To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Post-stroke neurocognitive disorders are highly prevalent, yet screening tools that are fit for culturally diverse populations are scarce. This study evaluates the impact of cultural differences on the Oxford Cognitive Screen (OCS), a stroke-specific screening tool.
Methods:
To evaluate cultural differences, we compared two populations with varying degrees of cultural diversity and Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich and Democratic (WEIRD) characteristics. We adapted the Dutch OCS for Suriname through a multi-stage process. Using Bayesian hierarchical regression analysis, we compared 264 Surinamese participants, assessed with the adapted Dutch OCS, with 247 Belgian participants, assessed with the Dutch OCS, while controlling for age and education. We further investigated whether the associations of age and education with performance were comparable between the two populations.
Results:
Our findings revealed minimal differences in OCS performance between the Belgian and Surinamese populations. Both populations showed similar age-related decline and education-related improvement across all subtests, except for Picture naming, where the age-related decline was more pronounced in the Belgian population.
Conclusion:
These findings suggest that with minimal adaptation, the OCS is a viable tool for screening post-stroke neurocognitive disorders in culturally diverse populations.
Moyamoya disease (MMD) is characterized by progressive carotid fork steno-occlusion and the development of “puff-of-smoke” collaterals on angiography. However, a subset of patients present with similar vascular changes but lack these hallmark collaterals, complicating both diagnosis and management. This “smokeless” phenotype, associated with ring finger protein 213 (RNF213) gene variants, challenges the traditional description of MMD. We describe a series of such patients who responded favorably to revascularization.
Methods:
In this ambispective observational study, we evaluated 12 patients with carotid fork steno-occlusive disease but without “puff-of-smoke” collaterals. Clinical, radiological and genetic assessments were assessed. Structural modeling of RNF213 protein variants was conducted through 3D homology modeling, validated via Ramachandran plots and further refined with COOT and PyMOL. Functional insights were derived through ConSurf analysis.
Results:
Of the 12 patients, 9 carried the RNF213 p.R4810K variant, 1 harboured a novel variant, 1 had both p.R4810K and a novel variant and 1 had p.R4859K. Initial misclassification as intracranial atherosclerosis or vasculitis led to inappropriate treatment. Following genetic confirmation, 9 patients underwent revascularization, with no stroke recurrence and a favorable clinical outcome. Structural modeling revealed minimal functional impact for the Val1529Met variant, whereas other variants significantly disrupted RNF213 stability and functionality.
Conclusions:
“Smokeless moyamoya,” characterized by carotid fork steno-occlusion without typical angiographic collaterals, represents a distinct clinical phenotype responsive to revascularization. RNF213 genetic screening enhances diagnostic precision, reshaping traditional paradigms and supporting tailored therapeutic approaches.
This is a proof-of-concept study to compare the effects of a 2-week program of “Remind-to-move” (RTM) treatment using closed-loop and open-loop wearables for hemiparetic upper extremity in patients with chronic stroke in the community. The RTM open-loop wearable device has been proven in our previous studies to be useful to address the learned nonuse phenomenon of the hemiparetic upper extremity. A closed-loop RTM wearable device, which emits reminding cues according to actual arm use, was developed in this study. A convenience sample of 16 participants with chronic unilateral stroke recruited in the community was engaged in repetitive upper extremity task-specific practice for 2 weeks while wearing either a closed-loop or an open-loop ambulatory RTM wearable device on their affected hand for 3 hrs a day. Evaluations were conducted at pre-/post-intervention and follow-up after 4 weeks using upper extremity motor performance behavioral measures, actual arm use questionnaire, and the kinematic data obtained from the device. Results showed that both open-loop and closed-loop training groups achieved significant gains in all measures at posttest and follow-up evaluations. The closed-loop group showed a more significant improvement in movement frequency, hand functions, and actual arm use than did the open-loop group. Our findings supported the use of closed-loop wearables, which showed greater effects in terms of promoting the hand use of the hemiparetic upper extremity than open-loop wearables among patients with chronic stroke.
