We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Edited by
Cecilia McCallum, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Brazil,Silvia Posocco, Birkbeck College, University of London,Martin Fotta, Institute of Ethnology, Czech Academy of Sciences
Poverty is a contentious and complex construct, an archetypal “thick” discourse, encapsulating the traces of social, economic, political, and historical struggles. Diverse poverty scenarios past and present all share a gendered core with specific cultural form and meaning. The author argues that gendering, the most powerful technique of social ordering at the heart of modernity, helped launch European poverty discourses and policies into the global orbit. From medieval Europe to the present and following the pathways of “poverty” projects across cultures, gender dynamically draws around itself a changing cloak of corporality, values, dispositions, practices, materialities, and legal regulations. At defining historical moments, these gendered forms became attached to other social arrangements of inequality, like class and race, but also to spatial divisions between “private” and “public” and a temporal contrast between the so-called primitive and civilized. Interventions in the name of Western poverty constructs led to an increasing feminization of poverty and the poor worldwide, woven from perceived attributes of domesticity, dependency, and deviancy.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.