To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
The last decade of Hemingway’s life is characterized by the culmination of his recognition as a great writer and, at the same time, by a diminution of his writerly power. During that decade, Hemingway continued to write prolifically and to be recognized for his literary achievements. His thematic preoccupations remained consistent; he continued to write on bullfighting (a substantial article for Life magazine) and on big-game hunting and sport fishing (including The Old Man and the Sea, the Pulitzer Prize–winning novella). The chapter also assesses the novels and nonfiction books published after Hemingway’s death in 1961: A Moveable Feast, Islands in the Stream, and Garden of Eden. With the possible exception of A Moveable Feast, the extent to which these books should be read as “books by Ernest Hemingway” is debatable. The author was famous for the work of condensation and cutting that characterized his revision process absent from the final preparation of their manuscripts. In the strongest passages of all of this work, Hemingway is able to thematize the exhaustion and belatedness that he seems to have been struggling against, so that even the failed work offers rewards to the careful reader.
As posthumous data use policy within the broader scope of navigating postmortem data privacy is a procedurally complex landscape, our study addresses this by exploring patterns in individuals’ willingness to donate data with health researchers after death and developing practical recommendations.
Methods:
An electronic survey was conducted in April 2021 among adults (≥18 years of age) registered in ResearchMatch (www.researchmatch.org), a national health research registry. Descriptive statistics were used to observe trends in, and multinomial logistic regression analyses were conducted at a 95% confidence interval to determine the association between, willingness to donate some, all, or no data after death with researchers based on the participants’ demographics (education level, age range, duration of using online medical websites, and annual frequency of getting ill).
Results:
Of 399 responses, most participants were willing to donate health data (electronic medical record data [67%], prescription history data [63%], genetic data [54%], and fitness tracker data [53%]) after death. Among 397 respondents, we identified that individuals were more likely to donate some data after death (vs. no data) if they had longer duration of using online medical websites (adjusted relative risk ratio = 1.22, p= 0.04, 95% CI: 1.01 to 1.48). No additional significant findings were observed between willingness to donate all, some, or none of their data after death and other demographic factors.
Conclusions:
Engaging patients in online medical websites may be one potential mechanism to encourage or inspire individuals to participate in posthumous data donation for health research purposes.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.