Rates of youth anxiety, depression, and self-harm have increased substantially in recent years. Expansion of clinical service capacity is constrained by workforce shortages and system fragmentation, and even substantial investment may not achieve the scale of growth required to address unmet need. Preventive strategies – such as strengthening social cohesion – are therefore essential to alleviate mounting pressures on the mental health system, yet their potential to compensate for these constraints remains unquantified.

This study employed a system dynamics model to explore the interplay between service capacity and social cohesion on youth mental health outcomes. The model was developed for a population catchment characterized by a mix of urban, suburban, and rural communities. Primary outcomes were prevalence of psychological distress and mental disorders, and incidence of mental health-related emergency department (ED) presentations among young people aged 15–24 years, projected over a 10-year time horizon. Two-way sensitivity analyses of services capacity and social cohesion were conducted.

Changes to specialized mental health services capacity growth had the greatest projected impact on youth mental health outcomes. Heatmaps revealed thresholds where improvements in social cohesion could offset negative impacts of constrained service capacity. For example, if services capacity growth was sustained at only 80% of baseline, improving social cohesion could still reduce years lived with symptomatic disorder by 6.3%. To achieve a similar scale of improvement without improvements in social cohesion, the current growth rate in services capacity would need to be more than double. Combining a doubling of service capacity growth with reversing the decline in social cohesion could reduce ED presentations by 25.6% and years with symptomatic mental disorder by 19.2%. A doubling of specialized, headspace, and GP services capacity growth could prevent 24,060 years lived with symptomatic mental disorder among youth aged 15–24.

This study provides a quantitative framework for understanding how social cohesion improvements can help mitigate workforce constraints in mental health systems, demonstrating the value of integrating service expansion with social cohesion enhancement strategies.

Hospital-treated self-harm is common, costly and associated with repeated self-harm and suicide. Providing a comprehensive psychosocial assessment following self-harm is recommended by professional bodies and may improve outcomes.

To review the provision of psychosocial assessments after hospital-presenting self-harm and the extent to which macro-level factors indicative of service provision explain variability in these estimates.

We searched five electronic databases to 3 January 2023 for studies reporting data on the proportion of patients and/or events that were provided a psychosocial assessment. Pooled weighted prevalence estimates were calculated with the random-effects model. Random-effects meta-regression was used to investigate between-study variability.

119 publications (69 unique samples) were included. Across ages, two-thirds of patients had a psychosocial assessment (0.67, 95% CI 0.58–0.76). The proportion was higher for young people and older adults (0.75, 95% CI 0.36–0.99 and 0.83, 95% CI 0.48–1.00, respectively) compared with adults (0.64, 95% CI 0.54–0.73). For events, around half of all presentations had these assessments across the age range. No macro-level factor explained between-study heterogeneity.

There is room for improvement in the universal provision of psychosocial assessments for self-harm. This represents a missed opportunity to review and tailor aftercare supports for those at risk. Given the marked unexplained heterogeneity between studies, the person- and system-level factors that influence provision of psychosocial assessments after self-harm should be studied further.

The use of smaller dishware as a way of reducing food consumption has intuitive appeal and is recommended to the general public. Recent experimental studies have failed to find an effect of plate size on food intake, although the methods used across studies have varied. The aim of the present study was to examine the effect that bowl size had on snack food consumption in a ‘typical’ snacking context (snacking while watching television).

Between-subjects.

Laboratory experiment.

Sixty-one adult participants served themselves and ate popcorn while watching television. Participants were randomly assigned to serve themselves with and eat from either a small or a large bowl.

The use of a smaller bowl size did not reduce food consumption. Unexpectedly, participants in the small bowl condition tended to consume more popcorn (34·0 g) than participants in the large bowl condition (24·9 g; 37 % increase, d=0·5), although the statistical significance of this difference depended on whether analyses were adjusted to account for participant characteristics (e.g. gender) associated with food intake (P=0·02) or not (P=0·07).

Counter to widely held belief, the use of a smaller bowl did not reduce snack food intake. Public health recommendations advising the use of smaller dishware to reduce food consumption are premature, as this strategy may not be effective.

There is growing interest in brief contact interventions for self-harm and suicide attempt.

To synthesise the evidence regarding the effectiveness of brief contact interventions for reducing self-harm, suicide attempt and suicide.

A systematic review and random-effects meta-analyses were conducted of randomised controlled trials using brief contact interventions (telephone contacts; emergency or crisis cards; and postcard or letter contacts). Several sensitivity analyses were conducted to examine study quality and subgroup effects.

We found 14 eligible studies overall, of which 12 were amenable to meta-analyses. For any subsequent episode of self-harm or suicide attempt, there was a non-significant reduction in the overall pooled odds ratio (OR) of 0.87 (95% CI 0.74–1.04, P = 0119) for intervention compared with control. The number of repetitions per person was significantly reduced in intervention v. control (incidence rate ratio IRR = 066, 95% CI 0.54–0.80, P<0001). There was no significant reduction in the odds of suicide in intervention compared with control (OR = 0.58, 95% CI 0.24–1.38).

A non-significant positive effect on repeated self-harm, suicide attempt and suicide and a significant effect on the number of episodes of repeated self-harm or suicide attempts per person (based on only three studies) means that brief contact interventions cannot yet be recommended for widespread clinical implementation. We recommend further assessment of possible benefits in well-designed trials in clinical populations.

In New Zealand the burden of nutrition-related disease is greatest among Māori, Pacific and low-income peoples. Nutrition labels have the potential to promote healthy food choices and eating behaviours. To date, there has been a noticeable lack of research among indigenous peoples, ethnic minorities and low-income populations regarding their perceptions, use and understanding of nutrition labels. Our aim was to evaluate perceptions of New Zealand nutrition labels by Māori, Pacific and low-income peoples and to explore improvements or alternatives to current labelling systems.

Māori, Samoan and Tongan researchers recruited participants who were regular food shoppers. Six focus groups were conducted which involved 158 people in total: one Māori group, one Samoan, one Tongan, and three low-income groups.

Māori, Pacific and low-income New Zealanders rarely use nutrition labels to assist them with their food purchases for a number of reasons, including lack of time to read labels, lack of understanding, shopping habits and relative absence of simple nutrition labels on the low-cost foods they purchase.

Current New Zealand nutrition labels are not meeting the needs of those who need them most. Possible improvements include targeted social marketing and education campaigns, increasing the number of low-cost foods with voluntary nutrition labels, a reduction in the price of ‘healthy’ food, and consideration of an alternative mandatory nutrition labelling system that uses simple imagery like traffic lights.