Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-grxwn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-11T02:04:35.817Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 January 2025

Edited by
Karolina Hübner  and
Justin Steinberg
Karolina Hübner
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Justin Steinberg
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Spinoza Lexicon , pp. 579 - 607
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aalderink, M. (2004). Spinoza en Wittichius over essentiae en existentie. In Coppens, G. (ed.), Spinoza en het Nederlands cartesianisme (pp. 79–94). Acco.Google Scholar
Abensour, M. (2015). Spinoza et l’épineuse question de la servitude volontaire. Asterion, 13. https://doi.org/10.4000/asterion.2594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ablondi, F., and Barbone, S. (1994). Individual identity in Descartes and Spinoza. Studia Spinozana, 10, 69–91.Google Scholar
Adams, M. P. (2014). Hobbes, definitions, and simplest conceptions. Hobbes Studies, 27(1), 35–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, J. (1996). Spinoza’s physical philosophy. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 78(3), 253–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akkerman, F. (1980). Studies in the Posthumous Works of Spinoza: On Style, Earliest Translation and Reception, Earliest and Modern Edition of Some Texts. PhD thesis, University of Groningen.Google Scholar
Alanen, L. (2012). Spinoza on passions and self-knowledge: The case of pride. In Pickavé, M. and Shapiro, L. (eds.), Emotion and Cognitive Life in Medieval and Early Modern Philosophy (pp. 234–47). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Alanen, L. (2016). Descartes and Spinoza on the love of God. In Laiho, H. and Repo, A. (eds.), De natura rerum: Scripta in honorem professoris Olli Koistinen sexagesimum annum complentis (pp. 74–97). University of Turku.Google Scholar
Allison, H. E. (2022). An Introduction to the Philosophy of Spinoza. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Althusser, L. (1971). Lenin and Philosophy and other Essays, trans B. Brewster. New Left Books.Google Scholar
Althusser, L. (1997). The only materialist tradition, Part I: Spinoza. In Montag, W. and Stolze, T. (eds.), The New Spinoza (pp. 3–20). University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Althusser, L. (2006). Philosophy of the Encounter: Later Writings, 1978–87, ed. Matheron, F. and Corpet, O., trans G. M. Goshgarian. Verso.Google Scholar
Ames, W. (1661). De verborgentheden van het Rijcke Godts. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Andrault, R. (2014). La vie selon la raison: Physiologie et métaphysique chez Spinoza et Leibniz. Honoré Champion.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrault, R. (2019). Spinoza’s missing physiology. Perspectives on Science, 27(2), 214–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Annen, J. (2016). The Kabbalistic sources of Spinoza. Journal of Jewish Thought & Philosophy, 24, 279–99.Google Scholar
Antognazza, M. R. (2001). The defence of the mysteries of the Trinity and the Incarnation: An example of Leibniz’s ‘other’ reason. British Journal of Philosophy, 9(2), 283–309.Google Scholar
Ariew, R. (1990). The infinite in Spinoza’s philosophy. In Curley, E. and Moreau, P.-F. (eds.), Spinoza: Issues and Directions (pp. 16–31). Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, A. (2009). Natural and unnatural communities: Spinoza beyond Hobbes. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 17(2), 279–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, A. (2018). Spinoza’s ethics and politics of freedom: Active and passive power. In Kordela, A. K. and Vardoulakis, D. (eds.), Spinoza’s Authority, vol. i: Resistance and Power in Ethics. Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Armstrong, A., Green, K., and Sangiacomo, A. (eds.). (2019). Spinoza and Relational Autonomy: Being with Others. Edinburgh University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkins, D. (1978). George Eliot and Spinoza. Edwin Mellen Press.Google Scholar
Atlas, S. (1954). Moses in the philosophy of Maimonides, Spinoza, and Solomon Maimon. Hebrew Union College Annual, 25, 369–400.Google Scholar
Audié, F. (2005). Spinoza et les mathématiques. Presses de l’Université Paris-Sorbonne.Google Scholar
Bacon, F. (1985). The Essayes or Counsels, Civill and Morall, ed. Kiernan, M.. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Baier, A. (2014). The Meditations and Descartes’ considered conception of God. In Cunning, D. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Descartes’ Meditations (pp. 299–305). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balibar, E. (1989). Spinoza, the anti-Orwell: The fear of the masses. Rethinking Marxism: A Journal of Economics, Culture & Society, 2(3).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balibar, E. (1997). Jus-pactum-lex: On the constitution of the subject in the Theologico-Political Treatise. In Montag, W. and Stolze, T. (eds.), The New Spinoza (pp. 171–206). University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Balibar, E. (1998). Spinoza and Politics. Verso.Google Scholar
Balling, P. (1662). Het Licht op den Kandelaar: Dienende tot opmerkinge der voornaemste dingen; in het boekje genaemt De verborgentheden van het rijke Ghodts. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Balling, P. (1663). Verdediging van de Regering der Doopsgezinde Gemeente, die men de vereen. Vlamingen, Vriezen, en Hoogduytsche noemt, binnen Amsterdam. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Balling, P. (1664). Nader verdediging van de regering der Doopsgezinde gemeente. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Barbone, S. (1999). Power in the Tractatus Theologico-Politicus. In Bagley, P. J. (ed.), Piety, Peace, and the Freedom to Philosophize (pp. 91–110). Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbone, S. (2002). What counts as an individual for Spinoza? In Koistinen, O. and Biro, J. (eds.), Spinoza: Metaphysical Themes (pp. 89–112). Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbone, S., and Rice, L. C. (1994). Spinoza and the problem of suicide. International Philosophical Quarterly, 34(2), 229–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartuschat, W. (1992). Spinozas Theorie des Menschen. Meiner.Google Scholar
Barua, A. (ed.). (2017). Schopenhauer on Self, World and Morality: Vedantic and Non-Vedantic Perspectives. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumgarten, J. (2019). De quelques possibles sources juives du Compendium de Spinoza. In Baumgarten, J., Rosier-Catach, I., and Totaro, P. (eds.), Spinoza: Philosophe grammairien (pp. 127–57). CNRS Éditions.Google Scholar
Baumgarten, J., Rosier-Catach, I., and Totaro, P. (eds.). (2019.) Spinoza: Philosophe grammairien. CNRS Éditions.Google Scholar
Bayle, P. (1991). Historical and Critical Dictionary: Selections, ed. Popkin, R.. Hackett.Google Scholar
Beiser, F. C. (1987). The Fate of Reason: German Philosophy from Kant to Fichte. Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benedict, P. (2002). Christ’s Churches Purely Reformed: A Social History of Calvinism. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Bennett, J. (1984). A Study of Spinoza’s Ethics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bennett, J. (1986). Spinoza on error. Philosophical Papers, 15(1), 59–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, J. (1990). Spinoza and teleology: A reply to Curley. In Curley, E. M. and Moreau, P.-F. (eds.), Spinoza: Issues and Directions (pp. 53–57). Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, J. (2001). Learning from six philosophers: Descartes, Spinoza, Leibniz, Locke, Berkeley, Hume. 2 vols. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Berman, D. (1982). Spinoza’s spiders, Schopenhauer’s dogs. Philosophical Studies, 29, 202–09.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beyssade, J. M. (1994). Sur le mode infini médiat dans l’attribut de la pensée: Du problème (letter 64) à une solution. Revue philosophique de la France et de l’étranger, 184, 23–26.Google Scholar
van Blijenbergh, W. (1666). Sociniaensche Ziel onder een Mennonitisch Kleedt. Utrecht.Google Scholar
Blom, H. W. (1988). Virtue and republicanism: Spinoza’s political philosophy in the context of the Dutch Republic. In Koenigsberger, H. G. (ed.), Republiken und Republikanismus im Europa der Frühen Neuzeit (pp. 195–212). R. Oldenbourg.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blom, H. W. (1995). Morality and Causality and in Politics: The Rise of Naturalism in Dutch Seventeenth-Century Political Thought. CIP Gegevens Koninklijke Bibliotheek.Google Scholar
Blom, H. W. (2003). The moral and political philosophy of Spinoza. In Parkinson, G. H. R. (ed.), The Renaissance and 17th Century Rationalism (pp. 315–46). Routledge.Google Scholar
Bock, G., Skinner, Q., and Viroli, M. (eds.). (1990). Machiavelli and Republicanism. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Boehm, O. (2014). Kant’s Critique of Spinoza. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolton, M. B. (1985). Spinoza on Cartesian doubt. Noûs, 19, 379–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boukouvala, Α. (2017). Imitation of affects and mirror neurons: Exploring empathy in Spinoza’s theory and contemporary neuroscience. Philosophia, 45, 1007–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-017-9857-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouveresse, R. (1992). Spinoza et Leibniz: L’idée d’animisme universel. J. Vrin.Google Scholar
Boyle, R. (1666). The Origine of Formes and Qualities. H. Hall.Google Scholar
Boyle, R. (1773). The Works of the Honourable Robert Boyle, vol. i. Johnston et al.Google Scholar
Brann, H. W. (1972). Schopenhauer and Spinoza. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 10(2), 181–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brewer, K., and Watkins, E. (2012). A difficulty still awaits: Kant, Spinoza, and the threat of theological determinism. Kant-Studien, 103, 163–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooke, C. (2012). Philosophic Pride. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
van Bunge, W. (2001). From Stevin to Spinoza: An Essay on Philosophy in the Seventeenth-Century Dutch Republic. Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Bunge, W. (2018). Hudde en Spinoza: Waarom er maar één God is. Gewina, 11(1), 55–61.Google Scholar
Burgersdijk, F. (1640). Institutionum metaphysicarum libri duo. Hieronymus de Vogel.Google Scholar
Burgersdijk, F. (1660). Institutionum logicarum libri duo. Gillis Valckenier and Casparus Commelijn.Google Scholar
Buyse, F. A. A. (2013). Boyle, Spinoza, and the Hartlib circle: The correspondence which never took place. Society and Politics, 7, 34–53.Google Scholar
Buyse, F. A. A. (2016). Spinoza on conatus, inertia, and the impossibility of self-destruction. Society and Politics, 10(2), 115–34.Google Scholar
Caird, J. (1888). Spinoza. Blackwood.Google Scholar
Cameron, E. (2010). Enchanted Europe: Superstition, Reason and Religion, 1250–1750. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlisle, C. (2017). Spinoza’s acquiescentia. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 55(2), 209–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlisle, C. (2021a). The intellectual love of God. In Melamed, Y. (ed.), A Companion to Spinoza (pp. 440–48). Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Carlisle, C. (2021b). Spinoza’s Religion: A New Reading of the Ethics. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carraud, V. (2002). Causa sive ratio: La raison de la cause de Suárez à Leibniz. Presses Universitaires de France.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carriero, J. (1991). Spinoza’s views on necessity in historical perspective. Philosophical Topics, 19(1), 47–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carriero, J. (1994). On the theological roots of Spinoza’s argument for monism. Faith and Philosophy, 11, 626–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carriero, J. (1995). On the relationship between mode and substance in Spinoza’s metaphysics. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 33(2), 245–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carriero, J. (2002). Monism in Spinoza. In Biro, J. and Koistinen, O. (eds.), Spinoza: Metaphysical Themes (pp. 38–59). Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carriero, J. (2005). Spinoza on final causality. Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy, 2, 105–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carriero, J. (2018). The highest good and perfection in Spinoza. In Della Rocca, M. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Spinoza (pp. 240–72). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Carriero, J. (2020). Descartes (and Spinoza) on intellectual experience and skepticism. Roczniki filozoficzne / Annals of Philosophy, 68(2), 21–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassuto, P. (1999). Spinoza hébraïsant: L’hébreu dans le “Tractatus theologico-politicus” et le “Compendium Grammatices Linguae Hebraeae”. Peeters.Google Scholar
Caterus, . (1985). First set of objections. In The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, vol. ii, trans. J. Cottingham, R. Stoothoff, and D. Murdoch. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
van Cauter, J., and Rediehs, L. (2013). Spiritualism and rationalism in Dutch Collegiant thought: New evidence from William Ames’s Mysteries of the Kingdom of God (1661), with a translation. Lias, 40, 105–75.Google Scholar
van Cauter, J., and Schneider, D. (2021). Spinoza: A Baconian in the TTP but not in the Ethics? Philosophies, 6(2).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chalier, C. (2006). Spinoza, lecteur de Maïmonide: La question theologico-politique. Les Éditions du Cerf.Google Scholar
Clauberg, J. (1658). Paraphrasis in Renati Des Cartes Meditationes de prima philosophia. Adrianus Wyngaerden.Google Scholar
Clauberg, J. (1660). Ontosophia Nova … Adrianus Wyngaerden.Google Scholar
Clausen-Brown, K. (2019). Spinoza’s translation of Margaret Fell and his portrayal of Judaism in the Theological-Political Treatise. The Seventeenth Century, 34(1), 89–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, H. (2014). Spinoza on State & Religion, Judaism & Christianity. Shalem Press.Google Scholar
Colerus, J. (1706). The Life of Benedict de Spinosa, Done out of French. London.Google Scholar
Cooper, J. (2013). Secular Powers: Humility in Modern Political Thought. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coppens, G. (ed.). (2003). Spinoza en de scholastiek. Acco.Google Scholar
Coppens, G. (2004a). Spinoza et la conception scolastique de Dieu dans le contexte hollandais. In Jaquet, C. (ed.), Les pensées métaphysiques de Spinoza (pp. 19–36). Publications de la Sorbonne.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coppens, G. (2004b). Spinoza et Hugo Boxel: Une histoire de fantômes. Revue de métaphysique et de morale, 41, 59–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costa, E. (2021). Spinoza and Scholastic philosophy. In Melamed, Y. (ed.), A Companion to Spinoza (pp. 47–55). Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coudert, A. P. (1994). The Kabbalah Denudata: Converting Jews or Seducing Christians? In Popkin, R. H. and Weiner, G. M. (eds.), Jewish Christians and Christian Jews: From the Renaissance to the Enlightenment (pp. 73–96). Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cover, J. A. (2003). Spinoza’s extended substance: Cartesian and Leibnizian reflections. In Gennaro, R. J. and Huenemann, C. (eds.), New Essays on the Rationalists (pp. 105–33). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cristofolini, P. (2008). La lettera di Stensen: Un falso d’autore. Historia philosophica, 6, 141–44.Google Scholar
Cunning, D. (ed.). (2014). The Cambridge Companion to Descartes’ Meditations. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curley, E. M. (1969). Spinoza’s Metaphysics: An Essay in Interpretation. Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curley, E. M. (1973a). Experience in Spinoza’s theory of knowledge. In Grene, M. (ed.), Spinoza: A Collection of Critical Essays (pp. 25–59). Anchor.Google Scholar
Curley, E. M. (1973b). Spinoza’s moral philosophy. In Grene, M. (ed.), Spinoza: A Collection of Critical Essays (pp. 354–76). Anchor.Google Scholar
Curley, E. M. (1975). Descartes, Spinoza, and the ethics of belief. In Freeman, E. and Mandelbaum, M. (eds.), Spinoza: Essays in interpretation (pp. 159–89).Google Scholar
Curley, E. M. (1977a). Notes on the immortality of the soul in Spinoza’s Short Treatise. Giornale critico della filosofia italiana, 56, 327–36.Google Scholar
Curley, E. M. (1977b). Spinoza as expositor of Descartes. In Hessing, S. (ed.), Speculum Spinozanum: 1677–1977 (pp. 133–42). Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Curley, E. M. (1985). Glossary. In The Collected Works of Spinoza, vol. i, trans. and ed. Curley. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Curley, E. M. (1988). Behind the Geometrical Method. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curley, E. M. (1990). On Bennett’s Spinoza: The issue of teleology. In Curley, E. M. and Moreau, P.-F. (eds.), Spinoza: Issues and Directions (pp. 39–52). Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curley, E. M. (1991a). A good man is hard to find. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, 65, 29–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curley, E. M. (1991b). The state of nature and its law in Hobbes and Spinoza. Philosophical Topics, 19(1), 97–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curley, E. M. (1992). “I durst not write so boldly,” or, how to read Hobbes’s Theological-Political Treatise. In Bostrenghi, D. and Giancotti, E. (eds.), Hobbes e Spinoza (pp. 497–593). Bibliopolis.Google Scholar
