To evaluate clinical outcomes in patients with uncomplicated β-hemolytic Streptococcus spp. bloodstream infections (BSI) transitioned to oral antimicrobial therapy (OAT) compared with those that remain on intravenous antimicrobial therapy.

Retrospective cohort study.

Tertiary academic hospital.

This retrospective cohort study included adult patients hospitalized between 1/1/2013 and 12/31/2019 diagnosed with uBSI due to β-hemolytic streptococci. Patients were excluded if BSI was due to endovascular, central nervous system, or bone/joint infection or patient was immunosuppressed or died within 72 hours of identification of BSI. We compared outcomes including: 30-day mortality, antimicrobial therapy, BSI relapse, 30-day rehospitalization, adverse drug events, and reversion to IV therapy. Fisher’s exact test was used for categorical variables; Mann – Whitney test and Independent T-test for continuous variables.

232 BSIs were included. OAT was used in 152 (65%). Cohort demographics were similar. Mortality was also similar between cohorts (2% vs 6% P = .13). Hospital length of stay was shorter in the OAT cohort with a median of 5 days (interquartile range 4.00, 8.00) versus 8 (5.00, 16.00) in the IV group (P < .0001). Patients transitioned to OAT were more likely to finish antibiotics outpatient (93% vs 62% P < .001).

For β-hemolytic Streptococcus uBSI, OAT was associated with decreased length of stay without adverse clinical outcomes. Opportunities exist to modify clinical management of uBSI.

No established guidelines exist regarding the role of oral antibiotic therapy (OAT) to treat bloodstream infections (BSIs), and practices may vary depending on clinician specialty and experience.

To assess practice patterns regarding oral antibiotic use for treatment of bacteremia in infectious diseases clinicians (IDCs, including physicians and pharmacists and trainees in these groups) and non–infectious diseases clinicians (NIDCs).

Open-access survey.

Clinicians caring for hospitalized patients receiving antibiotics.

An open-access, web-based survey was distributed to clinicians at a Midwestern academic medical center using e-mail and to clinicians outside the medical center using social media. Respondents answered questions regarding confidence prescribing OAT for BSI in different scenarios. We used χ2 analysis for categorical data evaluated association between responses and demographic groups.

Of 282 survey responses, 82.6% of respondents were physicians, 17.4% pharmacists, and IDCs represented 69.2% of all respondents. IDCs were more likely to select routine use of OAT for BSI due to gram-negative anaerobes (84.6% vs 59.8%; P < .0001), Klebsiella spp (84.5% vs 69.0%; P < .009), Proteus spp (83.6% vs 71.3%; P < .027), and other Enterobacterales (79.5% vs 60.9%; P < .004). Our survey results revealed significant differences in selected treatment of Staphylococcus aureus syndromes. Fewer IDCs than NIDCs selected OAT to complete treatment for methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) BSI due to gluteal abscess (11.9% vs 25.6%; P = .012) and methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) BSI due to septic arthritis (13.9% vs 20.9%; P = .219).

Practice variation and discordance with evidence for the use of OAT for BSIs exists among IDCs versus NIDCs, highlighting opportunities for education in both clinician groups.