We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
This chapter examines China’s asymmetrical engagement with different areas of international adjudication at a time of rising Chinese assertiveness and influence in the shaping of international law. It first explores the relatively minor, yet still remarkable softening of China’s traditional strategic detachment from international adjudicative systems concerning general public international law, international criminal law and international human rights law. These areas exemplify China’s lowest point of engagement with the international adjudicative system. It then focusses on China’s deepening engagement with other international adjudicative systems – in the areas of international trade law and international commercial and investment law – and how the prevention and dispute settlement system of the Belt and Road Initiative is taking shape. It looks at China’s exploratory accommodation of international settlement mechanisms in the law of the sea and newer areas, before examining an array of concomitant cultural, historical, political and contemporary strategic factors weighing both for and against China moving beyond its current ‘comfort zone’ regarding international adjudication.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.