Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-857557d7f7-8wkb5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-12-09T02:15:05.338Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 1 - Competitive Nonlinear Pricing under Adverse Selection

from Part I - Contests and Contracts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2025

Victor Chernozhukov
Affiliation:
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Johannes Hörner
Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
Eliana La Ferrara
Affiliation:
Harvard University, Massachusetts
Iván Werning
Affiliation:
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Get access

Summary

Every 5 years, the World Congress of the Econometric Society brings together scholars from around the world. Leading scholars present state-of-the-art overviews of their areas of research, offering newcomers access to key research in economics. Advances in Economics and Econometrics: Twelfth World Congress consists of papers and commentaries presented at the Twelfth World Congress of the Econometric Society. This two-volume set includes surveys and interpretations of key developments in economics and econometrics, and discussions of future directions for a variety of topics, covering both theory and application. The first volume addresses such topics as contract theory, industrial organization, health and human capital, as well as racial justice, while the second volume includes theoretical and applied papers on climate change, time-series econometrics, and causal inference. These papers are invaluable for experienced economists seeking to broaden their knowledge or young economists new to the field.

Information

Type
Chapter
Information
Advances in Economics and Econometrics
Twelfth World Congress
, pp. 3 - 46
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Akerlof, G. A. (1970). “The market for ‘lemons’: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84(3), 488500.10.2307/1879431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, F. (1985). “Repeated principal–agent relationships with lending and borrowing,” Economics Letters, 17(1–2), 2731.10.1016/0165-1765(85)90121-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnott, R. J., and Stiglitz, J. E. (1991). “Equilibrium in competitive insurance markets with moral hazard.” NBER Working Paper No. 3588.Google Scholar
Attar, A., and Chassagnon, A. (2009). “On moral hazard and nonexclusive contracts,” Journal of Mathematical Economics, 45(9–10), 511525.10.1016/j.jmateco.2008.09.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Attar, A., Farinha Luz, V., Mariotti, T., and Salanié, F. (2021). “Mixed-strategy equilibria in limit-order markets.” Mimeo, Toulouse School of Economics.Google Scholar
Attar, A., Mariotti, T., and Salanié, F. (2011). “Nonexclusive competition in the market for lemons,” Econometrica, 79(6), 18691918.Google Scholar
Attar, A., Mariotti, T., and Salanié, F. (2014). “Nonexclusive competition under adverse selection,” Theoretical Economics, 9(1), 140.10.3982/TE1126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Attar, A., Mariotti, T., and Salanié, F. (2018). “Concurrence non exclusive et sélection adverse,” Revue Economique, 69(6), 10091023.10.3917/reco.696.1009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Attar, A., Mariotti, T., and Salanié, F. (2019). “On competitive nonlinear pricing,” Theoretical Economics, 14(1), 297343.10.3982/TE2708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Attar, A., Mariotti, T., and Salanié, F. (2020). “The social costs of side trading,” Economic Journal, 130(630), 16081622.10.1093/ej/ueaa041CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Attar, A., Mariotti, T., and Salanié, F. (2021). “Entry-proofness and discriminatory pricing under adverse selection,” American Economic Review, 111(8), 26232659.10.1257/aer.20190189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Attar, A., Mariotti, T., and Salanié, F. (2022). “Regulating insurance markets: Multiple contracting and adverse selection,” International Economic Review, 63(3), 9811020.10.1111/iere.12570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ausubel, L. M. (2004). “An efficient ascending-bid auction for multiple objects,” American Economic Review, 94(5), 14521475.10.1257/0002828043052330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Back, K., and Baruch, S. (2013). “Strategic liquidity provision in limit order markets,” Econometrica, 81(1), 363392.Google Scholar
Baruch, S., and Glosten, L. R. (2019). “Tail expectation and imperfect competition in limit order book markets,” Journal of Economic Theory, 183, 661697.10.1016/j.jet.2019.07.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beaudry, P., and Poitevin, M. (1995). “Competitive screening in financial markets when borrowers can recontract,” Review of Economic Studies, 62(3), 401423.10.2307/2298035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biais, B., and Mariotti, T. (2005). “Strategic liquidity supply and security design,” Review of Economic Studies, 72(3), 615649.10.1111/j.1467-937X.2005.00345.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biais, B., Martimort, D., and Rochet, J.-C. (2000). “Competing mechanisms in a common value environment,” Econometrica, 68(4), 799837.10.1111/1468-0262.00138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biais, B., Martimort, D., and Rochet, J.-C. (2013). “Corrigendum to ‘Competing mechanisms in a common value environment’,” Econometrica, 81(1), 393406.Google Scholar
Bisin, A., and Gottardi, P. (2006). “Efficient competitive equilibria with adverse selection,” Journal of Political Economy, 114(3), 485516.10.1086/503754CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bisin, A., and Guaitoli, D. (2004). “Moral hazard and nonexclusive contracts,” RAND Journal of Economics, 35(2), 306328.10.2307/1593693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Budish, E., Cramton, P., and Shim, J. (2015). “The high-frequency trading arms race: Frequent batch auctions as a market design response,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 130(4), 15471621.10.1093/qje/qjv027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carmona, G., and Fajardo, J. (2009). “Existence of equilibrium in common agency games with adverse selection,” Games and Economic Behavior, 66(2), 749760.10.1016/j.geb.2008.10.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cawley, J., and Philipson, T. (1999). “An empirical examination of information barriers to trade in insurance,” American Economic Review, 89(4), 827846.10.1257/aer.89.4.827CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiappori, P.-A., Jullien, B., Salanié, B., and Salanié, F. (2006). “Asymmetric information in insurance: Some testable implications,” RAND Journal of Economics, 37(4), 783798.10.1111/j.1756-2171.2006.tb00057.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiappori, P.-A., and Salanié, B. (2000). “Testing for asymmetric information in insurance markets,” Journal of Political Economy, 108(1), 5678.10.1086/262111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiappori, P.-A., and Salanié, B. (2003). “Testing contract theory: A survey of some recent work.” In Dewatripont, M., Hansen, L. P., and Turnovsky, S. J. (eds.), Advances in Economics and Econometrics: Theory and Applications, Eighth World Congress, vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 115–149.Google Scholar
Cole, H. L., and Kocherlakota, N. R. (2001). “Efficient allocations with hidden income and hidden storage,” Review of Economic Studies, 68(3), 523542.10.1111/1467-937X.00179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crocker, K. J., and Snow, A. (1985). “The efficiency of competitive equilibria in insurance markets with asymmetric information,” Journal of Public Economics, 26(2), 207219.10.1016/0047-2727(85)90005-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dasgupta, P., and Maskin, E. (1986). “The existence of equilibrium in discontinuous economic games, II: Applications,” Review of Economic Studies, 53(1), 2741.10.2307/2297589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeMarzo, P., and Duffie, D. (1999). “A liquidity-based model of security design,” Econometrica, 67(1), 6599.10.1111/1468-0262.00004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamond, D. W., and Dybvig, P. H. (1983). “Bank runs, deposit insurance, and liquidity,” Journal of Political Economy, 91(3), 401419.10.1086/261155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Einav, L., Finkelstein, A., and Cullen, M. R. (2010). “Estimating welfare in insurance markets using variation in prices,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 125(2), 877921.10.1162/qjec.2010.125.3.877CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Engers, M., and Fernandez, L. (1987). “Market equilibrium with hidden knowledge and self-selection,” Econometrica, 55(2), 425439.10.2307/1913244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farhi, E., Golosov, M., and Tsyvinski, A. (2009). “A theory of liquidity and regulation of financial intermediation,” Review of Economic Studies, 76(3), 973992.10.1111/j.1467-937X.2009.00540.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farinha Luz, V. (2017). “Characterization and uniqueness of equilibrium in competitive insurance,” Theoretical Economics, 12(3), 13491391.10.3982/TE2166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finkelstein, A., and McGarry, K. (2006). “Multiple dimensions of private information: Evidence from the long-term care insurance market,” American Economic Review, 96(4), 938958.10.1257/aer.96.4.938CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Finkelstein, A., and Poterba, J. (2004). “Adverse selection in insurance markets: Policyholder evidence from the U.K. annuity market,” Journal of Political Economy, 112(1), 183208.10.1086/379936CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glosten, L. R. (1989). “Insider trading, liquidity, and the role of the monopolist specialist,” Journal of Business, 62(2), 211235.10.1086/296460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glosten, L. R. (1994). “Is the electronic open limit order book inevitable?,” Journal of Finance, 49(4), 11271161.10.1111/j.1540-6261.1994.tb02450.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golosov, M., and Tsyvinski, A. (2007). “Optimal taxation with endogenous insurance markets,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122(2), 487534.10.1162/qjec.122.2.487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammond, P. J. (1979). “Straightforward individual incentive compatibility in large economies,” Review of Economic Studies, 46(2), 263282.10.2307/2297050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammond, P. J. (1987). “Markets as constraints: Multilateral incentive compatibility in continuum economies,” Review of Economic Studies, 54(3), 399412.10.2307/2297566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, M., and Townsend, R. M. (1981). “Resource allocation under asymmetric information,” Econometrica, 49(1), 3364.10.2307/1911125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hellwig, M. F. (1983). “On moral hazard and non-price equilibria in competitive insurance markets.” Discussion Paper No. 109, Sonderforschungsbereich 21, Universität Bonn.Google Scholar
Hellwig, M. F. (1988). “A note on the specification of interfirm communication in insurance markets with adverse selection,” Journal of Economic Theory, 46(1), 154163.10.1016/0022-0531(88)90155-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendren, N. (2013). “Private information and insurance rejections,” Econometrica, 81(5), 17131762.Google ScholarPubMed
Hosseini, R. (2015). “Adverse selection in the annuity market and the role for social security,” Journal of Political Economy, 123(4), 941984.10.1086/681593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacklin, C. J. (1987). “Demand deposits, trading restrictions, and risk sharing.” In Prescott, E. C. and Wallace, N. (eds.), Contractual Arrangements for Intertemporal Trade. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 26–47.Google Scholar
Jaynes, G. D. (1978). “Equilibria in monopolistically competitive insurance markets,” Journal of Economic Theory, 19(2), 394422.10.1016/0022-0531(78)90102-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaynes, G. D. (2011). “Equilibrium and strategic communication in the adverse selection insurance model.” Economics Department Working Paper No. 91, Yale University.Google Scholar
Kahn, C. M., and Mookherjee, D. (1998). “Competition and incentives with nonexclusive contracts,” RAND Journal of Economics, 29(3), 443465.10.2307/2556099CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kehoe, T. J., Levine, D. K., and Prescott, E. C. (2002). “Lotteries, sunspots, and incentive constraints,” Journal of Economic Theory, 107(1), 3969.10.1006/jeth.2001.2792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kosenko, A., Stiglitz, J., and Yun, J. (2023). “Bilateral information disclosure in adverse selection markets with nonexclusive competition,” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 205(Jan), 144168.10.1016/j.jebo.2022.10.015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leland, H. E., and Pyle, D. H. (1977). “Informational asymmetries, financial structure, and financial intermediation,” Journal of Finance, 32(2), 371387.10.2307/2326770CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mailath, G., and Nöldeke, G. (2008). “Does competitive pricing cause market breakdown under extreme adverse selection?,” Journal of Economic Theory, 140(1), 97125.10.1016/j.jet.2007.08.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malinvaud, E. (1972). “The allocation of individual risks in large markets,” Journal of Economic Theory, 4(2), 312328.10.1016/0022-0531(72)90155-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martimort, D. (2006). “Multi-contracting mechanism design.” In Blundell, R., Newey, W. K., and Persson, T. (eds.), Advances in Economics and Econometrics: Theory and Applications, Ninth World Congress, vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 57–101.Google Scholar
Martimort, D., and Stole, L. (2002). “The revelation and delegation principles in common agency games,” Econometrica, 70(4), 16591673.10.1111/1468-0262.t01-1-00345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milgrom, P. (2000). “Putting auction theory to work: The simultaneous ascending auction,” Journal of Political Economy, 108(2), 245272.10.1086/262118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milgrom, P., and Shannon, C. (1994). “Monotone comparative statics,” Econometrica, 62(1), 157180.10.2307/2951479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mimra, W., and Wambach, A. (2014). “New developments in the theory of adverse selection in competitive insurance,” Geneva Risk and Insurance Review, 39(2), 136152.10.1057/grir.2014.11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mimra, W., and Wambach, A. (2019). “Contract withdrawals and equilibrium in competitive markets with adverse selection,” Economic Theory, 67(4), 875907.10.1007/s00199-018-1101-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mirrlees, J. A. (1971). “An exploration in the theory of optimum income taxation,” Review of Economic Studies, 38(2), 175208.10.2307/2296779CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miyazaki, H. (1977). “The rat race and internal labor markets,” Bell Journal of Economics, 8(2), 394418.10.2307/3003294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers, S. C., and Majluf, N. S. (1984). “Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have,” Journal of Financial Economics, 13(2), 187221.10.1016/0304-405X(84)90023-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myerson, R. B. (1983). “Mechanism design by an informed principal,” Econometrica, 51(6), 17671797.10.2307/1912116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Netzer, N., and Scheuer, F. (2014). “A game theoretic foundation of competitive equilibria with adverse selection,” International Economic Review, 55(2), 399422.10.1111/iere.12054CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, F. H. Jr., and P. K. Monteiro (2003). “Three principles of competitive nonlinear pricing,” Journal of Mathematical Economics, 39(1–2), 63109.10.1016/S0304-4068(02)00084-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pauly, M. V. (1974). “Overinsurance and public provision of insurance: The roles of moral hazard and adverse selection,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 88(1), 4462.10.2307/1881793CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, M. (2001). “Common agency and the revelation principle,” Econometrica, 69(5), 13491372.10.1111/1468-0262.00245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Philippon, T., and Skreta, V. (2012). “Optimal interventions in markets with adverse selection,” American Economic Review, 102(1), 128.10.1257/aer.102.1.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prescott, E. C., and Townsend, R. M. (1984). “Pareto optima and competitive equilibria with adverse selection and moral hazard,” Econometrica, 52(1), 2145.10.2307/1911459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riley, J. G. (1979). “Informational equilibrium,” Econometrica, 47(2), 331359.10.2307/1914187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riley, J. G. (2001). “Silver signals: Twenty-five years of screening and signaling,” Journal of Economic Literature, 39(2), 432478.10.1257/jel.39.2.432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rockafellar, R. T. (1970). Convex Analysis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Rosenthal, R. W., and A. Weiss (1984). “Mixed-strategy equilibrium in a market with asymmetric information,” Review of Economic Studies, 51(2), 333342.Google Scholar
Rothschild, C. (2015). “Nonexclusivity, linear pricing, and annuity market screening,” Journal of Risk and Insurance, 82(1), 132.10.1111/jori.12019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothschild, M., and Stiglitz, J. E. (1976). “Equilibrium in competitive insurance markets: An essay on the economics of imperfect information,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 90(4), 629649.10.2307/1885326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rustichini, A., and Siconolfi, P. (2008). “General equilibrium in economies with adverse selection,” Economic Theory, 37(1), 129.10.1007/s00199-007-0286-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salanié, B. (2017). “Equilibrium in insurance markets: An empiricist’s view,” Geneva Risk and Insurance Review, 42(1), 114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheshinski, E. (2008). The Economic Theory of Annuities. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400829422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spence, M. (1973). “Job market signaling,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355374.10.2307/1882010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spence, M. (1978). “Product differentiation and performance in insurance markets,” Journal of Public Economics, 10(3), 427447.10.1016/0047-2727(78)90055-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tirole, J. (2012). “Overcoming adverse selection: How public intervention can restore market functioning,” American Economic Review, 102(1), 2959.10.1257/aer.102.1.29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, C. (1977). “A model of insurance markets with incomplete information,” Journal of Economic Theory, 16(2), 167207.10.1016/0022-0531(77)90004-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, R. B. (1989). “Game-theoretic analyses of trading processes.” In Bewley, T. F. (ed.), Advances in Economic Theory, Fifth World Congress. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 33–70.Google Scholar
Wilson, R. B. (1993). Nonlinear Pricing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195068856.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamashita, T. (2010). “Mechanism games with multiple principals and three or more agents,” Econometrica, 78(2), 791801.Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: Inaccessible, or known limited accessibility

Why this information is here

This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

Accessibility Information

The PDF of this book is known to have missing or limited accessibility features. We may be reviewing its accessibility for future improvement, but final compliance is not yet assured and may be subject to legal exceptions. If you have any questions, please contact accessibility@cambridge.org.

Content Navigation

Table of contents navigation
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Index navigation
Provides an interactive index, letting you go straight to where a term or subject appears in the text without manual searching.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×