During the COVID-19 pandemic, the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention provided strategies, such as extended use and reuse, to preserve N95 filtering facepiece respirators (FFR). We aimed to assess the prevalence of N95 FFR contamination with SARS-CoV-2 among healthcare personnel (HCP) in the Emergency Department (ED).

Real-world, prospective, multicenter cohort study. N95 FFR contamination (primary outcome) was measured by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Multiple logistic regression was used to assess factors associated with contamination.

Six academic medical centers.

ED HCP who practiced N95 FFR reuse and extended use during the COVID-19 pandemic between April 2021 and July 2022.

Total number of COVID-19-positive patients treated.

Two-hundred forty-five N95 FFRs were tested. Forty-four N95 FFRs (18.0%, 95% CI 13.4, 23.3) were contaminated with SARS-CoV-2 RNA. The number of patients seen with COVID-19 was associated with N95 FFR contamination (adjusted odds ratio, 2.3 [95% CI 1.5, 3.6]). Wearing either surgical masks or face shields over FFRs was not associated with FFR contamination, and FFR contamination prevalence was high when using these adjuncts [face shields: 25% (16/64), surgical masks: 22% (23/107)].

Exposure to patients with known COVID-19 was independently associated with N95 FFR contamination. Face shields and overlying surgical masks were not associated with N95 FFR contamination. N95 FFR reuse and extended use should be avoided due to the increased risk of contact exposure from contaminated FFRs.

Individuals with long-term physical health conditions (LTCs) experience higher rates of depression and anxiety. Conventional self-report measures do not distinguish distress related to LTCs from primary mental health disorders. This difference is important as treatment protocols differ. We developed a transdiagnostic self-report measure of illness-related distress, applicable across LTCs.

The new Illness-Related Distress (IRD) scale was developed through thematic coding of interviews, systematic literature search, think-aloud interviews with patients and healthcare providers, and expert-consensus meetings. An internet sample (n = 1,398) of UK-based individuals with LTCs completed the IRD scale for psychometric analysis. We randomly split the sample (1:1) to conduct: (1) an exploratory factor analysis (EFA; n = 698) for item reduction, and (2) iterative confirmatory factor analysis (CFA; n = 700) and exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM). Here, further item reduction took place to generate a final version. Measurement invariance, internal consistency, convergent, test–retest reliability, and clinical cut-points were assessed.

EFA suggested a 2-factor structure for the IRD scale, subsequently confirmed by iteratively comparing unidimensional, lower order, and bifactor CFAs and ESEMs. A lower-order correlated 2-factor CFA model (two 7-item subscales: intrapersonal distress and interpersonal distress) was favored and was structurally invariant for gender. Subscales demonstrated excellent internal consistency, very good test–retest reliability, and good convergent validity. Clinical cut points were identified (intrapersonal = 15, interpersonal = 12).

The IRD scale is the first measure that captures transdiagnostic distress. It may aid assessment within clinical practice and research related to psychological adjustment and distress in LTCs.

Dysphagia is common in infants born with critical CHD. Thickened liquids are often used to treat dysphagia, but associated risks limit widespread use among feeding specialists. This survey aims to assess dysphagia treatment patterns and thickened liquid use across paediatric cardiac surgical centres.

A 24-question, cross-sectional survey. Convenience and snowball sampling methods were used to engage 52 paediatric cardiac surgical centres affiliated with the Cardiac Newborn Neuroprotective Network. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse and compare responses.

Twenty-six individual respondents represented 21 unique paediatric cardiac surgical centres. Most responses were from experienced, speech–language pathologists (78%) at medium size centres (88%). Ninety-three percent of responding centres used thickened liquids to treat dysphagia and 81% only after formal instrumental assessment of swallowing. Thickened oral feeding was used for single-ventricle patients by 85% versus 69% for two-ventricle patients. Barriers to recommending thickened oral feedings included the cost of thickening agents, parental non-adherence, and gastrointestinal concerns.

This is the first survey to report multi-institutional dysphagia treatment practice variation at United States congenital cardiac surgical centres. Thickened oral feedings are frequently used across centres in high-risk critical CHD patients but treatment benefit remains unclear. This survey highlights a broad scientific community poised to direct dysphagia research in critical CHD to address practice variation, short- and long-term impact of thickened oral feeding on feeding outcomes, and barriers to use and access of thickening agents.

Seattle Children’s Research Institute is identifying the amount and type of health equity scholarship being conducted institution wide. However, methods for categorizing how scholarship is equity-focused are lacking. We developed and evaluated the reliability of a health equity scholarship coding schema applied to Seattle Children’s affiliated scholarship.

A 2021–2022 Ovid MEDLINE affiliation search yielded 3551 affiliated scholarship records, with 1079 records identified via an existing filter as scholarship addressing social determinants of health. Through reliability testing and examining concordance and discordance across three independent coders of these records, we developed a coding schema to classify health equity scholarship (yes/no). When health equity scholarship proved positive/Yes, the coders assigned a one through five maturity rating of the scholarship towards addressing inequities. Subsequent reliability testing including a new coder was conducted for 992 subsequent affiliated scholarship records (Oct 2022–June 2023), with additional testing of the sensitivity and specificity of the existing filter relative to the new coding schema.

Reliability for identifying health equity scholarship was consistently high (Fleiss kappas ≥ .78) and categorization of health equity scholarship into maturity levels was moderate (Fleiss kappas ≥ .47). The coding schema identified additional health equity scholarship not captured in an existing filter for social determinants of health scholarship. Based on the new schema, 23.3% of Seattle Childrens’ affiliated scholarship published October 2002–June 2023 was health equity focused.

This new coding schema can be used to identify and categorize health equity scholarship to help quantitate the health equity focus of portfolios of human-focused research.

Previous research showed that behavioural activation is as effective as cognitive–behavioural therapy for general depression. However, it remains unclear if it leads to greater improvement in depressive symptoms when compared with standard treatment for post-stroke depression.

To compare the effectiveness of behavioural activation against control conditions in reducing depression symptoms in individuals with post-stroke depression.

This review searched five databases from inception until 13 July 2021 (updated 15 September 2023) for randomised controlled trials comparing behavioural activation and any control conditions for post-stroke depression. Risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane Collaboration's Risk-of-Bias 2 tool. The primary outcome was improvement in depressive symptoms in individuals with post-stroke depression. We calculated a random-effects, inverse variance weighting meta-analysis.

Of 922 initial studies, five randomised controlled trials with 425 participants met the inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis showed that behavioural activation was associated with reduced depressive symptoms in individuals with post-stroke depression at 6-month follow-up (Hedges’ g −0.39; 95% CI −0.64 to −0.14). The risk of bias was low for two (40%) of five trials, and the remaining three (60%) trials were rated as having a high risk of bias. Heterogeneity was low, with no indication of inconsistency.

Evidence from this review was too little to confirm the effectiveness of behavioural activation as a useful treatment for post-stroke depression when compared with control conditions. Further high-quality studies are needed to conclusively establish the efficacy of behavioural activation as a treatment option for post-stroke depression.