Introduction: In the Intensive Care Unit(ICU), healthcare-associated infections can arise from factors such as compromised patient immunity and the use of diverse medical equipment. Furthermore, inadequate awareness of infection control among ICU staff can further increase the risk of infections. Therefore, it is crucial for ICU staff to recognize and address infection risks proactively. To enhance infection control measures, designated infection control facilitators within the department have spearheaded infection control activities. Case Presentation: Internal assessments within the ICU identified areas requiring improvement in infection control, leading to the formulation of a self-improvement initiative. The evaluation results revealed deficiencies in pre- hub disinfection and the appropriateness of Chlorhexidine gluconate(CHG) bathing. To address this, ICU team members were tasked with monitoring hand hygiene and performing pre-hub disinfection at least 10 times before central venous catheter usage. The monitoring results were shared with department members monthly, encouraging performance improvement by rewarding outstanding employees. Additionally, protocols and educational videos for proper CHG bathing were developed within the ICU and reviewed by the Infection Control Department. Using this material, internal education sessions were conducted within the ICU to support all team members in achieving their goals. Discussion: Through various improvement initiatives, staff awareness of infection control has increased, leading to proper CHG bathing and hub disinfection. The incidence rate of central venous catheter-related bloodstream infections decreased from 4.25 in 2022 to 3.35 in 2023. Additionally, hand hygiene compliance increased from 92% in 2022 to 96% in 2023. For effective infection management, the participation of not only the Infection Control Department but also departmental members is crucial. Through effective collaboration and discussions between ICU staff and the infection control team, we were able to address departmental issues, improve staff awareness and performance in infection management. Sustained interest and participation in these activities require continuous staffing and support.

Positive health outcomes are realized when individuals receive interprofessional care, which also includes collaboration with family and care providers. We used social network analysis to explore interprofessional care networks and experiences of independent, community-dwelling older adults and how they perceive collaboration between different medical and non-medical network members. Twenty-three participants were interviewed and asked to name individuals contributing to their health and well-being (network of care) and position them in a concentric circle to reflect the relative strength of relationships. The average network size was 11. Closest relationships were with spouses, children, and family physicians. Relationship strength with network members was marked by frequency, accessibility, longevity, and impact of interactions. Participants were ardent self-advocates for their care, but reported few apparent episodes of collaboration between network members. Our study highlights that coordinated and collaborative care for independent community-dwelling older adults is lacking and does not routinely engage non-medical network members.

Collaboration is both a process and an outcome. Collaboration is based on the idea that interactions between participants with a common goal, working together as partnerships and sharing resources, can solve complex or “wicked” problems that are not possible to solve in isolation. Collaboration may be simple, occurring between individuals, or more complex interorganizational arrangements across sectors, with the life cycle and size of the collaboration determined by the issue at hand. HTA collaborations may involve a wide range of stakeholders, including HTA agencies at the national, regional, or global level, academia, government (including regulatory authorities), industry, clinicians, providers, and patient organizations. Regardless of the number or type of participants, collaborations need a shared understanding of the common goal, an agreement on aims, and a commitment to shared solutions.

Industry and agency members of the Health Technology Assessment International (HTAi) Asia Policy Forum (APF) met in Seoul, South Korea, in November 2024 for open discussions on how to facilitate and improve the collaborative process between all stakeholders in the health system, including government, HTA agencies, industry, academia, clinicians, as well as patients. Over the three days, these discussions identified some of the risks and obstacles to collaboration in the region, how to develop and use collaboration better, as well as articulating the value and benefits of collaboration both in the region and globally.

Health Technology Assessment international (HTAi) supports global collaboration and innovation in HTA through its dynamic network of Interest Groups (IGs). These thematic communities provide a dedicated platform for members to engage in focused, collaborative efforts that drive professional exchange, advance methodologies, and develop best practices in HTA. This commentary offers a panoramic overview of all IGs, their evolution, aim, and initiatives. By drawing on diverse stakeholder perspectives, spanning academia, clinical practice, industry, and patient communities, the IGs foster inclusiveness and extend HTAi’s influence to significantly contribute to the broader HTA community. Through activities such as workshops, conference sessions, webinars, publications, and research projects, they offer opportunities for professional development and thought leadership. The IGs’ cross-cutting contributions position them as engines of innovation to ensure HTAi remains at the forefront of shaping a globally relevant, responsive, and ethically grounded HTA ecosystem.

