Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b95js Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-10T23:52:56.792Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Gender representation in undergraduate music technology education: case studies from Aotearoa/New Zealand

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 January 2025

Catherine Hoad*
Affiliation:
Toi Rauwhārangi Massey University, Wellington, Aotearoa New Zealand
Henry Johnson
Affiliation:
University of Otago, Dunedin, Aotearoa New Zealand
Megan Rogerson-Berry
Affiliation:
Wintec Te Pūkenga, Hamilton, Aotearoa New Zealand
Oli Wilson
Affiliation:
Toi Rauwhārangi Massey University, Wellington, Aotearoa New Zealand
Josh Ellery
Affiliation:
Independent scholar, Aotearoa New Zealand
*
Corresponding author: Catherine Hoad; Email: c.hoad@massey.ac.nz

Abstract

This article explores the relationship between gender inequities in undergraduate music technology education and the widespread imbalances that permeate the professional music technology workforce. We present evidence concerning the relationship between tertiary training and industry outcomes by focusing on three music technology degree-level offerings in Aotearoa/New Zealand. In doing so, we critically examine the ways in which higher education in Aotearoa/New Zealand may be seen to perpetuate international trends concerning the underrepresentation of women in music technology fields. Firstly, the article offers an overview of extant scholarship on gender and music technology training. From here, it examines national data on music enrolments that show gender imbalances across music degrees. It then analyses three music technology degree-level offerings in Aotearoa as case studies. These reveal how gender inequities are amplified in areas relating to music technology. Datasets are then considered in relation to gender representation within the music industry in Aotearoa. The article concludes by offering reflections on key areas for interventions and avenues for further research.