Curley, E. M. (1994). Spinoza on truth. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 72, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curley, E. M. (1996). Kissinger, Spinoza, and Genghis Khan. In Garrett, D. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza, 1st edn (pp. 315–42). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Curley, E. M. (2015). Resurrecting Leo Strauss. In Schröder, W. (ed.), Reading Between the Lines: Leo Strauss and the History of Early Modern Philosophy (pp. 129–70). De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Curley, E. M. (2016a). Editorial preface. In The collected works of Spinoza, vol. ii (pp. 491–502). Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Curley, E. M. (2016b). Law of nature. In Nolan, L. (ed.), The Cambridge Descartes Lexicon (pp. 440–46). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Curley, E. M. (2017). From Augustine to Locke and Spinoza: Answering the Christian case against religious liberty. In Speight, C. A. and Zank, M. (eds.), Politics, Religion and Political Theology (pp. 19–37). Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curley, E. M. (2019). Spinoza’s metaphysics revisited. In Stetter, J. and Ramond, C. (eds.), Spinoza in Twenty-First-Century American and French Philosophy: Metaphysics, Philosophy of Mind, Moral and Political Philosophy (pp. 3–51). Bloomsbury.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curley, E. M. (forthcoming). Laws of nature in Spinoza. In Garber, D. et al. (eds.), Spinoza: Reason, Religion, Politics. The Relation between the Ethica and the Tractatus Theologico-Politicus. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Curley, E. M., and Walski, G. (1999). Spinoza’s necessitarianism revisited. In Gennaro, R. J. and Huenemann, C. (eds.), New Essays on the Rationalists (pp. 241–64). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dahlbeck, J. (2016). Spinoza and Education: Freedom, Understanding and Empowerment. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Damasio, A. R. (2003). Looking for Spinoza: Joy, Sorrow, and the Human Brain. Harcourt.Google Scholar
Dascal, M. (1987). Reason and the mysteries of faith: Leibniz on the meaning of religious discourse. In Dascal, (ed.), Leibniz: Language, Signs, and Thought (pp. 93–124). Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeBrabander, F. (2007). Spinoza and the Stoics. Continuum.Google Scholar
De Deugd, C. (1966). The Significance of Spinoza’s First Kind of Knowledge. Van Gorcum.Google Scholar
De Dijn, H. (1996). Spinoza: The Way to Wisdom. Purdue University Press.Google Scholar
De Dijn, H. (2011). Ethics as medicine for the mind (5P1–20). In Hampe, M., Renz, U., and Schnepf, R. (eds.), Spinoza’s Ethics: A Collective Commentary (pp. 265–79). Brill.Google Scholar
Delassus, E. (2012). Le suicide de Spinoza: Un problème éthique et philosophique. Interrogations?, 15. www.revue-interrogations.org/Le-suicide-de-Spinoza-un-problemeGoogle Scholar
Deleuze, G. (1988). Spinoza: Practical Philosophy, trans. R. Hurley. City Lights.Google Scholar
Deleuze, G. (1990). Expressionism in Philosophy: Spinoza, trans. M. Joughin. Zone.Google Scholar
Deleuze, G. (1994). Difference and Repetition, trans. P. Patton. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Deleuze, G. (1997). Spinoza and the three ‘ethics.’ In Montag, W. and Stolze, T. (eds.), The New Spinoza (pp. 21–36). University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Deleuze, G., and Guattari, F. (1987). A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia, trans. B. Massumi. University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Della Rocca, M. (1993). Spinoza’s argument for the identity theory. Philosophical Review, 102(2), 183–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Della Rocca, M. (1996a). Spinoza’s metaphysical psychology. In Garrett, D. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza, 1st edn (pp. 192–266). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Della Rocca, M. (1996b). Representation and the Mind-Body Problem in Spinoza. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Della Rocca, M. (2002). Spinoza’s Substance Monism. In Koistinen, O. and Biro, J. (eds.), Spinoza: Metaphysical Themes (pp. 11–34). Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Della Rocca, M. (2003). The power of an idea: Spinoza’s critique of pure will. Noûs, 37(2), 200–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Della Rocca, M. (2004). Egoism and the imitation of affects in Spinoza. In Yovel, Y. (ed.), Spinoza on Reason and the Free Man (pp. 97–108). Little Room Press.Google Scholar
Della Rocca, M. (2007). Spinoza and the metaphysics of scepticism. Mind, 116, 851–74.Google Scholar
Della Rocca, M. (2008a). Rationalism run amok: Representation and the reality of the emotions in Spinoza. In Huenemann, C. (ed.), Interpreting Spinoza: Critical Essays (pp. 26–52). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Della Rocca, M. (2008b). Spinoza. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Della Rocca, M. (2010). Getting his hands dirty: Spinoza’s criticism of the rebel. In Melamed, Y. and Rosenthal, M. A. (eds.), Spinoza’s Theological-Political Treatise: A Critical Guide (pp. 168–91). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Della Rocca, M. (2011). Explaining explanation and the multiplicity of attributes in Spinoza. In Hampe, M. (ed.), Spinoza’s Ethics (pp. 17–36). Brill.Google Scholar
Della Rocca, M. (2012). Rationalism, idealism, monism, and beyond. In Förster, E. and Melamed, Y. (eds.), Spinoza and German Idealism (pp. 7–26). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Della Rocca, M. (2015). Interpreting Spinoza: The real is the rational. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 53, 525–35.Google Scholar
Della Rocca, M. (2019a). The elusiveness of the one and the many in Spinoza: Substance, attribute, and mode. In Ramond, C. and Stetter, J. (eds.), Spinoza in Twenty-first-Century American and French Philosophy: Metaphysics, Philosophy of Mind, Moral and Political Philosophy (pp. 59–86). Bloomsbury.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Della Rocca, M. (2019b). Steps toward Eleaticism in Spinoza’s philosophy of action. In Naaman-Zauderer, N. (ed.), Freedom, Action, and Motivation in Spinoza’s “Ethics” (pp. 13–30). Routledge.Google Scholar
Della Rocca, M. (2022). Spinoza’s metaphysical psychology. In Garrett, D. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza, 2nd edn (pp. 234–81). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Del Lucchese, F. (2004). Tumulti e indignatio: Conflitto, diritto e moltitudine in Machiavelli e Spinoza. Ghibli.Google Scholar
Del Lucchese, F. (2009a). Conflict, Power and Multitude in Machiavelli and Spinoza: Tumult and Indignation, trans. Z. Hanafi. Continuum.Google Scholar
Del Lucchese, F. (2009b). Democracy, multitudo and the third kind of knowledge in the works of Spinoza. European Journal of Political Theory, 8(3), 339–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Del Lucchese, F. (2020). The mother of all prejudices: Teleology and normativity in Spinoza. Parrhesia, 32, 145–70.Google Scholar
Den Uyl, D. J. (1983). Power, State and Freedom: An interpretation of Spinoza’s Political Philosophy. Van Gorcum.Google Scholar
Den Uyl, D. J. (2000). Why Read the Political Treatise? In Spinoza, , Political Treatise, trans. Shirley, S.. Hackett.Google Scholar
Descartes, R. (1644). Principia philosophiae. Ludovicum Elzevirium.Google Scholar
Descartes, R. (1964–71). Œuvres de Descartes, ed. Adam, Charles and Tannery, Paul. 11 vols. J. Vrin.Google Scholar
Descartes, R. (1985). The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, trans. Cottingham, J., Stoothoff, R., and Murdoch, D.. 2 vols. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Di Biase, G. (2014). John Locke on monotheism: A dispute with Johannes Hudde. Archivio di Filosofia, 82(1/2), 317–30.Google Scholar
Dibon, P. (1990). Sur la réception de l’œuvre de F. Bacon en Hollande dans la première moitié du XVIIe siècle. In Dibon, (ed.), Regards sur la Hollande du siècle d’or (pp. 191–220). Vivarium.Google Scholar
Diderot, D. (1751–65). “Droit naturel” and “Spinosiste.” In Diderot, D. and d’Alembert, J. (eds.), Encyclopédie, ou dictionnaire raisonné des sciences, des arts et des métiers (vols. v, xv). 17 vols. Briasson.Google Scholar
Diderot, D., and d’Alembert, J. (eds.). (1751–65). Encyclopédie, ou dictionnaire raisonné des sciences, des arts et des métiers. 17 vols. Briasson.Google Scholar
Diefenbach, K. (2019). Spekulativer Materialismus: Spinoza in der postmarxistischen Philosophie. turia + kant.Google Scholar
Dilthey, W. (1977). Gesammelte Schriften. 10th edn. Teubner.Google Scholar
Di Poppa, F. (2009). Spinoza’s concept of substance and attribute: A reading of the Short Treatise. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 17(5), 921–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Di Poppa, F. (2017). Diagnosing superstition: Superstition and piety in Spinoza’s political philosophy. In Adams, M. P. et al. (eds.), Eppur si muove: Doing History and Philosophy of Science with Peter Machamer (pp. 69–82). Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobbs-Weinstein, I. (1994). Maimonidean aspects in Spinoza’s thought. Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal, 17(1/2), 153–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobbs-Weinstein, I. (2002). The power of prejudice and the force of law: Spinoza’s critique of religion and its heirs. Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy, 7(1), 51–70.Google Scholar
Dobbs-Weinstein, I. (2010). The ambiguity of the imagination and the ambivalence of language in Maimonides and Spinoza. In Dobbs-Weinstein, I., Goodman, L. E., and Grady, J. A. (eds.), Maimonides and His Heritage (pp. 95–112). State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Dobbs-Weinstein, I. (2015). Spinoza’s Critique of Religion and Its Heirs: Marx, Benjamin, Adorno. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Domínguez, A. (1980). La morale de Spinoza et le salut par la foi. Revue philosophique de Louvain, 78, 345–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Domínguez, A. (1994). Presencia de Antonio Pérez in Spinoza. In Domínguez, (ed), Spinoza y España (pp. 165–78). Ediciones de la Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha.Google Scholar
Donagan, A. (1973). Spinoza’s proof of immortality. In Grene, M. (ed.), Spinoza: A Collection of Critical Essays (pp. 241–58). Anchor.Google Scholar
Donagan, A. (1980). Spinoza’s dualism. In Kennington, R. (ed.), The Philosophy of Baruch Spinoza (pp. 89–102). Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar
Douglas, A. X. (2015a). Spinoza and Dutch Cartesianism: Philosophy and Theology. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, A. X. (2015b). Was Spinoza a naturalist? Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 96, 77–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, A. X. (2018). Quatenus and Spinoza’s monism. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 56(2), 261–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, A. X. (2022). Spinoza’s theophany: The expression of God’s nature by particular things. Journal of Early Modern Studies, 11(2), 49–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, A. X. (forthcoming). Spinoza on the Expression of Modes.Google Scholar
Drieux, P. (2014). Perception et sociabilité: La communication des passions chez Descartes et Spinoza. Garnier.Google Scholar
Driggers, R. K. (2021). The unity of substance and attribute in Spinoza. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 29(1), 45–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckstein, W. (1944). Rousseau and Spinoza: Their political theories and their conception of ethical freedom. Journal of the History of Ideas, 5(3), 259–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elena, A. (1991). Baconianism in the seventeenth-century Netherlands: A preliminary survey. Nuncius, 6, 33–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eliot, G. (1990[1851]). R. W. Mackay’s The Progress of the Intellect. In Eliot, , Selected Essays, Poems and Other Writings, ed. Byatt, A. S. and Warren, N. (pp. 135–41). Penguin.Google Scholar
Fabricius, H. (1661). Hieronimi Fabritii ab Aquapendente Heelkonstige handwerkingen, Bartolomaei Cabrolii A,B,C, der ontledinge: en Joannis Fernelii Boek der natuurkunde: vervattende een korte en bondige beschrijvinge des menschelijken lichaams. Nu nieu overgeset, met kantaanteijkeningen en nieuwe bladwijsers vermeerdert door M. Jacob Ostens, heelmeester tot Rotterdam. Naeranus.Google Scholar
Felicius, H. (1666). De communione et societate deque lucro et quaestu, ed. Boxel, H.. Gorinchem.Google Scholar
Feuer, L. S. (1958). Spinoza and the Rise of Liberalism. 1st edn. Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Feuer, L. S. (1987). Spinoza and the Rise of Liberalism. New edn. Transaction Books.Google Scholar
Fichant, M. (1994). Commentaire et traductions. In Leibniz, G. W., La réforme de la dynamique: De corporum concursu (1678) et autre textes inédits, ed. and trans.Fichant, M. . J. Vrin.Google Scholar
Field, S. L. (2020a). Political power and depoliticized acquiescence: Spinoza and aristocracy. Constellations: An International Journal of Critical and Democratic Theory, 27(4), 670–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Field, S. L. (2020b). Potentia: Hobbes and Spinoza on Power and Popular Politics. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Förster, E. (2012a). Goethe’s Spinozism. In Förster, E. and Melamed, Y. (eds.), Spinoza and German Idealism (pp. 85–99). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Förster, E. (2012b). The Twenty-Five Years of Philosophy: A Systematic Reconstruction, trans. B. Bowman. Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Förster, E., and Melamed, Y. (eds.). (2012). Spinoza and German Idealism. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foucault, M. (2004). Society Must Be Defended: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1975–1976. Penguin.Google Scholar
Foucher de Careil, L. A. (1854). Réfutation inédite de Spinoza par Leibniz, précédée par un “Mémoire” de Foucher de Careil. Paris.Google Scholar
Fraenkel, C. (2006). Maimonides’ God and Spinoza’s Deus sive Natura. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 44, 169–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraenkel, C. (2013). Reconsidering the case of Elijah Delmedigo’s Averroism and its impact on Spinoza. In Akasoy, A. and Giglioni, G. (eds.), Renaissance Averroism and Its Aftermath: Arabic Philosophy in Early Modern Europe (pp. 213–36). Springer.Google Scholar
Fraenkel, C. (2018). Spinoza’s philosophy of religion. In Della Rocca, M. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Spinoza (pp. 377–407). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Frankel, S. (2001). The invention of liberal theology: Spinoza’s theological-political analysis of Moses and Jesus. Review of Politics, 63, 287–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankel, S. (2002). Spinoza’s dual teachings of Scripture: His solution to the quarrel between reason and revelation. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 84(3), 273–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankena, W. K. (1975). Spinoza’s ‘new morality’: Notes on Book IV. In Freedman, E. (ed.), Spinoza: Essays in Interpretation (pp. 85–100). Open Court.Google Scholar
Franks, P. W. (2018). ‘Nothing comes from nothing’: Judaism, the Orient, and Kabbalah in Hegel’s reception of Spinoza. In Della Rocca, M (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Spinoza (pp. 512–39). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Freudenthal, J. (1887). Spinoza und die Scholastik. In Philosophische Aufsätze: Eduard Zeller zum 50 jährigen Doctor-Jubiläum gewidmet (pp. 86–138). Fues.Google Scholar
Friedmann, G. (1945). Leibniz et Spinoza. Gallimard.Google Scholar
Gabbey, A. (1980). Force and inertia in the seventeenth century: Descartes and Newton. In Gaukroger, S. (ed.), Descartes: Philosophy, Mathematics and Physics (pp. 230–320). Harvester Press.Google Scholar
Gabbey, A. (2008). Spinoza, infinite modes, and the infinitive mood. Studia Spinozana, 16, 41–66.Google Scholar
Gabbey, A. (2022). Spinoza’s natural science and methodology. In Garrett, D. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza, 2nd edn (pp. 142–91). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Galilei, G. (2016). The assayer. In Drake, S. (ed.), The Controversy on the Comets of 1618 (pp. 151–336). University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Gallicet Calvetti, C. (1972). Spinoza lettore del Machiavelli. Vita e Pensiero.Google Scholar
Garber, D. (1994). Descartes and Spinoza on persistence and conatus. Studia Spinozana, 10, 43–68.Google Scholar
Garber, D. (2004). Dr. Fischelson’s dilemma: Spinoza on freedom and sociability. In Yovel, Y. and Segal, G. (eds.), Ethica IV: Spinoza on Reason and the “Free Man” (pp. 183–208). Little Room Press.Google Scholar
Garber, D. (2005). ‘A free man thinks of nothing less than death’: Spinoza on the eternity of the mind. In Mercer, C. and O’Neill, E. (eds.), Early Modern Philosophy: Mind, Matter and Metaphysics (pp. 103–18). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Garber, D. (2008). Should Spinoza have published his philosophy? In Huenemann, C. (ed.), Interpreting Spinoza: Critical Essays (pp. 166–87). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Garber, D. (2015a). Spinoza’s Cartesian dualism in the Korte Verhandeling. In Melamed, Y. (ed.), The Young Spinoza: A Metaphysician in the Making (pp. 121–32). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Garber, D. (2015b). Superheroes in the history of philosophy: Spinoza, super-rationalist. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 53(3), 507–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garber, D. (2019). Anthropomorphism, teleology, and superstition: The politics of obedience in Spinoza’s Tractatus Theologico-Politicus. In Ramond, C. and Stetter, J. (eds.), Spinoza in Twenty-First-Century American and French Philosophy: Metaphysics, Philosophy of Mind, Moral and Political Philosophy (pp. 297–310). Bloomsbury.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garber, D. (2021). Spinoza’s non-theory of non-consciousness. In Melamed, Y. (ed.), A Companion to Spinoza (pp. 304–327). Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garber, D. (2024). Philosophy and theology, reason and revelation. In Garber, D. et al. (eds.), Spinoza: Reason, Religion, Politics. The Relation between the Ethics and the Tractatus Theologico-Politicus (pp. 295–329). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Garrett, A. (2003a). Meaning in Spinoza’s Method. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, A. (2003b). Spinoza as natural lawyer. Cardozo Law Review, 25(2), 627–41.Google Scholar
