Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-857557d7f7-zntvd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-29T22:21:38.743Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Appendix relating to Part I: Brannen & Peterson, 2009

from Appendixes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2025

Mary Yoko Brannen
Mary Yoko Brannen
Affiliation:
San José State University, California
Get access

Information

Type
Chapter
Information
Ethnography in International Business
Learning from the Field
 , pp. 252
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Adler, N. J. 1983. Cross-cultural management research: The ostrich and the trend. Academy of Management Review, 8(2): 226–232.Google Scholar
Aiken, M. T., & Hage, J. 1966. Organizational alienation: A comparative analysis. American Sociological Review, 31(4): 497–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvesson, M., & Sveningsson, S. 2003. Managers doing leadership: The extra-ordinarization of the mundane. Human Relations, 56(12): 1435–1459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barkema, H. G., Bell, H. J., & Pennings, J. M. 1996. Foreign entry, cultural barriers, and learning. Strategic Management Journal, 17(2): 151–166.3.0.CO;2-Z>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, E. L. 1990. The bicultural life experience of career-oriented black women. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 11(6): 459–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benet-Martinez, V., & Haritatos, J. 2005. Bicultural identity integration (BII): Components and psychological antecedents. Journal of Personality, 73(4): 1015–1050.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benet-Martinez, V., Leu, J., Lee, F., & Morris, M. 2002. Negotiating biculturalism: Cultural frame switching in biculturals with oppositional versus compatible cultural identities. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33(5): 492–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhagat, R. S., Kedia, B. L., Harveston, P. D., & Triandis, H. C. 2002. Cultural variations in the cross-border transfer of organizational knowledge: An integrative framework. Academy of Management Review, 27(2): 204–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bijlsma-Frankema, K., & Costa, A. C. 2005. Understanding the trust-control nexus. International Sociology, 20(3): 259–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blauner, R. 1960. Work satisfaction and industrial trends in modern society. In Galenson, W. & Lipset, M. S. (Eds.), Labor and trade unionism: 339–360. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Blauner, R. 1964. Alienation and freedom: The factory worker and his industry. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Boyacigiller, N., & Adler, N. J. 1991. The parochial dinosaur: Organizational science in a global context. Academy of Management Review, 16(2): 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brannen, M. Y. 1994. Your next boss is Japanese: Negotiating cultural change at a Western Massachusetts paper plant. Unpublished Dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Brannen, M. Y. 1996. Ethnographic international management research. In Punnet, B. J. & Shenkar, O. (Eds.), Handbook for international management research: 115–143, Cambridge: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Brannen, M. Y., & Fruin, W. M. 1999. Cultural alienation in today’s multinational work arenas: Behavioral fallout from globalization. In T. Hamada (Ed.), “Anthropologists and the Globalization of Business,” Special Issue of Practicing Anthropology, Vol. 21(4) Fall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brannen, M. Y., & Salk, J. E. 2000. Partnering across borders: Negotiating organizational culture in a German-Japanese joint-venture. Human Relations, 53(4): 451–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butterfield, D. A., & Farris, G. F. 1972. The Likert organizational profile: Methodological analysis and test of system 4 theory in Brazil. Sloan School of Management Working Paper No. 608–72.Google Scholar
Calori, R., Lubatkin, M., & Very, P. 1994. Control mechanisms in cross-border acquisitions: An international comparison. Organizational Science, 15(3): 361–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaterjee, S., Lubatkin, M. H., Schweiger, D. M., & Weber, Y. 1992. Cultural differences and shareholder value in related mergers: linking equity and human capital. Strategic Manage ment Journal, 13(5): 319–334.Google Scholar
Cheng, C.-Y., Lee, F., & Benet-Martinez, V. 2006. Assimilation and contrast effects in cultural frame switching: Bicultural identity integration and valence of cultural cues. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 37(6): 742–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Child, J., Falkner, D., & Pitkethy, R. 2001. The management of international acquisitions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Datta, D. K., & Puia, G. 1995. Cross-border acquisitions: an examination of the influence of relatedness and cultural fit on shareholder value creation in US acquiring firms. Management International Review, 35(4): 337–359.Google Scholar
Dill, B. T. 1979. The dialectics of black womanhood. Signs, 4(3): 543–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doi, T. 1971. Amae no kozo (The structure of amae). Tokyo: Kobundo.Google Scholar
Durkheim, E. 1933. The division of labor in society. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Eisenhardt, K. 1991. Better stories and better constructs: The case for rigor and comparative logic. Academy of Management Review, 16(3): 620–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, N. 1995. Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Fine, G. A. 1984. Negotiated orders and organizational cultures. Annual Review of Sociology, 10: 239–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardberg, N. A., & Fombrun, C. J. 2006. Corporate citizenship: Creating intangible assets across institutional environments. Academy of Management Review, 31(2): 329–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geertz, C. 1973. The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Gelfand, M. J., Erez, M., & Aycan, Z. 2007. Cross-cultural organizational behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 58: 479–514.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. 1967. The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Gruyter.Google Scholar
Glater, J. D. 2005. Suit by two employees in US accuses Japanese company of bias. New York Times. newyorktimes.com, January 20.Google Scholar
Harvey, M., Novicevic, M. A., Buckley, A. R., & Fung, H. 2005. Reducing inpatriate managers’ “liability of foreignness” by addressing stigmatization and stereotype threats. Journal of World Business, 40(3): 267–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hassard, J., McCann, L., & Morris, J. 2007. At the sharp end of new organizational ideologies. Ethnography, 8(3): 324–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hitt, M. A., Harrison, J. S., & Ireland, R. D. 2001a. Mergers and acquisitions: A guide to creating value for stakeholders. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hitt, M. A., Ireland, R. D., Camp, S. M., & Sexton, D. L. 2001b. Strategic entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial strategies for wealth creation. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6–7): 479–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holden, L., & Roberts, I. 2004. The depowerment of the European middle-managers: Challenges and uncertainties. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 19(3): 269–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
JETRO (Japan External Trade Relations Organization). 2007. Japanese trade and investment statistics. http://www.jetro. go.jp/en/stats/statistics/.Google Scholar
Kanter, R. M., & Corn, B. I. 1994. Cultural changes during the integration process of acquisitions: A comparative study between German-Korean acquisitions. International Journal of International Relations, 31(5): 591–604.Google Scholar
Kanungo, R. 1984. Work alienation: An integrative approach. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Kanungo, R. 1990. Work alienation: A pan-cultural perspective. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 21(2): 232–248.Google Scholar
Kleinberg, J. 1989. Cultural clash between managers: America’s Japanese firms. Advances in International Comparative Management, 4: 221–243.Google Scholar
Kopp, R. 1994. The rice paper ceiling: Breaking through Japanese corporate culture. Berkeley, CA: Stone Bridge Press.Google Scholar
Krug, J. A., & Hegarty, W. H. 2001. Predicting who stays and leaves after an acquisition: A study of top managers in multinational firms. Strategic Management Journal, 22(2): 185–196.3.0.CO;2-M>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larsson, R., & Lubatkin, M. 2001. Achieving acculturation in mergers and acquisitions: An international case survey. Human Relations, 54(12): 1573–1607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lebra, T. S. 1976. Japanese patterns of behavior. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, S. 2003. Global acquisitions: Strategic integration and the human factor. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Lincoln, J. R., & Kalleberg, A. L. 1990. Culture, control, and commitment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lipponen, J., Olkkonen, M. E., & Moilanen, A. 2004. Perceived procedural justice and employee responses to an organizational merger. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 13(3): 391–413.Google Scholar
Mann, J. 1958. Group relations and the marginal personality. Human Relations, 11(1): 77–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markides, C., & Ittner, C. D. 1994. Shareholder benefits from corporate international diversification: Evidence from US international acquisitions. Journal of International Business Studies, 25(2): 343–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marks, M. L. 1982. Merging human resources: A review of current research. Mergers and Acquisitions, 17(2): 50–55.Google Scholar
Marks, M. L., & Mirvis, P. 1985. Merger syndrome: Stress and uncertainty. Mergers and Acquisitions, 20(2): 50–55.Google Scholar
Markus, H. R., & Zajonc, R. B. 1985. The cognitive perspective in social psychology. In Lindzey, G. & Aronson, E. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (3rd ed.). Vol. 1: 137–230. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Marx, K. 1897. Capital, Vol. 1. (Trans. 1967). New York: New World Paperbacks.Google Scholar
McGregor, D. 1960. The human side of enterprise. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. 1991. A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1(1): 61–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mezias, J. 2002. Identifying liabilities of foreignness and strategies to minimize their effects: The case of labor lawsuit judgments in the United States. Strategic Management Journal, 23(3): 229–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Middleton, R. 1963. Alienation, race and education. American Sociological Review, 28(6): 973–977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Misra, S., Kanungo, R., Von Ronsenstiel, L., & Stuhler, E. 1985. The motivational formulation of job and work involvement: A cross-national study. Human Relations, 33(6): 501–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morosini, P., Shane, S., & Singh, S. 1998. National cultural distance and cross-border performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 29(1): 137–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mowday, R. T., Steers, R. M., & Porter, L. W. 1979. The measurement of organizational commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 14: 224–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nahavandi, A., & Malekzadeh, A. R. 1988. Acculturation in mergers and acquisitions. Academy of Management Review, 13(1): 79–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. 1995. The knowledge creating company. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohnuki-Tierney, E. 1984. Illness and culture in contemporary Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ong, A. 1987. Spirits of resistance and capitalist discipline: Factory women in Malaysia. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Peltonen, T. 2007. In the middle of managers’ occupational communities, global ethnography and the multinationals. Ethnography, 8(3): 346–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, M. F., Peng, T. K., & Smith, P. B. 1999. Using expatriate supervisors to promote cross-border management practice transfer: The experience of a Japanese electronics company. In Liker, J. K., Fruin, W. M., & Adler, P. S. (Eds.), Remade in America: Transplanting and transforming Japanese management systems: 294–327. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Polanyi, M. 1966. The tacit dimension. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Rohlen, T. 1974. For harmony and strength: Japanese white-collar organization in anthropological perspective. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schweiger, D. M., & Lippert, R. L. 2005. Integration: The critical link in M&A value creation. In Stahl, G. & Mendenhall, M. (Eds.), Mergers and acquisitions: 17–46. Stanford: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seeman, M. 1959. On the meaning of alienation. American Sociological Review, 24(6): 783–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shimizu, K., Hitt, M., Vaidyanath, D., & Pisano, V. 2004. Theoretical foundations of cross-border mergers and acquisitions: A review of current research and recommendations for the future. Journal of International Management, 10(3): 307–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spreitzer, G. M. 1996. Social structural characteristics of psychological empowerment. Academy of Management Journal, 39(2): 483–504.Google Scholar
Stahl, G., Mendenhall, M., Pablo, A., & Javidan, M. 2005. Sociocultural integration in mergers and acquisitions. In Stahl, G. & Mendenhall, M. (Eds.), Mergers and acquisitions: 3–16. Stanford: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stonequist, E. V. 1937. The marginal man: A study in personality and culture conflict. New York: Russell & Russell.Google Scholar
Strauss, A. L. 1982. Interorganizational negotiation. Urban Life, 11(3): 350–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thiederman, S. 2003. Making diversity work: 7 steps for defeating bias in the workplace. Chicago: Dearborn Trade Publishing.Google Scholar
Uhlenbruck, K. 2004. Developing acquired foreign subsidiaries: The experience of MNEs in transition economies. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(2): 109–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valentine, C. 1971. Deficiency, difference and bicultural models. Harvard Educational Review, 41(2): 137–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Maanen, J. 1992. Displacing Disney: Some notes on the flow of culture. Qualitative Sociology, 15(1): 5–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veiga, J. F., Lubatkin, M. H., Calori, R., & Very, P. 2000. Measuring organizational culture clashes: A two-nation posthoc analysis of a cultural compatibility index. Human Relations, 53(4): 539–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vermeulen, F., & Barkema, H. 2001. Learning through acquisitions. Academy of Management Journal, 44(3): 457–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Very, P., Lubatkin, M., Calori, R., & Veiga, J. 1996. Cross-national assessment of acculturative stress in recent European mergers. International Studies of Management and Organization, 26(1): 59–88.Google Scholar
Very, P., Lubatkin, M., Calori, R., & Veiga, J. 1997. Relative standing and the performance of recently acquired European firms. Strategic Management Journal, 18(8): 593–615.3.0.CO;2-I>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, Y., Shenkar, O., & Raveh, A. 1996. National and corporate cultural fit in mergers/acquisitions: An exploratory study. Management Science, 42(8): 1215–1227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wong, N. 1990. A study of the special economic zones and coastal open cities in China, Research report on investment environment of Mainland China (6). Taipei: Investment Department, Ministry of Economy.Google Scholar
Xu, H., & Van de Vliert, E. 2004. Job level and national culture as joint roots of job satisfaction. Applied Psychology, 53(3): 329–348.Google Scholar
Yeung, H. W. C. 2000. State intervention and neoliberalism in the globalising world economy: Lessons from Singapore’s regionalization programme. The Pacific Review, 13(1): 133–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhu, Y., May, S., & Rosenfeld, L. 2004. Information adequacy and job satisfaction during merger and acquisition. Management Communication Quarterly, 18(2): 241–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zurcher, L. A. Jr, Meadow, A., & Zurcher, S. L. 1965. Value orientation, role conflict, and alienation from work: A cross-cultural study. American Sociological Review, 30(4): 539–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Accessibility standard: WCAG 2.0 A

Why this information is here

This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

Accessibility Information

The PDF of this book conforms to version 2.0 of the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG), ensuring core accessibility principles are addressed and meets the basic (A) level of WCAG compliance, addressing essential accessibility barriers.

Content Navigation

Table of contents navigation
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Index navigation
Provides an interactive index, letting you go straight to where a term or subject appears in the text without manual searching.

Reading Order & Textual Equivalents

Single logical reading order
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
Short alternative textual descriptions
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.
Full alternative textual descriptions
You get more than just short alt text: you have comprehensive text equivalents, transcripts, captions, or audio descriptions for substantial non‐text content, which is especially helpful for complex visuals or multimedia.

Visual Accessibility

Use of colour is not sole means of conveying information
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.

Structural and Technical Features

ARIA roles provided
You gain clarity from ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) roles and attributes, as they help assistive technologies interpret how each part of the content functions.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×