Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-hvd4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-10T21:17:07.576Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Intensive Family Services in Australia: A ‘snapshot’

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 February 2016

Lynda Campbell
Lynda Campbell*
Affiliation:
School of Social Work, University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Email: lyndamc@unimelb.edu.au
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper reports a survey of 21 Intensive Family Services programs, members of the Intensive Family Services National Practice Symposium. The survey was designed to elicit a ‘snapshot’ of program models, operational issues and policy matters within these services, in order to consolidate some understanding of the evolution of Intensive Family Preservation Services since the developments of the early 1990s.

Type
Research Article
Information
Children Australia , Volume 29 , Issue 4 , 2004 , pp. 4 - 11
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Atkinson, G., Absler, D. & Campbell, L. (2000) Aboriginal Family Preservation Pilot Program Evaluation: Final report, Melbourne: Yuruga Enterprises & University of Melbourne School of Social Work, Victoria.Google Scholar
Berg, I.K.. & Kelly, S. (2000) Building solutions in child protective services, W.W. Norton and Co., New York.Google Scholar
Berry, M., Charlson, R & Dawson, K. (2003) “Promising practices in understanding and treating child neglect’, Child and Family Social Work, 8, 13–24.Google Scholar
Berry, M., Cash, S. & Brook, J. (2000) ‘Intensive family preservation services: An examination of critical service components’, Child and Family Social Work, 5, 191–203.Google Scholar
Burchili, M. (2004) Scars beneath our skin, unpublished Master of Social Work thesis, University of Melbourne, Victoria.Google Scholar
Campbell, L. (1994) ‘The Families First Pilot Program in Victoria: Cuckoo or contribution?’ Children Australia, 19 (2), 4–10.Google Scholar
Campbell, L. (1997a) ‘Service to parents who abuse substances: Literature to inform a practice- research initiative’, Children Australia, 22 (2), 19–27.Google Scholar
Campbell, L. (1997b) The Substance Abuse Family Support Program: the First Year, Evaluation Report. Children Young People and Families Research Unit, School of Social Work, University of Melbourne, for St. Joseph's Child and Family Support Services, Flemington, Victoria.Google Scholar
Campbell, L. (1997c) ‘Child Neglect and Intensive Family Preservation practice’, Families in Society, The Journal of Contemporary Human Services, 78 (3), 280–290.Google Scholar
Campbell, L. (1998a) ‘Translating Intensive Family Preservation Services across national boundaries: An Australian experience’, Child Welfare, LXXVII (I), 79–93.Google Scholar
Campbell, L. (1998b) Substance Abuse Family Support Service: Final Report, Children Young People and Families Research Unit, School of Social Work, University of Melbourne, for MacKillop Family Services, Footscray, Victoria.Google Scholar
Campbell, L. (2002) ‘Interagency Practice in Intensive Family Preservation Services’, Children and Youth Services Review, 24 (9/10), 701–718.Google Scholar
Campbell, L., Jackson, A., Goodman, H., Cameron, N. & Smith, S. (2002) High Risk Infants Service Quality Initiatives Project Evaluation: Final Report, RCH/University of Melbourne Social Work Practice Research Unit & Children, Young People and Families Research Unit, School of Social Work, University of Melbourne. Department of Human Services, Melbourne, Victoria.Google Scholar
Campbell, L., Jackson, A., Smith, S. & Cameron, N. (2002) High Risk Infants Service Quality Initiative Evaluation: Implementation of the Parent Assessment and Skill Development Program, RCH/University of Melbourne Social Work Practice Research Unit & Children, Young People and Families Research Unit, School of Social Work, University of Melbourne, Department of Human Services, Melbourne, Victoria.Google Scholar
Campbell, L. & Tierney, L. (1993) Families First: Report of the evaluation of the pilot program. University of Melbourne School of Social Work, Parkville, Victoria.Google Scholar
Commonwealth of Australia (2004) A hand up not a hand out: Renewing the fight against poverty, Report on poverty and financial hardship, March 2004.Google Scholar
Hayward, K. & Cameron, G. (2002) ‘Focussing Intensive Family Preservation Services: Patterns and Consequences’, Child and Youth Care Forum, 31 (5), 241–256.Google Scholar
Kelly, S. & Blythe, B. (2000) ‘Family Preservation: A potential not yet realized’, Child Welfare, 79 (1), 29–42.Google Scholar
Kinney, J., Haapala, D. & Booth, C. (1991) Keeping families together: the Homebuilders model. Aldine de Gruyter, New York.Google Scholar
Reder, P. & Lucey, C. (1995) ‘Significant issues in the assessment of parenting’, Chapter 1 in Reder, P. and Lucey, C. (Eds.), Assessment of Parenting: Psychiatric and psychological contributions, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Steering Committee for the Review of Government Service Provision (SCRGSP) (2002) Report on Government Service 2002, Productivity Commission, Canberra.Google Scholar
Steering Committee for the Review of Government Service Provision (SCRGSP) 2004, Report on Government Services 2004, Productivity Commission, Canberra.Google Scholar
Wise, S. (2001) How should family senices respond to ‘Children in Need’?, Australian Family Briefing No. 11, AIFS, Melbourne.Google Scholar