To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
In this chapter, we focus on the neuronal networks underlying the socio-affective capacities empathy and compassion. We first provide definitions of empathy and compassion and give an overview of the historical development in social neuroscience related to empathy and compassion research, with a focus on differentiating between empathy, empathic distress, compassion, and related concepts of social understanding like Theory of Mind. We then examine the neuronal networks underlying these distinct social capacities and discuss the latest discoveries in this field. Next, we turn to the plasticity of the social brain and compare training approaches in their efficacy in improving socio-affective and socio-cognitive capacities. This is followed by the exploration of how psychopathological symptoms are differentially related to empathy, compassion, and socio-cognitive skills. Lastly, we conclude the main findings of this chapter and provide questions for future neuroscientific and psychological research on empathy and compassion.
While empathy is often seen as a resilience factor, emotional resonance with others’ suffering may increase psychological vulnerability during mass trauma exposure, particularly in youth. Since the role of early empathy as a prospective risk factor remains understudied, we used a decade-long longitudinal design to examine whether empathic reactions in childhood predicted early adolescents’ internalizing (depression and anxiety) symptoms following the October 7th attack and the Israel–Hamas war. Empathic distress was assessed at age 1.5 years and age 3 years through observational tasks. Emotional empathy and internalizing symptoms were self-reported at age 11 years, before the war, and reported again after its outbreak. Findings showed substantial internalizing symptoms during the war, with 31% of participants exceeding the clinical cutoff for anxiety and 23% for depression. Non of the empathy measures predicted internalizing symptoms before the war. However, during the war, empathic distress at age 1.5 and emotional empathy at age 11 predicted internalizing symptoms, controlling for negative emotionality and prior internalizing symptoms. Path analysis also linked empathic distress at age 3 to internalizing symptoms during war. Findings suggest that early empathic reactions may increase vulnerability to internalizing symptoms during mass trauma but not in non-traumatic contexts, aligning with a diathesis-stress model. Understanding empathy’s role in risk and resilience can inform interventions for youth exposed to war.
Lack of compassion among health service staff has been identified as a concern around the world. High-profile scandals and inquiries in the United Kingdom have suggested that health systems and services ‘are struggling to provide safe, timely, and compassionate care’. In the United States, only half of patients and staff surveyed believed the health system provides compassionate care. Similarly, a recent study in Australia identified a gap between the intentions of organisational leadership to provide consistently high-quality care and the ability of staff to do so at point of care. Healthcare managers are looking for proven ways to support staff to recognise and provide compassionate care.
Virtual Reality (VR) has garnered significant attention as a potential ‘empathy machine’ for its ability to simulate firsthand experiences of others’ perspectives. However, recent research reveals conflicting evidence regarding VR’s effectiveness in fostering empathy, with outcomes ranging from strong positive effects to complete ineffectiveness. By analyzing both subjective experiences and objective measures, this study aims to elucidate the relationship between VR design and human empathy, addressing three prevalent perspectives on the field’s inconsistencies: flawed mechanisms, ineffective design, and mismatched methodology. The findings contribute to the theoretical understanding of empathic VR and provide practical implications for designing effective VR-based empathy interventions in engineering contexts.
We present a philosophically motivated framework for modelling moral agency. In addition to choosing strategies, agents in this framework choose among an appropriate exogenous set of moralities that depends on the context of the game. Further, agents can use mixed strategies to choose their degree of morality. We present two models to demonstrate the framework. In the first model, agents choose between empathy and selfishness while playing prisoner’s dilemma. In the second, agents choose between Kantian universalizing and selfishness while playing a public goods game. For both models, the degree of morality gets determined endogenously rather than assigned parametrically.
Chapter 8 considers the politics and poetics of alterity or otherness. Others confront us with experiences that may be radically unfamiliar, strange, and unsettling. This may be compounded by illness, trauma, and cultural difference. With empathy and imagination, we can gain an understanding of another’s experience, see their perspective, and build a picture of their predicament. The imaginative spaces and places in their stories offer us a way into another’s lifeworld—even when that world is profoundly different from our own. Narrative medicine provides a pedagogy of empathic understanding through literature. While much of this work employs story, lyric poetry offers another mode of articulating illness experience that may be closer to patients’ emotionally charged, confused efforts to make sense of experiences that do not fit cultural models or templates. The work of the poets Paul Celan and Edouard Glissant sheds light on the power of language to bridge disparate worlds and on the ethical stance needed when empathy fails. A poetics of alterity has implications for efforts to understand individuals’ illness experience and grounding an ethics of care.
