Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b95js Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-11T13:05:42.477Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Upper cervical vertebrae movement during intubating laryngeal mask, fibreoptic and direct laryngoscopy: a video-fluoroscopic study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 January 2005

A. Sahin ,
M. A. Salman ,
I. A. Erden  and
U. Aypar
A. Sahin
Affiliation:
Hacettepe University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Anaesthesiology, Ankara, Turkey
M. A. Salman
Affiliation:
Hacettepe University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Anaesthesiology, Ankara, Turkey
I. A. Erden
Affiliation:
Hacettepe University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Anaesthesiology, Ankara, Turkey
U. Aypar
Affiliation:
Hacettepe University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Anaesthesiology, Ankara, Turkey
Get access

Extract

Summary

Background and objective: Minimizing cervical vertebrae motion during endotracheal intubation is important in patients with cervical instability. The aim of this study was to compare upper cervical spine extension during endotracheal intubation using three different techniques.

Methods: Duration of intubation and movement of upper cervical vertebrae during endotracheal intubation were compared in 33 patients undergoing lumbar laminectomy. Patients requiring tracheal intubation under general anaesthesia and neuromuscular blockade were randomly allocated into three groups – direct laryngoscopy, intubating laryngeal mask (LM) airway and fibreoptic laryngoscopy. The procedure was recorded by video-fluoroscopy and analysed with computer-assisted measurements. The maximum movement of the C1/C2 and C2/C3 vertebrae during intubation were obtained. Data were analysed using one-way analysis of variance with Bonferroni and Kruskal–Wallis tests.

Results: We found statistically significant movement between the first and second, but not between the second and third cervical vertebrae. The mean (±SD) movement at C1/C2 was 10.2 ± 7.3° with direct laryngoscopy, 5.0 ± 6.3° with LM and 1.6 ± 3.2° with fibreoptic laryngoscopy. This difference was statistically significant (P = 0.01) between the direct and fibreoptic laryngoscopy groups. The maximum movement at C2/C3 was 2.2 ± 10.1° with direct laryngoscopy, 3.5 ± 5.1° with LM and 0.5 ± 3.2° with fibreoptic laryngoscopy. Duration of intubation was significantly longer in the intubating LM group (P < 0.001).

Conclusion: We conclude that fibreoptic laryngoscopy is the more suitable intubation technique when cervical spine movement is not desired.

Keywords

INTUBATION, intratrachealLARYNGEAL MASKSENDOSCOPES, laryngoscopesSPINE, cervical vertebrae, atlas, axis
Type
Original Article
Information
European Journal of Anaesthesiology , Volume 21 , Issue 10 , October 2004 , pp. 819 - 823
Copyright
© 2004 European Society of Anaesthesiology

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Hastings RH, Marks JD. Airway management for trauma patients with potential cervical spine injuries. Anesth Analg 1991; 73: 471–482.Google Scholar
Sawin PD, Todd MM, Traynelis VC, et al. Cervical spine motion with direct laryngoscopy and orotracheal intubation. An in vivo cinefluoroscopic study of subjects without cervical abnormality. Anesthesiology 1996; 85: 26–36.Google Scholar
Hastings RH, Vigil AC, Hanna R, et al. Cervical spine movement during laryngoscopy with Bullard, Macintosh, and Miller laryngoscopes. Anesthesiology 1995; 82: 859–869.Google Scholar
Wood PR, Lawler PGP. Managing the airway in cervical spine injury. Anaesthesia 1992; 47: 792–797.Google Scholar
Brimacombe J, Keller C, Künzel KH, Gaber O, Boehler M, Pühringer F. Cervical spine motion during airway management: a cinefluoroscopic study of the posteriorly destabilized third cervical vertebrae in human cadavers. Anesth Analg 2000; 91: 1274–1278.Google Scholar
Lennarson PJ, Smith D, Todd MM, et al. Segmental cervical spine motion during orotracheal intubation of the intact and injured spine with and without external stabilization. J Neurosurg (Spine 2) 2000; 92: 201–206.Google Scholar
Cormack RS, Lehane J. Difficult tracheal intubation in obstetrics. Anaesthesia 1984; 39: 1105–1111.Google Scholar
Waltl B, Melischek M, Schuschnig C, et al. Tracheal intubation and cervical spine excursion: direct laryngoscopy and intubating laryngeal mask. Anaesthesia 2001; 56: 221–226.Google Scholar
Lennarson PJ, Smith DW, Sawin PD, Todd MM, Sato Y, Traynelis VC. Cervical spine motion during intubation: efficacy of stabilization maneuvers in the setting of complete segmental instability. J Neurosurg (Spine 2) 2001; 94: 265–270.Google Scholar
Panjabi MM, Thibodeau LL, Crisco III JJ, et al. What constitutes spinal instability? Clin Neurosurg 1988; 34: 313–339.Google Scholar
Hastings RH, Wood PR. Head extension and laryngeal view during laryngoscopy with cervical spine stabilization maneuvers. Anesthesiology 1994; 80: 825–831.Google Scholar
Majernick TG, Bieniek R, Houston JB, Hughes HG. Cervical spine movement during orotracheal movement. Ann Emerg Med 1986; 15: 417–420.Google Scholar
Langeron O, Semjen F, Bourgain JL, Marsac A, Cros AM. Comparison of the intubating laryngeal mask airway with the fiberoptic intubation in anticipated difficult airway management. Anesthesiology 2001; 94: 968–972.Google Scholar