To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
This chapter defines paradoxes. It reviews several definitions, demonstrating the difference between contradictions and paradoxes. The essence of paradoxes is that they deliver a certain truth and a higher-level meaning. Contradictions are conflicting elements within the same system, whereas paradoxes are conflicting elements that reveal a previously unknown truth. A definition derived from the field of psychotherapy is also mentioned: Paradoxes are best characterized as unacceptable conclusions derived by apparently acceptable reasoning from apparently acceptable premises. Paradoxes are also seen as unacceptable conclusions derived from apparently acceptable reasoning based on seemingly acceptable premises. The definition proposed for this book is “a statement that is seemingly contradictory or opposed to common sense and yet is perhaps true,” including the broader notion of an “air of absurdity,” provided that this absurdity carries a higher-level meaning. Some historical examples are presented, such as Achilles never catching up with a much slower tortoise, the arrow paradox, the paradox of place, the liar paradox, identity paradox, and the paradox of the stone.
The paradoxes of the Greek philosopher Zeno of Elea seem to be perverse arguments about the nonexistence of bodily motion in time and through space. One of the best-known is that of an arrow that remains stationary during its flight. Aristotle refuted Zeno; most modern experts have done the same. Occasionally a modern – cinematic – view of the arrow’s flight has been advanced; this is the chapter’s topic. To Zeno, the arrow only appears to be moving but is at any one moment occupying one specific place. The images on our screens appear to move only because the unmoving images exposed on a filmstrip are projected so rapidly that they are perceived as moving. Extreme high-speed photography and computer-generated “bullet time,” as in the Matrix films and elsewhere, provide a new understanding of Zeno’s brain teaser. The chapter ends on a lighter note with the appearance of a modern Professor Zeno in a comedy film.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.