A black hole can be rightfully thought as the most extreme manifestation of gravity – and thus of curvature! Besides being a unique source of puzzles and paradoxes for scientists, they have also been the inspiration for endless and breathtaking adventures in science-fiction novels and movies. This chapter will, therefore, explain the concept of black hole by making use of two different mechanical equivalents that have many points in common with black holes. In this way, it will become clear what is an event horizon and why it represents a one-way membrane, which can be entered, but from within which nothing can exit, not even light. Similarly, we will introduce the concept of spacetime singularity and explain why this is a problem that worries us physicists most, and for which we have not found any satisfactory solution yet. We will see that black holes are beautiful manifestations of nature and are not more monstrous than an erupting volcano.

Black holes are the outcome of unhalted gravitational collapse. Gravitational collapse to a black hole occurs on a wide range of mass scales in the universe because gravity is an attractive and universal force. This chapter describes black holes of three different origins, with three different mass scales, how they have or could be identified, and sketches how they are at the heart of some of the most energetic phenomena in astrophysics. These are black holes in X-ray binaries, black holes in galaxy centers, and exploding primordial black holes. Black holes are not only interesting because they check general relativity, they also contribute to the explanation of frontier astrophysical phenomena.

I distinguish between two versions of the black hole information-loss paradox. The first arises from apparent failure of unitarity on the spacetime of a completely evaporating black hole, which appears to be non-globally hyperbolic; this is the most commonly discussed version of the paradox in the foundational and semipopular literature, and the case for calling it `paradoxical' is less than compelling. But the second arises from a clash between a fully statistical-mechanical interpretation of black hole evaporation and the quantum-field-theoretic description used in derivations of the Hawking effect. This version of the paradox arises long before a black hole completely evaporates, seems to be the version that has played a central role in quantum gravity, and is genuinely paradoxical. After explicating the paradox, I discuss the implications of more recent work on AdS/CFT duality and on the `Firewall paradox', and conclude that the paradox is if anything now sharper. The article is written at a (relatively) introductory level and does not assume advanced knowledge of quantum gravity.