We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
The Irish 1950s lend themselves all too well to examination through the absurdist prism. Perhaps the most significant figure in the multilayered evolution of Irish literature in this period, Samuel Beckett offers a platform for constructions of Ireland’s ‘Continental’ affiliations, a testing-ground for theories of an Irish avant-garde and a point of resistance to categorisations of Ireland as committed to traditions of conservative domestic realism. This chapter initially reviews Beckett’s engagements with the absurd, discussing his novel Molloy and radio play All That Fall, and outlining how the absurdist paradigm became an early and influential critical response to the representation of language. Drawing connections between Beckett and his younger contemporary Flann O’Brien, particularly on the level of religion, this chapter also considers the extent to which a parallel response played out on the domestic front in the distinctive career of O’Brien. It asks to what extent an absurdist counter-ideology was played out in O’Brien’s fictional narratives and in the work of his journalistic alter ego, Myles na gCopaleen, whose column ran uninterrupted from 1940 to 1966.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.