We investigate whether, in Swedish national registers, social and psychiatric outcomes for six major psychiatric and substance disorders – drug use disorder (DUD), alcohol use disorder (AUD), major depression (MD), bipolar disorder (BD), anxiety disorder (AD), and schizophrenia (SZ) – reflect the primary genetic risk for each disorder and the level of genetic heterogeneity.

We utilize Genetic Risk Ratios – defined as the ratio of the genetic risk for secondary disorders to the genetic risk for the primary disorder – derived from Family Genetic Risk Scores. Poor social outcome was defined by a common factor of four variables: receipt of social welfare, sick leave, early retirement pension, and residence in a socially deprived area. Psychiatric outcome was defined as days of inpatient psychiatric hospitalization.

With poorer social outcomes, the primary genetic risks rose robustly for all disorders except SZ, as did the secondary genetic risks for DUD, AUD, and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. With poorer psychiatric outcomes, available only for BD and SZ, the primary genetic risks increased sharply. Overall, MD, AD, and BD became substantially more genetically heterogenous as their social outcomes became poorer, while for AUD, DUD, and SZ, the increase in heterogeneity was more modest. By contrast, with poorer psychiatric outcome, genetic risks for SZ became substantially more genetically homogeneous, with a similar but less robust trend seen for BD.

Despite important differences between our primary disorders, social and psychiatric outcomes are often robust indices of genetic risk and can reflect the levels of genetic heterogeneity.

Genetic and environmental factors, including adverse childhood experiences (ACEs), contribute to substance use disorders (SUDs). However, the interactions between these factors are poorly understood.

We examined associations between SUD polygenic scores (PGSs), ACEs, and the initiation of use and severity of alcohol (AUD), opioid use disorder (OUD), and cannabis use disorder (CanUD) in 10,275 individuals (43.5% female, 47.2% African-like ancestry [AFR], and 52.8% European-like ancestry [EUR]). ACEs and SUD severity were modeled as latent factors. We conducted logistic and linear regressions within ancestry groups to examine the associations of ACEs, PGS, and their interaction with substance use initiation and SUD severity.

All three SUD PGS were associated with ACEs in EUR individuals, indicating a gene–environment correlation. Among EUR individuals, only the CanUD PGS was associated with initiating use, whereas ACEs were associated with initiating use of all three substances in both ancestry groups. Additionally, a negative gene-by-environment interaction was identified for opioid initiation in EUR individuals. ACEs were associated with all three SUD severity latent factors in EUR individuals and with AUD and CanUD severity in AFR individuals. PGS were associated with AUD severity in both ancestry groups and with CanUD severity in AFR individuals. Gene-by-environment interactions were identified for AUD and CanUD severity among EUR individuals.

Findings highlight the roles of ACEs and polygenic risk in substance use initiation and SUD severity. Gene-by-environment interactions implicate ACEs as moderators of genetic susceptibility, reinforcing the importance of considering both genetic and environmental influences on SUD risk.

The mental health of incarcerated individuals is a widely recognized public health issue, but little is known about the mental health status of the incarcerated individuals upon release. This study aimed to measure the prevalence of psychiatric disorders and substance use disorders (SUDs) among incarcerated men scheduled to be released from jail soon.

We conducted a cross-sectional national survey from September 2020 to September 2022 across 26 jails (selected at random) in France. Each participant was interviewed within 30 days prior to their release via a structured questionnaire, including the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview.

A total of 579 individuals were included in the analysis (participation rate: 66.2%). The prevalence of mood disorders, anxiety disorders, post-traumatic stress disorder, and psychotic episodes were 30.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 27.1%–34.6%), 28.7% (95% CI: 25.1%–32.5%), 11.1% (95% CI: 8.8%–13.9%), and 10.5% (95% CI: 8.3%–13.3%), respectively. Additionally, almost half of the individuals had an SUD, and dual disorders were identified in 21.9% (95% CI: 18.8%–25.5%) of the cases. The analysis of mental health care pathways raised questions about access to certain types of care, such as full-time psychiatric hospitalization while in prison, as well as questions about the continuity of care upon release.

This study shows that the mental health of incarcerated men who are scheduled to be released soon is precarious. Complex mental health problems, particularly dual disorders, are common and require better coordination between mental health care systems in prisons and the community.

Self-harm, self-poisoning or self-injury, irrespective of the motivation, is a central risk factor for suicide. Still, there is limited knowledge of self-harm among patients with substance use disorders (SUDs) who die by suicide.

We aimed to describe the prevalence of a history of self-harm and identify the factors associated with self-harm, comparing individuals who died by suicide with and without SUDs.

We used data from the Norwegian Surveillance System for Suicide in Mental Health and Substance Use Services, which is based on a national linkage between the Norwegian Cause of Death Registry and the Norwegian Patient Registry, to identify individuals who died by suicide within 1 year after last contact with mental health or substance use services (n = 1140). A questionnaire was retrieved for 1041 (91.3%) of these individuals. We used least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression to select variables and compared patients with and without SUDs. Conditional selective inference was used to improve 90% confidence intervals and p-values.

The prevalence of self-harm was 55% in patients with SUDs and 52.6% in patients without SUDs. Suicidal ideation (odds ratio 2.98 (95% CI 1.74–5.10)) emerged as a factor shared with patients without SUDs, while personality disorders (odds ratio 1.96 (1.12–3.40)) and a history of violence (odds ratio 1.86 (1.20–2.87)) were unique factors for patients with SUDs.

A history of self-harm is prevalent in patients with SUDs who die by suicide and is associated with suicidal ideation, a history of violence and personality disorders in patients with SUDs.

Exposure to maternal mental illness during foetal development may lead to altered development, resulting in permanent changes in offspring functioning.

To assess whether there is an association between prenatal maternal psychiatric disorders and offspring behavioural problems in early childhood, using linked health administrative data and the Australian Early Development Census from New South Wales, Australia.

The sample included all mother–child pairs of children who commenced full-time school in 2009 in New South Wales, and met the inclusion criteria (N = 69 165). Univariable logistic regression analysis assessed unadjusted associations between categories of maternal prenatal psychiatric disorders with indicators of offspring behavioural problems. Multivariable logistic regression adjusted the associations of interest for psychiatric categories and a priori selected covariates. Sensitivity analyses included adjusting the final model for primary psychiatric diagnoses and assessing association of interest for effect modification by child's biological gender.

Children exposed in the prenatal period to maternal psychiatric disorders had greater odds of being developmentally vulnerable in their first year of school. Children exposed to maternal anxiety disorders prenatally had the greatest odds for behavioural problems (adjusted odds ratio 1.98; 95% CI 1.43–2.69). A statistically significant interaction was found between child biological gender and prenatal hospital admissions for substance use disorders, for emotional subdomains, aggression and hyperactivity/inattention.

Children exposed to prenatal maternal mental illness had greater odds for behavioural problems, independent of postnatal exposure. Those exposed to prenatal maternal anxiety were at greatest risk, highlighting the need for targeted interventions for, and support of, families with mental illness.

Chemsex occurs primarily among gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men (GBMSM), and there is evidence of a subgroup of users who carry out chemsex-related criminal offences and experience harm. Challenges with chemsex can present to various settings; there are concerns that harm is increasing, including at interfaces between health, social care and criminal justice systems. The UK response to date has lacked a coordinated approach. An expert reference group was convened to share chemsex knowledge, articulate priorities for research and pathway development, and foster collaborative working between agencies. It made three key recommendations: develop and increase training and awareness across all services; implement a coordinated research programme with the development of a common data-set and assessment tool to fully characterise population-level needs; develop a professional network to share information, provide professional support and act as a knowledge hub. There was support for a unified multi-agency strategy incorporating the priorities identified as overarching principles.

We aimed to assess whether viewing expert witness evidence regarding the mental health of Johnny Depp and Amber Heard in the 2022 court case in the USA would affect viewers’ attitudes towards the mental health of the two protagonists and towards mental illness in general. After viewing excerpts of the cross-examination evidence, 38 trial-naive undergraduate students completed the Prejudice towards People with a Mental Illness (PPMI) scale.

Following viewing, participants held more stigmatising views of the protagonists than they held about mental disorders in general.

It is plausible that mass media trial coverage further stigmatises mental illness.

It has been suggested that people with mental disorders have an elevated risk to acquire severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 and to be disproportionally affected by coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) once infected. We aimed to analyse the COVID-19 infection rate, course and outcome, including mortality and long COVID, in people with anxiety, depressive, neurodevelopmental, schizophrenia spectrum and substance use disorders relative to control subjects without these disorders.

This study constitutes a preregistered systematic review and random-effects frequentist and Bayesian meta-analyses. Major databases were searched up until 27 June 2023.

Eighty-one original articles were included reporting 304 cross-sectional and prospective effect size estimates (median n per effect-size = 114837) regarding associations of interest. Infection risk was not significantly increased for any mental disorder that we investigated relative to samples of people without these disorders. The course of COVID-19, however, is relatively severe, and long COVID and COVID-19-related hospitalization are more likely in all patient samples that we investigated. The odds of dying from COVID-19 were high in people with most types of mental disorders, except for those with anxiety and neurodevelopmental disorders relative to non-patient samples (pooled ORs range, 1.26–2.57). Bayesian analyses confirmed the findings from the frequentist approach and complemented them with estimates of the strength of evidence.

Once infected, people with pre-existing mental disorders are at an elevated risk for a severe COVID-19 course and outcome, including long COVID and mortality, relative to people without pre-existing mental disorders, despite an infection risk not significantly increased.

Research regarding quitting cannabis use often excludes patients with severe mental illness (SMI). We investigated facilitating and impeding factors in SMI patients and their advice to others, using semi-structured interviews with 12 SMI-patients, who were daily cannabis users for ≥12 months and had fully stopped using for ≥6 months.

Seeking distraction, social contacts in personal environment, avoiding temptation and support from professionals were facilitating factors in stopping. Impeding factors were withdrawal symptoms, user environment, experiencing stress and user's routine. Advice to other patients included to just do it, seek support from others, quit ‘cold turkey’ and acknowledge that cannabis use is a problem. Advice to mental health professionals is to discuss cannabis use from the start of treatment.

It is important to inform patients that cannabis use has negative consequences and limits the effects of treatment. Do not judge cannabis use or force the patient to stop.