Hostname: page-component-7857688df4-jlx94 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-12T04:55:36.750Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

“Improvements in Reflective Functioning in Patients with Treatment-Resistant Depression and Personality Disorder Treated with Esketamine”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 August 2025

M. Olivola*
Affiliation:
Department of mental health, ASST FBF SACCO, Milano
F. Mazzoni
Affiliation:
DEPARTMENT OF BRAIN AND BEHAVIOURAL SCIENCE, ASST PAVIA
G. Alessandro
Affiliation:
DEPARTMENT OF BRAIN AND BEHAVIOURAL SCIENCE, ASST PAVIA
A. Silva
Affiliation:
DEPARTMENT OF BRAIN AND BEHAVIOURAL SCIENCE, ASST PAVIA
N. Brondino
Affiliation:
DEPARTMENT OF BRAIN AND BEHAVIOURAL SCIENCE, University of Pavia, PAVIA
F. Calorio
Affiliation:
Department of mental health, ASST PAVIA, Voghera, Italy
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Reflective functioning, the cognitive ability to interpret both one’s own and others’ behaviors in terms of underlying mental states such as emotions, desires, intentions, and beliefs, is essential for effective social interaction, emotional regulation, and self-awareness and is compromised more in Personality disorders. In the context of depression, reflective functioning can be particularly compromised, leading to difficulties in processing emotional experiences and managing social interactions. (Williams, 2010; Luyten, 2013)

Objectives

This study aims to understand the impact of esketamine on RF.

Methods

Tool test: Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and the Reflective Functioning Questionnaire (RFQ-8), to monitor changes in depressive symptoms and mentalization ability across six stages of treatment with Spravato: before treatment (T0), after 1 week (T1), 1 month (T2), 2 months (T3), 3 months (T4), and 6 months (T5) of Spravato treatment.

Results

The analysis revealed significant positive correlations between mentalization scores and the severity of depressive symptoms (MADRS):

  • - T1 Mentalization and T1 MADRS: The Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.349 indicates a moderate positive relationship, suggesting that poorer mentalization at Time 1 (T1) is associated with more severe depressive symptoms at the same time point.

  • - T0 Mentalization and T3 MADRS: The Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.392 shows a moderate positive association between mentalization at Time 0 (T0) and depressive symptoms at Time 3 (T3), indicating that poorer mentalization at T0 is related to more severe depressive symptoms later.

  • - T2 Mentalization and T3 MADRS: A Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.384 indicates a moderate positive relationship between mentalization at Time 2 (T2) and depressive symptoms at Time 3 (T3), suggesting that lower mentalization at T2 correlates with higher depressive symptoms at T3.

Image 1:

Image 2:

Conclusions

The study assessed the effects of esketamine on depressive symptoms and reflective functioning (RF) in patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD) and a 58% comorbidity rate of personality disorders. These findings underscore the potential impact of mentalization on the severity and trajectory of depressive symptoms. The observed correlations indicate that patients with mentalization scores above 3.5 generally report higher levels of depressive symptoms. These results highlight the significant role of mentalization in influencing the severity and progression of depressive symptoms.

Disclosure of Interest

None Declared

Information

Type
Abstract
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of European Psychiatric Association
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.