We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
In his 1978–9 lectures on The Birth of Biopolitics, Michel Foucault highlighted the prevalence of what he described as “state phobia.” This state phobia held two important elements: first, the belief that the state possesses an inherent power of expansion in relation to civil society; and, second, the belief in a continuity between various state forms – the welfare state and the totalitarian state for instance. While Foucault nominated the Austrian neoliberals and Soviet dissidents as important vectors of this state phobia, this chapter assesses another factor that Foucault does not mention: the new generation of activist humanitarian organizations (with whom Foucault was closely aligned) which, throughout the 1970s and 1980s, challenged the principle of national sovereignty. In opposition to the anti-colonial nationalism of the previous decade, figures like Bernard Kouchner, and members of Médecins sans Frontières spin-off Liberté sans Frontières, launched an attack on the anti-colonial privileging of sovereignty over individual rights. Moreover, they developed a critique of Third Worldism that rested on the assimilation of the postcolonial state to the paradigm of “totalitarianism”; postcolonial states were portrayed not as weak states subjected to continuing neocolonial exploitation but as excessively strong states whose power was inadequately limited by human rights.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.