We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
A milestone of the European integration process, the European Public Prosecutor Office (EPPO) has been established in 2017 through the enhanced cooperation mechanism and has become operative in 2021. Following a biphasic idea of criminal proceedings, the investigative and prosecutorial powers related to crimes affecting the European financial interests. are exercised by EPPO at the EU level, while adjudicatory powers are exerted by national courts at the domestic level – this justifies the EPPO’s multi-layered system which is, moreover, characterized by a verticalization of judicial cooperation in criminal matters. While the material scope of the EPPO is narrowed both to the so-called ‘PIF’ offences and broader ‘ancillary offences’, only an interplay between European and domestic levels may ensure the effectiveness of the whole procedure. Yet, the applicable national law in case, cross-border investigation issues, evidence rules and defence rights are very sensitive issues that still rest unresolved as the EPPO Regulation did not deal clearly with those matters. Despite the numerous issues, the establishment of the EPPO might pave the way to a deeper cooperation in criminal matters among the EU and Member States, through a pragmatic approach which would show its results in the coming years.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.