Garrett, A. (2017). Virtues of geometry. In Della Rocca, M. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Spinoza (pp. 18–44). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Garrett, D. (1979). Spinoza’s ‘ontological’ argument. Philosophical Review, 88, 198–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, D. (1990a). ‘A free man always acts honestly, not deceptively’: Freedom and the good in Spinoza’s Ethics. In Curley, E. and Moreau, P.-F. (eds.), Spinoza: Issues and Directions (pp. 221–38). Brill.Google Scholar
Garrett, D. (1990b). Truth, method, and correspondence in Spinoza and Leibniz. Studia Spinozana, 6, 13–43.Google Scholar
Garrett, D. (1991). Spinoza’s necessitarianism. In Yovel, Y. (ed.), God and Nature: Spinoza’s Metaphysics (pp. 191–218). Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, D. (1994). Spinoza’s theory of metaphysical individuation. In Barber, K. and Gracia, J. (eds.), Individuation and Identity in Early Modern Philosophy (pp. 73–101). State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Garrett, D. (ed.). (1996a). The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza. 1st edn. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Garrett, D. (1996b). Spinoza’s ethical theory. In Garrett, (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza, 1st edn (pp. 266–314). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Garrett, D. (1999). Teleological explanation in Spinoza and early modern philosophy. In Gennaro, R. J. and Huenemann, C. (eds.), New Essays on the Rationalists (pp. 310–35). Oxford University Press. Repr. in Garrett 2018a.Google Scholar
Garrett, D. (2002). Spinoza’s conatus argument. In Koistinen, O. and Biro, J. (eds.), Spinoza: Metaphysical Themes (pp. 126–58). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Garrett, D. (2008). Representation and consciousness in Spinoza’s naturalistic theory of the imagination. In Huenemann, C. (ed.), Interpreting Spinoza: Critical Essays (pp. 4–25). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, D. (2009). The essence of the body and the part of the mind that is eternal. In Koistinen, O. (ed.), A Companion to Spinoza’s Ethics (pp. 284–302). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, D. (2010). Spinoza’s theory of scientia intuitiva. In Sorell, T., Rogers, G. A. J., and Kraye, J. (eds.), Scientia in Early Modern Philosophy (pp. 99–115). Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, D. (2012). A reply on Spinoza’s behalf. In Förster, E. and Melamed, Y. (eds.), Spinoza and German Idealism (pp. 248–64). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Garrett, D. (2017). The indiscernibility of identicals and the transitivity of identity in Spinoza’s logic of the attributes. In Melamed, Y. (ed.), Spinoza’s Ethics: A Critical Guide (pp. 12–42). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, D. (2018a). Nature and Necessity in Spinoza’s Philosophy. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, D. (2018b). Representation, misrepresentation, and error in Spinoza’s philosophy of mind. In Della Rocca, M. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Spinoza (pp. 190–203). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Garrett, D. (ed.). (2022). The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza. 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gascón Pérez, J. (2007). Aragón en la monarquía de Felipe II. Zaragoza.Google Scholar
Gatens, M. (1996). Through a Spinozist lens: Ethology, difference, power. In Patton, P. (ed.), Deleuze: A Critical Reader (pp. 162–87). Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gatens, M. (2009a). Feminist Interpretations of Benedict Spinoza. Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Gatens, M. (2009b). Spinoza’s disturbing thesis: Power, norms and fiction in the Tractatus Theologico-Politicus. History of Political Thought, 30(3), 454–68.Google Scholar
Gatens, M. (2012). Compelling fictions: Spinoza and George Eliot on imagination and belief. European Journal of Philosophy, 20(1), 74–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gatens, M., and Lloyd, G. (1999). Collective Imaginings: Spinoza, Past and Present. Routledge.Google Scholar
Gatens, M., et al. (2021). Spinoza: Thoughts on hope in our political present. Contemporary Political Theory, 20, 200–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gennaro, R. J., and Huenemann, C. (2009). Spinoza on the eternity of the mind. In Newlands, S. G. and Jorgensen, L. M. (eds.), Metaphysics and the Good: Themes from the Philosophy of Robert Merrihew Adams (pp. 105–33). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Giancotti, E. (1991). On the problem of infinite modes. In Yovel, Y. (ed.), God and Nature: Spinoza’s Metaphysics (pp. 97–118). Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giancotti, E. (1999). The theory of the affects in the strategy of Spinoza’s Ethics. In Yovel, Y. (ed.), Desire and Affect: Spinoza as Psychologist (pp. 129–38). Little Room Press.Google Scholar
Gilead, A. (1983). Spinoza’s principium individuationis and personal identity. International Studies in Philosophy, 15(1), 41–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilson, E. (1923). Spinoza interprète de Descartes. Chronicon Spinozanum, 3, 68–87.Google Scholar
Gilson, E. (1979). Index Scolastico-cartésien. J. Vrin.Google Scholar
Gleizer, M. (2017). Vérité et certitude chez Spinoza. Garnier.Google Scholar
Goclenius, R. (1613). Lexicon philosophicum. Typis viduae Matthiae Beckeri.Google Scholar
Goetschel, W. (2004). Spinoza’s Modernity: Mendelssohn, Lessing, Heine. University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Goldenbaum, U. (1999). Die ‘Commentatiuncula de judice’ als Leibnizens erste philosophische Auseinandersetzung mit Spinoza nebst der Mitteilung über ein neuaufgefundenes Leibnizstück. Studia Leibnitiana, Special Issue, 29, 61–127.Google Scholar
Goldenbaum, U. (2002). Spinoza’s parrot, Socinian syllogisms, and Leibniz’s metaphysics: Leibniz’s three strategies of defending Christian mysteries. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly, 76(4), 551–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldenbaum, U. (2007). Why shouldn’t Leibniz have studied Spinoza? The rise of the claim of continuity in Leibniz’ philosophy out of the ideological rejection of Spinoza’s impact on Leibniz. Leibniz Review, 17, 107–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldenbaum, U. (2011). Sovereignty and obedience 1550–1750. In Clarke, D. M. and Wilson, C. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy in Early Modern Europe (pp. 500–21). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goldenbaum, U. (2016). The geometrical method as a new standard of truth, based on the mathematization of nature. In Gorham, G. et al. (eds.), The Language of Nature: Reassessing the Mathematization of Natural Philosophy in the Seventeenth Century (pp. 274–307). University of Minnesota PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, L., and Ravven, H. (eds.). (2002). Jewish Themes in Spinoza’s Philosophy. State University of New York Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gootjes, A. (2016). Sources inédites sur Spinoza: La correspondance entre Johannes Bouwmeester et Johannes Georgius Graevius. Archives de philosophie, 79, 817–19.Google Scholar
Gootjes, A. (2018). The first orchestrated attack on Spinoza: Johannes Melchioris and the Cartesian network in Utrecht. Journal of the History of Ideas, 79(1), 23–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gootjes, A. (2019). The Collegie der Sçavanten: A seventeenth-century Cartesian scholarly society in Utrecht. In Spaans, J. and Touber, J. (eds.), Enlightened Religion: From Confessional Churches to Polite Piety in the Dutch Republic (pp. 156–82). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004389397_007Google Scholar
Gootjes, A. (2020). Spinoza between French Libertines and Dutch Cartesians: The 1673 Utrecht visit. Modern Intellectual History, 17, 591–617. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1479244318000471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, B. (2009). Calvin. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Goudriaan, A., and van Lieburg, F. (eds). (2011). Revisiting the Synod of Dordt (1618–1619). Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gramusset-Piquois, B. (2021). Puissance de Dieu, pouvoir des hommes: Théologie et politique chez Hobbes et Spinoza. PhD thesis, Université de Lyon.Google Scholar
Green, K. (2013). Spinoza on blame and hatred. Iyyun: The Jerusalem Philosophical Quarterly, 62, 195–233.Google Scholar
Grene, M. (1984). Introduction. In Grene, M. and Nails, D. (eds.), Spinoza and the Sciences (pp. xi–xix). D. Reidel.Google Scholar
Grey, J. (n.d.). Benedict de Spinoza: Moral philosophy. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://iep.utm.edu/spin-morGoogle Scholar
Grey, J. (2013). “Use them at our pleasure”: Spinoza on animal ethics. History of Philosophy Quarterly, 30(4), 367–88.Google Scholar
Grey, J. (2014). Spinoza on composition, causation and the mind’s eternity. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 22, 446–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grey, J. (2017). Reply to Nadler: Spinoza and the metaphysics of suicide. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 25(2), 380–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grey, J. (2021). The metaphysics of natural right in Spinoza. Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy, 10, 37–60.Google Scholar
Grotius, H. (2005). The Rights of War and Peace, ed. Tuck, R.. Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Gueroult, M. (1960). Le cogito et l’ordre des axioms métaphysiques dans le Principia philosophiæ cartesianæ de Spinoza. Archives de Philosophie, 23, 171–85.Google Scholar
Gueroult, M. (1968). Spinoza, vol. i: Dieu (Éthique, 1). Aubier-Montaigne.Google Scholar
Gueroult, M. (1973). Spinoza’s Letter on the Infinite. In Grene, M. (ed.), Spinoza: A Collection of Critical Essays (pp. 182–212). Anchor.Google Scholar
Gueroult, M. (1974). Spinoza, vol. ii: L’Ame (Éthique, 2). Aubier-Montaigne.Google Scholar
Guigon, G. (2012). Spinoza on composition and priority. In Goff, P. (ed.), Spinoza on Monism (pp. 183–205). Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Gullan-Wuhr, M. (2008). Spinoza and the equality of women. Theoria, 68, 91–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haitsma Mulier, E. O. G. (1980). The Myth of Venice and Dutch Republican Thought in the Seventeenth Century, trans. G. T. Moran. Van Gorcum.Google Scholar
Haitsma Mulier, E. O. G. (1990). Dutch views on Machiavelli in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. In Bock, G., Skinner, Q., and Viroli, M. (eds.), Machiavelli and Republicanism (pp. 247–63). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, A. R., and Hall, M. B. (1964). Philosophy and natural philosophy: Boyle and Spinoza. In Taton, R. and Braudel, F. (eds.), L’aventure de l’esprit: Mélanges Alexandre Koyre (pp. 615–34). Hermann.Google Scholar
Hallett, H. F. (1957). Benedict de Spinoza, the Elements of His Philosophy. Athlone Press.Google Scholar
Hammacher, K. (1969). Spinozas Gedanke der Identität und die Begründung im menschlichen Verhalten. Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung, 23(1), 24–35.Google Scholar
Hampe, M. (2010). Rationality as the therapy of self-liberation in Spinoza’s Ethics. In Ganeri, J. and Carlisle, C. (eds.), Philosophy as Therapeia (pp. 35–50). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hampshire, S. (1951). Spinoza, Penguin.Google Scholar
Hampshire, S. (2005). Spinoza and Spinozism. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardt, M., and Negri, A. (2004). Multitude: War and Democracy in the Age of Empire. Penguin.Google Scholar
Harris, E. (1971). Spinoza’s theory of human immortality. The Monist, 55, 668–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartbecke, K. (2008). Zur Geschichte des Modusbegriffs: Suárez – Descartes – Spinoza – Holbach. Studia Spinozana, 16, 19–40.Google Scholar
Harvey, W. Z. (1981). A portrait of Spinoza as a Maimonidean. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 19, 151–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, W. Z. (2002). Spinoza’s metaphysical Hebraism. In Ravven, H. M. and Goodman, L. E. (eds.), Jewish Themes in Spinoza’s Philosophy (pp. 107–14). State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Hassing, R. (1980). The use and non-use of physics in Spinoza’s Ethics. Southwestern Journal of Philosophy, 11(2), 41–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedwig, K. (2017). Natura naturans/naturata. In Ritter, J., Gründer, K., and Gabriel, G. (eds.), Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie. Schwabe.Google Scholar
Heereboord, A. (1665). Meletemata philosophica, in quibus pleræque res Metaphysicæ ventilantur, Ethica explicatur, Physica exponitur, summa rerum Logicarum per Disputationes traditur. Joannem Ravesteinium.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1969). The Science of Logic, trans. A. V. Miller. Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1974). Hegel’s Lectures on the History of Philosophy, trans. E. S. Haldane and F. Simson. Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1995). Lectures on the History of Philosophy, ed. Rockmore, T., trans. Haldane, E. S. and Simson, F. H.. University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Helm, P. (2004). John Calvin’s Ideas. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobbes, T. (1667). Leviathan: Of van de stoffe, gedaente, ende magt van de kerckelycke ende wereldlycke regeeringe. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Hobbes, T. (1974). Leviathan. Penguin.Google Scholar
Hobbes, T. (1998). On the Citizen. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hoffman, P. (1991). Three dualist theories of the passions. Philosophical Topics, 19(1), 153–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Homan, M. (2021). Spinoza’s Epistemology through a Geometrical Lens. Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hubbeling, H. G. (1980). Spinoza comme précurseur du reconstructivisme logique dans son livre sur Descartes. Studia Liebnitiana, 12, 88–95.Google Scholar
Hubert, C. (1994). Les premières réfutations de Spinoza: Aubert de Versé, Wittich, Lamy. Presses de l’Université de Paris Sorbonne.Google Scholar
Hübner, K. (2014). Spinoza on being human and human perfection. In Kisner, M. J. and Youpa, A. (eds.), Essays on Spinoza’s Ethical Theory (pp. 124–42). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hübner, K. (2015a). On the significance of formal causes in Spinoza’s metaphysics. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 97, 196–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hübner, K. (2015b). Spinoza on essences, universals, and beings of reason. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 97(1), 58–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hübner, K. (2015c). Spinoza on negation, mind-dependence, and the reality of the finite. In Melamed, Y. (ed.), The Young Spinoza: A Metaphysician in the Making (pp. 221–37). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hübner, K. (2016). Spinoza’s thinking substance and the necessity of modes. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 92(1), 3–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hübner, K. (2017). The trouble with feelings, or Spinoza on the identity of power and essence. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 55(1), 35–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hübner, K. (2018). Spinoza’s unorthodox theory of the will. In Della Rocca, M. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Spinoza (pp. 343–69). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hübner, K. (2019). Spinoza on intentionality, materialism, and mind-body relations. Philosophers’ Imprint, 19(43), 1–23.Google Scholar
Hübner, K. (2021a). Spinoza on the limits of explanation. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 103, 341–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hübner, K. (2021b). Spinoza on universals. In Melamed, Y. (ed.), A Companion to Spinoza (pp. 204–13). Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hübner, K. (2022a). On looking for truth: Spinoza after Descartes. Journal of Spinoza Studies, 1(1), 36–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hübner, K. (2022b). Representation and mind-body identity in Spinoza’s philosophy. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 60(1), 47–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hübner, K. (2022c). Spinoza’s epistemology and philosophy of mind. In Zalta, E. N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2022/entries/spinoza-epistemology-mind/Google Scholar
Hübner, K., and Mátyási, R. (2021). Spinoza on expression and grounds of intelligibility. Philosophical Quarterly, 72(3), 628–51.Google Scholar
Hughes, J. (2020). The greatest deception: Fiction, falsity, and manifestation in Spinoza’s metaphysical thoughts. Intellectual History Review, 30(3), 363–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, D. (2000). A Treatise of Human Nature, ed. Norton, D. F. and Norton, M. J.. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ibn, Tufayl. (1672). Het leeven van Hai Ebn Yokdhan … in het Nederduitsch vertaald, [trans. J. Bouwmeester]. Rieuwertsz.Google Scholar
