Clinical trials provide valuable treatment insights but often fail to represent real-world outcomes. This is particularly true for advanced laryngeal cancer patients, who face significant co-morbidities and socioeconomic challenges. This study evaluates whether outcomes from research datasets in The Cancer Imaging Archive reflect real-world survival in a regional cohort from North-East England.

This retrospective analysis compares outcomes between The Cancer Imaging Archive (n = 198) and North-East England (n = 222) cohorts. Demographics, treatment modalities and five-year disease-specific survival were assessed via Kaplan–Meier curves and Cox regression.

North-East England had a lower five-year disease-specific survival (59.2 per cent vs. 76.9 per cent; p = 0.0018) and was characterised by greater co-morbidity burden and upfront surgery with adjuvant therapy (51 per cent), whereas The Cancer Imaging Archive patients received upfront chemoradiotherapy (53 per cent) or radiotherapy alone (41 per cent).

The poorer real-world outcomes reflect the challenges of generalising research data to heterogeneous populations. Bridging the gap between research efficacy and real-world effectiveness is critical to delivering equitable care for advanced laryngeal cancer.

Long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIs) have demonstrated better rates of adherence among patients with schizophrenia than oral antipsychotics (OAs). While LAIs often cost more than OAs, better adherence can lead to cost offsets in other areas.

The purpose of this LAI Cost-Offset Value Calculator (LCVC) model is to provide an evidence-based model that estimates total costs and total cost offsets for a hypothetical population of adult patients with schizophrenia treated with atypical LAIs relative to second-generation oral antipsychotics (SGOAs) in the United States.

The model was derived based on studies included in a recent meta-analysis of patients who relapsed while taking an SGOA and were either switched to an atypical LAI or continued an SGOA. User inputs to the model include population size and payer archetype. The model then estimates the difference in adherence rates, relapse rates, hospitalizations, hospital days, hospital costs, emergency department (ED) visits, ED costs, and pharmacy costs, as well as cost offsets overall and by source (ie, hospitalization, ED, pharmacy).

In the base case, representing a hypothetical cohort of 1000 adult patients with schizophrenia in the United States and a composite payer archetype, 1-year pharmacy costs were higher for patients who switched to an LAI relative to patients who continued taking an SGOA ($14,561,971 vs $7,203,142). However, cost offsets were observed for other dimensions of direct costs, including lower ED costs ($1,664,808 vs $2,241,483) and substantially lower hospital costs ($23,623,612 vs $44,195,100) due to fewer relapses (409 vs 508). For some payer archetypes (ie, Medicare and Veteran Affairs), the cost offsets completely covered the higher pharmacy costs for LAIs; for others (ie, Commercial and Medicaid), the cost offsets partially covered the higher pharmacy costs for LAIs, though sometimes substantially.

Despite potential higher pharmacy costs for LAIs, this model supports the conclusion that those costs could be mitigated by cost offsets in other areas, with varying results depending on payer archetype. The LCVC model, parameterized using real-world data extracted from a recent systematic review and meta-analysis, may be helpful for payers in understanding the potential cost offsets of switching patients with schizophrenia who have relapsed while taking OAs to LAIs. To our knowledge, there are no similar studies for schizophrenia that calculate cost offsets based solely on empirical evidence of patients who failed on OAs.

Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc.

Healthcare professionals (HCPs) face unique challenges when managing patients with schizophrenia. Educational initiatives targeting common clinical dilemmas encountered by clinicians, including partial or nonadherence, may alleviate knowledge gaps and clarify the role of long-acting injectable antipsychotic agents (LAIs) in treating this population.

4 experts in schizophrenia management used empirical evidence to identify 11 key clinical dilemmas where LAIs may be useful. These experts then developed a heuristic, educational tool (S.C.O.P.E.™: Schizophrenia Clinical Outcome Scenarios and Patient-Provider Engagement) based on empirical evidence and expert opinion for clinicians to use when encountering similar scenarios to optimize schizophrenia care.

S.C.O.P.E.™ is a freely-available resource comprising an interactive digital platform providing educational materials for HCPs involved in continued care for patients with schizophrenia. S.C.O.P.E.™ provides HCPs with considerations in common clinical scenarios met in inpatient and outpatient settings, as well as questions to consider when patients present to the emergency department. The potential usefulness of LAIs is explored in each scenario. Clinical education videos prepare nurse practitioners, social workers, and case managers to address patient concerns and communicate the benefits of LAI treatment. S.C.O.P.E.™ will not replace clinical judgment, guidelines, or continuing medical education, and is not a platform for recording patient-level data, nor intended for payer negotiations or access-related questions by HCPs.

S.C.O.P.E.™ is an educational tool for HCPs to use alongside standard psychiatric evaluations to improve understanding of how to manage common clinical dilemmas when treating patients with schizophrenia and the role of LAIs in schizophrenia management.

Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc.

Healthcare professionals (HCPs) face unique challenges when managing patients with schizophrenia. Educational initiatives targeting common clinical dilemmas encountered by clinicians, such as unfamiliarity with prescribing information for long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIs), may assist clinicians when treating patients with schizophrenia.

Four experts in schizophrenia management used empirical evidence to identify 11 key clinical dilemmas where LAIs may be useful. These experts then developed a heuristic, educational tool (S.C.O.P.E.™: Schizophrenia Clinical Outcome Scenarios and Patient-Provider Engagement) based on empirical evidence and expert opinion for clinicians to use when encountering similar scenarios to optimize schizophrenia care. S.C.O.P.E.™ also includes supportive elements such as an LAI selector.

S.C.O.P.E.™ is a freely available resource comprising an interactive digital platform providing educational materials for HCPs involved in continued care for patients with schizophrenia. To acquaint HCPs with characteristics of common LAIs used in schizophrenia treatment, S.C.O.P.E.™ offers a selector that filters LAIs by approved indication(s), initiation regimen, reconstitution, dosing strengths and frequency, injection volumes and routes, and supply and storage information based on approved product labels. The LAI selector does not provide LAI safety and efficacy data, so HCPs should visit individual product websites for this information. Therefore, S.C.O.P.E.™ will not replace clinical judgment, guidelines, or continuing medical education, and is not a platform for recording patient-level data, nor intended for payer negotiations or access-related questions by HCPs.

S.C.O.P.E.™ is an educational tool for HCPs to use alongside standard psychiatric evaluations to improve understanding of how to manage common clinical dilemmas when treating patients with schizophrenia, the role of LAIs in schizophrenia management, and the product characteristics of available LAIs.

Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc.