Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7857688df4-8d8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-13T01:34:42.697Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2016

Richard A. Richards
Richard A. Richards
Affiliation:
University of Alabama
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
Chapter
Information
Biological Classification
A Philosophical Introduction
 , pp. 287 - 298
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Agapow, P. M., Bininda-Edmunds, O. R. P., Crandall, K. A., Gittleman, J. L., Mace, G. M., Marshall, J. C., and Purvis, A.. 2004. “The Impact of Species Concept on Biodiversity Studies.” The Quarterly Review of Biology, 79(2): 161–179.10.1086/383542CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Amundson, R. 2005. The Changing Role of the Embryo in Evolutionary Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139164856CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andam, C. Williams, P. D., and Gogarten, J. P.. 2010. “Natural Taxonomy in Light of Horizontal Gene Transfer.” Biology and Philosophy, 25: 589–602.10.1007/s10539-010-9212-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aristotle, . 1995. The Complete Works of Aristotle, Vols. I and II, ed. Barnes, J.. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Atran, S. 1999. “Itzaj Maya Folkbiological Taxonomy,” in Folkbiology, ed. Medin, D. L. and Atran, S., 119–203. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/3042.003.0007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bacon, F. 1960. The New Organon and Related Writings, ed. Anderson, F. H.. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Balme, D. M. 1987. “Aristotle’s Use of Division and Differentiae,” in Philosophical Issues in Aristotle’s Biology, ed. Gotthelf, A. and Lennox, J. G., 69–89. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bapteste, E., and Burian, R.. 2010. “On the Need for Integrative Phylogenomics, and Some Steps toward Its Creation.” Biology and Philosophy, 25: 711–736.10.1007/s10539-010-9218-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, J. 1995. “Life and Work,” in The Cambridge Companion to Aristotle, ed. Barnes, J., 1–26. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Baum, D. A., and Smith, S. D.. 2012. Tree Thinking: An Introduction to Phylogenetic Biology. Greenwood Village, CO: Roberts & Company.Google Scholar
Baum, D. A., Smith, S. D., and Donovan, S. S. S.. 2005. “The Tree-Thinking Challenge.” Science, 310(5750): 979–980.10.1126/science.1117727CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berlin, B. 1992. Ethnobiological Classification: Principles of Categorization of Plants and Animals in Traditional Societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400862597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berlin, B.. 1999. “How a Folkbotanical System Can Be Both Natural and Comprehensive: One Maya Indian’s View of the Plant World,” in Folkbiology, ed. Medin, D. L. and Atran, S., 71–89. Cambridge: MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/3042.003.0005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bird, A., and Tobin, E.. 2008. “Natural Kinds,” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2009 edition), ed. Zalta, E. N.. Retrieved from: http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2009/entries/natural-kinds/Google Scholar
Blackburn, S. 2002. “Metaphysics,” in The Blackwell Companion to Philosophy, ed. Bunnin, N. and Tsui-James, E. P., 61–89. Malden, MA: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470996362.ch4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blumenthal, H. J. 1996. Aristotle and Neoplatonism in Late Antiquity: Interpretations of De Anima. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Bock, W., and Wahlert, G. v.. 1965. “Adaptation and the Form-Function Complex.” Evolution, 19(3): 269–299.10.2307/2406439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bock, W., and Wahlert, G. v.. 1981. “Functional-Adaptive Analysis in Evolutionary Classification.” American Zoologist, 21: 5–20.10.1093/icb/21.1.5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouchard, F. 2013. “What Is a Symbiotic Individual and How Do You Measure Its Fitness?” in From Groups to Individuals: Evolution and Emerging Individuality, ed. Bouchard, F. and Huneman, P., 243–264. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/8921.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, R. 1999. “Homeostasis, Species, and Higher Taxa,” in Species: New Interdisciplinary Essays, ed. Wilson, R. A., 141–185. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Brogaard, B. 2004. “Species as Individuals.” Biology and Philosophy, 19: 223–242.10.1023/B:BIPH.0000024322.46358.61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, S. F. 1999. “Realism versus Nominalism,” in The Columbia History of Western Philosophy, ed. Popkin, R.. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Bulmer, R. N. H. 1967. “Why Is the Cassowary Not a Bird? A Problem of Zoological Taxonomy among the Karam of the New Guinea Highlands.” Man, 2: 5–25.10.2307/2798651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capone, N. C., Haynes, W. O., and Grohne-Riley, K.. 2010. “Early Semantic Development: The Developing Lexicon,” in Language Development: Foundations, Processes, and Clinical Applications, ed. Shulman, B. B. and Capone, N. C.. Burlington, MA: Bartlett.Google Scholar
Clarke, E., and Okasha, S., , S. 2013. “Species and Organisms: What Are the Problems?” in From Groups to Individuals: Evolution and Emerging Individuality, ed. Bouchard, F. and Huneman, P., 197–223. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cracraft, J. 1981. “The Use of Functional and Adaptive Criteria in Phylogenetic Systematics.” American Zoologist, 21: 21–36.10.1093/icb/21.1.21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cracraft, J. 2000. “Species Concepts in Theoretical and Applied Biology: A Systematic Debate with Consequences,” in Species Concepts and Phylogenetic Theory, ed. Wheeler, Q. D, and Meier, R., 3–14. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Crisp, A., Boschetti, C., Tunnacliffe, A., and Micklem, G.. 2015. “Expression of Multiple Horizontally Acquired Genes Is a Hallmark of Both Vertebrate and Invertebrate Genomes.” Genome Biology, 16: 50, DOI 10.1186/s13059- 015-0607-3.10.1186/s13059-015-0607-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dagan, T., Artzy-Randrup, Y., and Martin, W., 2008. “Modular Networks and Cumulative Impact of Lateral Transfer in Prokaryote Genome Evolution.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 105(29): 10039–10044.10.1073/pnas.0800679105CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Darwin, C. 1859. On the Origin of Species, at The Complete Works of Charles Darwin Online. Retrieved from: http://darwin-online.org.uk/content/frameset?viewtype=text&itemID=F339.1&keywords=cirripedia&pageseq=1Google Scholar
Darwin, F. 1887. The Life and Letters of Charles Darwin. New York: D. Appleton and Company.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. 1995. Darwin’s Dangerous Idea. New York: Simon and Schuster.10.1002/j.2326-1951.1995.tb03633.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Depew, D., and Weber, B. H. 1995. Darwinism Evolving: Systems Dynamics and the Genealogy of Natural Selection. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
de Queiroz, K. 1999. “The General Lineage Concept of Species and the Defining Properties of the Species Category,” in Species: New Interdisciplinary Essays, ed. Wilson, R. A., 49–89. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/6396.003.0007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Queiroz, K. 2005. “Ernst Mayr and the Modern Concept of Species.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 102(1): 6600–6607.10.1073/pnas.0502030102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Queiroz, K., and Cantino, P. D.. 2001. “Taxon Names, not Taxa Are Defined.” Taxon, 50(3): 821–824.10.2307/1223709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Queiroz, K., and Gauthier, J.. 1992. “Phylogenetic Taxonomy.” Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 23: 449–480.10.1146/annurev.es.23.110192.002313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Queiroz, K., and Gauthier, J.. 1994. “Toward a Phylogenetic System of Biological Nomenclature.” Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 9: 27–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devitt, M. 2008. “Resurrecting Biological Essentialism.” Philosophy of Science, 75(3): 344–382.10.1086/593566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamond, J., and Bishop, K. D., 1999. “Ethno-ornithology and the Ketengban People, Indonesian New Guinea,” in Folkbiology, ed. Medin, L. and Atran, S.. 17–45. Cambridge: MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/3042.003.0003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobzhansky, T. 1937. Genetics and the Origin of Species. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Dobzhansky, T. 1964. “Biology, Molecular and Organismic.” American Zoologist, 4(4): 443–452.10.1093/icb/4.4.443CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doolittle, W. F. 2010. “The Attempt on the Life of the Tree of Life: Science, Philosophy and Politics.” Biology and Philosophy, 25: 455–473.10.1007/s10539-010-9210-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dupré, J. 1993. The Disorder of Things: Metaphysical Foundations of the Disunity of Science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ebbesen, S. 1990a. “Boethius as an Aristotelian Commentator,” in Aristotle Transformed, ed. Sorabji, R., 373–391. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Ebbeson, S. 1990b. “Porphyry’s Legacy to Logic: A Reconstruction,” in Aristotle Transformed, ed. Sorabji, R., 141–179. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Eddy, J. H. Jr. 1994. “Buffon’s Histoire Naturelle: History? A Critique of Recent Interpretations.” ISIS, 85(40): 644–661.10.1086/356982CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eldredge, N., and Cracraft, J.. 1980. Phylogenetic Patterns and the Evolutionary Process. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Ellstrand, N. C., Whitkus, R., and Rieseberg, L. H.. 1996. “Distribution of Spontaneous Plant Hybrid.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 93: 5090–5093.10.1073/pnas.93.10.5090CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ereshefsky, M. 1992. “Species, Higher Taxa, and the Units of Evolution,” in The Units of Evolution: Essays on the Nature of Species, ed. Ereshefsky, M.. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books.Google Scholar
Ereshefsky, M. 1998. “Species Pluralism and Anti-Realism.” Philosophy of Science, 65: 103–120.10.1086/392628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ereshefsky, M. 2001. The Poverty of the Linnaean Hierarchy: A Philosophical Study of Biological Taxonomy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ereshefsky, M. 2010. “Microbiology and the Species Problem.” Biology and Philosophy, 25: 553–568.10.1007/s10539-010-9211-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eriksson, G. 1983. “Linnaeus the Botanist,” in Linnaeus the Man and His Work, ed. Frangsmyr, T.. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Falcon, A. 2005. “Commentators on Aristotle,” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Edward N. Zalta. Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2005/entries/aristotle-commentators/Google Scholar
Felsenstein, J. 1982. “Numerical Methods for Inferring Evolutionary Trees.” Quarterly Review of Biology, 57(4): 379–404.10.1086/412935CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felsenstein, J. 1983. “Methods for Inferring Phylogenies.” in Numerical Taxonomy, ed. Felstein, Joseph. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.10.1007/978-3-642-69024-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franklin-Hall, L. R. 2010. “Trashing Life’s Tree.” Biology and Philosophy, 25: 689–709.10.1007/s10539-010-9219-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Futuyama, D. 1979. Evolutionary Biology. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar
Gelman, S. A. 2003. The Essential Child: Origins of Essentialism in Everyday Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195154061.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghiselin, M. T. 1969. The Triumph of the Darwinian Method. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ghiselin, M. T. 1997. Metaphysics and the Origin of Species. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Griffiths, P. 1999. “Squaring the Circle, Natural Kinds with Historical Essences,” in Species, New Interdisciplinary Essays, ed. Wilson, R. A., 209–228. Boston, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/6396.003.0014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haber, M. H. 2012. “Multilevel Lineages and Multidimensional Trees: The Levels of Lineage and Phylogeny Reconstruction.” Philosophy of Science, 79: 609–623.10.1086/667849CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haber, M. H. 2013. “Colonies Are Individuals,” in From Groups to Individuals: Evolution and Emerging Individuality, ed. Bouchard, F. and Huneman, P., 195–217. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/8921.003.0015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haber, M. H., and Hamilton, A.. 2005. “Coherence, Consistency, and Cohesion: Clade selection in Okasha and Beyond.” Philosophy of Science, 72: 1026–1040.10.1086/508101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanson, N. R. 1969. Patterns of Discovery. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hennig, W. 1966. Phylogenetic Systematics, trans. Davis, D. D. and Zangerl, R.. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Hey, J. 2001. Genes, Categories and Species: The Evolutionary and Cognitive Causes of the Species Problem. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195144772.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huerta-Sánchez, E., Jin, X., Asan, , , Z. Bianba, Peter, B. M., Vinchenbosch, N., Liang, Y., Yi, X., He, M., Somel, M., Ni, P., Wang, B., Ou, X., Huasang, J. Luosang, Z. Cuo, X. P., Kui Li, G. Gao, Y. Yin, W. Wang, Zhang, X., Xu, X., Yang, H., Li, Y., Wang, J., Wang, J., and Nielsen, R.. 2014. “Altitude Adaptations in Tibetans Caused by Introgression of Denisovan-like DNA.” Nature, 512: 194–197.10.1038/nature13408CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hull, D. L. 1989. The Metaphysics of Evolution. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Hull, D. L. 1990. Science as Process: An Evolutionary Account of the Social and Conceptual Development of Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hull, D. L. 1992. “A Matter of Individuality,” in The Units of Evolution: Essays on the Nature of Species, ed. Ereshefsky, M., 293–316. Cambridge, MA: Bradford BooksGoogle Scholar
Hull, D. L. 1998. “Introduction to Part V,” in The Philosophy of Biology, ed. Hull, D. L. and Ruse, M.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hull, D. L. 1999. “The Use and Abuse of Sir Karl Popper.” Biology and Philosophy, 14: 481–504.10.1023/A:1006554919188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunn, E. 1982. “The Utilitarian Factor in Folk Biological Classification.” American Anthropologist, 84(4): 830–847.10.1525/aa.1982.84.4.02a00070CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huxley, J. S. 1940. “Introductory: Towards the New Systematics,” in The New Systematics, ed. Huxley, Julian, 1–46. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hyman, A., and Walsh, J. J. (1983) Philosophy in the Middle Ages. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
Jablonski, D. 1997. “Body Size Evolution in Cretaceous Molluscs and the Status of Cope’s Rule.” Nature, 385: 250–252.10.1038/385250a0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jablonsky, D. 2008. “Species Selection: Theory and Data.” Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 39: 501–524.10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.39.110707.173510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, W. T. 1969. The Medieval Mind. San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Kant, I, 1965. Critique of Pure Reason, trans. Smith, N. K.. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
Khalidi, M. Ali 2013. Natural Categories and Human Kinds: Classification in the Natural and Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511998553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitcher, P. 1992. “Species,” The Units of Evolution: Essays on the Nature of Species, ed. Ereshefsky, M., 317–341. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books.Google Scholar
Kitts, D. R., and Kitts, D. J.. 1979. “Biological Species as Natural Kinds.” Philosophy of Science, 46(4): 613–622.10.1086/288898CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klima, G. 2003. “Natures: The Problem of Universals.” Cambridge Companion to Medieval Philosophy, ed. McGrade, A. S., 196–206. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kripke, S. 1972. Naming and Necessity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.1007/978-94-010-2557-7_9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LaPorte, J. 2004. Natural Kinds and Conceptual Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Larson, J. L. 1968. “The Species Concept of Linnaeus.” Isis, 59(3): 291–299.10.1086/350398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larson, J. L. 1971. Reason and Experience: The Representation of Natural Order in the Work of Carl von Linne. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lecointre, G., and Guyader, H. L.. 2006. The Tree of Life: A Phylogenetic Classification. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Leibniz, G. 1996. New Essays on Human Understanding, transl. and ed. Remnant, P. and Bennett, J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139166874CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lennox, J. 1980. “Aristotle on Genera, Species and the More and the Less.” Journal of the History of Biology, 13: 321–346.10.1007/BF00125746CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lennox, J. 1987. “Kinds, Forms of Kinds and the More and Less in Aristotle’s Biology,” in Philosophical Issues in Aristotle’s Biology, ed. Gotthelf, A. and Lennox, J. G., 339–359. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lennox, J. 2006. “Aristotle’s Biology,” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Zalta, E. N.. Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2006/entries/aristotle-biology/Google Scholar
Lindroth, S. 1983. “The Two Faces of Linnaeus,” in Linnaeus: The Man and His Work, ed. Frangsmyr, T., 1–62. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, C. 1964. Systema Naturae, Facsimile of the First Edition, ed. Engel-Ledeboer, M. J. S. and Engel, H.. Nieuwkoop, Netherlands: B. De Graaf.Google Scholar
Locke, J. 1975. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Lovejoy, A. O. 1968. “Buffon and the Problem of Species,” in Forerunners of Darwin, 84–113. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
MacLauren, J., and Sterelny, K.. 2008. What Is Biodiversity? The University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226500829.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maddison, D. R., Schulz, K-S., and Maddison, W. P. 2007. “The Tree of Life Web Project.” Zootaxa, 1668: 19–40.10.11646/zootaxa.1668.1.4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madigan, A. S. J. 1994. “Alexander on Aristotle’s Species and Genera as Principles,” in Aristotle in Late Antiquity, ed. Schrenk, L., 76–91. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar
Magnus, P. D. 2012. Scientific Inquiry and Natural Kinds: From Planets to Mallards. London: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9781137271259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maier, D. S. 2013. What’s So Good about Biodiversity. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
Mallet, J. 2005. “Hybridization as an Invasion of the Genome.” Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 20(5): 229–237.10.1016/j.tree.2005.02.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mallet, J. 2013. “Darwin and Species,” in The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Darwin and Evolutionary Thought, ed. Ruse, Michael, 109–115. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139026895.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marenbon, J. 2005. “Anicius Manlius Severinus Boethius,” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2008 Edition), ed. Edward N. Zalta. Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2008/entries/boethius/Google Scholar
Markman, E. 1989, Categorization and Naming in Children: Problems of Induction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Marrone, S. P. 2003. “Medieval Philosophy in Context,” in Cambridge Companion to Medieval Philosophy, ed. McGrade, A. S., 10–50. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mason, A. S. 2010. Plato. Berkeley: University of California Press.10.1017/UPO9781844654352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayden, R. L. 1997. “A Hierarchy of Species Concepts: The Denouement in the Saga of the Species Problem,” in Species: the Units of Biodiversity, ed. Claridge, M. F., Dawah, H. A., and Wilson, M. R., 381–424. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Mayr, E. 1942. Systematics and the Origin of Species. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Mayr, E. 1982. The Growth of Biological Thought. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Mayr, E., and Ashlock, P. D.. 1991. Principles of Systematic Zoology. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
McFadden, B. 1986. “Fossil Horses from “Eohippus” (Hyracotherium) to Equus” Scaling, Cope’s Law and the Evolution of Body Size.” Paleobiology, 12(4): 355–369.10.1017/S0094837300003109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McOuat, G. R. 1996. “Species, Rules and Meaning: The Politics of Language and the Ends of Definitions in 19th Century Natural History.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 27(4): 473–519.10.1016/0039-3681(95)00060-7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Medin, D. L., and Atran, S.. 1999. “Introduction,” in Folkbiology, ed. Medin, D. and Atran, S., 1–15. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/3042.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mill, J. S. 1843. A System of Logic, Ratiocinative and Inductive: Being a Connected View of the Principles of Evidence and the Methods of Scientific Investigation. London: John W. Parker.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. 1858. A System of Logic, Ratiocinative and Inductive: Being a Connected View of the Principles of Evidence and the Methods of Scientific Investigation, 3rd ed. New York: Harper & Brothers.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. 1882. A System of Logic, Ratiocinative and Inductive: Being a Connected View of the Principles of Evidence and the Methods of Scientific Investigation, 8th ed. New York: Harper & Brothers.Google Scholar
Minelli, A. 1993. Biological Systematics. London; Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
Mishler, B. D., and Brandon, R.. 1987. “Individuality, Pluralism, and the Phylogenetic Species Concept.” Biology and Philosophy, 2: 397–414.10.1007/BF00127698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mishler, B. D., and Donoghue, M.. 1992. “Species Concepts: A Case for Pluralism,” The Units of Evolution: Essays on the Nature of Species, ed. Ereshefsky, M., 121–137. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books.Google Scholar
Morgan, G. J., and Pitts, W. B. 2008. “Evolution Without Species: The Case of Mosaic Bacteriophages.” British Journal of Philosophical Science, 59: 745–765.10.1093/bjps/axn038CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, K. 1973. “Structure and Strategy in Learning to Talk.” Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 38: 1–135.10.2307/1165788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, G., and Platnick, N. 1981. Systematics and Biogeography: Cladistics and Vicariance. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Niklas, K. J. 1997. The Evolutionary Biology of Plants. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Normore, C. G. 1990. “Ockham on Mental Language,” in Historical Foundations of Cognitive Science, ed. Smith, J. C., 53–70. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Ogilvie, B. W. 2006. The Science of Describing: Natural History in Renaissance Europe. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226620862.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okasha, S. 2006. Species Selection, Clade Selection and Macroevolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199267972.003.0007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Malley, M. 2010. “Ernst Mayr, the Tree of Life and Philosophy of Biology.” Biology and Philosophy, 25: 529–552.10.1007/s10539-010-9214-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ospovat, D. 1981. The Development of Darwin’s Theory: Natural History, Natural Theology and Natural Selection 1838–1859. Cambridge: Cambridge University of Press.Google Scholar
Panchen, A. L. 1992. Classification, Evolution, and the Nature of Biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511565557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paterson, H. E. H. 1993. Evolution and the Recognition Concept of Species. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Peters, F. E. 1967. Greek Philosophical Terms: A Historical Lexicon. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Pietsch, T. W. 2012. Trees of Life: A Visual History of Evolution. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.10.56021/9781421404790CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plato, . 1961. The Collected Dialogues of Plato, ed. Hamilton, E. and Cairns, H.. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Pradeu, T. 2013. “Immunity and the Emergence of Individuality,” in From Groups to Individuals: Evolution and Emerging Individuality, ed. Bouchard, F. and Huneman, P., 77–96. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Putnam, H. 1973. “Meaning and Reference.” The Journal of Philosophy, 70(19): 699–711.10.2307/2025079CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. 1976. The Ways of Paradox and Other Essays. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ray, J. 1735. The Wisdom of God Manifested in the Works of Creation, 10th ed. London: William Innys and Richard Manby.Google Scholar
Richards, R. A. 2003. “Character Individuation in Phylogenetic Inference.” Philosophy of Science, 70: 264–279.10.1086/375467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, R. A. 2005. “Evolutionary Naturalism and the Logical Structure of Valuation: The Other Side of Error Theory.” Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy, 1(2): 270–292.Google Scholar
Richards, R. A. 2008. “Functional Analysis and Character Transformation,” in Form and Function in Developmental Evolution, ed. Laubichler, M. D. and Maienshein, J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Richards, R. A. 2010. The Species Problem. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511762222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruse, M. 1987. “Biological Species: Natural Kinds, Individuals or What?” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 38(2): 225–242.10.1093/bjps/38.2.225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruse, M. 1999. The Darwinian Revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Simpson, G. G. 1961. Principles of Animal Taxonomy. New York: Columbia University Press.10.7312/simp92414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slater, M. 2013. Are Species Real: An Essay on the Metaphysics of Species. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230393233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sloan, P. R. 1976. “The Buffon-Linnaeus Controversy.” Isis, 67(3): 356–375.10.1086/351629CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sloan, P. R. 1979. “Buffon, German Biology, and the Historical Interpretation of Biological Species.” The British Journal for the History of Science, 12(2): 109–153.10.1017/S0007087400017027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sloan, P. R. 1985. “From Logical Universals to Historical Individuals.” Histoire du Concept D’Espece dans Les Sciences de la Vie. Paris: Fondation Singer-Polignac.Google Scholar
Sloan, P. R. 2003. “Reflections on the Species Problem,” in The Philosophy of Marjorie Grene, ed. Auxier, R. and Hahn, L. E.. Chicago: Open Court Publishing.Google Scholar
Sober, E. 1988. Reconstructing the Past: Parsimony, Evolution and Inference. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Sober, E. 2000. Philosophy of Biology, 2nd ed. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Sokal, R. R., and Sneath, P. H. A. 1963. Principles of Numerical Taxonomy. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman and Company.Google Scholar
Sorabji, R. 1990. “The Ancient Commentators on Aristotle,” in Aristotle Transformed, ed. Sorabji, R., 1–30. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Stafleu, F. A. 1971. Linnaeus and the Linnaeans. Utrecht, the Netherlands: A. Oosthooek’s Uitgeversmaatschappij N.V.Google Scholar
Stamos, D. 2003. The Species Problem. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.10.5771/9780739161180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stamos, D. 2007. Darwin and the Nature of Species. Albany: State University of New York Press.10.1353/book5132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stauffer, R. C. 1975. Charles Darwin’s Natural Selection. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stevens, P. F. 1983. “Augustin Augier’s “Arbre Botanique” (1801), A Remarkably Early Botanical Representation of the Natural System.” Taxon, 32(2): 203–211.10.2307/1221972CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, P. F. 1994. The Development of Biological Systematics: Antoine-Laurent de Jussieu, Nature and the Natural System. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Stott, R. 2003. Darwin and the Barnacle. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Thompson, A. 1995. “The Debate on Universals before Peter Abelard.” The Journal of the History of Philosophy, 33(3): 409–429.10.1353/hph.1995.0063CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Valen, L. 1992. “Ecological Species, Multispecies, and Oaks,” in The Units of Evolution: Essays on the Nature of Species, ed. Ereshefsky, M., 69–77. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books.Google Scholar
Velasco, J. 2012. “The Future of Systematics: Tree Thinking Without the Tree.” Philosophy of Science, 79(5): 624–636.10.1086/667878CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waxman, S. R. 1999. “The Dubbing Ceremony Revisited: Object Naming and Categorization in Infancy and Early Childhood,” in Folkbiology, ed. Medin, D. L. and Atran, S., 233–284. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/3042.003.0009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weishampel, D. B., Dodson, P., and Osmólska, H.. 2004. The Dinosauria, 2nd ed. Berkeley: University of California Press.10.1525/california/9780520242098.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheeler, W. 2012. Systematics: A Course of Lectures. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9781118301081CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whewell, W. 1989. Theory of Scientific Method, ed. Butts, R. E.. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
Wiley, E. O. 1981. Phylogenetics: The Theory and Practice of Phylogenetic Systematics. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Wiley, E. O., and Lieberman, B. S., 2011. Phylogenetics: The Theory of Phylogenetic Systematics. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9781118017883CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkins, J. 2009. Species: A History of the Idea. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Wilkins, J. S., and Ebach, M. C., 2014. The Nature of Classification: Relationships and Kinds in the Natural Science. London: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9781137318121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, E. O. 1999. The Diversity of Life. London: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Wilson, E. O. 2000. Sociobiology: The New Synthesis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.2307/j.ctvjnrttdCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winsor, M. P. 1969. “Barnacle Larvae in the Nineteenth Century: A Case Study in Taxonomic Theory.” Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences, 24: 294–309.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Winsor, M. P. 2001. “Cain on Linnaeus: The Scientist-Historian as Unanalysed Entity.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Biology & Biomedical Science, 32(2): 239–254.10.1016/S1369-8486(01)00010-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winsor, M. P. 2003. “Non-essentialist Methods in pre-Darwinian Taxonomy.” Biology and Philosophy, 18: 387–400.10.1023/A:1024139523966CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winsor, M. P. 2006. “The Creation of the Essentialism Story: An Exercise in Metahistory.” History and Philosophy of Life Sciences, 28: 149–174.Google ScholarPubMed
Wittgenstein, L. 1968. Philosophical Investigations. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Why this information is here

This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

Accessibility Information

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Richard A. Richards, University of Alabama
  • Book: Biological Classification
  • Online publication: 05 September 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107588233.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Richard A. Richards, University of Alabama
  • Book: Biological Classification
  • Online publication: 05 September 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107588233.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Richard A. Richards, University of Alabama
  • Book: Biological Classification
  • Online publication: 05 September 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107588233.011
Available formats
×