Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-5r2nc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-11T03:46:10.307Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Asymptotic matching of plasma and sheath in an active low pressure discharge

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 March 2009

R. N. Franklin  and
J. R. Ockendon
R. N. Franklin
Affiliation:
Engineering Laboratory, University of Oxford
J. R. Ockendon
Affiliation:
St Catherine's College, University of Oxford
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The method of matched asymptotic expansions is applied to the fluid model of the low-pressure positive column. The expansion of the eigenvalue in the plasma balance equation is obtained to second order in plane and in cylindrical geometry, and uniformly valid expressions for charged particle densities and fluid velocity in two separate regions are indicated.

The free-fall model is also examined and the scales of the transition layer and sheath layer found. Comparison is made with the results of direct numerical integration of the equations involved for both models.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Plasma Physics , Volume 4 , Issue 2 , May 1970 , pp. 371 - 385
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Blank, J. L. 1968 Phys. Fluids 11, 1686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohm, D. 1949 In The Characteristics of Electrical Discharges in Magnetic Fields, Ed. by Guthrie, A. and Wakerling, R. K.. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Boyd, R. L. F. 1950 Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 201, 329.Google Scholar
Caruso, A. & Cavaliere, A. 1962 Nuovo Cimento 26, 1389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, H. T. 1961 Introduction to Nonlinear Differential and Integral Equations, p. 229. U.S. Atomic Energy Commission.Google Scholar
Van Dyke, M. D. 1964 Perturbation Methods in Fluid Mechanics. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Forrest, J. R. & Franklin, R. N. 1968 Br. J. Appl. Phys. 1, 1357.Google Scholar
Friedman, H. W. 1967 Phys. Fluids 10, 2053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, E. R. & Thompson, W. B. 1959 Proc. Phys. Soc. 72, 2145.Google Scholar
Lam, S. H. 1965 Phys. Fluids 8, 73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lam, S. H. 1967 Proc. 8th Int. Conf. on Phenomena in Ionized Gases, p. 545et seq. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency.Google Scholar
Langmuir, I. & Tonks, L. 1929 Phys. Rev. 34, 876.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Persson, K. B. 1962 Phys. Fluids 5, 1625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Self, S. A. 1963 Phys. Fluids 6, 1762,.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Self, S. A. & Ewald, H. N. 1966 Phys. Fluids 9, 2486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woods, L. C. 1965 J. Fluid Mech. 23, 315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar