Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7857688df4-8r446 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-12T21:38:00.434Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 26 - Rupture of the Uterus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 October 2025

Sir Sabaratnam Arulkumaran
Affiliation:
St George's Hospital Medical School, University of London
Get access

Summary

Peripartum rupture of the uterus is rare, but is a life-threatening complication leading to maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality. There is wide variation in the reported incidence of rupture of the uterus, with high incidence and more morbidity and mortality among the developing countries compared to the developed world. In the high-income countries uterine rupture is mainly due to scar rupture, while in the developing world, rupture due to prolonged and obstructed labour is still happening in spite of the progress made in the field of antenatal and intrapartum care. Caesarean section rates are increasing all over the world, and women with prior caesarean section are at higher risk of uterine rupture during subsequent pregnancy. Women with a previous lower segment caesarean section can opt for an elective caesarean delivery or a vaginal delivery after caesarean (VBAC). The most feared complication of VBAC is uterine rupture with its associated maternal and fetal consequences.

Information

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Justus Hofmeyr, G, Say, L, Gülmezoglu, AM. WHO systematic review of maternal mortality and morbidity: the prevalence of uterine rupture. BJOG. 2005;112(9):1221–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vandenberghe, G, Bloemenkamp, K, Berlage, S, et al. INOSS (the International Network of Obstetric Survey Systems). BJOG. 2019;126(3):370–81.Google ScholarPubMed
Al-Zirqi, I, Stray-Pedersen, B, Forsén, L, Daltveit, A-K, Vangen, S. Uterine rupture: trends over 40 years. BJOG. 2016;123(5):780–7.Google ScholarPubMed
Motomura, K, Ganchimeg, T, Nagata, C, et al. Incidence and outcomes of uterine rupture among women with prior caesarean section: WHO Multicountry Survey on Maternal and Newborn Health. Sci Rep. 2017;7:44093.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guise, J-M, Eden, K, Emeis, C, et al. Vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2010(191):1397.Google Scholar
Buhimschi, CS, Buhimschi, IA, Patel, S, Malinow, AM, Weiner, CP. Rupture of the uterine scar during term labour: contractility or biochemistry? BJOG. 2005;112(1):3842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Royal College of Obstetricians & Gynaecologists. Birth after previous caesarean birth (Green-top Guideline No. 45). 2015 Oct [cited 2024 14 Mar]. Available from: www.rcog.org.uk/media/kpkjwd5h/gtg_45.pdfGoogle Scholar
Practice Bulletin No. 184: vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 130(5):e217–e233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, JR. Intrapartum management of trial of labour after caesarean delivery: evidence and experience: BJOG. 2014;121(2):157–62.Google Scholar
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Inducing labour (NICE Guideline NG207). 2021 4 Nov [cited 2024 14 Mar]. Available from: www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng207Google Scholar
Landon, MB, Lynch, CD. Optimal timing and mode of delivery after cesarean with previous classical incision or myomectomy: a review of the data. Semin Perinatol. 2011;35(5):257–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grobman, WA, Lai, Y, Landon, MB, et al. Prediction of uterine rupture associated with attempted vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199(1):30.e130.e5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grobman, WA, Sandoval, G, Rice, MM, et al. Prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in term gestations: a calculator without race and ethnicity, Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021;225(6):664.e1664.e7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gambacorti-Passerini, Z, Gimovsky, AC, Locatelli, A, Berghella, V. Trial of labor after myomectomy and uterine rupture: a systematic review. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2016;95(7):724–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Claeys, J, Hellendoorn, I, Hamerlynck, T, et al. The risk of uterine rupture after myomectomy: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. Gynecol Surg. 2014;11:197206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryberg, J, Carlson, Y, Sevensson, M, Thunström, E, Svanvik, T. Risk of uterine rupture in multiparous women after induction of labour with prostaglandin: a national population-based study. Int J Gyn Obst. 2024;165(1):328–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Revicky, V, Muralidhar, A, Mukhopadhyay, S, Mahmood, T. A case series of uterine rupture: lessons to be learned for future clinical practice. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2012;62(6):665–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holmgren, C, Scott, JR, Porter, TF, et al. Uterine rupture with attempted vaginal birth after caesarean delivery, decision-to-delivery-time and neonatal outcome; Obstet Gynecol. 2012;119(4):725–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wylie, BJ, Gilbert, S, Landon, MB, et al. Comparison of transverse and vertical skin incision for emergency cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;115(6):1134–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shakur, H, Roberts, I, Fawole, B, et al. Effect of early tranexamic acid administration on mortality, hysterectomy, and other morbidities in women with post-partum haemorrhage (WOMAN): an international, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2017;389(10084):2105–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paily, VP, Sidhik, A, Girijadevi, RR, et al. Managing placenta accreta spectrum in low-resource settings using a novel dissection-free aorta clamp: operative technique. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2022;158:469–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Why this information is here

This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

Accessibility Information

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×