Israel, J. (1997). The intellectual debate about toleration in the Dutch Republic. In Berkvens-Stevelinck, C., Israel, J., and Posthumus Meyjes, G. H. M. (eds.), The Emergence of Tolerance in the Dutch Republic (pp. 3–36). Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Israel, J. (2001). Radical Enlightenment: Philosophy and the Making of Modernity, 1650–1750. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Israel, J. (2011). Democratic Enlightenment: Philosophy, Revolution, and Human Rights 1750–1790. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Israel, J. (2019). The rise of democratic republicanism. In Israel, , The Enlightenment that Failed: Ideas, Revolution, and Democratic Defeat. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Israel, J. (2023). Spinoza, Life and Legacy. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ivic, S. (2007). Spinoza and Kant on suicide. Res Cogitans, 1(4), 132–44.Google Scholar
Jacobi, F. (1994). The Main Philosophical Writings and the Novel Allwill, trans. G. di Giovanni. McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
James, S. (1993). Spinoza the Stoic. In Sorrell, T. (ed.), The Rise of Modern Philosophy (pp. 212–26). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
James, S. (1997). Passion and Action: The Emotions in Seventeenth-Century Philosophy. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
James, S. (1998). Explaining the passions: Passions, desires, and the explanation of action. In Gaukroger, S. (ed.), The Soft Underbelly of Reason: The Passions in the Seventeenth Century. Routledge.Google Scholar
James, S. (2009). Freedom, slavery, and the passions. In Koistinen, O. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza’s Ethics (pp. 223–41). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
James, S. (2010). Narrative as the means to freedom: Spinoza on the uses of imagination. In Melamed, Y. and Rosenthal, M. A. (eds.), Spinoza’s Theological-Political Treatise: A Critical Guide (pp. 250–67). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
James, S. (2011). Creating rational understanding: Spinoza as a social epistemologist. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volume, 85(1), 181–99. Repr. in James 2020b.Google Scholar
James, S. (2012). Spinoza on Philosophy, Religion and Politics: The Theologico-Political Treatise. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, S. (2014). Spinoza, the body, and the good life. In Kisner, M. J. and Youpa, A. (eds.), Essays on Spinoza’s Ethical Theory (pp. 143–59). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
James, S. (2019). Responding emotionally to fiction: A Spinozist approach. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement, 85, 195–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, S. (2020a). Freedom, slavery, and the passions. In James, , Spinoza on Learning to Live Together (pp. 137–53). Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, S. (2020b). Spinoza on Learning to Live Together. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, S. (2020c). Spinoza on superstition: Coming to terms with fear. In James, , Spinoza on Learning to Live Together (pp. 43–57). Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, S. (2021). Spinoza on the constitution of animal species. In Melamed, Y. (ed.), A Companion to Spinoza (pp. 365–74). Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
James, S. (2022). Spinoza’s philosophical religion. In Garrett, D. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza, 2nd edn (pp. 335–53). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
James, W. (1909). A Pluralistic Universe. Longmans, Green.Google Scholar
Jaquet, C. (ed.). (2004). Les pensées métaphysiques de Spinoza. Publications de la Sorbonne.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaquet, C. (2005). L’apparition de l’amour de soi chez Spinoza. In Jaquet, , Les expressions de la puissance d’agir chez Spinoza (pp. 159–90). Publications de la Sorbonne.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaquet, C. (2018a). Affects, Actions and Passions: The Unity of Body and Mind in Spinoza, trans. T. Reznichenko. Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Jaquet, C. (2018b). Eternity. In Della Rocca, M. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Spinoza (pp. 370–76). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jaquet, C. (2021). The mind-body union. In Melamed, Y. (ed.), A Companion to Spinoza (pp. 296–303). Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaquet, C., Sévérac, P., Suhamy, A., and Matheron, A. (eds.). (2008). La multitude libre: Nouvelles lectures du Traité Politique de Spinoza. Éditions Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Jarrett, C. (2001). Spinoza’s distinction between essence and existence. Iyyun: The Jerusalem Philosophical Quarterly, 50, 245–52.Google Scholar
Jarrett, C. (2014). Spinozistic constructivism. In Kisner, M. J. and Youpa, A. (eds.), Essays on Spinoza’s Ethical Theory (pp. 57–84). Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jelles, J. (1684). Belydenisse des algemeenen en christelyken Geloofs, vervattet in een Brief aan N.N. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Joachim, H. H. (1901). A Study of the Ethics of Spinoza. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Joachim, H. H. (1940). Spinoza’s Tractatus de Intellectus Emendatione: A Commentary. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Jonas, H. (1965). Spinoza and the theory of organism. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 3(1), 43–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jorink, E. (2018). Modus politicus vivendi: Nicolaus Steno and the Dutch (Swammerdam, Spinoza and other friends), 1660–1664. In Andrault, R. and Lærke, M. (eds.), Steno and the Philosophers (pp. 13–44). Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kabitz, W. (1909). Die Philosophie des jungen Leibniz: Untersuchungen zur Entwicklungsgeschichte seines Systems. Lippert.Google Scholar
Kaplan, Y. (1984). The social functions of the herem in the Portuguese-Jewish community of Amsterdam in the seventeenth century. In Michman, J. (ed.), Dutch Jewish History: Proceedings of the Symposium on the History of the Jews in the Netherlands, 2 vols. (vol. i, pp. 1–55). Tel Aviv University.Google Scholar
Kasher, A., and Biderman, S. (1990). Why was Baruch de Spinoza excommunicated? In Katz, D. S. and Israel, J. (eds.), Sceptics, Millenarians and Jews (pp. 98–141). Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kato, Y., and Sakamoto, K. (2020). Between Cartesianism and orthodoxy: God and the problem of indifference in Christoph Wittich’s Anti-Spinoza. Intellectual History Review, 32(2), 239–57.Google Scholar
Kaufman, F. (1940). Spinoza’s system as theory of expression. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 1(1), 83–97. https://doi.org/10.2307/2103198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenny, A. (2006). A New History of Western Philosophy, vol. iii. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Kisner, M. J. (2010). Perfection and desire: Spinoza on the good. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 91, 97–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kisner, M. J. (2011). Spinoza on Human Freedom: Reason, Autonomy and the Good Life. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kisner, M. J. (2012). Spinoza’s liberalism. Philosophy Compass, 7(11), 782–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kisner, M. J. (2021). Spinoza’s guise of the good: Getting to the bottom of 3p9s. Philosophical Explorations, 24, 34–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, J. R. (2002). ‘By eternity I understand’: Eternity according to Spinoza. Iyyun: The Jerusalem Philosophical Quarterly, 51, 295–324.Google Scholar
Klein, J. R. (2013). Philosophizing historically/historicizing philosophy: Some Spinozistic reflections. In Lærke, M., Smith, J. E. H., and Schliesser, E. (eds.), Philosophy and Its History: Aims and Methods in the Study of Early Modern Philosophy (pp. 134–58). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Klein, J. R. (2014). ‘Something of it remains’: Spinoza and Gersonides on intellectual eternity. In Nadler, S. (ed.), Spinoza and Medieval Jewish Philosophy (pp. 177–203). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, J. R. (2024). How to make philosophers. In Garber, D. et al. (eds.), Spinoza: Reason, Religion, Politics. The Relation between the Ethics and the Tractatus Theologico-Politicus. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Klever, W. (1989). Hudde’s question on God’s uniqueness: A reconstruction on the basis of Van Limborch’s correspondence with John Locke. Studia Spinozana, 5, 327–58.Google Scholar
Klever, W. (1991a). Lodewijk Meyer’s ethics. Studia Spinozana, 7, 241–60.Google Scholar
Klever, W. (1991b). Verba et sententiae Spinozae, or, Lambertus van Velthuysen (1622–1685) on Benedictus de Spinoza. APA-Holland University Press.Google Scholar
Klijnsmit, A. J. (1986). Spinoza and grammatical tradition. Mededelingen vanwege het Spinozahuis, 49.Google Scholar
Kneale, M. (1973). Eternity and sempiternity. In Grene, M. (ed.), Spinoza: A Collection of Critical Essays (pp. 227–40). Anchor.Google Scholar
Koerbagh, A. (1658). De chilo vitioso exercitatio prima. Leiden.Google Scholar
Koerbagh, A. (1659). Disputatio medica inauguralis de Phthisi. Leiden.Google Scholar
Koerbagh, A. (1661). Disputatio juridica inauguralis de Querela inofficiosi testamenti et legitima. Leiden.Google Scholar
Koerbagh, A. (1664). ’t Nieuw Woordenboek der Regten. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Koerbagh, A. (1668). Een Bloemhof van allerley Lieflijkheid sonder verdriet geplant. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Koerbagh, A. (2011). A Light Shining in Dark Places to Illuminate the Main Questions of Theology and Religion, ed. and trans. Wielema, M.. Brill.Google Scholar
Koistinen, O. (1996). Causality, intensionality and identity: Mind Body interaction in Spinoza. Ratio, 9(1), 23–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koistinen, O. (2009). Spinoza on action. In Koistinen, O. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza’s Ethics (pp. 143–69). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koistinen, O. (2018). Spinoza on mind. In Della Rocca, M. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Spinoza (pp. 273–94). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Krop, H. (2011). La scholastique élusive: Les trace de la scholastique dans l’Ethique. In F. Manzini (ed.), Spinoza et les scolastiques (pp. 15–30). PUPS.Google Scholar
Kulstad, M. (1997). Roads not taken: Radical suggestions of Leibniz’s De summa rerum. Synthesis Philosophica, Special Issue, 12(2), 403–13.Google Scholar
Kulstad, M. (1999). Leibniz, Spinoza, and Tschirnhaus: Multiple Worlds, Possible Worlds. In Brown, S. C. (ed.), The Young Leibniz and His Philosophy (1646–76) (pp. 245–62). Kluwer.Google Scholar
Kulstad, M. (2002a). Exploring middle ground on the question, was Leibniz’s conception of God ever Spinozistic? American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly, 76(4), 671–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kulstad, M. (2002b). Leibniz, Spinoza and Tschirnhaus: Metaphysics à trois, 1675–76. In Koistinen, O. and Biro, J. (eds.), Spinoza: Metaphysical Themes (pp. 221–40). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lachterman, D. (1977). The physics of Spinoza’s Ethics. Southwest Journal of Philosophy, 8(3), 71–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacroix, J. (1970). Spinoza et le problème du salut. PUF.Google Scholar
Lærke, M. (2008). Leibniz lecteur de Spinoza: La genèse d’une opposition complexe. Honoré Champion.Google Scholar
Lærke, M. (2011a). A conjecture about a textual mystery: Leibniz, Tschirnhaus and Spinoza’s Korte Verhandeling. Leibniz Review, 20, 33–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lærke, M. (2011b). Spinoza’s cosmological argument in the Ethics. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 49(4), 439–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lærke, M. (2012). ‘Deus quatenus’ … Sur l’emploi des particules réduplicatives dans l’Éthique. In Delbraccio, M., Moreau, P.-F., and Cohen Boulakia, C. (eds.), Lectures contemporaines de Spinoza (pp. 261–75). Presses Universitaires de Paris-Sorbonne.Google Scholar
Lærke, M. (2014a). Les études spinozistes aux États-Unis: Spinoza et le principe de raison suffisante (‘PSR’ en Anglais), représentations, concepts, idées. Archives de Philosophie, 77, 721–26.Google Scholar
Lærke, M. (2014b). Spinoza’s language. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 52(3), 519–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lærke, M. (2017). Aspects of Spinoza’s theory of essence: Formal essence, non-existence and two types of actuality. In Sinclair, M. (ed.), The Actual and the Possible: Modality and Metaphysics in Modern Philosophy (pp. 11–44). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lærke, M. (2021). Spinoza and the Freedom of Philosophizing. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lærke, M. (2024). Prejudices, common notions, intuitions: Knowledge of God between the Ethics and the Tractatus Theologico-Politicus. In Garber, D. et al. (eds.), Spinoza: Reason, Religion, Politics. The Relation between the Ethics and the Tractatus Theologico-Politicus (pp. 59–80). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lagrée, J. (1991). La raison ardente: Religion naturelle et raison au XVIIe siècle. J. Vrin.Google Scholar
Lagrée, J. (2002). Spinoza et la norme du bien. In Lagrée, J. (ed.), Spinoza et la norme (pp. 107–19). Presses Universitaires Franc-Comtoises.Google Scholar
Laplanche, F. (1986). L’écriture, le sacré, l’histoire. APA-Holland University Press.Google Scholar
Lavaert, S. (2021). Le renversement de Spinoza, dans l’esprit de Machiavel. In Lavaert, S. and Moreau, P.-F. (eds.), Spinoza et la politique de la multitude (pp. 35–55). Kimé.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lavaert, S., and Moreau, P.-F. (2021). Spinoza et la politique de la multitude. Kimé.Google Scholar
Lazzeri, C. (1998). Droit, pouvoir et liberté: Spinoza, critique de Hobbes. Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
LeBuffe, M. (2009). The anatomy of the passions. In Koistinen, O. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza’s Ethics (pp. 188–222). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LeBuffe, M. (2010a). From Bondage to Human Freedom: Spinoza on Human Excellence. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
LeBuffe, M. (2010b). Theories about consciousness in Spinoza’s Ethics. Philosophical Review, 119(4), 531–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LeBuffe, M. (2018). Spinoza on Reason. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
LeBuffe, M. (2021). Citizens and states in Spinoza’s Political Treatise. Mind, 130(519), 809–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lécrivain, A. (1977). Spinoza et la physique cartésienne. Cahiers Spinoza, 1, 235–65.Google Scholar
Lécrivain, A. (1978). Spinoza et la physique cartésienne. Cahiers Spinoza, 2, 93–206.Google Scholar
Leibniz, G. W. (1926–). Sämtlichte Schriften und Briefe. Akademie Verlag. Series iii, vol. 2.Google Scholar
Leibniz, G. W. (1976a). Meditations on knowledge, truth, and ideas. In Leibniz, , Philosophical Papers and Letters (pp. 291–95). Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leibniz, G. W. (1976b). On universal synthesis and analysis, or the art of discovery and judgment. In Leibniz, , Philosophical Papers and Letters (pp. 229–34). Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leibniz, G. W. (1988). Theodicy: Essays on the Goodness of God, the Freedom of Man and the Origin of Evil, trans. Huggard, E. M., ed. Farrer, A.. Wipf and Stock.Google Scholar
Leibniz, G. W. (1989a). Philosophical Essays, ed. and trans. Ariew, R. and Garber, D.. Hackett.Google Scholar
Leibniz, G. W. (1989b). Two sects of naturalists. In Ariew, R. & Garber, D. (eds.), Leibniz, , Philosophical Essays, ed. and trans. Ariew, R. and Garber, D. (pp. 281–83). Hackett.Google Scholar
Leibniz, G. W. (2006). Short commentary on the judge of controversies [Commentatiuncula de judice controversarium]. In Leibniz, , The Art of Controversies, ed. and trans. Dascal, M. (pp. 7–28). Springer. Cited by numbers of paragraphs.Google Scholar
Lennon, T. M. (2005). The rationalist conception of substance. In Nelson, A. (ed.), A Companion to Rationalism (pp. 12–30). Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, L. (2000). L’automate spirituel: La naissance de la subjectivité moderne d’après l’Ethique de Spinoza. Van Gorcum.Google Scholar
Levy, Z. (1989). The problem of normativity in Spinoza’s “Hebrew Grammar.” In Levy, Z. (ed.), Baruch or Benedict: On some Jewish aspects of Spinoza’s philosophy (pp. 155–93). Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Lewes, G. H. (1845). The Biographical History of Philosophy. Appleton.Google Scholar
Lewis, D. (2007). Spinoza on having a false idea. Metaphysica, 8(1), 17–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, M. (2004). Spinoza’s metaphysics of desire: The demonstration of IIIP6. Archiv fur Geschichte der Philosophie, 86(1), 21–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, M. (2005). Memory and personal identity in Spinoza. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 35(2), 243–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, M. (2006a). Substance, attribute, and mode in Spinoza. Philosophy Compass, 1(2), 144–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, M. (2006b). Teleology and human action in Spinoza. Philosophical Review, 115(3), 317–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, M. (2009). The power of reason in Spinoza. In Koistinen, O. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza’s Ethics (pp. 105–26). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lin, M. (2018). The Principle of Sufficient Reason in Spinoza. In Della Rocca, M. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Spinoza (pp. 133–54). Oxford University Press,Google Scholar
