We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Let
$\boldsymbol{f}$
be a square-integrable, zero-mean, random vector with observable realizations in a Hilbert space H, and let
$\boldsymbol{g}$
be an associated square-integrable, zero-mean, random vector with realizations which are not observable in a Hilbert space K. We seek an optimal filter in the form of a closed linear operator X acting on the observable realizations of a proximate vector
$\boldsymbol{f}_{\epsilon } \approx \boldsymbol{f}$
that provides the best estimate
$\widehat{\boldsymbol{g}}_{\epsilon} = X \boldsymbol{f}_{\epsilon}$
of the vector
$\boldsymbol{g}$
. We assume the required covariance operators are known. The results are illustrated with a typical example.
Let Xt be an n-dimensional diffusion process and S(t) be a set-valued function. Suppose Xt is invisible when it is hidden by S(t), but we can see the process exactly otherwise. In this paper, we derive the optimal estimator E[f(X1) | Xs1Xs∉S(s), 0 ≤ s ≤ 1] for a bounded Borel function f. We illustrate some computations for Gauss-Markov processes.
This paper
addresses the problem of identifying the uncertainties present in a
robotic contact situation. These uncertainties are errors and misalignments of
an object with respect to its ideal position. The paper
describes how to solve for the errors caused during grasping
and errors present when coming into contact with the environment.
A force sensor is used together with Kalman Filters to
solve for all the uncertainties. The straightforward use of a
force sensor and the Kalman Filters is found to be
effective in finding only some of the uncertainties in robotic
contact. The other uncertainties form dependencies that cannot be estimated
in this manner. This dependency brings about the problem of
observability. To make the unobservable uncertainties observable a sequence of
contacts are used. The error covariance matrix of the Kalman
Filter (KF) is used to obtain new contacts that are
required to solve for all the uncertainties completely. There is
complete freedom in choosing which unobservable quantity to be excited
in forming the next contact. The paper describes how these
new contacts can be randomly executed. A two dimensional contact
situation will be used to demonstrate the effectiveness of the
method. Experimental data are also presented to prove the validity
of the procedure. Due to the non-linear relationship between the
uncertainties and the forces, an Extended Kalman Filter (EKF) has
been used.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.