Practical Philosophy, Cambridge: CUP, pp. 3–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ong, W. J. 1958: Ramus, Method, and the Decay of Dialogue: From the Art of Discourse to the Art of Reason, Cambridge (MA): Harvard UP.Google Scholar
Ostaric, L. 2006: Between Insight and Judgment: Kant’s Conception of Genius and Its Fate in Early Schelling, Doctoral Thesis.Google Scholar
Ostaric, L. 2010: Works of Genius as Sensible Exhibitions of the Idea of the Highest Good, Kant-Studien, 101, 1, pp. 22–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oz-Salzberger, F. 1995: Translating the Enlightenment: Scottish Civic Discourse in Eighteenth-Century Germany, Oxford: OUP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmquist, S. R. 1993: Kant’s System of Perspectives: An Architectonic Interpretation of the Critical Philosophy, Lanham (NY): University Press of America.Google Scholar
Paltrinieri, G. 2009: Kant e il linguaggio. Autocritica e immaginazione, Venezia: Cafoscarina.Google Scholar
Park, P. 2013: Africa, Asia, and the History of Philosophy: Racism in the Formation of the Philosophical Canon, 1780–1830, Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Patton, L. 2018: Hermann von Helmholtz, in Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/hermann-helmholtz/Google Scholar
Perconti, P. 1999: Kantian Linguistics: Theories of Mental Representation and the Linguistic Transformation of Kantism, Münster: Nodus.Google Scholar
Piché, C. 1997: La Métaphore de la guerre et du tribunal dans la philosophie critique, in L’Année 1795. Kant. Essai sur la Paix, sous la dir. de P. Laberge, G. Lafrance, D. Dumas, Paris: Vrin, pp. 389–401.Google Scholar
Pietsch, L.-H. 2010: Topik der Kritik: die Auseinandersetzung um die Kantische Philosophie (1781–1788) und ihre Metaphern, Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pillow, K. 2001: Jupiter’s Eagle and the Despot’s Hand Mill: Two Views on Metaphor in Kant, The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 59, 2, pp. 193–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pillow, K. 2006: Understanding Aestheticized, in Aesthetics and Cognition in Kant’s Critical Philosophy, ed. by Kukla, R., Cambridge: CUP, pp. 245–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ploucquet, G. 1763: Observationes ad Commentationem Dni. Imanuelis Kant de uno possibli fundamento Demonstr. Exist. Dei die von dem einzig möglichen Beweisgrund zu einer Demonstr. des Daseyns Gottes, Tübingen: Schramm.Google Scholar
Ploucquet, G. 1765: Untersuchung und Abänderung der logikalischen Constructionen des Herrn. Professor Lambert, nebst einigen Anmerkungen über den logikalischen Calcul. Tübingen: Cotta.Google Scholar
Ploucquet, G. 1772: Institutiones philosophiae theoreticae, sive de arte cogitandi notionibus rerum fundamentalibus, Deo, universo, et speciatim de homine, Tübingen.Google Scholar
Ploucquet, G. 1778: Elementa philosophiae contemplativae, sive de scientia ratiocinandi notionibus disciplinarum fundamentalibus: Deo, universo et speciatim de homine, Stuttgart: Mezler.Google Scholar
Pollok, K. 2011: Reflexion und Untersuchung in Kants Logischem Expressivismus, in Robert Brandom’s Expressive Vernunft, ed. by Sturm, H., Barth, C., Paderborn: Mentis, pp. 117–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollok, K. 2017: Kant’s Theory of Normativity. Exploring the Space of Reason, Cambridge: CUP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, H. n.d.: From Non-Cognitivism to Global Expressivism: Carnap’s Unfinished Journey?, in Carnap Handbuch, ed. by C. Dambock, G. Schiemer, Stuttgart: Metzler.Google Scholar
Price, H., Blackburn, S., Brandom, R., Horwich, P., Williams, M. 2013: Expressivism, Pragmatism and Representationalism, Cambridge: CUP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reusch, J. P. 1750: Systema logicum antiquorum atque recentiorum item propria praecepta exhibens. Editio tertia, Jena: Croecker.Google Scholar
Ribeiro, A. 2009: Toward a Philosophy of Poetry, Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 33, 1, pp. 61–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ribeiro, A. 2014: Heavenly Hurt: The Joy and Value of Sad Poetry, in Suffering Art Gladly. The Paradox of Negative Emotion in Art, ed. by Levinson, J., New York: Palgrave-Macmillan, pp. 186–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ricoeur, P. 1975: La métaphore vive, Paris: Seuil, transl. by R. Czerny, The Rule of Metaphor, Toronto: The University of Toronto Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Ridge, M. 2006: Ecumenical Expressivism: Finessing Frege, Ethics, 116, 2, pp. 302–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogerson, K. 2008: The Problem of Free Harmony in Kant’s Aesthetics, Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Rosefeldt, T. 2019: Kant Über Sollen Als Wollen, in Natur und Freiheit: Akten des XII. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses, Bd. I, ed. by Waibel, V. L., Ruffing, M., Wagner, D., Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 265–288.Google Scholar
