We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Chapter 6 examines the imperial practice of tax collection among the desert societies. Bedouin taxes could be collected with the consent and cooperation of their sheikhs. The chapter starts with an analysis of how coercive methods of tax collection failed to exact the nomadic duties and how the sheikhs played a crucial role in the process. Sheikhs persuaded their followers of the necessity of paying a moderate tax to the government, which demonstrates the role of the sheikh as agent of the empire. Although the tax was moderate, the great number of tribal animals made the amount a remarkable contribution to the provincial treasuries. The sheikly collaboration was in return for a quearter share of the collected taxes.
Chapter 1 is dedicated to demonstrating the failed imperial attempts to subjugate, pacify and ‘deport’ the Anizah and Shammar groups by force. During the 1840s and 1850s, and early 1860s, the authorities made several attempts to that end. However, the Anizah and Shammar successfully resisted the imperial project and remained in the lands they had occupied as pasturages mostly since the late eighteenth century in spite of the official objection. Their achievements stemmed from the lack of sufficient troops, which compelled officials to consent to the tribal existence. Again for the same reason, particularly in the 1850s, the tribal sheikhs occasionally helped the local governments to suppress local rebels and to expand their influence in the Arab countryside, which gradually led to the construction of a long-term compromise. In this way, theyforced the government both to recognize their existing privileges and to give them new ones. This occasional cooperation and ‘forced consent’ to tribal existence, however, did not transform into a systematized partnership as imperial officers still occasionally endeavoured to exile them into the desert and the tribes maintained their plundering and raids against the villages and caravans. The state of hostility continued to dominate state-tribe relations until the early 1870s although its intensity gradually decreased.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.