Stroke is a prevalent neurological event that often induces significant motor impairments in the upper extremities, such as hemiplegia, which impacts bimanual coordination and fine motor skills. Robotic-assisted therapy has gained prominence as a contemporary rehabilitation modality, providing augmented motor repetitions and proprioceptive feedback, thereby potentiating neuroplasticity and functional recovery. This pilot study aimed to examine the therapeutic efficacy of a robotic intervention for wrist rehabilitation in two post-stroke adults aged 50–70 years. The intervention protocol, implemented biweekly over four weeks, encompassed 45-minute sessions consisting of passive muscle elongation (5 min) and robotic-facilitated exercises targeting pronation-supination (10 min), flexion-extension (10 min), and radial-ulnar deviation (10 min). Outcome measures included pre- and post-intervention assessments utilizing the motor activity log, Fugl-Meyer Scale, and robotic metrics for muscular strength. Results indicated enhancements in joint range of motion, motor precision, and neuromuscular control, with patient “B” demonstrating superior improvements, particularly in complex motor patterns. In contrast, patient “A” exhibited attenuated progress, attributable to pronounced baseline deficits and fatigue. Specific gains were observed in flexion-extension for patient “A” and pronation-supination for patient “B,” with minimal advancements in radial-ulnar deviation across both subjects. These findings provide preliminary evidence supporting the efficacy of robotic-assisted therapy in motor rehabilitation post-stroke with the novel proposed wrist rehabilitation device.
Management of transient ischemic attack (TIA) patients in an observation unit (OU) results in reduced risk for subsequent stroke, greater compliance with diagnostic evaluation, shorter length of stay, lower cost, decreased hospital overcrowding and ambulance diversion. OU management should evaluate TIA mimics, differentiate TIA from stroke, and detect high-risk pathologies that require immediate intervention and admission.
In this chapter of Complex Ethics Consultations: Cases that Haunt Us, the author describes a case in which she was the community member on an ethics committee undertaking a retrospective ethics review of a case where a patient’s surrogate shifted to end-of-life care and discharge to home after being told Medicare (government insurance) would no long pay for his hospitalization. Although the consult was called on a Friday while the patient was alive, it was not reviewed by the full committee until Tuesday, by which time the patient had died.
This chapter explores the impact of strokes and the role of music therapy in post-stroke rehabilitation. It highlights the urgency of seeking immediate medical attention for stroke symptoms, emphasizing that prompt treatment can minimize brain damage. The chapter also discusses the potential for music to aid in cognitive recovery, as evidenced by studies showing improvements in verbal memory and concentration in stroke patients who listened to music regularly. Furthermore, the chapter looks at the application of music therapy for addressing specific post-stroke conditions such as aphasia and hemiparesis. It describes melodic intonation therapy (MIT) as a promising intervention for speech recovery in aphasia patients, showcasing its ability to stimulate new neural connections in the brain. Additionally, it explores the effectiveness of rhythmic auditory stimulation (RAS) in improving gait and coordination in patients with hemiparesis. The chapter underscores the importance of tailoring music therapy to individual needs and preferences, emphasizing the potential for music to enhance emotional well-being and motivate patients during their rehabilitation journey. It concludes by advocating for the integration of music therapy into standard stroke rehabilitation practices, recognizing its potential to improve patient outcomes and quality of life.
We conducted an international survey of stroke physicians to assess practices and attitudes toward cardiac monitoring and early rhythm control. A 20-question survey was completed by 241 clinicians representing 61 countries. The minimum duration of actionable atrial fibrillation varied widely, and more than 90% (223/241) of respondents indicated a willingness to enroll patients in a trial assessing the ideal duration of cardiac monitoring. Only a quarter of respondents (62/241) offered early rhythm control for patients with atrial fibrillation, with the majority (209/241, 87%) expressing an opinion that there was equipoise about the benefit of rhythm control in the post-stroke population.
Endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is the gold standard treatment for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO). Multiple factors can influence EVT outcomes, including procedural and patient-related variables. This meta-analysis investigated the impact of periprocedural hemoglobin (Hb) levels on EVT outcomes.
Methods:
We performed a comprehensive literature search across PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Cochrane CENTRAL. We analyzed the mean difference (MD) in Hb levels between good (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] 0–2) and poor (mRS 3–6) prognosis groups. We calculated pooled odds ratios (OR) for Hb levels as a predictor of prognosis and compared mortality and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) across different Hb levels.
Results:
The analysis included 921 patients from four studies. Patients in the good prognosis group had significantly higher Hb levels (MD: 0.48 g/dL, 95% CI: [0.2, 0.75], P = 0.0007). Each 1 g/dL increase in Hb was associated with a 22% increase in the odds of achieving a good three-month prognosis (OR: 1.22, 95% CI: [1.13, 1.33], P < 0.00001). Patients with Hb levels ≤13 g/dL in males and ≤12 g/dL in females were 1.69 times more likely to experience mortality (OR: 1.69, 95% CI: [1.1, 2.59], P = 0.02). No significant difference was observed in sICH occurrence between anemic and non-anemic patients.
Conclusion:
Higher Hb levels may be associated with improved prognosis, and lower Hb levels might increase mortality risk in AIS-LVO patients undergoing EVT. Further research is needed to validate these findings.
To maintain procedural proficiency and certification according to the standards set by The Joint Commission—which accredits health care centers in the United States—thrombectomy-capable stroke centers (TSCs) must achieve a minimum annual procedural volume. The addition of thrombectomy-capable centers in a regional stroke care system has the potential to increase access but also to decrease patient presentations and procedural volume at nearby centers. This study sought to characterize the impact of certifying additional thrombectomy-capable centers on procedural volume by center in a large, urban Emergency Medical Services (EMS) system.
Methods:
Data were collected from each designated thrombectomy-capable center in Los Angeles (LA) County from January 1, 2018 through June 30, 2022, during which a net total of five thrombectomy-capable centers were newly designated in the County. Per center volume for ischemic stroke presentations, intravenous (IV) thrombolysis administrations (IV tissue plasminogen activator [tPA]), and thrombectomy were tabulated by six-month interval. Median last-known-well-to-procedure times by LA County Public Health service planning area (SPA) were calculated. The effect of the number of designated centers on procedural volumes per center and median last-known-well-to-procedure times were analyzed via a linear mixed effects model with a log link function.
Results:
Procedural volume, ischemic stroke presentation volume, and last-known-well-to-procedure times had high variability over the time period studied. Nonetheless, the median values for each metric in this EMS system remained largely stable over the study period. There was no statistically significant association between the number of thrombectomy-capable centers and per center procedural volumes or times-to-procedure.
Conclusion:
The designation of additional thrombectomy-capable centers in a regional stroke care system was not significantly associated with the volume of procedures by center or times-to-procedure, suggesting that additional centers may increase patient access to time-sensitive interventions without diluting patient presentations at existing centers.
In acute ischemic stroke, a longer time from onset to endovascular treatment (EVT) is associated with worse clinical outcome. We investigated the association of clinical outcome with time from last known well to arrival at the EVT hospital and time from hospital arrival to arterial access for anterior circulation large vessel occlusion patients treated > 6 hours from last known well.
Methods:
Retrospective analysis of the prospective, multicenter cohort study ESCAPE-LATE. Patients presenting > 6 hours after last known well with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion undergoing EVT were included. The primary outcome was the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at 90 days. Secondary outcomes were good (mRS 0–2) and poor clinical outcomes (mRS 5–6) at 90 days, as well as the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale at 24 hours. Associations of time intervals with outcomes were assessed with univariable and multivariable logistic regression.
Results:
Two hundred patients were included in the analysis, of whom 85 (43%) were female. 90-day mRS was available for 141 patients. Of the 150 patients, 135 (90%) had moderate-to-good collaterals, and the median Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) was 8 (IQR = 7–10). No association between ordinal mRS and time from last known well to arrival at the EVT hospital (odds ratio [OR] = 1.01, 95% CI = 1.00–1.02) or time from hospital arrival to arterial access (OR = -0.01, 95% CI = -0.02–0.00) was seen in adjusted regression models.
Conclusion:
No relationship was observed between pre-hospital or in-hospital workflow times and clinical outcomes. Baseline ASPECTS and collateral status were favorable in the majority of patients, suggesting that physicians may have chosen to predominantly treat slow progressors in the late time window, in whom prolonged workflow times have less impact on outcomes.
Central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO) is a retinal stroke with poor visual prognosis and frequent association with life-threatening conditions. Clinical guidelines and treatment options are in evolution, and Canadian data regarding CRAO are limited.
Methods:
Patients with CRAO between June 1, 2019, and May 31, 2023, were included. The medical chart was reviewed for demographics, presentation factors, investigations, interventions, secondary prevention referrals and outcomes.
Results:
Seventy-six patients were included. Median age was 68.1 (61.4–81.8) years, and 60.5% were male. The site of presentation was an emergency department in 61.8%. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) time from vision loss to presentation was 15.0 (3.5–48.0) hours; 28.9% presented within 4.5 hours. The median (IQR) time for ophthalmological consultation was 12.0 (4.6–22.6) hours. No patient was treated with thrombolysis. Referral for neurovascular secondary prevention occurred for 92.1%; however, referral for ocular follow-up was omitted in 21.1%. Among patients with non-arteritic CRAO, 25.7% had symptomatic carotid stenosis, and 10.5% had a cardioembolic source. Giant cell arteritis was diagnosed in 8.1% of patients over age 50. Functional visual recovery occurred for 10.5% of patients.
Conclusions:
In this series, patients often presented within hours of CRAO and usually to an emergency department; however, no patient was treated with thrombolysis. As in other centers, delay in ophthalmological consultation and the lack of a defined CRAO treatment pathway are barriers. Patients with CRAO frequently have high-risk underlying pathology and generally do not experience meaningful improvement in vision. There is an unmet need for Canadian guidelines to standardize multidisciplinary care for CRAO.
Stroke clinical registries are critical for systems planning, quality improvement, advocacy and informing policy. We describe the methodology and evolution of the Registry of the Canadian Stroke Network/Ontario Stroke Registry in Canada.
Methods:
At the launch of the registry in 2001, trained coordinators prospectively identified patients with acute stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) at comprehensive stroke centers across Canada and obtained consent for registry participation and follow-up interviews. From 2003 onward, patients were identified from administrative databases, and consent was waived for data collection on a sample of eligible patients across all hospitals in Ontario and in one site in Nova Scotia. In the most recent data collection cycle, consecutive eligible patients were included across Ontario, but patients with TIA and those seen in the emergency department without admission were excluded.
Results:
Between 2001 and 2013, the registry included 110,088 patients. Only 1,237 patients had follow-up interviews, but administrative data linkages allowed for indefinite follow-up of deaths and other measures of health services utilization. After a hiatus, the registry resumed data collection in 2019, with 13,828 charts abstracted to date with a focus on intracranial vascular imaging, identification of intracranial occlusions and treatment with thrombectomy.
Conclusion:
The Registry of the Canadian Stroke Network/Ontario Stroke Registry is a large population-based clinical database that has evolved throughout the last two decades to meet contemporary stroke needs. Registry data have been used to monitor stroke quality of care and conduct outcomes research to inform policy.
Secondary stroke prevention can reduce subsequent vascular events, mortality and accumulation of disability. Current rates of adherence to secondary stroke prevention indicators are unknown. Our aim was to evaluate secondary stroke prevention care in Ontario, Canada.
Methods:
A retrospective cohort study using health administrative databases included all adults discharged alive following an ischemic stroke from April 2010 to March 2019. Indicators of secondary stroke prevention, including laboratory testing, physician visits and receipt of routine influenza vaccinations, were evaluated among survivors in the one year following a stroke event. The use of medication was also assessed among individuals over the age of 65 years and within subgroups of stroke survivors with diabetes and atrial fibrillation.
Results:
After exclusions, 54,712 individuals (mean age 68.4 years, 45.7% female) survived at least one year following their stroke event. In the 90 days following discharge from the hospital, most individuals (92.8%) were seen by a general practitioner, while 26.2% visited an emergency department. Within the year following discharge, 66.2% and 61.4% were tested for low-density lipoprotein and glycated hemoglobin, respectively, and 39.6% received an influenza vaccine. Among those over the age of 65 years, 85.5% were prescribed a lipid-lowering agent, and 88.7% were prescribed at least one antihypertensive medication. In those with diabetes, 70.3% were prescribed an antihyperglycemic medication, while 84.9% with atrial fibrillation were prescribed an anticoagulant.
Conclusion:
Secondary stroke prevention, especially for important laboratory values, remains suboptimal, despite thorough best practice guidelines. Future studies should explore barriers to better secondary stroke care.