Collaborative engineering design is increasingly important for modern engineering practices as projects routinely require collaboration across multiple domains. Reaching shared understanding within the team is a critical factor in constructing a successful and enjoyable collaboration. One way to promote shared understanding is through the use of design artifacts and design representations as boundary objects. Different design representations have unique characteristics that benefit the engineering design process but could also hinder the development of shared understanding. It is important to identify the limitations of the design artifacts to select the suitable design artifact for the situation and mitigate potential adverse effects, including design fixation and miscommunication. Despite previous studies’ findings, there are still unsolved questions regarding the exact effect of the modality of the design representations on the development of team-shared understanding. This work examines three types of commonly used design representations in the engineering design community, namely, textual description, hand sketch and engineering CAD model. Their unique effect on the development of shared understanding is investigated in a collaborative engineering design setting. The results indicate that the modality of the design artifact would affect the development of shared understanding, and using visual representations can yield better team outcomes regardless of the modality complexity, mainly for design structures. This work shows the importance of using the proper design representation in collaborative engineering design tasks, and such a finding is a critical and timely reminder in the current age when team interactions constantly involve text-dominant online communications.

While adapting to future sea-level rise (SLR) and its hazards and impacts is a multidisciplinary challenge, the interaction of scientists across different research fields, and with practitioners, is limited. To stimulate collaboration and develop a common research agenda, a workshop held in June 2024 gathered 22 scientists and policymakers working in the Netherlands. Participants discussed the interacting uncertainties across three different research fields: sea-level projections, hazards and impacts, and adaptation. Here, we present our view on the most important uncertainties within each field and the feasibility of managing and reducing those uncertainties. We find that enhanced collaboration is urgently needed to prioritize uncertainty reductions, manage expectations and increase the relevance of science to adaptation planning. Furthermore, we argue that in the coming decades, significant uncertainties will remain or newly arise in each research field and that rapidly accelerating SLR will remain a possibility. Therefore, we recommend investigating the extent to which early warning systems can help policymakers as a tool to make timely decisions under remaining uncertainties, in both the Netherlands and other coastal areas. Crucially, this will require viewing SLR, its hazards and impacts, and adaptation as a whole.

A priority of the Northern New England Clinical and Translational Research (NNE-CTR) Network is conducting, promoting, and advancing community-engaged research through its Community Engagement and Outreach (CEO) Core. We sought to measure the CEO Core’s success in strengthening community-level research partnerships using a validated survey platform based on network science to map and track collaborations over time. The survey was completed by 59/76 organizations (77.6% response rate). Key findings included a high level of trust and a modest level of perceived value relative to published benchmarks. Additional specific findings will inform opportunities to improve the network as the NNE-CTR matures.

This article provides a retrospective on the formation of the Engaged Humanities Lab at Royal Holloway, University of London. It sets the lab’s development within the broader history of labs in the humanities, setting out how the Engaged Humanities Lab aligns closely with Pawlicka-Deger’s description of “infrastructure of engagement” rather than the physical spaces that characterise science laboratories. We also explain why the sub-category of “engaged” humanities was selected over the broader and more established “public” humanities. The second half of the article provides reflections on the activities and achievements of the Engaged Humanities Lab, focusing on how intra-institution collaboration between an academic school and the Research and Innovation Department supported the formation and governance of the lab, allowing for ongoing dialogue and co-creation between subject area experts and research management professionals with expertise in research funding, policy, and knowledge exchange. This article also illuminates what is needed from university leaders to ensure the success and longevity of infrastructures of engagement like the Engaged Humanities Lab.

This introduction to the special issue “Performance, Projection,Provocation! Relational Creativity in Contemporary Japan” presents ahistory of group-based creative practice in Japan, from the amateur endeavors ofsākuru (circles) to the professional creativity of internationalproduction companies. The special issue applies the concept of“relational creativity” to a series of case studies to betterunderstand how creative practices shape relationships and other social forms,institutional and less institutional.