Lin, M. (2019a). Affirmation, judgment, and epistemic theodicy in Descartes and Spinoza. In Ball, B. and Schuringa, C. (eds.), The Act and Object of Judgment (pp. 26–44). Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, M. (2019b). Being and Reason: An Essay on Spinoza’s Metaphysics. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, M. (2019c). Spinoza’s panpsychism. In Seager, W. (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Panpsychism (pp. 36–43). Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, G. (1994). Part of Nature: Self-knowledge in Spinoza’s Ethics. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. (1996). Spinoza’s version of the eternity of the mind. In Grene, M. and Nails, D. (eds.), Spinoza and the Sciences (pp. 211–33). Springer.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. (2005). Spinoza and the education of imagination. In Oksenberg Rorty, A. (ed.), Philosophers on Education: New Historical Perspectives (pp. 156–70). Routledge.Google Scholar
Loeb, L. E. (1981). From Descartes to Hume: Continental Metaphysics and the Development of Modern Philosophy. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (2003). Stoicism in the philosophical tradition: Spinoza, Lipsius, Butler. In Miller, J. and Inwood, B. (eds.), Hellenistic and Early Modern Philosophy (pp. 7–29). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lord, B. (2011). Kant and Spinozism: Transcendental Idealism and Immanence from Jacobi to Deleuze. Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lord, B. (2014). Spinoza, equality, and hierarchy. History of Philosophy Quarterly, 31(1), 59–77.Google Scholar
Lord, B. (2016). The concept of equality in Spinoza’s Theological-Political Treatise. Epoche: A Journal for the History of Philosophy, 20(2), 367–86.Google Scholar
Lord, B. (2017). Spinoza on natural inequality and the fiction of moral equality. In Ducheyne, S. (ed.), Reassessing the Radical Enlightenment (pp. 127–42). Routledge.Google Scholar
Lordon, F. (2014). Willing Slaves of Capital: Spinoza and Marx on Desire, trans. G. Ash. Verso.Google Scholar
Lovejoy, A. O. (1936). Great Chain of Being: A Study of the History of an Idea. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lucash, F. (2012). Spinoza on friendship. Philosophia, 40, 305–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maber, R. G. (2005). Publishing in the Republic of Letters: The Ménage-Graevius-Wetstein Correspondence 1679–1692. Rodopi.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macherey, P. (1996). The encounter with Spinoza. In Patton, P. (ed.), Deleuze: A Critical Reader (pp. 139–61). Blackwell.Google Scholar
Macherey, P. (1997). Introduction à l’Éthique de Spinoza: La seconde partie: La réalité mentale. PUF.Google Scholar
Maimon, S. (2018). The Autobiography of Solomon Maimon: The Complete Translation, ed. Melamed, Y. and Socher, A., trans. Reitter, Paul. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maimonides, M. (1963). The Guide of the Perplexed, trans. S. Pines. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Malcolm, N. (2002). Hobbes and Spinoza. In Malcolm, , Aspects of Hobbes (pp. 27–52). Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malcolm, N. (2019). Useful Enemies: Islam and the Ottoman Empire in Western Political Thought, 1450–1750. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Malinowski-Charles, S. (2004). Affects et conscience chez Spinoza: L’automatisme dans le progrès éthique. Olms.Google Scholar
Malinowski-Charles, S. (2024). Spinoza on knowing that I know. Paper presented at Ontario-Quebec Seminar in Early Modern Philosophy, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Manning, R. (2002). Spinoza, thoughtful teleology, and the causal significance of content. In Koistinen, O. and Biro, J. (eds.), Spinoza: Metaphysical Themes (pp. 182–209). Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manning, R. (2006). Spinoza’s physical theory. In Zalta, E. N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/spinoza-physics/Google Scholar
Manzini, F. (ed.). (2011). Spinoza et ses scolastiques: Retour aux sources et nouveaux enjeux. Presses de l’Université Paris-Sorbonne.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marion, J.-L. (1994) Aporias and the origins of Spinoza’s theory of adequate ideas. In Yovel, Y. (ed.), Spinoza on Knowledge and the Human Mind (pp. 129–58). Brill.Google Scholar
Marrama, O. (2017). Consciousness, ideas of ideas and animation in Spinoza’s Ethics. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 25(3), 506–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marrama, O. (2019). Spinoza’s Theory of the Human Mind: Consciousness, Memory, and Reason. PhD thesis, University of Groningen.Google Scholar
Marshall, C. (2009). The mind and the body as ‘one and the same thing’ in Spinoza. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 17(5), 897–919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, C. (2012). Spinoza on destroying passions with reason. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 85(1), 139–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, C. (2015). Reason in the Short Treatise. In Melamed, Y. (ed.), The Young Spinoza: A Metaphysician in the Making (pp. 133–43). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Marshall, C. (2021). Kant and Spinoza. In Melamed, Y. (ed.), A Companion to Spinoza (pp. 517–26). Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Marshall, G. (formerly Eugene). (2008a). Adequacy and innateness in Spinoza. Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy, 4, 51–88.Google Scholar
Marshall, G. E. (2008b). Spinoza’s cognitive affects and their feel. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 16(1), 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, G. E. (2010). Spinoza on the problem of akrasia. European Journal of Philosophy, 18, 41–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0378.2008.00326.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, G. E. (2014). The Spiritual Automaton: Spinoza’s Science of the Mind. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, C. P. (2008). The framework of essences in Spinoza’s Ethics. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 16(3), 489–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martineau, J. (1883). A Study of Spinoza. Macmillan.Google Scholar
Marx, K. (1994). Early Political Writings, ed. and trans. O’Malley, J.. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Massimi, M. (2017). Kant on the ideality of space and the argument from Spinozism. In O’Shea, J. (ed.), Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason: A Critical Guide (pp. 64–82). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matheron, A. (1969). Individu et communauté chez Spinoza. Éditions de Minuit.Google Scholar
Matheron, A. (1971). Le Christ et le salut des ignorants chez Spinoza. Aubier-Montaigne.Google Scholar
Matheron, A. (1985). Le ‘droit du plus fort’: Hobbes contre Spinoza. Revue philosophique de la France et de l’étranger, 175(2), 149–76.Google Scholar
Matheron, A. (1986). Spinoza and Euclidean arithmetic: The example of the fourth proportional. In Grene, M. and Nails, D. (eds.), Spinoza and the Sciences (pp. 125–50). D. Reidel.Google Scholar
Matheron, A. (1988). Individu et communauté chez Spinoza. New edn. Éditions de Minuit.Google Scholar
Matheron, A. (1991). Physique et ontologie chez Spinoza: L’énigmatique réponse à Tschirnhaus. Cahiers Spinoza, 6, 83–109.Google Scholar
Matheron, A. (1994). La vie éternelle et le corps selon Spinoza. Revue philosophique de la France et de l’étranger, 120(1), 27–40.Google Scholar
Matheron, A. (1997). The theoretical function of democracy in Spinoza and Hobbes. In Montag, W. and Stolze, T. (eds.), The New Spinoza (pp. 171–207). University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Matheron, A. (2011). Philosophie et religion chez Spinoza. In Matheron, , Études sur Spinoza et les philosophies de l’âge Classique (pp. 389–406) ENS.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matheron, A. (2020). Politics, Ontology and Knowledge in Spinoza, ed. Del Lucchese, F., Maruzzella, D., and Morejon, G., trans. Maruzzella, D. and Morejon, G.. Edinburgh University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matson, W. (1977). Death and destruction in Spinoza’s Ethics. Inquiry, 20, 403–17.Google Scholar
Matson, W. (1990). Body essence and mind eternity in Spinoza. In Curley, E. and Moreau, P.-F. (eds.), Spinoza: Issues and Directions (pp. 82–95). Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattern, R. (1978). Spinoza and ethical subjectivism. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 8 (Supplement 1), 59–82.Google Scholar
Mátyási, R. (2020). Spinoza on composition, monism, and beings of reason. Journal of Modern Philosophy, 2(1), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAllister, B. (2014). Adequate and inadequate ideas in Spinoza. History of Philosophy Quarterly, 31, 119–36.Google Scholar
McShea, R. (1968). The Political Philosophy of Spinoza. Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meinsma, K. O. (1980[1896]). Spinoza en zijn kring: Over Hollandsche vrijgeesten. HES.Google Scholar
Melamed, Y. (2000). On the exact science of nonbeings: Spinoza’s view of mathematics. Iyyun: The Jerusalem Philosophical Quarterly, 49, 3–22.Google Scholar
Melamed, Y. (2010). Acomism or weak individuals? Hegel, Spinoza, and the reality of the finite. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 48, 77–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melamed, Y. (2011). Spinoza’s anti-humanism: An outline. In Fraenkel, C., Perinetti, D., and Smith, J. E. H. (eds.), The Rationalists: Between Tradition and Innovation (pp. 147–66). Springer.Google Scholar
Melamed, Y. (2012a). ‘Christus secundum spiritum’: Spinoza, Jesus, and the infinite intellect. in Stahl, N. (ed.), The Jewish Jesus (pp. 140–51). Routledge.Google Scholar
Melamed, Y. (2012b). Inherence, causation, and conceivability in Spinoza. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 50(3), 365–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melamed, Y. (2012c). ‘Omnis determinatio est negatio’: Determination, negation, and self-negation in Spinoza, Kant, and Hegel. In Förster, E. and Melamed, Y. (eds.), Spinoza and German Idealism (pp. 175–96). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Melamed, Y. (2012d). Spinoza’s deification of existence. Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy, 6, 75–104.Google Scholar
Melamed, Y. (2012e). Why Spinoza is not an eleatic monist (or why diversity exists). In Goff, P. (ed.), Spinoza on Monism (pp. 206–22). Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Melamed, Y. (2013a). Spinoza’s metaphysics of thought: Parallelisms and the multifaceted structure of ideas. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 86(3), 636–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melamed, Y. (2013b). Spinoza’s Metaphysics: Substance and Thought. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melamed, Y. (ed). (2015). The Young Spinoza: A Metaphysician in the Making. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melamed, Y. (2018). Spinozism, acosmism, and Hassidism: A closed circle.” In Kravitz, A. and Noller, J. (eds.), The Concept of Judaism in German Idealism (pp. 75–85). Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Melamed, Y. (2019). The enigma of Spinoza’s amor Dei intellectualis. In Naaman-Zauderer, N. (ed.), Freedom, Action, and Motivation in Spinoza’s Ethics (pp. 222–38). Routledge.Google Scholar
Melamed, Y. (2022). Spinoza’s metaphysics of substance. In Garrett, D. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza, 2nd edn (pp. 61–112). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Melamed, Y. (2024). Spinoza’s ‘atheism,’ the Ethics and the TTP. In Garber, D. et al. (eds.), Spinoza: Reason, Religion, Politics: The Relation Between the Ethics and the Tractatus Theologico-Politicus. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Melamed, Y. (forthcoming). From the Gate of Heaven to the ‘Field of Holy Apples’: Spinoza and the Kabbalah. In Cisiu, C. (ed.), Early Modern Philosophy and the Kabbalah.Google Scholar
Melamed, Y., and Lin, M. (2016). Principle of Sufficient Reason. In Zalta, E.N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2021/entries/sufficient-reasonGoogle Scholar
Melamed, Y., and Rosenthal, M. A. (eds.). (2010). Spinoza’s Theological-Political Treatise: A Critical Guide. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melamed, Y., and Sharp, H. (eds.). (2018). Spinoza’s Political Treatise: A Critical Guide. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendelssohn, M. (2012). Last Works, trans. Rosenstock, B.. University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Mertens, F. (2011). Johannes Koerbagh’s lost album amicorum seen through the eyes of Pieter de la Ruë. Lias, 38, 59–127.Google Scholar
Meshelski, K. (2011). Two kinds of definition in Spinoza’s Ethics. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 19(2), 201–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Messeri, M. (1990). L’espistemologia di Spinoza: Saggio sui corpi e le menti. Il Saggiatore.Google Scholar
Messina, J. (2014). Kantian space, supersubstantivalism, and the spirit of Spinoza. Kant Yearbook, 6(1), 43–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, L. (attributed). (1666). Philosophia S. Scripturae interpres. Rieuwertsz.Google Scholar
Meyer, L.(1998). Inaugural dissertation on matter: On matter and its affections: Motion and rest (1660). In Spinoza, , The Principles of Cartesian Philosophy and Metaphysical Thoughts, trans. Shirley, S. (pp. 144–59). Hackett.Google Scholar
Meyer, L. (2005). Philosophy as the Interpreter of Holy Scripture, trans. Shirley, S., ed. Rice, L. C. and Pastijn, F.. Marquette University Press.Google Scholar
Mignini, F. (1979) Per la datazione e l’interpretazione del Tractatus de intellectus emendatione di B. Spinoza. La cultura, 17, 87–160.Google Scholar
Mignini, F. (1986a). Introduzione. In Spinoza, , Korte Verhandeling, van God, de Mensch, en deszelvs Welstand / Breve trattato su dio, l’uomo, e il suo bene (pp. 11–118). Japadre.Google Scholar
Mignini, F. (1986b). Spinoza’s theory on the active and passive nature of the intellect, trans. Rae, B.. Studia Spinozana, 2, 27–58.Google Scholar
Miller, J. (2003a). Spinoza and the concept of a law of nature. History of Philosophy Quarterly, 20, 257–76.Google Scholar
Miller, J. (2003b). Stoics, Grotius, and Spinoza on moral deliberation. In Miller, J. and Inwood, B. (eds.), Hellenistic and Early Modern Philosophy (pp. 116–40). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, J. (2005). Spinoza’s axiology. Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy, 2, 149–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, J. (2007). The status of consciousness in Spinoza’s concept of mind. In Heinämaa, L., Lähteenmäki, V., and Remes, P. (eds.), Consciousness: From Perception to Reflection in the History of Philosophy (pp. 203–20). Springer.Google Scholar
Miller, J. (2012). Spinoza and natural law. In Jacobs, J. A. (ed.), Reason, Religion and Natural Law (pp. 201–21). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, J. (2015). Spinoza and the Stoics. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miner, R. C. (2002). The dependence of Descartes’ ontological proof upon the doctrine of causa sui. Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia, 58, 873–86.Google Scholar
Mock, K. (2016). Hébreu: Du sacré au maternel. CNRS Éditions.Google Scholar
Mock, K. (2019). La nature du nom: Modification, conservation et dégénérescence. In Baumgarten, J., Rosier-Catach, I., and Totaro, P. (eds.), Spinoza: Philosophe grammairien (pp. 183–200). CNRS Éditions.Google Scholar
Monaco, D. (2019). Individuation and death in Spinoza’s Ethics: The Spanish Poet case reconsidered. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 27, 941–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montag, W. (2009). Imitating the affects of beasts: Interest and inhumanity in Spinoza. Differences, 20(2/3), 54–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montag, W. (2020). Spinoza’s counter-aesthetics. Intellectual History Review, 30(3), 411–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moreau, P.-F. (1975). Spinoza. Seuil.Google Scholar
Moreau, P.-F. (1994a). The metaphysics of substance and the metaphysics of forms. In Yovel, Y. (ed.), Spinoza on Knowledge and the Human Mind (27–35). Brill.Google Scholar
Moreau, P.-F. (1994b). Spinoza: L’expérience et l’éternité. Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Moreau, P.-F. (2005). Notice sur la reception du Traité politique. In Spinoza, Oeuvres, vol. v: Traité Politique, ed. Ramond, C. (pp. 77–79). Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Moreau, P.-F. (2011). Imitation of the affects and interhuman relations. In Hampe, M., Renz, U., and Schnepf, R. (eds.), Spinoza’s Ethics: A Collective Commentary (pp. 167–78). Brill.Google Scholar
Moreau, P.-F. (2021[1994]). Experience and Eternity in Spinoza, trans. Boncardo, R.. Edinburgh University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moreau, P.-F., and Lærke, M. (2022). Spinoza’s reception. In Garrett, D. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza, 2nd edn (pp. 405–43). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Moreau, P.-F., and Steenbakkers, P. (2020). Introduction. In Spinoza, Œuvres, vol. iv: Ethica/Éthique, ed. Akkerman, F. and Steenbakkers, P., trans. Moreau, P.-F. (pp. 13–66). Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Morfino, V. (1994). Spinoza contra Leibniz: Documenti di uno scontro intelettuale. Unicopli.Google Scholar
Morfino, V. (2002). Il tempo e l’occasione: L’incontro Spinoza Machiavelli. LED.Google Scholar
Morfino, V. (2019). The Spinoza–Machiavelli Encounter: Time and Occasion, trans. Mesing, D.. Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Mori, G. (1999). Bayle philosophe. Honoré Champion.Google Scholar
Morrison, Ja. (1994). Spinoza on the self, personal identity and immortality. In Hunter, G. (ed.), Spinoza: The Enduring Questions (pp. 31–47). University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Morrison, Jo. (2013). The relation between conception and causation in Spinoza’s metaphysics. Philosophers’ Imprint, 13(3), 1–17.Google Scholar
Morrison, Jo (2015). Restricting Spinoza’s causal axiom. Philosophical Quarterly, 65(258), 40–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrison, Jo (2017). Two puzzles about thought and identity in Spinoza. In Melamed, Y. (ed.), Spinoza’s Ethics: A Critical Guide (pp. 56–81). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mugnier-Pollet, L. (1976). La philosophie politique de Spinoza. J. Vrin.Google Scholar
Muller, R. (2000). The Unaccommodated Calvin: Studies in the Foundation of a Theological Tradition. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naaman-Zauderer, N. (ed.). (2016). Freedom, Action, and Motivation in Spinoza’s Ethics. Routledge.Google Scholar
Nadler, S. (2001). Spinoza’s Heresy: Immortality and the Jewish Mind. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadler, S. (2006). Spinoza’s Ethics: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadler, S. (2008a). Spinoza and consciousness. Mind, 117, 575–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadler, S. (2008b). Whatever is, is in God. In Huenemann, C. (ed.), Interpreting Spinoza: Critical Essays (pp. 53–64). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadler, S. (2011). A Book Forged in Hell: Spinoza’s Scandalous Treatise and the Birth of the Secular Age. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Nadler, S. (2012). Spinoza’s monism and the reality of the finite. In Goff, P. (ed.), Spinoza on Monism (pp. 223–43). Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Nadler, S. (2014a). The lives of others: Spinoza on benevolence as a rational virtue. In Kisner, M. J. and Youpa, A. (eds.), Essays on Spinoza’s Ethical Theory (pp. 41–56). Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadler, S. (ed.). (2014b). Spinoza and Medieval Jewish Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadler, S. (2015). On Spinoza’s “free man”. Journal of the American Philosophical Association, 1, 103–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadler, S. (2016). Spinoza on lying and suicide. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 24(2), 257–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadler, S. (2018a). Aliquid remanet: What are we to do with Spinoza’s Compendium of Hebrew Grammar? Journal of the History of Philosophy, 56, 155–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadler, S. (2018b). The intellectual love of God. In Della Rocca, M. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Spinoza (pp. 295–313). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nadler, S. (2018c). Spinoza: A Life. 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadler, S. (2019a). Spinoza, Descartes, and the “Stupid Cartesians”. In Nadler, S., Schmaltz, T., and Antoine-Mahut, D. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Descartes and Cartesianism (pp. 659–77). Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadler, S. (2019b). Spinoza’s values: Joy, desire and good in the Ethics. In Naaman-Zauderer, N. (ed.), Freedom, Action, and Motivation in Spinoza’s Ethics (pp. 174–97). Routledge.Google Scholar
Nadler, S. (2020). Think Least of Death: Spinoza on How to Live and How to Die. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Nadler, S. (2021). Spinoza on friendship. Historia philosophica, 19, 87–97.Google Scholar
Naess, A. (1981). Spinoza’s finite god. Revue internationale de philosophie, 35(135), 120–26.Google Scholar
Nassar, D. (2012). Spinoza in Schelling’s early conception of intellectual intuition. In Förster, E. and Melamed, Y. (eds.), Spinoza and German Idealism (pp. 136–55). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Negri, A. (1981). L’anomalia selvaggia: Saggio su potere e potenza in Baruch Spinoza. Feltrinelli.Google Scholar
Negri, A. (1991). The Savage Anomaly: The Power of Spinoza’s Metaphysics and Politics, trans. Hardt, M.. University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Negri, A. (1997). Reliqua desiderantur: A conjecture for a definition of the concept of democracy in the final Spinoza. In Montag, W. and Stolze, T. (eds.), The New Spinoza (pp. 207–18). University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, A. (1997). Descartes’s ontology of thought. Topoi, 16, 163–78.Google Scholar
Nelson, A. (2011). Descartes’s theory of ideas. In Broughton, J. and Carriero, J. (eds.), A Companion to Descartes (pp. 393–423). Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Nelson, A. (2013). The structure of Cartesian sensations. Analytic Philosophy, 54(2), 155–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, A. (2014). Descartes’ dualism and its relation to Spinoza’s metaphysics. In Cunning, D. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Descartes’ Meditations (pp. 277–98). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, A. (2015) The problem of true ideas in Spinoza’s Treatise. In Melamed, Y. (ed.), The Young Spinoza: A Metaphysician in the Making (pp. 52–65). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, A. (2016). Early modern theories of truth. In Glanzberg, M. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Truth (pp. 75–92). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, A. (2017). Logic and knowledge. In Kaufman, D. (ed.), The Routledge Companion to Seventeenth Century Philosophy (pp. 224–49). Routledge.Google Scholar
Neostadius, C. (1670). De feudi juris scripti, & Hollandici, West-Frisicique successione, ed. Boxel, H.. Gorinchem.Google Scholar
Newlands, S. (2010a). Another kind of Spinozistic monism. Noûs, 44, 469–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newlands, S. (2010b). The harmony of Spinoza and Leibniz. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 81(1), 64–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newlands, S. (2011). Hegel’s Idealist Reading of Spinoza; more recent Idealist readings of Spinoza. Philosophy Compass, 6(2), 100–19.Google Scholar
Newlands, S. (2012). Thinking, conceiving, and Idealism in Spinoza. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 94(1), 31–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newlands, S. (2015). Spinoza’s early anti-abstractionism. In Melamed, Y. (ed.), The Young Spinoza: A Metaphysician in the Making (pp. 255–71). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Newlands, S. (2018). Reconceiving Spinoza. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newlands, S. (2020). Spinozistic selves. Journal of the American Philosophical Association, 6(1), 16–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nietzsche, F. (1956). The Portable Nietzsche, ed. and trans. Kaufmann, W.. Viking.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, F. (1974). The Gay Science: With a Prelude in Rhymes and an Appendix of Songs, ed. and trans. Kaufmann, W.. Random House.Google Scholar
Nizzoli, M. (1576). Marius Nizolius sive thesaurus Ciceronianus. Tampach.Google Scholar
Nobbs, J. (1938). Theocracy and Toleration: A Study of the Disputes in Dutch Calvinism from 1600 to 1650. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nolan, L. (1996). Leibniz on the Trinity and the Incarnation: Reason and Revelation in the Seventeenth Century. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Novaes de Rezende, C. (2018). Spinoza’s proposal for a doctrine of children’s education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 50(9), 830–38.Google Scholar
Nyden, T. (1999). Radical Cartesian politics: Van Velthuysen, de La Court, and Spinoza. Studia Spinozana, 15, 35–65.Google Scholar
Nyden-Bullock, T. (2007). Spinoza’s Radical Cartesian Mind. Continuum.Google Scholar
Ogden, S. R. (2021). Avicenna and Spinoza on essence and existence. In Melamed, Y. (ed.), A Companion to Spinoza (pp. 30–40). Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsthoorn, J. (2016). Spinoza on human and divine justice. History of Philosophy Quarterly, 33(1), 21–41.Google Scholar
Ostens, J. (1651). Liefde-Son, Omstralende de Hoedanigheyt der tegenwoordig genaamde Christenheyt. Utrecht.Google Scholar
Ostens, J. (1662). De Aantekeningen van C. Gentman Publijk Predikant binnen Uitrecht … Overwogen, beantwoord en wederleid. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Ostens, J. (1665). De Aan-teikeningen … Krachteloos en ongelukkigh Verdedight, door C. Gentman. Utrecht.Google Scholar
Otto, R. (1994). Studien zur Spinozarezeption in Deutschland im 18. Jahrhundert. P. Lang.Google Scholar
Parchment, S. (2000). The mind’s eternity in Spinoza’s Ethics. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 38(3), 349–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parkinson, G. H. R. (1964). Truth and falsity in Spinoza. In Kashap, S. P. (ed.), Studies in Spinoza (pp. 212–35). University of California Press.Google Scholar
Parkinson, G. H. R. (1977). Hegel, pantheism, and Spinoza. Journal of the History of Ideas, 38(3), 449–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parrochia, D. (1984–85). Physique pendulaire et modèles dans l’Éthique de Spinoza. Cahiers Spinoza, 5, 711–92.Google Scholar
Parrochia, D. (1987a). La science de la nature corporelle. Studia Spinozana, 3, 151–73.Google Scholar
Parrochia, D. (1987b). Sur quelques modèles scientifiques de la métaphysique spinoziste. In Dascal, M. (ed.), Leibniz: Language, Signs, and Thought (pp. 93–124). Benjamins.Google Scholar
Pätzold, D. (1999). Ist Tschirnhaus’ Medicina mentis ein Ableger von Spinozas Methodologie? In Nauta, L. and Vanderjagt, A. (eds.), Between Demonstration and Imagination: Essays in the History of Science and Philosophy Presented to John D. North (339–64). Brill.Google Scholar
Perler, D. (2014). Spinoza über Tiere. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 96(2), 232–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perler, D. (2018). Spinoza on skepticism. In Della Rocca, M. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Spinoza (pp. 220–239). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Perler, D. (2021). Spinoza on diachronic identity. In Melamed, Y. (ed.), A Companion to Spinoza (pp. 170–78). Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Peterman, A. (2014). Spinoza on physical science. Philosophy Compass, 9(3), 214–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterman, A. (2015). Spinoza on extension. Philosophers’ Imprint, 15(14), 1–23.Google Scholar
Peterman, A. (2017). The ‘Physical’ Interlude. In Melamed, Y. (ed.), Spinoza’s Ethics: A Critical Guide (pp. 102–20). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
van Peursen, C. A. (1993). E. W. von Tschirnhaus and the Ars inveniendi. Journal of the History of Ideas, 54(3), 395–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pirola, F. (2017). L’obbedienza nel ‘Trattato teologico-politico’ di Spinoza. Filosofia politica, 31, 217–33.Google Scholar
Pitkin, H. (1984). Fortune is a Woman: Gender and Politics in the Thought of Niccolò Machiavelli. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Pollock, F. (1899). Spinoza: His Life and Philosophy. Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Popkin, R. (1985). Spinoza and Samuel Fisher. Philosophia, 15, 219–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popkin, R. (1990). Spinoza and the Three Imposters. In Curley, E. and Moreau, P.-F., Spinoza: Issues and Directions: The Proceedings of the Chicago Spinoza Conference (pp. 347–58). Brill.Google Scholar
Popkin, R. (1992). Spinoza’s relations with the Quakers in Amsterdam. In Popkin, , The Third Force in Seventeenth-Century Thought. Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popkin, R. (2003). The History of Scepticism from Savonarola to Bayle. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popkin, R., and Signer, M. (eds.) (1987). Spinoza’s Earliest Publication? The Hebrew Translation of Margaret Fell’s ‘A Loving Salutation to the Seed of Abraham Among the Jews, wherever they are scattered up and down the Face of the Earth. Van Gorcum.Google Scholar
Pozzi, P. (1990). L’intendere come ‘puro patire’ nella Korte Verhandeling: Note sulla gnoseologia di Spinoza. In Mignini, F. (ed.), Dio, l’uomo, la liberté: Studi sul Breve Trattato di Spinoza (pp. 235–63). Japadre.Google Scholar
Prelorentzos, Y. (1996). Temps, durée et éternité dans les Principes de la philosophie de Descartes. Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Preus, S. J. (2001). Spinoza and the Irrelevance of Biblical Authority. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Primus, K. (2019). Spinoza’s ‘infinite modes’ reconsidered. Journal of Modern Philosophy, 1(1), 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Primus, K. (2021a). Reflective knowledge. In Melamed, Y. (ed.), A Companion to Spinoza (pp. 265–75). Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Primus, K. (2021b). Spinoza’s monism II: A proposal. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 105(3), 444–69.Google Scholar
Primus, K. (2024). Finding oneself in God: Scientia intuitiva as a metaphysically self-locating thought. In Garber, D. et al. (eds.), Spinoza: Reason, Religion, Politics. The Relation between the Ethics and the Tractatus Theologico-Politicus. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Proietti, O. (2010a). Compendium XXIII, 82–86. Emendazioni alla Grammatica spinoziana. Quaderni di storia, 71, 159–71.Google Scholar
Proietti, O. (2010b). Emendazioni all Grammatica ebraica spinoziana. Rivista di storia della filosofia, 65, 25–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prokhovnik, R. (1997). From democracy to aristocracy: Spinoza, reason and politics. History of European Ideas, 23(2–4), 105–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prokhovnik, R. (2004). Spinoza and Republicanism. Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radner, D. (1971). Spinoza’s theory of ideas. Philosophical Review, 80(3), 338–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ravven, H., and Goodman, L. (eds.). (2002). Jewish Themes in Spinoza’s Philosophy. State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Reichert, K. (1985). Fortuna oder die Beständigkeit des Wechsels. Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Reid, J. (2014). Descartes and the individuation of bodies. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 96(1), 38–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renz, U. (2010). Die Erklärbarkeit von Erfahrung: Subjektivität und Realismus in Spinozas Theorie des menschlichen Geistes. Klostermann.Google Scholar
Renz, U. (2014). Doxastische Selbstkontrolle und Wahrheitssensitivität: Descartes und Spinoza über die Voraussetzungen einer rationalistischen Ethik der Überzeugungen. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 96(4), 463–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renz, U. (2015). From the passive to the active intellect. In Melamed, Y. (ed.), The Young Spinoza: A Metaphysician in the Making (pp. 287–99). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Renz, U. (2018a). The Explainability of Experience: Realism and Subjectivity in Spinoza’s Theory of the Human Mind. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renz, U. (2018b). Finite subjects in the Ethics: Spinoza on indexical knowledge, the first person, and the individuality of human minds. In Della Rocca, M. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Spinoza (pp. 204–19). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Renz, U. (2019). Spinozist cognitive psychology: Spinoza’s concept of the imagination. In Meer, R., Motta, G., and Stiening, G. (eds.), Konzepte der Einbildungskraft in der Philosophie, den Wissenschaften und den Künsten des 18. Jahrhunderts: Festschrift zum 65. Geburtstag von Udo Thiel (pp. 9–24). De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renz, U. (2022). Spinoza’s epistemology. In Garrett, D. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza, 2nd edn (pp. 142–86). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Renz, U., and Hutchins, B. (2021). Spinoza on human and divine knowledge. In Melamed, Y. (ed.), A Companion to Spinoza (pp. 253–64). Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Renz, U., and Schnepf, R. (eds.). (2008). Studia Spinozana, 16: Spinoza and Late Scholasticism.Google Scholar
Ribe, N. M. (1997). Cartesian optics and the mastery of nature. Isis, 88(1), 42–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rice, L. C. (1971). Spinoza on individuation. The Monist, 55(4), 640–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rice, L. C. (1990a). Individual and community in Spinoza’s social psychology. In Curley, E. and Moreau, P.-F. (eds.), Spinoza: New Directions (pp. 271–85). Brill.Google Scholar
Rice, L. C. (1990b). Reflexive ideas in Spinoza. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 28(2), 201–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rice, L. C. (1991). Tanquam naturae humanae exemplar: Spinoza on human nature. Modern Schoolman, 68(4), 291–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rice, L. C. (1999a). Action in Spinoza’s account of affectivity. In Yovel, Y. (ed.), Desire and Affect: Spinoza as Psychologist (pp. 155–68). Little Room Press.Google Scholar
Rice, L. C. (1999b). Paradoxes of parallelism in Spinoza. Iyyun: The Jerusalem Philosophical Quarterly, 48, 37–54.Google Scholar
Rice, L. C. (2001). Meyer as precursor to Spinoza on the interpretation of scripture. Philosophy & Theology, 13(1), 159–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rice, L. C. (2005). Introduction. In Meyer, L., Philosophy as the Interpreter of Holy Scripture, trans. Shirley, S., ed. Rice, L. C. and Pastijn, F. (pp. 1–19). Marquette University Press.Google Scholar
Richards, R. (2002). The Romantic Conception of Life: Science and Philosophy in the Age of Goethe. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richter, G. T. (1912). Spinozas philosophische Terminologie: Historisch und immanent kritisch untersucht. Johann Ambrosius Barth.Google Scholar
Rivaud, A. (1924). La physique de Spinoza. Chronicon Spinozanum, 4, 24–57.Google Scholar
Rogers, C. (2021). Being consistently biocentric: On the (im)possibility of a Spinozist animal ethics. Journal for Critical Animal Studies, 18(1), 52–72.Google Scholar
Rorty, A. (2009). Spinoza on the pathos of idolatrous love and the hilarity of true love. In Gatens, M. (ed.), Feminist Interpretations of Benedict Spinoza (pp. 147–60). Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, M. A. (1997). Why Spinoza chose the Hebrews: The exemplary function of prophecy in the Theological-Political Treatise. History of Political Thought, 18(1), 207–41.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, M. A. (2001). Tolerance as a virtue in Spinoza’s Ethics. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 34(4), 535–57.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, M. A. (2003). Spinoza’s republican argument for tolerance. Journal of Political Philosophy, 11(3), 320–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenthal, M. A. (2010). Miracles, wonder, and state in Spinoza’s Theological-Political Treatise. In Melamed, Y. and Rosenthal, M. A. (eds.), Spinoza’s Theological-Political Treatise: A Critical Guide (pp. 231–49). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, M. A. (2014). Politics and ethics in Spinoza: The problem of normativity. In Kisner, M. J. and Youpa, A. (eds.), Essays on Spinoza’s Ethical Theory (pp. 85–101). Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenthal, M. A. (2016). Spinoza on circumcision and ceremonies. Modern Judaism, 36(1), 42–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenthal, M. A. (2019). Spinoza on beings of reason [entia rationis] and the analogical imagination. In Stetter, J. and Ramond, C. (eds.), Spinoza in Twenty-First-Century American and French Philosophy: Metaphysics, Philosophy of Mind, Moral and Political Philosophy (pp. 231–50). Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, M. A. (2021). Spinoza’s “republican idea of freedom”. In Melamed, Y. (ed.), A Companion to Spinoza (pp. 402–09). Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Roth, L. (1963). Spinoza, Descartes, and Maimonides. Russell & Russell.Google Scholar
Rotter, H. M. (2019). Selbsterhaltung und Wille zur Macht: Nietzsches Spinoza Rezeption. De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rousseau, J. J. (1995). Confessions. In The Collected Writings of Rousseau, vol. v, ed. Kelly, C., Masters, R. D., and Stillman, P. G.. University Press of New England.Google Scholar
Rousseau, J. J. (1997a[1755]). Discourse on Political Economy. In Rousseau, , The Social Contract and Other Later Political Writings, ed. Gourevitch, V.. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rousseau, J. J. (1997b[1750]). Discourse on the Sciences and the Arts. In Rousseau, , The Social Contract and Other Later Political Writings, ed. Gourevitch, V.. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rousseau, J. J. (1997c[1762]). The Social Contract. In The Social Contract and Other Later Political Writings, ed. Gourevitch, V.. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rousset, B. (1999). Geulincx entre Descartes et Spinoza. J. Vrin.Google Scholar
Rovere, M. (2018). Honors and theater: Spinoza’s pedagogical experience and his relation to F. van den Enden, Educational Philosophy and Theory, 50(9), 809–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudavsky, T. (2000). Time Matters: Time, Creation and Cosmology in Medieval Jewish Thought. State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Rudavsky, T. (2014). The science of Scripture: Abraham Ibn Ezra and Spinoza on biblical hermeneutics. In Nadler, S. (ed.), Spinoza and Medieval Jewish Philosophy (pp. 59–78). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rutherford, D. (1999). Salvation as a state of mind: The place of acquiescentia in Spinoza’s Ethics. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 7(3), 447–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rutherford, D. (2008). Spinoza and the dictates of reason. Inquiry, 51(4), 485–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rutherford, D. (2010). Spinoza’s conception of law: Metaphysics and ethics. In Melamed, Y. and Rosenthal, M. A. (eds.), Spinoza’s Theological-Political Treatise: A Critical Guide (pp. 143–67). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rutherford, D. (2020). Deciding what to do: The relation of affect and reason in Spinoza’s Ethics. In Naamen-Zauderer, N. (ed.), Freedom, Action, and Motivation in Spinoza’s Ethics (pp. 133–51). Routledge.Google Scholar
Ryan, T. (2009). Pierre Bayle’s Cartesian Metaphysics: Rediscovering Early Modern Philosophy. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sacks, E. (2014). Spinoza, Maimonides and the politics of prophecy. Jewish Studies Quarterly, 21, 67–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sacksteder, W. (1975). Spinoza on democracy. In Freeman, E. and Mandelbaum, M. (eds.), Spinoza: Essays in Interpretation (pp. 67–91). Open Court.Google Scholar
Sacksteder, W. (1977). Spinoza on part and whole: The worm’s eye view. Southwestern Journal of Philosophy, 8(3), 139–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sacksteder, W. (2001). Communal orders in Spinoza. In Lloyd, G. (ed.), Spinoza: Critical Assessments (pp. 20–38). Routledge.Google Scholar
Salgado Borge, A. (2021). Spinozistic expression as signification. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 29(4), 717–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/09608788.2021.1953961Google Scholar
Salgado Borge, A. (2022). Spinoza on essence constitution. Philosophia, 50, 987–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-021-00437-0Google Scholar
Salomon, H. P. (1984). La vraie excommunication de Spinoza. Forum Litterarum, 28, 181–99.Google Scholar
Sangiacomo, A. (2013a). L’essenza del corpo: Spinoza e la scienza delle composizioni. G. Olms.Google Scholar
Sangiacomo, A. (2013b). What are human beings? Essences and aptitudes in Spinoza’s anthropology. Journal of Early Modern Studies, 2(2), 78–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sangiacomo, A. (2015). The ontology of determination, from Descartes to Spinoza. Science in Context, 28(4), 515–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sangiacomo, A. (2016a). Aristotle, Heereboord and the polemical target of Spinoza’s critique of final causes. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 54(3), 395–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sangiacomo, A. (2016b). Spinoza et les problèmes du corps dans l’histoire de la critique: Essai bibliographique (1924–2015). Journal of Early Modern Studies, 5(2), 101–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sangiacomo, A. (2019). Spinoza on Reason, Passions, and the Supreme Good. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sangiacomo, A., and Nachtomy, O. (2018). Spinoza’s rethinking of activity: From the Short Treatise to the Ethics. Southern Journal of Philosophy, 56(1), 101–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santos Campos, A. (2012). Spinoza’s Revolutions in Natural Law. Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santos Campos, A. (2016). Spinoza on justice: Understanding the suum cuique. Epoché, 21(1), 127–43.Google Scholar
Särman, S. (2020). Spinoza and the Inevitable Perfection of Being. PhD thesis, Hong Kong University.Google Scholar
Sauvagnargues, A., and Sévérac, P. (eds.). (2016). Spinoza-Deleuze: Lectures croisées. ENS.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savan, D. (1958). Spinoza and language. Philosophical Review, 67, 212–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savini, M. (2011). L’horizon problématique du concept d’ens reale dans les Pensées métaphysiques de Spinoza. In Manzini, F. (ed.), Spinoza et ses scolastiques: Retour aux sources et nouveaux enjeux (pp. 99–113). Presses de l’Université Paris-Sorbonne.Google Scholar
Saw, R. (1972). Personal identity in Spinoza. In Kashap, P. (ed.), Studies in Spinoza: Critical and Interpretive Essays (pp. 86–100). Hutchinson.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schacht, R. (1995). Making Sense of Nietzsche. University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Schechter, O. (2015). Temporalities and kinds of cognition in the Treatise on the Emendation of the Intellect, the Short Treatise, and the Ethics. In Melamed, Y. (ed.), The Young Spinoza: A Metaphysician in the Making (pp. 238–54). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schliesser, E. (2018). Spinoza and the philosophy of science. In Della Rocca, M. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Spinoza (pp. 155–89). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schliesser, E., and Smith, G. E. (2000). Huygens’s 1688 Report to the Directors of the Dutch East India Company on the measurement of longitude at sea and the evidence it offered against universal gravity. http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/5510Google Scholar
Schmaltz, T. (1997). Spinoza’s mediate infinite mode. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 35(2), 199–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmaltz, T. (1999). Spinoza on the vacuum. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 81(2), 174–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmaltz, T. (2000). The disappearance of analogy in Descartes, Spinoza, and Regis. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 30, 85–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmaltz, T. (2008). Causa sui and created truth in Descartes. In Wippel, J. (ed.), The Ultimate Why Question: Why Is There Anything at All Rather than Nothing? (pp. 109–24). Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar
Schmaltz, T. (2011). From causes to laws. In Clarke, D. M. and Wilson, C. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy in Early Modern Europe (pp. 32–50). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schmaltz, T. (2015). Spinoza on eternity and duration: The 1663 connection. In Melamed, Y. (ed.), The Young Spinoza: A Metaphysician in the Making (pp. 205–20). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schmaltz, T. (2017). Early Modern Cartesianisms: Dutch and French Constructions. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schmaltz, T. (2020). The Metaphysics of the Material World: Suárez, Descartes, Spinoza. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmid, S. (2014). Spinoza on the unity of will and intellect. In Perler, D. and Corcilius, K. (eds.), Partitioning the Soul: Debates From Plato to Leibniz (pp. 245–70). De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Schmitt, E. (1910). Die unendlichen Modi bei Spinoza. Johann Ambrosius Barth.Google Scholar
Schnepf, R. (2011). The one substance and finite things (1p16–28). In Hampe, M., Renz, U., and Schnepf, R., Spinoza’s Ethics: A Collective Commentary (pp. 37–56). Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schrijvers, M. (1999). The conatus and the mutual relationship between active and passive affects in Spinoza. In Yovel, Y. (ed.), Desire and Affect: Spinoza as Psychologist (pp. 63–78). Little Room Press.Google Scholar
Schwartz, D. B. (2012). The First Modern Jew: Spinoza and the History of an Image. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Scribano, E. (2012). La connaissance du bien et du mal: Du court traité à l’Éthique. In Jacquet, C. and Moreau, P.-F. (eds.), Spinoza transalpin (pp. 59–78). Publications de la Sorbonne.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segev, M. (2021). Schopenhauer’s critique of Spinoza’s pantheism, optimism, and egoism. In Melamed, Y. (ed.), A Companion to Spinoza (pp. 557–67). Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Seidel, H. (2009). Philosophie vernünftiger Lebenspraxis, ed. Caysa, V.. Rosa-Luxemburg-Stiftung Sachsen.Google Scholar
Sévérac, P. (2005). Le devenir actif chez Spinoza. Honoré Champion.Google Scholar
Sewell, W. (1722). The History of the Rise, Increase and Progress of the Christian People called Quakers. London.Google Scholar
Sharp, H. (2011a). Animal affects: Spinoza and the frontiers of the human. Journal for Critical Animal Studies, 9(1), 48–68.Google Scholar
Sharp, H. (2011b). Spinoza and the Politics of Renaturalization. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharp, H. (2012). Eve’s perfection: Spinoza on sexual (in)equality. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 50(4), 559–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharp, H. (2019). Generosity as freedom in Spinoza’s Ethics. In Ramond, C. and Stetter, J. (eds.), Spinoza in Twenty-First-Century American and French Philosophy: Metaphysics, Philosophy of Mind, Moral and Political Philosophy (pp. 277–88). Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Sharp, H. (2022). Spinoza on the fear of solitude. Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy, 11, 137–62.Google Scholar
Shein, N. (2009). The false dichotomy between objective and subjective interpretations of Spinoza’s theory of attributes. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 17(3), 505–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shein, N. (2015). Causation and determinate existence of finite modes in Spinoza. Archiv für Geschichte Der Philosophie, 97(3), 334–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shein, N. (2018a). Not wholly finite: The dual aspects of modes in Spinoza. Philosophia, 46(2), 433–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shein, N. (2018b), The road to finite modes in Spinoza’s Ethics. In Nachtomy, O. and Winegar, R. (eds.), Infinity in Early Modern Philosophy. Springer.Google Scholar
Shein, N. (2018c). Spinoza’s theory of attributes. In Zalta, E. N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2018/entries/spinoza-attributesGoogle Scholar
Shein, N. (2020). Spinning strands into aspects: Realism, idealism, and finite modes in Spinoza. European Journal of Philosophy, 28, 323–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sibilia, G. (2014). El itinerario de Spinoza en 1663: Algunos problemas relativos a la temporalidad en Los principios de filosofía de Descartes, Los pensamientos metafísicos, y la ‘Carta sobre el infinito’. Praxis filosofíco, 38, 27–51.Google Scholar
Siebeck, H. (1890). Über de Entstehung der Termini Natura naturans und Natura naturata. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 3, 370–78.Google Scholar
Sierhuis, F. (2015). The Literature of the Arminian Controversy: Religion, Politics and the Stage in the Dutch Republic. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, Q. (1978). The Foundations of Modern Political Thought, vol. ii: The Age of Reformation. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Skinner, Q. (1981). Machiavelli. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, S. B. (1997). Spinoza, Liberalism, and the Question of Jewish Identity. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Soyarslan, S. (2014). From ordinary life to blessedness. In Kisner, M. J. and Youpa, A. (eds.), Essays on Spinoza’s Ethical Theory (pp. 236–57). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Soyarslan, S. (2016). The distinction between reason and intuitive knowledge in Spinoza’s Ethics. European Journal of Philosophy, 24, 27–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soyarslan, S. (2018). Spinoza’s critique of humility in the Ethics. Southern Journal of Philosophy, 56(3), 342–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soyarslan, S. (2019). Two ethical ideals in Spinoza’s Ethics: The free man and the wise man. Journal of the American Philosophical Association, 5, 357–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soyarslan, S. (2021). Spinoza’s account of blessedness explored through an Aristotelian lens. Dialogue, 60(3), 499–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spinoza, B. (1664). Renatus Des Cartes Beginzelen der Wysbegeerte, I en II Deel, na de meetkonstige wijze beweezen. Mitsgaders deszelfs Overnatuurkundige Gedachten … Alles uit ’t Latijn vertaalt door P.B. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Spinoza, B. (1677a). Opera posthuma. Rieuwertsz.Google Scholar
Spinoza, B. (1677b). De nagelate schriften. Rieuwertsz.Google Scholar
Spinoza, B. (1981). Ethics, trans. G. Eliot, ed. Deegan, G. T.. Salzburg Studies in English Literature: Romantic Reassessment 102. Universität Salzburg.Google Scholar
Spinoza, B. (1985–2015). The Collected Works of Spinoza, trans. and ed. Curley, Edwin. 2 vols. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Spinoza, B. (1986). Korte Verhandeling, van God, de mensch, en deszelvs welstand / Breve trattato su Dio, l’uomo, e il suo bene, ed. and trans. Mignini, F.. Japadre.Google Scholar
Spinoza, B. (2009). Œuvres I: Premiers écrits, ed. Mignini, F., trans. Beyssade, M. and Ganault, J.. Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Spinoza, B. (2020a). Ethics, trans. G. Eliot, ed. Carlisle, C.. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Spinoza, B. (2020b). Œuvres, vol. iv: Ethica/Éthique, ed. Akkerman, F. and Steenbakkers, P., trans. Moreau, P.-F.. Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Spruit, L., and Totaro, P. (eds). (2011). The Vatican Manuscript of Spinoza’s Ethica. Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanglin, K. D., and McCall, T. H. (2012). Jacob Arminius: Theologian of Grace. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steenbakkers, P. (1994). Spinoza’s Ethica from Manuscript to Print. PhD thesis, University of Groningen.Google Scholar
Steenbakkers, P. (2003). Een vijandige overname: Spinoza over Natura naturans en Natura naturata. In Coppens, G. (ed.), Spinoza en de scholastiek (pp. 35–52). Acco.Google Scholar
Steenbakkers, P. (2010). Spinoza leest Machiavelli. In Klugkist, A. C. and van Sluis, J. (eds.), Spinoza: Zijn boeken en zijn denken (pp. 35–54). Uitgeverij Spinozahuis.Google Scholar
Steenbakkers, P. (2011). Sive. In van Bunge, W. et al. (eds). The Continuum Companion to Spinoza (pp. 312–13). Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Steenbakkers, P. (2022). Spinoza’s life. In Garrett, D. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza, 2nd edn (pp. 12–60). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Steenbakkers, P., and Bordoli, R. (2003). Lodewijk Meijer’s Tribute to Johannes Bouwmeester, 4 November 1673. Studia Spinozana, 13, 241–57.Google Scholar
Steenbakkers, P., Touber, J., and van de Ven, J. (2011). A clandestine notebook (1678–1679) on Spinoza, Beverland, the Bible, and sex. Lias, 38, 225–365.Google Scholar
