Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-hw7sx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T18:04:26.392Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Effect of Manufacturing Parameters and Environmental Factors on Mechanical Properties of Carbon Fiber/Epoxy Composites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 August 2018

C. F. Hsu ,
H. Y. Tsai  and
T. H. Chen
C. F. Hsu
Affiliation:
Department of Power Mechanical EngineeringNational Tsing Hua UniversityHsinchu, Taiwan
H. Y. Tsai*
Affiliation:
Department of Power Mechanical EngineeringNational Tsing Hua UniversityHsinchu, Taiwan
T. H. Chen
Affiliation:
Department of Power Mechanical EngineeringNational Tsing Hua UniversityHsinchu, Taiwan
*
*Corresponding author (hytsai@pme.nthu.edu.tw)
Get access

Abstract

In the recent years, the development of wind turbines has been so hectic in Taiwan. The design of the turbine blades directly impacts power effectiveness. In this study, the effects of manufacturing parameters and environmental factors on the mechanical properties of carbon fiber/epoxy composites that are used in turbine blades are discussed. Parameters of the manufacturing process affect the mechanical properties. Carbon composites made by a different numbers of layers are tested on various aspects of performance such as mechanical strength and corrosion resistance.

Keywords

Carbon fiberCompositeHigh humidityMechanical properties

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Mechanics , Volume 34 , Issue 6 , December 2018 , pp. 839 - 846
Copyright
Copyright © The Society of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1. Liu, H. K., Wang, Y. C. and Huang, T. H., “Moisture Effect on Mechanical Properties of Graphene/Epoxy Nanocomposites,” Journal of Mechanics, 32, pp. 673–682 (2016).Google Scholar
2. Yang, B. and Sun, D., “Testing, Inspecting and Monitoring Technologies for Wind Turbine Blades: A Survey,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 22, pp. 515–526 (2013).Google Scholar
3. Ogasawara, T., Ishida, Y. and Kasai, T., “Mechanical Properties of Carbon Fiber/Fullerene-Dispersed Epoxy Composites,” Composites Science and Technology, 69, pp. 2002–2007 (2009).Google Scholar
4. Mathur, R. B., Chatterjee, S. and Singh, B. P., “Growth of Carbon Nanotubes on Carbon Fiber Substrates to Produce Hybrid/Phenolic Composites with Improved Mechanical Properties,” Composites Science and Technology, 68, pp. 1608–1615 (2008).Google Scholar
5. Acheson, J. A., Simacek, P. and Advani, S. G., “The Implications of Fiber Compaction and Saturation on Fully Coupled VARTM Simulation,” Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing (Incorporating Composites and Composites Manufacturing), 35, pp. 159–169 (2004).Google Scholar
6. Yen, P. W., “Computational Simulation and Fabrication Technique of Aircraft Wing Rib by Resin Transfer Molding,” M. S. Thesis, Department of Fiber and Composite Materials, Feng Chia University, Taichung, Taiwan (2007).Google Scholar
7. Lundstrom, T. S., Gebart, B. R. and Lundemo, C. Y., “Void Formation in RTM,” Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites, 17, pp. 1167–1184 (1998).Google Scholar
8. Abraham, D. and Mcllhagger, R., “Investigations Into Various Methods of Liquid Injection to Achieve Mouldings with Minimum Void Contents and Full Wet Out,” Composites Part A, 29, pp. 533–539 (1998).Google Scholar
9. Senibi, S. and Klang, E. C., “Experiments Related to the Fabrication of a Graphite/Epoxy Tube by the Resin Transfer Molding (RTM) Process,” Composites Modeling and Processing Science, 3, pp. 317–328 (1993).Google Scholar
10. Govignon, Q., Bickerton, S. and Kelly, P. A., “Simulation of the Reinforcement Compaction and Resin Flow During the Complete Resin Infusion Process,” Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 41, pp. 45–57 (2010).Google Scholar
11. de Paiva, J. M. F., Mayer, S. and Rezende, M. C., “Evaluation of Mechanical Properties of Four Different Carbon/Epoxy Composites Used in Aeronautical Field,” Materials Research, 8, pp. 91–97 (2005).Google Scholar
12. Bian, L. C., Liu, W. and Pan, J., “Probability of Debonding and Effective Elastic Properties of Particle-Reinforced Composites,” Journal of Mechanics, 33, pp. 789–796 (2017).Google Scholar
13. Joshi, O. K., “The Effect of Moisture on the Shear Properties of Carbon Fiber Composites,” Composites, 14, pp. 196–200 (1983).Google Scholar
14. Rouquie, S., Frenot, M. C. L., Cinquin, J. and Colombaro, A. M., “Thermal Cycling of Carbon/Epoxy Laminates in Neutral and Oxidative Environments,” Composites Science and Technology, 65, pp. 403–409 (2005).Google Scholar
15. Du, L. and Jana, S. C., “Hygrothermal Effects on Properties of Highly Conductive Epoxy/Graphite Composites for Applications as Bipolar Plates,” Journal of Power Sources, 182, pp. 223–229 (2008).Google Scholar
16. ASTM D3039/D3039M-08, “Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Polymer Matrix Composite Materials,” Annual Book of ASTM Standards (2008).Google Scholar
17. ASTM D790-10, “Flexural Test Methods for Flexural Properties of Unreinforced and Reinforced Plastics and Electrical Insulating Materials,” Annual Book of ASTM Standards (2010).Google Scholar
18. Kellas, S., Morton, J. and Curtis, P. T., “The Effect of Hygrothermal Environments upon the Tensile and Compressive Strength of Notched CFRP Laminates: Part I - Static Loading,” Composites, 21, pp. 41–51 (1990).Google Scholar