Hostname: page-component-857557d7f7-d5hhr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-12-02T03:55:16.782Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Association between physician’s sexual orientation, gender and their emotional response when evaluating suicidal patients

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 August 2025

R. T. Monteiro*
Affiliation:
Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre (UFCSPA) Serviço de Psiquiatria, Hospital Materno Infantil Presidente Vargas (HMIPV), Porto Alegre, Brazil
G. I. Zanella
Affiliation:
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
T. P. Comissoli
Affiliation:
Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre (UFCSPA)
P. B. Bolzan
Affiliation:
Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre (UFCSPA)
Y. A. Ferrão
Affiliation:
Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre (UFCSPA) Serviço de Psiquiatria, Hospital Materno Infantil Presidente Vargas (HMIPV), Porto Alegre, Brazil
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Despite several efforts and public awareness campaigns, suicide rates are still rising in some countries, being third leading cause of death among 15-29-years-old. Some populations are at higher risk for suicidal behavior, such as LGBTIQ+ people and physicians. We found no literature regarding a possible association between physicians emotional response to suicidal patients (countertransference), sociodemographic factors and physicians mental health.

Objectives

Identify a possible association between sociodemographic factors, countertransference and Burnout Syndrome.

Methods

An anonymous web-based survey was implemented through the software REDCap, collected by snowball sampling. Participants were volunteers and could withdraw at any time. The study was approved by the University Ethics Committee. The survey consisted of the Informed Consent Form (ICF), Sociodemographic Questionnaire, Rating Scale for Countertransference (RSCT), which evaluate the main emotional responses (approximation, indifference or rejection). Scales also included Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT) and the Interpersonal Reactivity Index of Davis. Other scales were included, but are being developed in other studies.

Results

From the 210 respondents, 179 (85.2%) completed the query: 108 (60.3%) were female; 166 (92.7%) were self-declared white-colored skin; 139 (77.7%) had a sexual partner. The mean age was 37.22 (SD=12.33), 65(36.3%) were medical residents; 112 (62.6%) were already specialists, 54 (48.2%) of those, declared to be psychiatrists. Indifference varies according to sexual orientation (p = 0,002), even when controlling for burnout (p < 0,001). Bissexual physicians had lower indifference rates than the other groups (Heterosexual: N=104, M 1,52, SD 1,52, CV 0,998; Homosexual: N=15, M 2,60, CV 0,870; Bisexual: N=17, M 0,64, SD 0,20, CV 1,332). Females had higher approximation rates when compared to male (Male: N = 53; M 15,71; SD 5,77; Female: N = 90; M 17,94; SD 3,70; p = 0,006). There’s no difference between gender when evaluating indifference and rejection. Homosexual and bisexual physicians experience more burnout (Heterosexual: N = 118, M 49,94, SD 14,5. Homosexual: N = 16; M 60,0; SD 15,2. Bisexual: N = 18; M 59,6; SD 4,6). F (2) = 5,51; p = 0,05.

Conclusions

We find preliminary evidence that sexual orientation could influence emotional response when evaluating suicidal patients. Women have higher approximation. Both results remain the same when controlling for Burnout syndrome.

Disclosure of Interest

None Declared

Information

Type
Abstract
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of European Psychiatric Association
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.