We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Foreign judges often face a challenge when interpreting a constitution in ways that respond to local context. That challenge can be overcome if due diligence is exercised by paying close attention to how the constitution is inherently intertwined with the customs of the land. Ultimately there is an expectation that precedents established by foreign judges should reflect the values of the Indigenous population in shaping the legal system. In many instances in Micronesia foreign judges did the opposite: they often brought with them assumptions that were contradictory to customary principles, and in the process contributed to the devaluation of customary practices as enshrined in the Constitution. The case of the Federated States of Micronesia illustrates the erosion of customary values as American judges asserted control over the legal system by importing American jurisprudential practices and treating customary law as inferior to black letter law. Today Micronesian judges are working towards striking the balance between black letter and Indigenous customary legal principles in adherence to Micronesia’s Constitution.
Papua New Guinea’s Constitution, made for its independence in 1975, provided the judiciary with broad, liberal powers to rectify the wrongs of colonialism, assist the country’s development, and meet the needs of a diverse people. This presents a challenge for judges, and particularly foreign judges, who are often unfamiliar with the constitutional history of Papua New Guinea or are reluctant to take an approach to judging that departs from the more conservative judicial roles preferred in their own jurisdictions. This chapter argues that foreign judges must adapt to their role as judges of Papua New Guinea, which requires relinquishing some of the biases and professional sensibilities ingrained from their training and experiences in other jurisdictions. It suggests that greater attention to the judicial ideology of foreign candidates, and prioritising recruits from jurisdictions with similar constitutional frameworks and colonial histories to Papua New Guinea, would help the judiciary to fulfil the transformative role envisaged for it by the Constitution.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.