We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
This chapter examines narrative representations of slavery in early monasticism. It then reads these accounts in light of extant material remains and in conversation with prescriptive regulatory precepts. Such contextualisation necessarily situates emergent communities within a late-Roman world where ‘attitudes of slaveholders [remained] constant’ and the ‘conditions in which slaves lived and worked persisted from generation to generation’ (Glancy). As the cracks and fissures routinely glossed over in more seamless depictions underscore the degree to which monastic ideals and ideologies, institutional and relational norms, remain inextricably intertwined with wider Greco-Roman practice, the chapter posits that emergent monastic mores may be best understood as at once dismantling and reinscribing the structural hierarchies of slavery. Against this landscape, where the jagged edges of lived experience remain patent, the chapter simultaneously premises reconceptualisations that effectively disrupt both static idealisation and wholesale denigration. Through engaging reading strategies that resist the limitations implicit to binaried definitions of practice, its aim is to breathe life into the larger than life.
The chapter analyses the presence of children in Byzantine Egyptian monasteries. It attempts to reconcile the seeming tension between the constant prohibition of and evidence for the ongoing presence of children in monasteries for an extended period. Ancient monastic and canonical norms provide vital information on this topic: most of them forbade any children in monasteries, even for a short period (e.g. to attend liturgies). However, some monastic sources confirm the presence of children in Byzantine-era Egyptian monasteries due to a variety of different circumstances, These varied from temporary to permanent residence, from children brought for education to those who were abandoned, traded, or donated to monasteries (because of social and economic hardships or medical conditions). For children facing such difficulties, the monastery was an opportunity to improve their quality of life, but, unfortunately, the monastic residence often became a place of violence and insecurity. Monastic obedience and submission to authority, alongside bodily punishments, were often and excessively applied in their education and formation as subjects of the monastic community and as future monastic members.
Children in early Egyptian monasteries were simultaneously a special, protected class and one of the most vulnerable populations – in some ways protected from the realities of the poverty-stricken world outside the monastic walls and the rigors of asceticism within, in other ways still vulnerable to the whims, desires, and ambitions of the adult monks around them. A status above the enslaved, but well below free adult men, children even in the monastery found their standing and status subject to negotiation. Children were in many ways a gift; caring for them was regarded as a sacred duty commanded directly by God. Their many needs and challenges, however, remained secondary to those of their adult caregivers. This chapter examines the education of children, their discipline (including corporal punishment), and their preparation for future lives as monastics.
As the fifth century wore on, monasticism became an increasingly familiar fixture in Western society, though there were considerable divergences in the types of monastic life to be found within any one area of Western Europe. In Gaul, for instance, not all communities could afford or wished to embrace the aristocratic and learned lifestyle of Lérins. The earliest monastic rules frequently attempted to capture the essence of the spirit inspiring the groups from which they originated. Benedict's Rule is mentioned in two works traditionally attributed to Gregory, but neither text can be taken as evidence of the early diffusion of the Benedictine Rule. For that, one needs to turn to the history of the monasteries founded by Columbanus. Columbanus' forging of links with an aspirant Frankish aristocracy led many families to realise that the foundation of monasteries could be a valuable weapon in their struggle to establish themselves as a permanent elite in the early seventh century.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.