Hostname: page-component-7857688df4-7g6pc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-12T18:13:06.476Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Group A Streptococcal Bacteremias Associated With Intravascular Catheters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 June 2016

Michael A. Martin*
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
Joan N. Hebden
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
Carlos I. Bustamante
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
Lewis J. Rubin
Affiliation:
Pulmonary Division, Department of Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
*
University of Maryland Hospital, 22 South Greene Street, Baltimore, MD 21201

Extract

Most intravascular device-related infections are caused by staphylococci, presumably because the microbial flora of the skin surface is the major reservoir of microorganisms colonizing and infecting percutaneously-inserted intravascular cannulas.

Recently, we observed two episodes of group A streptococcal cellulitis and bacteremia related to infection of the subcutaneous tunnel of indwelling catheters. This prompted us to review our experience with nosocomial and community-acquired group A streptococcal bacteremias for the past year, and we identified a third catheter-related case. In our ongoing prospective surveillance of nosocomial bacteremias, we have not previously identified any other cases of intravascular catheter-related bacteremia caused by group A streptococcus. Likewise, in two large prospective studies of Hickman and Broviac catheter-related infections, the investigators did not report infections caused by this organism.

Information

Type
Readers' Forum
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 1990 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1. Henderson, DK. Bacteremia due to percutaneous intravascular devices. In: Mandell, GL. Douglas, RGD. Bennett, JE. eds. Principles and Practice of Infectious Diseases. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Churchill Livingstone; 1990.Google Scholar
2. Dickinson, GM, Bisno, AL. Infections associated with indwelling devices: concepts of pathogenesis; infections associated with intravascular devices. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1989;33:597601.Google Scholar
3. Maki, DG, Ringer, M. Evaluation of dressing regimens for prevention of infection with peripheral intravenous catheters: gauze a transparent polyurethane dressing, and an iodophor-transparent dressing. JAMA. 1987:258:23962403.Google Scholar
4. Bjornson, HS, Colley, R, Bower, RH, Duty, VT, Schwartz-Fulton, JT, Fischer, JE. Association between microorganism growth at the catheter insertion site and colonization of the catheter in patients receiving total parenteral nutrition. Surgery. 1982;92:720727.Google Scholar
5. Press, OW. Ramsey, PG. Larson, EB. Fefer, A. Hickman, RO. Hickman catheter infections in patients with malignancies. Medicine. 1984:63:189200.Google Scholar
6. Johnson, PR, Decker, ME, Edwards, KM, Schaffner, W, Wright, PF. Frequency of Broviac catheter infections in pediatric oncology patients. J Infect Dis. 1986;154:570578 Google Scholar
7. Maki, DG, Weise, CE, Sarafin, HW. A semiquantitative culture method for identifying intravenous-catheter-related infection. N Engl J Med 1977;296:13051309 Google Scholar
8. Gil, RT, Kruse, JA, Thill-Baharozian, MC, Carlson, RW. Triple-vs. single-lumen central venous catheters-a prospective study in a critically ill population. Arch Intern Med. 1989;149;11391143.Google Scholar
9. Benezra, D, Kiehn, TE, Gold, JWM, Brown, AE, Turnbull, ADM, Armstrong, D. Prospective study of infections in indwelling central venous catheters using quantitative blood cultures. Am J Med. 1988;85:495498.Google Scholar
10. Brun-Buisson, C, Abrouk, F, Legrand, P, Huet, WY, Larabi, S, Rapin, M. Diagnosis of central venous catheter-related sepsis—ritical level of quantitative tip cultures. Arch Intern Med. 1987;147:873877.Google Scholar
11. Lowder, JN, Lazrus, HM, Herzig, RH. Bacteremias and fungemias in oncologic patients with central venous catheters—changing spectrum of infection. Arch Intern Med 1982;142:14561459.Google Scholar
12. Stevens, DL, Tanner, MH. Winship, J, et al. Severe group A streptococcal infections associated with a toxic shock-like syndrome and scarlet fever toxin A. N Engl J Med. 1989;321:16.Google Scholar
13. Bartter, T, Dascal, A, Carroll, K, Curley, FJ. “Toxic strep syndrome” manifestation of group A streptococcal infection. Arch Intern Med. 1988;148:14211424.Google Scholar
14. Cone, LA, Woodward, DR. Schlievert, PM, Tomory, GS. Clinical and bacteriologic observations of a toxic shock-like syndrome due to Streptococcus pyogenes . N Engl J Med. 1987;317:146149.Google Scholar
15. Schaffner, W, Lefkowitz, LB, Goodman, JS, Koenig, MG. Hospital outbreak of infections due to group A streptococci traced to an asymptomatic anal carrier. N Engl J Med. 1969;280:12241225.Google Scholar
16. Stamm, WE, Feely, JC, Facklam, RR. Wound infections due to group A streptococcus traced to a vaginal carrier. J Infect Dis. 1978;138:287292.Google Scholar
17. Berkelman, RL, Martin, D, Graham, DR, et al. Streptococcal wound infections caused by a vaginal carrier. JAMA. 1982;247:26802682.Google Scholar
18. Richman, DD, Breton, SJ, Goldman, DA. Scarlet fever and group A streptococcal surgical wound infection traced to an anal carrier. J Pediatrics. 1977;90:387390.Google Scholar
19. Gryska, PF, O'Dea, AE. Post-operative streptococcal wound infection. JAMA. 1970;213:11891191.Google Scholar
20. Garner, JJ, Simmons, BP. Guideline for isolation precautions in hospitals. Infect Control. 1983;4:279.Google Scholar