Type
Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ARMSTRONG, V. (2008). Hard bargaining on the hard drive: Gender bias in the music technology classroom. Gender and Education, 20(4), 375386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ARMSTRONG, V. (2016). Technology and the Gendering of Music Education. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BENNETT, D., MACARTHUR, S., HOPE, C., GOH, T. & HENNEKAM, S. (2018). Creating a career as a woman composer: Implications for music in higher education. British Journal of Music Education, 35(3), 237253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BLICKENSTAFF, J. (2005). Women and science careers: Leaky pipeline or gender filter? Gender and Education, 17(4), 369386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BORN, G. & DEVINE, K. (2015). Music technology, gender, and class: Digitization, educational and social change in Britain. Twentieth-Century Music, 12(2), 135172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BRADLEY, D., GOLNER, R. & HANSON, S. (2007). Unlearning whiteness: Rethinking race issues in graduate music education. Music Education Research, 9(2), 293304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BURNARD, P. (2010). Creativity and technology: Critical agents of change in the work and lives of music teachers. In BURNARD, P. & FINNEY, J. (eds.), Music Education with Digital Technology (pp. 196206). London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
BYRNE, C. & MACDONALD, R. (2002). The use of information & communication technology (I&CT) in the Scottish Music Curriculum: A focus group investigation of themes and issues. Music Education Research, 4(2), 263273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CARRASCO BENÍTEZ, M. (1996). Conferencia internacional Dance and boundaries in society, politics, gender, education and technology. Revista de musicología, 19(1–2), 383384.Google Scholar
COLLEY, A., COMBER, C., & HARGREAVES, D. (1997). IT and music education: What happens to boys and girls in coeducational and single sex schools? British Journal of Music Education, 14(2), 119127. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265051700003569 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
COMBER, C., HARGREAVES, D. J., & COLLEY, A. (1993). Girls, boys and technology in music education. British Journal of Music Education, 10(2), 123–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
COOPER, L. (2007). The gender factor: Teaching composition in music technology lessons to boys and girls in year 9. In FINNEY, J. & BURNARD, P. (eds.), Music Education with Digital Technology (pp. 3040). London, New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
DAMMERS, R. (2012). Technology-based music classes in high schools in the United States. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 194, 7390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DE BOISE, S. (2018). Gender inequalities and higher music education: Comparing the US and Sweden. British Journal of Music Education, 35(1), 2341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DONNELLAN, M. & LUCAS, R. (2013). Secondary data analysis. In LITTLE, T. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Quantitative Methods in Psychology: Vol. 2: Statistical Analysis (pp. 665677). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
DOUBLEDAY, V. (2008). Sounds of power: An overview of musical instruments and gender. Ethnomusicology Forum, 17(1), 339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ELPUS, K. (2015). Music teacher licensure candidates in the United States: A demographic profile and analysis of licensure examination scores. Journal of Research in Music Education, 63(3), 314335. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429415602470 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ESCALANTE, S. (2020). Exploring access, intersectionality, and privilege in undergraduate music education courses. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 29(2), 2237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FIANI, C. N. & HAN, H. J. (2018). Navigating identity: Experiences of binary and non-binary transgender and gender non-conforming (TGNC) adults. International Journal of Transgender, 22(20), 181194.Google Scholar
GILLARD, H. (2022). The limits to non-binary inclusion within the university. Journal of Australian Studies, 46(3), 354369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GREEN, L. (1997). Music, Gender, Education. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HALLAM, S., ROGERS, L. & CREECH, A. (2008). Gender differences in musical instrument choice. International Journal of Music Education, 26(1), 719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HESS, J. (2017). Equity and music education: Euphemisms, terminal naivety, and whiteness. Action, Criticism & Theory for Music Education, 16(3), 1547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HESS, J. (2018). Troubling whiteness: Music education and the “messiness” of equity work. International Journal of Music Education, 36(2), 128144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HESS, J. (2021). Becoming an anti-racist music educator: Resisting whiteness in music education. Music Educators Journal, 107(4), 1420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HOPKINS, E. & BERKERS, P. (2019). Engineering a place for women: Gendered experiences of the music technology classroom. In RAINE, S. & STRONG, C. (eds.), Toward Gender Equality in the Music Industry: Education, Activism and Practice (pp. 4558). London: Bloomsbury.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LAWRENCE, M. & MCKENDRY, S. (2019). Supporting Transgender and Non-Binary Students and Staff in Further and Higher Education: Practical Advice for Colleges and Universities. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.Google Scholar
LEAVITT, E. H. (2022). Building a New World: Negotiating Gender Identity and Technology in Canada’s Electroacoustic Music Industry. (Dissertation, McGill University).Google Scholar
MATHEW, M., GROSSMAN, J. & ANDREOPOULOU, A. (2016). Women in audio: Contributions and challenges in music technology and production. Audio Engineering Society Convention, 141, 110.Google Scholar
MATSUNO, E. & BUDGE, S. L. (2017). Non-binary/Genderqueer identities: A critical review of the literature. Current Sexual Health Reports, 9(3), 116120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11930-017-0111-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MONRO, S. (2019). Non-binary and genderqueer: An overview of the field. International Journal of Transgenderism, 20(23), 126131. https://doi.org/10.1080/15532739.2018.1538841 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
PEGLEY, K. A. (2006). Like horses to water: Reconsidering gender and technology within music education discourses. Women & Music: A Journal of Gender and Culture, 10, 6070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
PETERS, V. (2017). The impact of technologies on society, schools, and music learning. In RUTHMANN, S. & MANTIE, R. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Technology and Music Education (pp. 276290). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
RICHARDS, C., BOUMAN, W. P., SEAL, L., BARKER, M. J., NIEDER, T. O. & T’SJOEN, G. (2016). Non-binary or genderqueer genders. International Review of Psychiatry, 28(1), 95102. https://doi.org/10.3109/09540261.2015.1106446 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
SMITH, D. M. (2010). Deci-belles: Gender and power in sound engineering for popular music in New Zealand (Doctoral dissertation, University of Otago).Google Scholar
TALBOT, B. C. (ed.) (2018). Marginalized Voices in Music Education. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
TAPSELL, D. W. (2021). Implicit gender bias in music technology education (Masters Dissertation, Auckland University of Technology).Google Scholar
TOMOKO, L. J. (1995). Border crossings: Dance and boundaries in society, politics, gender, education, and technology. In TOMKO, L. J. (Compiler), Proceedings [of the] Society of Dance History Scholars. Riverside, CA: University of California, Riverside.Google Scholar
WINTERSON, J. & RUSS, M. (2009). Understanding the transition from school to university in music and music technology. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 8(3), 339354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar