To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
This chapter explains why the promotion of workouts and hybrid procedures can be particularly desirable in emerging economies, and more generally in countries with inefficient insolvency systems and companies with concentrated debt structures. Nonetheless, informal workouts are subject to certain limitations. For that reason, in addition to implementing several strategies to actively promote informal workouts, this chapter argues that emerging economies should adopt enhanced workouts where the support of certain norms or actors can facilitate a successful out-of-court restructuring. Finally, it is suggested that emerging economies should also implement hybrid procedures equipped with several tools existing in formal reorganization procedures. Yet, while hybrid procedures generally require miminal court involvement, it is argued that the design of these procedures in emerging economies should limit the involvement of the judiciary even further. This chapter explains how this goal can be achieved while simultaneously increasing the protection of creditors against the potential opportunism of debtors.
Micro- and small enterprises (MSEs) represent the majority of businesses in most countries around the world. Despite the economic relevance of MSEs, most jurisdictions do not provide a suitable insolvency framework for MSEs. This chapter starts by analyzing the particular features of MSEs as well as the need to provide them with a simplified insolvency framework. It then discusses the solutions and policy recommendations that the academic literature and various international organizations have suggested for the design of a simplified insolvency regime for MSEs. This chapter concludes by proposing several pillars for the design of an efficient insolvency framework for MSEs in the context of emerging economies.
This book explains how and why insolvency law in emerging economies needs to be reinvented. It starts by examining the importance of insolvency law for the promotion of economic growth as well as the similarities and divergences in the design of insolvency law around the world. The central thesis of the book is that insolvency law in emerging economies fails to serve as a catalyst for growth. It is argued that this failure is mainly due to the design of an insolvency legislation that is not tailored to the market and institutional environment generally existing in emerging economies. The book also provides a critical analysis of the design of insolvency law in many advanced economies where the insolvency system has proven to be unattractive for debtors, creditors or both. Therefore, in addition to suggesting a new insolvency framework for emerging economies, this book ultimately invites readers to rethink insolvency law.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.