This chapter focuses on resilience and compassion, starting by examining the relevance of resilience in healthcare, especially during the Covid-19 pandemic. The chapter notes that while a certain amount of resilience is helpful and even essential, resilience depends on not only the personal characteristics of each healthcare worker, but also the conditions in which they work. Relevant factors include the structure and function of teams, models of organisation, quality of leadership, and resources. These matters have an enormous influence on individual experiences, attitudes, and behaviour, and on the levels of resilience that are required and accessible in the workplace, as well as compassion. This chapter considers the concepts of ‘compassion fatigue’ and ‘burnout’, and outlines barriers to, and facilitators of, compassionate care. Systemic challenges include competing system demands, time constraints, inadequate resources, communication issues, poor emotional connections with the broader healthcare system, and the perception and/or reality of staff not being valued for the care they provide. These are themes that resonate with many people who work in large healthcare systems where organisational challenges loom large, often distracting focus from day-to-day patient care. This chapter also examines the roles of mindfulness and meditation in navigating these challenges.
Certain skills support compassion and help us to develop and sustain compassion even in circumstances that are far from ideal. Against this background, recent decades have seen a remarkable growth of research in this field. There is, in particular, a welcome flourishing in the area of compassion studies and compassion-based therapies, which form the focus of this chapter. Paul Gilbert, in particular, has developed compassion-focused therapy (CFT) which is outlined further by the Compassionate Mind Foundation and available in many countries around the world, as well as online. The Compassionate Mind Foundation advances an evolutionary and bio-psycho-social informed approach to compassion, and this forms the basis of CFT and ‘Compassionate Mind Training’. This chapter starts by exploring the origins of CFT and key attributes for the cultivation of compassion, before considering compassion and shame in clinical contexts. Shame can be an especially powerful emotion with a profound effect on health-related behaviour. Compassion can be a valuable way to address this issue. This chapter examines CFT in practice and notes the growing evidence base to support its use. The chapter concludes with further reflections on compassion and self-compassion as key skills and vital resources in healthcare.
A growing literature examines the relationship between compassion and various aspects of nervous system function, especially the brain. The chapter starts by outlining neuroimaging studies of compassion and then examines the topic of empathy and the brain, noting evidence that observing another person’s emotional state activates parts of the neuronal network that are also involved in processing that same state in oneself. Research suggests that multiple areas within the brain are involved in compassion and compassion training, with some regions more strongly implicated than others. Finally, relevant conclusions are presented and potential directions for future work outlined. Overall, research into the neuroscience of compassion supports the idea that compassion can be cultivated deliberately through training. There is evidence that activities such as compassion training and meditation can increase positive affect, boost resilience, facilitate altruistic behaviour, and possibly even assist with equanimity. These ideas are underpinned by growing neuroscientific evidence of impact on the brain. These valuable findings underscore the importance of developing compassion as a skill and fundamental attribute for healthcare workers across all settings.
The literature about values in healthcare contains many terms which are sometimes used interchangeably. These terms include ‘compassion’, ‘sympathy’, ‘empathy’, ‘kindness’, ‘communication skills’, and various other words which are intended to denote a caring, understanding attitude towards healthcare provision. Confusion between these terms adds significantly to the apparent heterogeneity of research in this area and raises the worrying possibility that some writing on this topic uses these terms interchangeably. This chapter starts by exploring specific terms which are often used as synonyms for ‘compassion’, such as ‘sympathy’, ‘empathy’, ‘kindness’, and ‘communication skills’, and then focuses on two of the so-called ‘near enemies’ of compassion: pity and ‘horrified anxiety’. We may be trying to cultivate compassion, but, at times, emotions can arise that may be mistaken for compassion and can have negative effects. Clarity about concepts and terms can help to understand their significance, their importance in healthcare provision, and ways in which they support, as well as differ from, compassion. Overall, this chapter echoes the main arguments of this book by emphasising that compassionate healthcare requires an all-of-system approach, rather than isolated changes, paper exercises, or tinkering around the edges. Reflecting on terminology can help greatly in this process.
At its heart, compassion is the feeling of being motivated to act in the presence of suffering. From a psychological perspective, the construct is conceived as having two dimensions: state and trait. The compassionate state reflects the feeling of compassion or having a compassionate response in the moment, while a compassionate trait is more stable, reflecting a general tendency towards compassion or towards feeling and responding compassionately most of the time. For people who are expected or required to be compassionate in their everyday life or work, compassion requires sustained courage and a continued willingness to engage with suffering, rather than avoid it. This chapter explores compassion from psychological, evolutionary, and physiological viewpoints. Despite a useful and growing literature in this area, a precise definition of compassion in practice can remain elusive. The meaning of compassion is not written in stone; it flows. As a result, what the concept means in healthcare, and how it works in practice, are, perhaps, made most tangible through providing compassionate care to patients, interacting with families, discussing compassion with colleagues, and teaching students about compassionate healthcare. If compassion is defined flexibly and understood wisely, it can shape care in positive ways, improve outcomes, and change lives.
I scrutinize the common idea that Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD) involves empathy deficits. I argue that empathy is foremost an epistemic mechanism, leading to different forms and levels of interpersonal understanding. Interactive difficulties can result in profound interpersonal misunderstanding, which leaves some people in persistent doubt about other people’s perspectives and about their own social standing. Such status blindness, as I will call it, can explain some specific symptoms of NPD. I introduce relevant conceptual distinctions, devise a complex map of empathy that describes four types and four features, and apply the map to NPD. Finally, I specifically discuss empathy deficits in being the target of the empathy of others.
