We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
The chapter explains the historic background of preferential trade, both in the area of goods and services. It also explains the key rules in different WTO agreements as well as their monitoring mechanisms.
The chapter goes deeper into the key issue in services liberalization, which is the elimination of discrimination. It explains the challenges relating to the interpretation of services commitments and to understanding what entails discrimination in services trade.
The chapter puts forward a new methodology to study services commitments of preferential trade agreements. The method is suitable for all services agreements but is particularly applicable for the analysis and coding of services commitments by federal states and entities. The method is based on the legal criteria of Art. V GATS, as explained in previous Chapter 2 of Part I of the book.
The last chapter applies Art. V GATS to the four EU's services agreements that were analyzed in accordance with the methodology proposed in Chapter 2 of Part III. It puts forward some suggestions on the agreements' compatibility with Art. V GATS. The suggestions are extended outside the specific context of the EU to all federal entities. The key conclusion is that the criteria of Art. V GATS should be attained by all constituent parts of a federal entity.
The chapter gives a legal analysis of the results of the empirical analysis on four EU's services agreements (EIAs). It focuses on the criteria of Art. V GATS, especially on the conditions of substantial sectoral coverage and elimination of discrimination.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.