To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
This chapter aims to shed light on Ribot’s analysis of the types of weakening of the will that lead more particularly to indecisiveness or irresolution, the extreme form of which he identifies as “madness of doubt” (“la folie du doute”). Our goal is to tackle the extent to which the physiological and “dissolutive” perspectives proposed by Ribot in Les Maladies de la Volonté (The Diseases of the Will, Ribot, 1883) and in Les Maladies de la Personnalité (The Diseases of Personality, 1885) differ from the more classical philosophical approaches to the weakness of will in terms of akrasia. We intend to explore how the definition of the self as a combination of multiple affective tendencies, which Ribot calls character, can help us understand better how irresolution (or indecisiveness) is more of a normal psychological state than a pathological one; the resolute, “strong character”, although enviable, is too rare to be considered a statistical norm. Nonetheless, irresolution can become a pathological “madness of doubt” paralyzing all agency in the affected individual. This chapter intends to show how Ribot’s contribution can be considered a precursor to transdiagnostic and dimensional perspectives, highlighting commonalities and shared mechanisms across different psychiatric disorders.
Toward the close of the nineteenth century, a crisis of reason occurred, challenging positivist thought. Philosophy, psychology, and psychiatry were all asked to reexamine their conceptions of man and their scientific practices. The issue of subjectivity was explored not only through Freudian analysis, which was introduced at the end of the century, but also through other scientific methods, particularly French experimental psychology (Binet, Ribot, Richet) and hypnosis, which, despite its questionable scientific reliability, presented a new model of the mind and personality that was destined to be widely accepted beyond the sciences. These studies were at the forefront of scientific research. Luigi Pirandello engaged in both philosophical and scientific discourse, and his ideas and artistic works contributed to the deconstruction of traditional notions of self and identity, as seen in such works as One, No One, and One Hundred Thousand and Così è (se vi pare).
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.