Everyday understanding takes empathy to be not just emotional mirroring with a specific etiology, but also a form of feeling for, or on behalf of, another. This article proposes an analysis of that for-relation. The analysis begins with the phenomenon of acting on behalf, which is then used as a template for an analysis of generic on behalfness, applicable to both action and emotion. The key to the relation turns out to be an agent’s espousal of a target’s goal, in light of which the agent acquires reasons for acting or feeling.
Credibility and intent are important but imprecise legal categories that need to be assessed in criminal trials as neither common nor civil legal systems provide decision-makers with clear rules on how to evaluate them in practice. In this article, drawing on ethnographic data from trials and deliberations in Italian courts and prosecution offices, we discuss the emotive-cognitive dynamics at play in judges’ and prosecutors’ evaluations of credibility and intent, focusing on cases of murder, intimate partner violence and rape. Using sociological concepts of epistemic emotions, empathy, frame and legal encoding, we show that legal professionals use different reflexive practices to either avoid settling on feelings of certainty or overcome doubts when evaluating credibility and intent. Empathy emerges as a multifaceted tool that can either generate certainty or be used deliberately to instigate or overcome doubts. We contribute to the growing body of literature addressing the emotional dynamics of legal decision-making.
Describe how children develop fairness, spite, and helping behaviours; understand the role of emotions, punishment, and reputation in moral development; explore cross-cultural differences and similarities in morality.
Describe how children think and behave differently in groups; explain the roles of collaboration, self-identity, and categorisation in creating and sustaining groups; understand how group differences can be reduced via intergroup contact, cooperation, and empathy.
Ever since Rodrigo Duterte was sworn into office in 2016, until the end of his term in 2022, his so-called “drug war” has claimed 12,000–30,000 lives. Over 150 victims were children. Seventeen-year-old Kian de los Santos, mistakenly identified as a drug addict, was gunned down on the evening of 16 August 2017. His death prompted a group of teachers and students to express themselves through empathic creative writing. What started as an assignment grew into a community of writers, activists, artists, journalists, and curators from diverse disciplines, generations, and social classes. Four years later, the project found a name: Triggered: Creative Responses to the Extrajudicial Killings in the Philippines—an illustrated young adult fiction collection with a dimension of outreach towards an orphanage. The Triggered project illustrated three key features of public humanities, especially during a time of impunity: first, an imperfect but self-reflexive and reciprocal collaboration between the academe and the field; second, the book’s non-elitist accessibility in both content and material; and third, the funds of the book went to an orphanage.
Empathy statements are grammatically regular, performative statements used widely in the therapy and medical industries in the United States and adapted to be used by callers in India’s National Capital Region international call centers to navigate the foreign and emotionally heightened situations workers experience while speaking to customers. This paper shows the performative nature of translation by analyzing the training of empathy in a train-the-trainer training program. By identifying the grammatical structure, enregisterment, and strategic use of empathy statements in scripts, this paper shows how semiotic frameworks of emotion play a vital role in the types of translation necessitated by the mass mediation of the international call center.
In the United States, the public does not view all refugee groups with equal favorability. Why do individuals express more support for some refugee groups compared to others? We argue that some Americans are more supportive of certain refugee groups when they share a racial identity because it is easier for them to empathize with them. While recent research points to empathy as a useful tool for cultivating supportive attitudes toward refugees and immigrants, the political science literature lacks a nuanced understanding of the conditions under which empathy drives pro-social attitudes toward refugees, specifically with regard to racial dynamics. Does empathy allow people to overcome their racial ingroup preferences, or does it magnify them? With an original web experiment administered to a 50/50 Black and white sample of Americans, we prime half of the sample to associate refugees with their racial ingroup and prime the other half with their racial outgroup. We find that refugee race only affects support for refugees among white individuals with low group empathy. For high-empathy whites and Blacks of all levels of empathy, the race linked to refugees does not condition their support for refugees. Rather, group empathy is a strong, independent explanation for variation in attitudes toward refugees. We also find modest evidence that the positive association between empathy for refugees and support for this group is driven by partisanship, particularly for whites. The direct effect of partisanship on support for refugees is much stronger. This study contributes to research on the dynamics of race, empathy, and attitudes toward refugees.
Communicative interaction forms the core of human experience. In this fascinating book Levinson, one of the world's leading scholars in the field, explores how human communicative interaction is structured, the demands it puts on our cognitive processing, and how its system evolved out of continuities with other primate systems. It celebrates the role of the 'interaction engine' which drives our social interaction, not only in human life, but also in the evolution of our species – showing how exchanges such as words, glances, laughter and face-to-face encounters bring us our greatest and most difficult experiences, and have come to define what it means to be human. It draws extensively on the author's fieldwork with speakers across multiple cultures and communities, and was inspired by his own experiences during the Covid lockdown, when humans were starved of the very social interaction that shapes our lives. This title is also available as open access on Cambridge Core.