We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Teacher autonomy is a key component of teacher professionalism. It is positively related to self‐efficacy and job satisfaction among teachers – two factors that enhance their motivation and commitment to providing successful learning opportunities for students. However, despite playing a vital role in the teaching–learning process, insufficient attention has been paid over the past few decades to teacher autonomy in the field of English language teaching. There are significant gaps in theory, research, and practice. For example, there is a lack of consistency in definitions of teacher autonomy. Available empirical studies are also rather scarce. With this in mind, this chapter defines the construct of teacher autonomy and presents a profile of an autonomous teacher. This is followed by an overview of empirical projects investigating teacher autonomy. The aim is to show what has been done and what the findings reveal and identify possible gaps practitioners and educational researchers could fill in future research. The focus then shifts to pedagogical strategies for promoting teacher autonomy in teacher education programmes or professional development events. Eleven effective strategies are proposed that can be easily integrated into both types of provision and afford teachers ample opportunity to show personal autonomy and engage in collaboration, thus demonstrating collective autonomy.
Despite the increasing need to respond to changes in society and work, Higher Education (HE) remains slow to innovate and adapt (Serdyukov, 2017). The traditional model of education which was developed for a uniform, elite cohort, excludes many individuals. To realise the value of education in a modern society we need to consider Innovative and inclusive approaches to learning which can be enabled by digital technologies. This requires educators to re-examine their role and how they can influence change within current, rigid HE structures. Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) are in unusual circumstances in that academic staff have significant influence over change (Armstrong 2014). This can be advantageous as encouraging an innovative mind-set at individual levels of the organization can potentially lead to significant impact (Serdyukov, 2017; Jakovljevic, 2018). This chapter will explore barriers to innovation in HE, and the role of educators in enabling digital transformation. It will discuss a transformative Faculty Development model aimed at nurturing educators as agents for change in a digital age.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.