We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Children with congenital adrenal hyperplasia are considered to be at an elevated risk for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. The objective of this study was to evaluate the association between periaortic fat thickness and the cardiometabolic profile in children diagnosed with congenital adrenal hyperplasia.
Method:
A total of 20 children and adolescents with congenital adrenal hyperplasia and 20 healthy control subjects were enrolled in the study. We investigated metabolic and anthropometric parameters, comparing these values to those of the control group. Periaortic fat thickness was assessed using an echocardiographic method that has not previously been applied to paediatric patients with congenital adrenal hyperplasia.
Results:
The subjects in the congenital adrenal hyperplasia group were significantly shorter than the control subjects (p = 0.021) and exhibited a higher body mass index (p = 0.044) and diastolic blood pressure (p = 0.046). No significant differences were observed between the congenital adrenal hyperplasia group and control subjects concerning age, weight, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels. Additionally, dyslipidemia was identified in 5% (N = 1) of the congenital adrenal hyperplasia group. The mean fasting glucose, fasting insulin, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance, and fasting glucose-to-fasting insulin ratio were similar between the congenital adrenal hyperplasia group and the control subjects. However, 15% (n = 3) of the congenital adrenal hyperplasia group had insulin resistance. Two children with congenital adrenal hyperplasia (10%) were diagnosed with hypertension.
Periaortic fat thickness was significantly greater in the congenital adrenal hyperplasia group compared to the control group (p = 0.000), with measurements of 0.2039 ± 0.045 mm in the congenital adrenal hyperplasia group and 0.1304 ± 0.022 mm in the control group. In children with congenital adrenal hyperplasia, periaortic fat thickness exhibited a negative correlation with high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (r = −0.549, p = 0.034) and a positive correlation with the dose of hydrocortisone (r = 0.688, p = 0.001).
Conclusion:
Our results provide further evidence of subclinical cardiovascular disease in children with congenital adrenal hyperplasia. It is crucial to regularly assess cardiometabolic risk in children with congenital adrenal hyperplasia. The measurement of periaortic fat thickness in this population may serve as a valuable tool for identifying individuals at high risk for developing early atherosclerosis.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.