Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
  • Cited by 5
    • Show more authors
    • You may already have access via personal or institutional login
    • Select format
    • Publisher:
      Cambridge University Press
      Publication date:
      May 2023
      June 2023
      ISBN:
      9781009093835
      9781009098335
      9781009096157
      Dimensions:
      (229 x 152 mm)
      Weight & Pages:
      0.51kg, 248 Pages
      Dimensions:
      (229 x 152 mm)
      Weight & Pages:
      0.38kg, 248 Pages
    You may already have access via personal or institutional login
  • Selected: Digital
    Add to cart View cart Buy from Cambridge.org

    Book description

    Constitutional law has helped make Americans unhealthy. Drawing from law, history, political theory, and public health research, Constitutional Contagion explores the history of public health laws, the nature of liberty and individual rights, and the forces that make a nation more or less vulnerable to contagion. In this groundbreaking work, Wendy Parmet documents how the Supreme Court departed from past practice to stymie efforts to mitigate the COVID-19 pandemic and demonstrates how pre-pandemic court decisions helped to shatter social contracts, weaken democracy, and perpetuate the inequities that made the United States especially vulnerable when COVID-19 struck. Looking at judicial decisions from an earlier era, Parmet argues that the Constitution does not compel the stark individualism and disregard of public health that is evident in contemporary constitutional law decisions. Parmet shows us why, if we are to be a healthy nation, constitutional law must change.

    Reviews

    ‘Constitutional Contagion is undoubtedly the single most important book on the outsized influence of the judiciary in the COVID-19 pandemic. Wendy Parmet has no equal in American public health law. Her book contains a nuanced explanation of how an increasingly aggressive conservative judiciary has curbed important public health powers during the pandemic. Prof Parmet has always fought for a careful balance between strong public health powers and sensitivity to privacy and liberty of citizens. We need to learn the lessons she is teaching, not just for COVID-19 but also for the next health crisis, which might occur sooner then we think. This book is a tour de force-essential reading for scholars and citizens who care about good public health governance.’

    Lawrence Gostin - Georgetown University

    ‘Parmet’s incisive analysis will be an invaluable resource to experts and nonexperts alike as we all work together to reconstruct a viable balance between individual liberty and collective action to protect the public’s health.’

    Lindsay F. Wiley - University of California, Los Angeles

    ‘This book confirms Wendy Parmet’s status as our leading interpreter of the judicial doctrines of public health - and our most powerful legal voice for recognizing the promotion and protection of public health as a defining purpose of government. Parmet clearly recounts the history and explains the importance of landmark cases, in a way that a reader does not need a law degree to understand or profit by.’

    Scott Burris - Temple University

    ‘Constitutional Contagion is a compelling tour de force, and essential reading for anyone seeking to understand America’s fraught response to the COVID pandemic. No other scholar understands the legal and political conflicts better than Wendy Parmet. With clear, insightful explanation, Parmet shows us that thoughtful law and reasoned governance are possible even in the midst of a deadly pandemic. But to face a pandemic future, we must implement reforms now, rather than give in to the complacency that has so often followed serious outbreaks of contagious disease throughout our history.’

    Polly Price - Emory University School of Law

    ‘Provocative and illuminating.’

    Linda Greenhouse Source: New York Review of Books

    ‘Important and disquieting.’

    Mark Rothstein Source: American Journal of Public Health

    ‘Parmet’s book serves overwhelming evidence of how we have contorted our constitutive laws to thwart the common good. Can it truly be that we would forsake the good rather than hold it in common? But her message is fundamentally a hopeful one insofar as she is pointing out the contingency of our current constitutional condition, the shallowness of the recent health-hostile stance of the courts, and the more deeply-rooted, pro-public health orientation that we could recuperate.’

    Christina S. Ho Source: Jotwell

    ‘An impressively detailed analysis of the development of public health law in the United States.’

    Daniel Sledge Source: Perspectives on Politics

    Refine List

    Actions for selected content:

    Select all | Deselect all
    • View selected items
    • Export citations
    • Download PDF (zip)
    • Save to Kindle
    • Save to Dropbox
    • Save to Google Drive

    Save Search

    You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

    Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
    ×

    Contents

    Metrics

    Altmetric attention score

    Full text views

    Total number of HTML views: 0
    Total number of PDF views: 0 *
    Loading metrics...

    Book summary page views

    Total views: 0 *
    Loading metrics...

    * Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

    Usage data cannot currently be displayed.

    Accessibility standard: Unknown

    Why this information is here

    This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

    Accessibility Information

    Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.