One of the natural problems of operational semantics is to characterise the relationship between eager and lazy evaluation. In the context of $\lambda$-calculus, this is expressed by the classic theorem that call-by-value evaluation of a program to (weak-head) normal form can always be simulated by a call-by-name evaluation. While the statement and intuition behind it are simple and clear, naive attempts at proof famously fail: the result is usually established as a consequence of the more complex standardisation theorem. In this work, we develop and formalise a novel and lightweight inductive approach to tackle the problem of simulation between two semantics for a single calculus, but with different evaluation orders. We exercise our method on the classic call-by-value and call-by-name example and report on methodological takeaways suggested by our approach, in particular what effect the flavour of semantics chosen has on the proof.

We formalize and prove the folklore theorem that the static delimited-control operators shift and reset can be simulated in terms of the dynamic delimited-control operators control and prompt. The proof is based on small-step operational semantics.