Rousseau, J.-J. 2017: The Discourses and Other Early Political Writings, transl. and ed. by Gourevitch, V., Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Sabourin, C. 2014: L’analogie juridique dans la Critique de la raison pure, Université de Montréal.Google Scholar
Salami, M. 2020: Sensuous Knowledge: A Black Feminist Approach for Everyone, London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Sassen, B. 2003: Artistic Genius and the Question of Creativity, in Kant’s Critique of the Power of Judgment. Critical Essays, ed. by Guyer, P., Lanham (MD): Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 171–179.Google Scholar
Sayre-McCord, G. 2008: Hume on Practical Morality and Inert Reason, Oxford Studies in Metaethics, 3, pp. 299–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schafer, K. 2014: Constructivism and Three Forms of Perspective-Dependence in Metaethics, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 89, 1, pp. 68–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schafer, K. 2019: Kant: Constitutivism as Capacities-First Philosophy, Philosophical Explorations, 22, 2, pp. 177–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schafer, K. 2023: Kant’s Reason: The Unity of Reason and the Limits of Comprehension in Kant’s Philosophy. Oxford: OUP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schalow, F., Velkley, R. 2014: The Linguistic Dimension of Kant’s Thought: Historical and Critical Essays, Evanston: Northwestern UP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlapp, O. 1901: Kants Lehre vom Genie und die Entstehung der “Kritik der Urteilskraft”, Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Schönecker, D. 2006: How Is a Categorical Imperative Possible?, in Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals, ed. by Schönecker, D., Horn, C., Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 301–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schreiter, K. G. 1788: Vorselungen über Rhetorik und schöne Wissenschaften, Bd. III, Leipzig: Siegert.Google Scholar
Schroeder, M. 2008: Being For: Evaluating the Semantic Program of Expressivism, Oxford: OUP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schroeder, M. 2009: Hybrid Expressivism: Virtues and Vices, Ethics, 119, 2, pp. 257–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schubbach, A. 2021: The Genesis of the Symbolic: On the Beginnings of Ernst Cassirer’s Philosophy of Culture, transl. by Hobbs, D. J., Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Senderowicz, Y., Dascal, M. 1997: Language and Reason in Kant’s Epistemology, Histoire Épistémologie Langage, 19, 1, pp. 135–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sensen, O. 2017: Kant’s Constitutivism, in Realism and Antirealism in Kant’s Moral Philosophy: New Essays, ed. by Schmidt, E. E., dos Santos, R., Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 197–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shell, S. M. 2006: Kant’s Conception of a Human Race, in The German Invention of Race, ed. by Eigen, Sara, Larrimore, Mark, Albany: SUNY Press, pp. 55–72.Google Scholar
Shell, S. M. 2022: The Politics of Beauty: A Study of Kant’s Critique of Taste, Cambridge: CUP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silk, A. 2015: How to Be an Ethical Expressivist, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 91, 1, pp. 47–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simecek, K. 2019: Cultivating Intimacy: The Use of the Second Person in Lyric Poetry, Philosophy and Literature, 43, 2, pp. 501–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simecek, K. 2021: Listen to Me! The Moral Value of the Poetry Performance Space, in English Spoken Word in the UK, ed. by English, L., McGowan, J., London: Routledge, pp. 497–513.Google Scholar
Smit, H. 2000: Kant on Marks and the Immediacy of Intuition, The Philosophical Review, 109, 2, pp. 235–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smit, H. 2009: Kant on Apriority and the Spontaneity of Cognition, in Metaphysics and the Good: Themes from the Philosophy of Robert Merrihew Adams, ed. by Newlands, S., Jorgensen, L. M., Oxford: OUP, pp. 188–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sommerlatte, C. 2018: Erkenntnis in Kant’s Logical Works, Natur und Freiheit: Akten des XII. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses, Bd. II, ed. by Waibel, V. L., Ruffing, M., Wagner, D., Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 1413–1420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Speaks, J. 2019: Theories of Meaning, in Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/meaning/.Google Scholar
Stark, W. 2011: Kant’s Lectures on ‘Physical Geography’: A Brief Outline of Its Origins, Transmissions, and Development: 1754–1805, transl. by Reinhardt, O., in Reading Kant’s Geography, ed. by Elden, S., Mendieta, E., Albany: SUNY Press, pp. 69–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinthal, H. 1855: Grammatik, Logik und Psychologie. Ihre Principien und ihr Verhältniss zu einender, Berlin: Dümmler.Google Scholar
Stephenson, A. 2015: Kant on the Object-Dependence of Intuition and Hallucination, Philosophical Quarterly, 65, 260, pp. 486–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoner, S. 2017: Kant on the Power and Limits of Pathos: Toward a ‘Critique of Poetic Rhetoric’, Philosophy & Rhetoric, 50, 1, pp. 73–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stroud, S. R. 2011: Kant on Education and the Rhetorical Force of the Example, Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 41, 5, pp. 416–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stroud, S. R. 2014: Kant and the Promise of Rhetoric, University Park (PA): Pennsylvania State UP.Google Scholar
Stroud, S. R. 2015: The Vital Role of Religious Activity and Community in Kant’s Rhetoric, Journal of Communication and Religion, 38, 1, pp. 5–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stroud, S. R. 2016: Style and Spirit in Dreams of a Spirit-Seer: Swedenborg and the Origin of Kant’s Critical Rhetoric, CR: The New Centennial Review, 16, 3, pp. 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Süßmilch, J. P. 1766: Versuch eines Bewieses, daß die erste Sprache ihren Ursprung nicht vom Menschen, sondern allein vom Schöpfer erhalten habe, Berlin.Google Scholar
Sweet, K. 2019: Review of The Linguistic Dimension of Kant’s Thought: Historical and Critical Essays, ed. by Schalow, F., Velkley, R., Evanston: Northwestern UP, 2014, Kantian Review, 24, pp. 153–157.Google Scholar
Tarbet, D. W. 1968: The Fabric of Metaphor in Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 6, pp. 257–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, C. 2016: The Language Animal: The Full Shape of the Human Linguistic Capacity, Cambridge (MA): Harvard UP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tenenbaum, S. 2019: Formalism and Constitutivism in Kantian Practical Philosophy, Philosophical Explorations, 22, 2, pp. 163–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tetens, J. N. 2022: Writings on Method, Language, and Anthropology, London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Thielke, P. 2006: Fate and the Fortune of the Categories, Inquiry, 49, 5, pp. 438–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thielke, P. 2021: Judgments of Experience and the Grammar of Thought, in Kant’s Prolegomena: A Critical Guide, ed. by Thielke, P., Cambridge: CUP, pp. 92–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tolley, C. 2014: Kant on the Content of Cognition, European Journal of Philosophy, 22, 2, pp. 200–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tolley, C. 2019: Kant on the Role of the Imagination (and Images) in the Transition from Intuition to Experience, in Imagination in German Idealism and Romanticism, ed. by Pollok, K., Gentry, G., Cambridge: CUP, pp. 27–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tolley, C. 2020: Kant on the Place of Cognition in the Progression of Representations, Synthese, 197, pp. 3215–3244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tolley, C. 2022: Kant’s Appearances as Object-Dependent Senses, in The Sensible and Intelligible Worlds, ed. by Stang, N., Schafer, K., Oxford: OUP, pp. 217–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tonelli, G. 1966: Kant’s Early Theory of Genius, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 4, 2, pp. 109–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tracz, B. 2018: Helmholtz on Perceptual Properties, Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy, 6, 3, pp. 63–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tracz, B. 2019: Imagination and the Distinction between Image and Intuition in Kant, Ergo, 6, 38, pp. 1087–1120.Google Scholar
Twain, M. 2006: The Complete Interviews, ed. by Scharnhorst, G., Tuscaloosa (AL): University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Van der Zande, J. 1995: In the Image of Cicero: German Philosophy between Wolff and Kant, Journal of the History of Ideas, 56, 3, pp. 419–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van der Zande, J. 1998: The Microscope of Experience: Christian Garve’s Translation of Cicero’s De Officiis (1783), Journal of the History of Ideas, 59, 1, pp. 75–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Roojen, M. S. 2015: Metaethics: A Contemporary Introduction, London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vidmar Jovanović, I. 2017: The Portrait of an Artist as a Gifted Man; What Lies in the Mind of a Genius?, Proceedings of the European Society for Aesthetics, 9, pp. 591–614.Google Scholar
Vidmar Jovanović, I. 2020a: Kant on Poetry and Cognition, The Journal of Aesthetic Education, 54, 1, pp. 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vidmar Jovanović, I. 2020b: A New Look at Kant’s Genius: A Proposal of a Multicomponential Account, Con-Textos Kantianos, 1, 12, pp. 248–269.Google Scholar
