We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Cognitive frailty (CF) has been considered as a subtype of frailty characterized by concurrent physical frailty and potentially cognitive impairment (Kelaiditi et al., 2013). Early detection of CF is an important issue in order to implement prevention and intervention to improve quality of life in aging. The aim of this study was to explore the prevalence of cognitive frailty in a sample of Portuguese old people, living in the community, and determine its relationship with sex, age, education and comorbidity.
Method:
Two hundred forty nine community-dwelling participants aged over 60 years and without dementia and other neurological and psychiatric diseases were assessed to obtain sociodemographic, functional, health, physical, cognitive and socio-affective measures. Participants were classified with/without mild cognitive impairment using the Montreal cognitive test (MoCa Test), and as physically robust, pre-frail and frail using the criteria of Fried et al. (2001). A cognitive frailty classification variable was created with six groups that were compared on sociodemographic variables and on comorbidity measured with the Charlson Index Scale (ChIS).
Results:
A 20.1% of participants were classified as physically robust and cognitively normal (Group 1), a 28.5% as physically pre-frail and cognitively normal (Group 2), a 11.2% as physically frail and cognitively normal (Group 3), a 6.8% as physically robust with cognitive impairment (Group 4), a 14.9% as physically pre-frail with cognitive impairment (Group 5), and a 18.5% as physically frail with cognitive impairment (Group 6). No significant group differences were registered in the distribution by sex. Significant differences were observed between Group 6 and Group 1 and Group 2 in age [F(5, 243)=6.20, p<.01] and in education [F(5, 243)= 6.54, p<.01], being the first older and with lower education level than the two last ones. Regarding comorbidity, Group 6 had significant higher scores in the ChIS [F(5,243)=9.91, p<.01] than all the other groups
Conclusion:
The study reveals that a 33.4% of the older adults and with less education level living in community suffer the two more advanced stages of cognitive frailty. Prevention and interventions measures are need to improve their quality of life.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.