We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Beginning in 1740, the passage of a series of antiliteracy laws formally racialized reading in America. The expansion of those antiliteracy laws authorized whites to determine by sight, and not slave status, who was to be designated black and mandated to illiteracy, therefore, bringing sight and reading into peculiar proximity as a predicate for reading bodies and reading texts. A prehistory of these intersections exists in Othello’s interrogation of sight’s reliability in determining racial knowledge at a moment when a broader cultural and philosophical debate about the stability of sight’s relation to knowledge was underway. This chapter argues that Othello presents a unique anatomy of an actual reading process during which an audience’s seemingly secure knowledge of racialized blackness is subverted. Shakespeare “interpellates” or calls out the audience’s white reading identity to posit its unreliability. Recent developments in “blind spot” theory and empirical research relative to automatic white preference prolong this history of unreliable sight, providing further explanatory tools for representing the phenomenon of unreliable racial reading of bodies and texts.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.