von Humboldt, W. 1988: On Language: The Diversity of Human Language-Structure and Its Influence on the Mental Development of Mankind, transl. by P. Heath, with an Introduction by H. Aarsleff, Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Watkins, E., Willaschek, M. 2017: Kant’s Account of Cognition, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 55, 1, pp. 83–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waxman, W. 2005: Kant and the Empiricists: Understanding Understanding, Oxford: OUP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiß, H. 1992: Universalgrammatiken aus der ersten Hälfte des 18. Jahrhunderts in Deutschland, Münster: Nodus.Google Scholar
Westra, A. 2009: La Critique de la raison pure, une œuvre inachevée, Université de Montréal.Google Scholar
Westra, A. 2015: Kritik ist Pflicht: La dimension éthique de la Critique de la raison pure, in Kant – La raison pratique: concepts et héritages, ed. by Grapotte, S., Ruffing, M., Terra, R., Paris: Vrin, pp. 263–274.Google Scholar
Westra, A. 2016: The Typic in Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason: Moral Judgment and Symbolic Representation, Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wicks, R. 2004: Routledge Philosophy Guidebook to Kant on Judgment, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wilson, C. 2014: Kant on Civilization, Culture and Moralisation, in Kant’s Lectures on Anthropology: A Critical Guide, ed. by Cohen, Alix, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 191–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolff, C. 1720: Vernünfftige Gedancken von Gott, der Welt und der Seele des Menschen, auch allen Dingen überhaupt. Halle: Renger.Google Scholar
Wolff, C. 1732a: Philosophia rationalis sive logica. Editio altera emendatior, Frankfurt am Main: Renger.Google Scholar
Wolff, C. 1732b: Psychologia empirica methodo scientifica pertractata, Frankfurt am Main: Renger.Google Scholar
Wolff, C. 1736: Philosophia prima, sive ontologia, editio nova, Frankfurt am Main: Renger.Google Scholar
Wolff, C. 1740: Psychologia rationalis methodo scientifica pertractata. Editio nova priori emendatior, Frankfurt am Main: Renger.Google Scholar
Wolff, C. 1749: Vernünfftige Gedancken von den Kräfften des Menschlichen Verstandes und ihrem richtigen Gebrauche in Erkäntniß der Wahrheit. Neue Auflage, Halle: Renger.Google Scholar
Wolff, C. 2005: Erste Philosophie oder Ontologie, transl. and ed. by Effertz, D., Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar
Wolff, M. 1995: Die Vollständigkeit der kantischen Urteilstafel: mit einem Essay über Freges Begriffsschrift, Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfson, H. A. 1964: The Philosophy of the Church Fathers, Cambridge (MA): Harvard UP.Google Scholar
Yab, J. 2021: Kant and the Politics of Racism: Toward Kant’s Racialised Form of Cosmopolitan Right, Cham: Palgrave-Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ypi, L. 2011: Practical Agency, Teleology and System in Kant’s Architectonic of Pure Reason, in Politics and Metaphysics in Kant, ed. by Baiasu, S., Pihlström, S., Williams, H., Cardiff: The University of Wales Press, pp. 134–152.Google Scholar
Ypi, L. 2021: The Architectonic of Reason: Teleology and Systematic Unity in Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason, Oxford: OUP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zammito, J. 1992: The Genesis of Kant’s Critique of Judgment, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Zammito, J. 2014: What a Young Man Needs for His Venture Into the World: The Function and Evolution of the ‘Characteristics’, in Kant’s Lectures on Anthropology: A Critical Guide, ed. by Cohen, A., Cambridge: CUP, pp. 230–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuidervaart, L. 2003: Aesthetic Ideas and the Role of Art in Kant’s Ethical Hermeneutics, in Kant’s Critique of the Power of Judgment. Critical Essays, ed. by Guyer, P., Lanham (MD): Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 199–208.Google Scholar
Accessibility standard: WCAG 2.2 AAA
The PDF of this book
complies with version 2.2 of the
Web Content Accessibility Guidelines
(WCAG), offering more comprehensive accessibility measures for a broad range
of users and attains the highest
(AAA)
level of WCAG compliance, optimising the user experience by meeting the most extensive
accessibility guidelines.
Content Navigation
Table of contents navigation
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Index navigation
Provides an interactive index, letting you go straight to where a term or subject appears in the text without manual searching.
Provides an interactive index, letting you go straight to where a term or subject appears in the text without manual searching.
Reading Order & Textual Equivalents
Single logical reading order
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
Short alternative textual descriptions
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.
Visual Accessibility
Use of colour is not sole means of conveying information
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.
Use of high contrast between text and background colour
You benefit from high‐contrast text, which improves legibility if you have low vision or if you are reading in less‐than‐ideal lighting conditions.
You benefit from high‐contrast text, which improves legibility if you have low vision or if you are reading in less‐than‐ideal lighting conditions.