Stein, L. (1890). Leibniz und Spinoza: Ein Beitrag zur Entwicklungsgeschichte der Leibnizschen Philosophie. Reimer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinberg, D. (1981). Spinoza’s theory of the eternity of the human mind. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 11, 35–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinberg, D. (1984). Spinoza’s ethical doctrine and the unity of human nature. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 22, 303–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinberg, D. (2005). Belief, affirmation, and the doctrine of conatus in Spinoza. Southern Journal of Philosophy, 43(1), 147–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinberg, J. (2008). Spinoza on being sui juris and the republican conception of liberty. History of European Ideas, 34, 239–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinberg, J. (2009). Spinoza on civil liberation. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 47(1), 35–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinberg, J. (2010). Spinoza’s curious defense of toleration. In Melamed, Y. and Rosenthal, M. A. (eds.), The Cambridge Critical Guide to Spinoza’s Theological-Political Treatise (pp. 210–30). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Steinberg, J. (2011). Spinoza on human purposiveness and mental causation. History of Philosophy & Logical Analysis, 14, 51–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinberg, J. (2013). Imitation, representation, and humanity in Spinoza’s Ethics. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 51(3), 383–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinberg, J. (2014). Following a recta ratio vivendi. In Kisner, M. J. and Youpa, A. (eds.), Essays on Spinoza’s Ethical Theory (pp. 178–96). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Steinberg, J. (2016). Affect, desire, and judgement in Spinoza’s account of motivation. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 24, 67–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinberg, J. (2018a). Spinoza’s Political Psychology: The Taming of Fortune and Fear. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinberg, J. (2018b). Two puzzles concerning Spinoza’s conception of belief. European Journal of Philosophy, 26(1), 261–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinberg, J. (2019a). Bodies politic and civic agreement. In Armstrong, A., Green, K., and Sangiacomo, A. (eds.), Spinoza and Relational Autonomy: Being with Others (pp. 132–48). Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Steinberg, J. (2019b). Spinoza’s political philosophy. In Zalta, E. N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2019/entries/spinoza-politicalGoogle Scholar
Steinberg, J. (2020). Politics as a model of pedagogy in Spinoza. Ethics and Education, 15(2), 158–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinberg, J. (2021). Striving, happiness, and the good: Spinoza as follower and critic of Hobbes. In Adams, M. P. (ed.), A Companion to Hobbes (pp. 431–47). Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Steinberg, J. (2023). The affirmative mind: Spinoza on striving under the attribute of Thought. Ergo, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.3998/ergo.4630Google Scholar
Stensen, N. (1669). Discours sur l’anatomie du cerveau. Robert de Ninville. Repr. with introd. and notes by Andrault, R., Garnier, 2009.Google Scholar
Stern, R. (2016). ‘Determination is negation’: The adventures of a doctrine from Spinoza to Hegel to the British Idealists. Hegel Bulletin, 37(1), 29–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stock, B. (2000). Spinoza on the immortality of the mind. History of Philosophy Quarterly, 17, 381–403.Google Scholar
Strauss, L. (1965). Spinoza’s Critique of Religion, trans. Sinclair, E. M.. Schocken.Google Scholar
Strazzoni, A. (2018). Dutch Cartesianism and the Birth of Philosophy of Science: From Regius to ’s Gravesande. De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suárez, F. (1597). Metaphysical Disputations.Google Scholar
Tantillo, A. (2002). The Will to Create: Goethe’s Philosophy of Nature. University of Pittsburgh Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, D. (2021). Spinoza and the Politics of Human Freedom. Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Thalheimer, A., and Deborin, A. (1928). Spinozas Stellung in der Vorgeschichte des dialektischen Materialismus: Reden und Aufsätze zur Wiederkehr seines 250. Todestages. Verlag für Literatur und Politik.Google Scholar
Thiel, U. (2011). The Early Modern Subject: Self-Consciousness and Personal Identity from Descartes to Hume. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Timm, H. (1974). Gott und die Freiheit: Studien zur Religionsphilosophie der Goethezeit, vol. i: Die Spinozarenaissance. Klostermann.Google Scholar
Totaro, G. (1994). Acquiescentia dans la cinquième partie de l’Ethique de Spinoza. Revue philosophique de la France et l’etranger, 184, 65–79.Google Scholar
Totaro, P. (2014). Obedientia in Spinoza. In Simonutti, L. (ed.), Religious Obedience and Political Resistance in the Early Modern World (pp. 345–62). Brepols.Google Scholar
Totaro, P. (2018). Steno in Italy: From Florence to Rome. In Andrault, R. and Lærke, M. (eds.), Steno and the Philosophers (pp. 270–87). Brill.Google Scholar
Totaro, P. (2019). Le Compendium Grammatices Linguae Hebraeae dans le contexte des œuvres de Spinoza. In Baumgarten, J., Rosier-Catach, I., and Totaro, P. (eds.), Spinoza: Philosophe grammairien (pp. 63–89). CNRS Éditions.Google Scholar
Totaro, P., Spruit, L., and Steenbakkers, P. (2011). L’Ethica di Spinoza in un manoscritto della Biblioteca Apostolica Vaticana (Vat. lat. 12838). Miscellanea bibliothecae apostolicae vaticanae, 18, 583–610.Google Scholar
Toth, O. (2018). Memory, recollection and consciousness in Spinoza’s Ethics. Society and Politics, 12(2), 50–71.Google Scholar
Toto, F. (2022). Superbia, existimatio, and despectus: An aspect of Spinoza’s theory of esteem. Intellectual History Review, 32(1), 113–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trendelenburg, F. A. (1847). Ist Leibniz in seiner Entwicklung einmal Spinozist oder Cartesianer gewesen und was bedeutet dafür die Schrift ‘de vita beata’? In Bericht über die zur Bekanntmachung geeigneten Verhandlungen der Kgl. Preuss. Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin (pp. 372–86).Google Scholar
Tucker, E. (2018). Hope, hate, and indignation: Spinoza and political emotion in the Trump era. In Sable, M. B. and Torres, A. J. (eds.), Trump and Political Philosophy (pp. 131–58). Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Tucker, E. (2021). Power, freedom, and relational autonomy. In Armstrong, A. and Sangiacomo, A. (eds.), Spinoza and Relational Autonomy: Being with Others (pp. 149–63). Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Vallée, G. (1988). The Spinoza Conversations between Lessing and Jacobi: Text with Excerpts from the Ensuing Controversy, trans. Vallée, G., Lawson, J. B., and Chapple, C. G.. University Press of America.Google Scholar
Vardoulakis, D. (2020). Spinoza, the Epicurean: Authority and Utility in Materialism. Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Vaz Dias, A. M., and van der Tak, W. G. (1982). Spinoza: Merchant and autodidact. Studia Rosenthaliana, 16, 105–71.Google Scholar
van Velthuysen, L. (1680). Opera omnia, ed. Leers, R.. 2 vols.Google Scholar
van Velthuysen, L. (2013). A Letter on the Principles of Justness and Decency: Containing a Defence of the Treatise de Cive of the Learned Mr. Hobbes, ed. Secretan, C., trans. de Mowbray, M.. Brill.Google Scholar
van de Ven, J. (2022). Printing Spinoza: A Descriptive Bibliography of the Works Published in the Seventeenth Century. Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verbeek, T. (1992). Descartes and the Dutch: Early Reactions to Cartesian Philosophy, 1637–1650. Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Verbeek, T. (1999). Spinoza and Cartesianism. In Coudert, A. P., Hutton, S., Popkin, R. H., and Weiner, G. M. (eds.), Judaeo-Christian Intellectual Culture in the Seventeenth Century: A Celebration of the Library of Narcissus Marsh (1638–1713) (pp. 173–84). Springer.Google Scholar
Verbeek, T. (2003). Spinoza’s Theologico-Political Treatise: Exploring ‘the Will of God’. Routledge.Google Scholar
Verbeek, T. (2005). Wittich’s critique of Spinoza. In Schmaltz, T. M. (ed.), Receptions of Descartes: Cartesianism and Anti-Cartesianism in Early Modern Europe (pp. 103–16). Routledge.Google Scholar
Verbeek, T. (2007). Spinoza on natural rights. Intellectual History Review, 17(3), 257–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verbeek, T. (2018). Spinoza on aristocratic and democratic government. In Melamed, Y. and Sharp, H. (eds.), Spinoza’s Political Treatise: A Critical Guide (pp. 145–60). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vermij, R. (2013). Instruments and the making of a philosopher: Spinoza’s career in optics. Intellectual History Review, 23(1), 65–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viljanen, V. (2008a). On the derivation and meaning of Spinoza’s conatus doctrine. Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy, 4, 89–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viljanen, V. (2008b). Spinoza’s essentialist mode of causation. Inquiry, 51, 412–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viljanen, V. (2009). Schopenhauer’s twofold dynamism. In Pietarinen, J. and Viljanen, V. (eds.), The World as Active Power: Studies in the History of European Reason (pp. 305–30). Brill.Google Scholar
Viljanen, V. (2011). Spinoza’s Geometry of Power. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viljanen, V. (2015). Spinoza’s essentialism in the Short Treatise. In Melamed, Y. (ed.), The Young Spinoza: A Metaphysician in the Making (pp. 183–95). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Vinciguerra, L. (2005). Spinoza et le signe: La logique de l’imagination. J. Vrin.Google Scholar
Virno, P. (2004). A Grammar of the Multitude: For an Analysis of Contemporary Forms of Life, trans. Bertoletti, I., Cascaito, J., and Casson, A.. Semiotext(e).Google Scholar
Vlessing, O. (2002). The excommunication of Baruch Spinoza: The birth of a philosopher. In Israel, J. and Salverda, R. (eds.), Dutch Jewry: Its History and Secular Culture (1500–2000) (pp. 141–72). Brill.Google Scholar
Voss, S. H. (1981). How Spinoza enumerated the affects. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 63, 167–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wachter, J. G. (1699). Der Spinozismus im Jüdenthumb oder die von dem heutigen Jüdenthumb und dessen geheimen Kabbala vergötterte Welt. Johann Wolters.Google Scholar
Walker, R. (1985). Spinoza and the coherence theory of truth. Mind, 94(373), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walther, M. (1986). Bibliographie zu Leibniz und Spinoza. In Spinoza, , Briefwechsel (pp. 426–34). Meiner.Google Scholar
Walther, M. (2018). Natur, Recht und Freiheit: Spinozas Theorie von Recht, Staat und Politik im Kontext der Frühen Neuzeit. Universitätsverlag Winter.Google Scholar
Ward, T. M. (2011). Spinoza on the essences of modes. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 19(1), 19–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wartofsky, M. W. (1979). Action and passion: Spinoza’s construction of a scientific psychology. In Wartofsky, , Models: Representation and the Scientific Understanding (pp. 183–97). Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weijers, O. (1978). Contribution à l’histoire des termes Natura naturans et Natura naturata jusqu’à Spinoza. Vivarium, 16, 70–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weststeijn, A. (2012). Commercial republicanism in the Dutch Golden Age: The Political Thought of Johan and Pieter de la Court. Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wetlesen, J. (1979). The Sage and the Way: Spinoza’s Ethics of Freedom. Van Gorcum.Google Scholar
Williams, D. L. (2010). Spinoza and the general will. Journal of Politics, 72(2), 341–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, D. L. (2015). Spinoza and the general will. In Farr, J. and Williams, D. L. (eds.), The General Will: The Evolution of a Concept (pp. 115–46). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, M. (1978). Descartes. Routledge.Google Scholar
Wilson, M. (1980). Objects, ideas and “minds”: Comments on Spinoza’s theory of mind. In Kennington, R. (ed.), The Philosophy of Baruch Spinoza (pp. 103–20). Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, M. (1983). Infinite understanding, scientia intuitiva, and Ethics 1.16. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 8, 181–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, M. (1991). Spinoza’s causal axiom (Ethics I, Axiom 4). In Yovel, Y. (ed.), God and Nature: Spinoza’s Metaphysics (pp. 133–60). Brill.Google Scholar
Wilson, M. (1996). Spinoza’s theory of knowledge. In Garrett, D. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza, 1st edn (pp. 89–141). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, M. (1999a). ‘For they do not agree in nature with us’: Spinoza on the lower animals. In Wilson, , Ideas and Mechanism: Essays on Early Modern Philosophy (pp. 178–95). Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, M. (1999b). Infinite understanding, scientia intuitiva, and Ethics 1.16. In Wilson, , Ideas and mechanism: Essays on early modern philosophy (pp. 237–59). Princeton University Press. (Originally published as Wilson 1983.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, M. (1999c). Objects, ideas and “minds”: Comments on Spinoza’s theory of mind. In Wilson, , Ideas and Mechanism: Essays on Early Modern Philosophy (pp. 126–40). Princeton University Press. (Originally published as Wilson 1980.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, M. (1999d). Spinoza’s causal axiom (Ethics I, Axiom 4). In Wilson, , Ideas and Mechanism: Essays on Early Modern Philosophy (pp. 141–65). Princeton University Press. (Originally published as Wilson 1991.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winkler, S. (2016). The problem of generation and destruction in Spinoza’s system. Journal of Early Modern Philosophy, 5(1), 89–113.Google Scholar
Winkler, S. (2018). Parallelism and the idea of God in Spinoza’s system. Idealistic Studies, 48(2), 149–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittich, C. (1690). Anti-Spinoza, sive examen Ethices Benedicti de Spinoza, et commentarius de Deo et eius attributis. Wolters.Google Scholar
Wolf, A. (1910). Introduction. In Spinoza’s Short Treatise on God, Man, and His Well-Being (pp. ix–cxxviii). Adam and Charles Black.Google Scholar
Wolfe, C. T. (2014). Epigenesis and/as Spinozism in Diderot’s biological project. In Nachtomy, O. and Smith, J. (eds.), The Life Sciences in Early Modern Philosophy (pp. 181–201). Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfson, H. A. (1934). The Philosophy of Spinoza: Unfolding the Latent Processes of His Reasoning. 2 vols. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wuerth, J. (2014). Kant on Mind, Actions, and Ethics. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wurtz, J. P. (1981). Tschirnhaus und die Spinozismusbeschuldigung: Die Polemik mit Christian Thomasius. Studia Leibnitiana, 13(1), 61–75.Google Scholar
Yakira, E. (2014). Spinoza and the Case for Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Youpa, A. (2007). Spinoza’s theory of motivation. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 88, 375–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Youpa, A. (2010a). Spinoza’s model of human nature. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 48(1), 61–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Youpa, A. (2010b). Spinoza’s theories of value. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 18, 209–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Youpa, A. (2020). The Ethics of Joy: Spinoza on the Empowered Life. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Yovel, Y. (1989). The third kind of knowledge as alternative salvation. In Yovel, , Spinoza and Other Heretics, vol. i: The Marrano of Reason (pp. 153–71). Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Yovel, Y. (1991). The infinite mode and natural laws in Spinoza. In Yovel, Y. (ed.), God and Nature: Spinoza’s Metaphysics (pp. 76–96). Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yovel, Y. (1992). Spinoza and Other Heretics, vol. ii. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Yovel, Y. (ed.). (1999). Desire and Affect: Spinoza as Psychologist. Little Room Press.Google Scholar
Zac, S. (1963). L’idée de vie dans la philosophie de Spinoza. Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Zachary, G. (2021). Spinoza on relations. In Melamed, Y. (ed.), A Companion to Spinoza (pp. 179–88). Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Zagorin, P. (2013). How the Idea of Religious Toleration Came to the West. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Zylstra, S. (2020). Spinoza on action and immanent causation. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 102(1), 29–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zylstra, S. (2023). Spinoza, emanation, and formal causation. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 61(4), 603–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Karolina Hübner, Cornell University, New York, Justin Steinberg, Cornell University, New York
  • Book: The Cambridge Spinoza Lexicon
  • Online publication: 09 January 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108992459.198
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Karolina Hübner, Cornell University, New York, Justin Steinberg, Cornell University, New York
  • Book: The Cambridge Spinoza Lexicon
  • Online publication: 09 January 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108992459.198
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Karolina Hübner, Cornell University, New York, Justin Steinberg, Cornell University, New York
  • Book: The Cambridge Spinoza Lexicon
  • Online publication: 09 January 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108992459.198
Available formats
×